you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]1st_Class_Mail_Ally 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

I think its interesting how the über woke left has a thing for promoting a new group as the cause du jour, in this case the transgendered people, and in the process kicking the last group off the woke totem pole as no longer oppressed enough. Some of the posters on the original superstraight aired out the trans movement dirty laundry about all the death threats and whatnot they've been sending, and all the "enjoy the girldick" memes (barf). Many straights such as myself had never seen the extent of that. I think straight people have an easier time ignoring the transgender stuff, but not so much gays and lesbians because they're kind of aligned with being inclusive/radical.

[–]GConly 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (21 children)

. Some of the posters on the original superstraight aired out the trans movement dirty laundry about all the death threats and whatnot they've been sending, and all the "enjoy the girldick" memes (barf). Many straights such as myself had never seen the extent of that

That was the main reason gendercritical got banned. It made sense, it exposed their threats, their homophobia and how they were negatively affecting women. Clearly, no slurs, just facts.

It very much was a trans narrative busting sub.

[–][deleted]  (20 children)

[deleted]

    [–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

    Yikes, calm down weirdo.

    [–][deleted]  (18 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

      Tinfoil hat phobic.

      You do know intergenerational wealth is kind of a myth, right? There is only about a 30% chance that amy generations wealth sees it to their grandkids

      [–][deleted]  (16 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

        Sigh.

        2/3 millionaires hit zero meaningful financial help from family as well.

        The odds of getting anything from your rich great grandparents is about 10%.

        Jewish higher income is down to just bring brighter. It's why they make up such a chunk of novel winners.

        [–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

        Jewish higher income is down to just bring brighter. It's why they make up such a chunk of novel winners.

        Wrong. Please show your proof of this. It has been demonstrated several times that their overrepresentation cannot be explained with higher intelligence. They are simply too few compared to their overrepresentation.

        [–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

        It has been demonstrated several times that their overrepresentation cannot be explained with higher intelligence.

        Wrong, please show your proof of this.

        My data is that with an average IQ of 111, and verbal IQ of about 125 as a group, they'll produce about 4x to 64x functioning geniuses and super producers. It roughly doubles as group IQ goes up five points.

        However, verbal IQ is way more relevant to income and achievement than non verbal. So I'm not entirely sure how that would affect the multiplier.

        Your turn.