Exactly
You used to be a fan and cited the WSJ.
I thought you referred to zerohedge.com, which is one of the dirtiest disinformation websites.
I'm certainly not a 'fan' post-2007 WSJ, when Rupert Murdoch's News Corp has controlled it. Everything before that was impressive, and for what they focus on most - markets - they have to be somewhat reasonable in that category (numbers don't lie), as does Bloomberg News
Edit: you might be refering to Washington Post, which is very good. "Democracy Dies in Darkness" is their slogan. Meh - trying to sell newspapers - and they're not wrong. Democracy is obviously under attack by the GOP.
Oh I was thinking of WaPo, what a ridiculous organization.
The only remaining US newspaper that's somewhat trustworthy and bothers to do investigative journalism. You should subscribe. Be good for ya.
It's fake and gay misinformation.
Fake and gay people said what?
You would know, faggot
Of course your mini topiary is excited and you want to butt into this discussion.
[deleted] 3 months ago ago
Try harder Eddie
k.
You type so well with having their dick in your mouth.
Instead, why not decentralize information and have them compete in the marketplace of ideas rather than rely on a centralized source to promote their version of the truth. The last 9 years should especially serve as a testament to why no one should ever put any information company on a pedestal.
Musky |6 pointswritten 3 months ago ago
That site is hilarious, "democracy dies in darkness" is their tagline and their paywall destroyed their reach to where they're irrelevant.