WorldNews

WorldNews

Dune1032[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 24 days ago

No tank is a match for kamikaze drones. The reason is that the top of a tank is thinly armored. A battlefield full of drones is something new. Armies will have to adjust their tactics to accommodate this. They will probably have to have weapons that clear the drones while the tanks advance.

binaryblob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 24 days ago

I am not sure why you would respond when you agree. I said it was plausible.

Dune1032[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 24 days ago

You appeared to imply that the M1 is an inferior tank because it can't survive a drone attack. My point is that no tank can survive such an attack because tanks weren't designed that way.

binaryblob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 24 days ago

I did not imply that. You should brush up your logic skills.

Dune1032[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 24 days ago

It is plausible that the M1 isn't a match for drones, because it wasn't designed for such a battle field.

Above is what you said. This implies that other tanks are a match for drone. If no tanks are designed to survive in the open with the sky filled with drones, why would say something like that?