But what about the site? Shit or not shit?
But what about the site? Shit or not shit?
More important- what about this poster, shit or not shit? What everyone thinks may surprise you(you already know though)!
Lighten up, old timer
[deleted] 2 years ago ago
They got 70% from summing the columns in the first chart (after the blue graph), which seems correct if the numbers are true. It's explained in the text immediately below.
But I can't quite wrap my head around the per-100,000 columns, and whether that includes the 28-day window of a positive test. The other article they link to before that chart doesn't help any.
Both articles are frustrating and don't clearly link to the full data. Makes the headlines worthless.
mahavishnunj |4 pointswritten 2 years ago ago
good article