TumblrInAction

A relative started panicking about Trump's secret plan to segregate all the gays into camps and do nefarious things to them. I decided to see what recent history tells us about his treatment of this group he supposedly hates so much. I typed the following into Grok:

Did Trump do anything in his previous term to repeal or harm the rights of gay or lesbian Americans?

During Donald Trump's presidency from 2017 to 2021, there were several actions taken that were perceived as rolling back or undermining rights and protections for gay and lesbian Americans. Here are some key points based on available information:

Military Service: Trump announced a ban on transgender individuals serving in the military, which indirectly impacted perceptions of LGB rights as well. Although this policy was more directly aimed at transgender individuals, it symbolized a broader retraction of inclusive policies. This ban was later overturned by the Biden administration.

Healthcare Protections: The administration sought to remove protections for transgender individuals in healthcare settings, which could also affect gay and lesbian individuals by setting a precedent for broader discrimination. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) attempted to redefine "sex" under Title IX, potentially limiting protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

Workplace and Housing Protections: Efforts were made to challenge or reinterpret laws to exclude sexual orientation and gender identity from protections against discrimination. For instance, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed changes allowing single-sex shelters to turn away transgender people, which could foster an environment more hostile to all of the LGBTQ community.

Judicial Appointments: Trump appointed judges with records of opposition to gay rights, which could influence future legal interpretations concerning same-sex marriage, employment discrimination, and other rights.

Federal Policy and Guidance: The administration rescinded guidance from the Obama administration that protected transgender students in schools, which indirectly affects all students, including those who are gay or lesbian by potentially creating a less inclusive educational environment.

Legal Arguments: The Department of Justice under Trump argued in court cases that federal law does not protect against discrimination based on sexual orientation, notably in the Bostock v. Clayton County case, although the Supreme Court ultimately ruled against this position.

Cultural and Symbolic Actions: Removal of information related to LGBTQ rights from government websites and a lack of acknowledgment of events like Pride Month were symbolic actions that could be interpreted as diminishing the visibility and recognition of gay and lesbian rights.

It's important to note that while these actions were seen by many advocacy groups and members of the community as detrimental, there were also counterpoints or nuances:

• Some supporters pointed out Trump's appointments of openly gay individuals to high-level positions, like Richard Grenell, and his administration's support for decriminalizing homosexuality globally.

However, the overarching narrative from many civil rights organizations and analyses was that these steps, especially in policy and judicial appointments, posed significant threats to the rights and protections of gay and lesbian Americans. The impact of these actions extended beyond direct policy changes, influencing the broader cultural and legal landscape for the LGBTQ community.

Of the above examples, did any of these actions provably harm the rights of gay or lesbian individuals (not including transgender individuals)? Answer only yes or no.

No.