/u/hibikiblack

The Jesuit order was infiltrated by naturalist revolutionary Freemasons and anti-Christ Communists. Actual members of the Jesuit order were against Bolshevism and there encyclicals and letters prove this.

A quote from 'The Plot Against the Church':

"Concerning the repeated attempts of Jewish freemasonry to introduce itself into the Society (Jesuits) and to control it, another source gives us information about this freemasonic rite created for this gloomy purpose. It is stated in the official encyclopaedic dictionary of freemasonry under the term “estricta observancia” (strict observance): “Estricta observancia. Description for a rite which had split up into many others and represents the most perfect expression of the Templar system in freemasonry. This rite was the third freemasonic innovation of the Jesuits, who stirred up the hope among their supporters to come into the possession of the riches of the old Templars. The chronological history of the Grandmasters corresponds to that of the generals of the Society of Jesus. The rite of strict observance was finally set up in Germany, between 1760 and 1763, by the brother Karl Gathels, the Baron of Hund, who to the six grades of the Order at first determined added yet another. The rite was organised in the following seven degrees: pupil, companion, master, Scottish master, novice, Templar in three classes: Eques, Socius and Armiger, and Eques professus.”342

The fact that, since his grounding in this Rite which was intended to control the Jesuits, a new Grandmaster was also chosen if a new general of the Order was appointed, shows the tenacity of Jewry and its satellites, freemasonry, to introduce themselves in the Holy Work of St. Ignatius and to control it."

You wrote:

Well, despite the claim that the Roths supposedly control the Vatican because it never paid off the loans it had with them, not only did the Vatican actually pay those loans back, but it even used the own money of the Roths in order to spread the anti-Semitic myths:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulgZTDtpZrQ YouTube

This is a Zionist scapegoat narrative promulgated by racialist 'Jews.' All 'Jews' are knowingly or unknowingly part of a mass deception and stolen Judahite Hebrew identity for land confiscation. Jews are not Jews (Judahite Hebrews). A modern 'Jew' is either the tribal anti-Christ ghetto religion of rabbinism or Ashkenazi/Sephardi culture... they have no Semitic roots and are not Judahites.

The Rothschilds and their rabbinical heirs who founded counterfeit Israel by corproate money which funded the bomb and sword and Sassoon and Rothschild opium money, outright control the Catholic Church presently and you are execommunicated for even mentioning Zionist Jews orchestrating 9/11. In my recent posts I prove that Freemasons and Jews subverted the Church in its totality. Every Catholic that understand the naturalism of Freemasonry and Zionism, knows this.

You wrote:

Antony Sutton wrote about how the Rothschilds were involved along with other Wall Street bankers in the funding of the Bolsheviks, so the Jesuits intentionally funded the Bolshevik movement.

Sutton never said the Jesuits as an order funded the Bolsheviks. Sutton came out of a think tank that now produces unipolar neocon propaganda. His book, however, lacking minute detail, does prove that the Bolsheviks were backed by western bankers. Other books, such as the Catholic Dennis Fahey's 'The Mythological Body of Christ' go into more detail on the rabbinical, Talmudic banks involved.

You wrote:

Not only was Lenin a former student of them...

No, Lenin was not a student of the Jesuit Order. He was a continental freemason with 'Jewish' Yiddish ancestry on his mothers side. The Jesuit order in the early 20th century was being subverted by revolutionary masons and 'Jews'. Lenin also was agent to the Tsarist police but he was only an agent for the sole goal of infiltration and subversion in order to act out the revolution, so if he had been in relationship with the Jesuit order, it was for this reason. His Hidden Hand gestures illsutrate where his loyalty lies.

You wrote:

but despite the association of the Jews with Communism and it being some kind of Ultra-Zionist movement, the Bolsheviks Jews themselves were for the most part, an anti-Zionist group...

First, 'Jews' don't exist in the definition of the word 'Jew.' No, 'Jew' is a Judahite Hebrew. They all died out long ago. We can say, however, that all 'modern Jews' today, anti-Christ Rabbinics, Talmudics, and atheistical 'Jews' who proclaim Ashkenazi, Sephardi culture, etc., need Christ.

I have a list of 20,000 Bolshevik 'Jews.' There was a rift with Bolshevik 'Jews' and 'Socialist' Zionist 'Jews' who wanted their own national homeland, both however, were fine with Christian persecution.

The USSR supplied Zionist terror gangs with money and arms but Unipolarism got in the way and then the USSR started to fund the Palestinian 'Jews,' who were mostly hardcore communists. Nevertheless, it was a hegelian dialectic that led to the synthesis of Israel LLC. Moreoever, while Christians were being slaughtered by the Bolsheviks, the 'Jews' for many years remained protected and so-called anti-semitism was a crime that if one were to be found guilty on the slightest of suspicion, he/she would be executed. Solzhenitsyn gives a great overview of the 'Jews' involved in the execution trials. When Stalin came to power, where many of the New bolsheviks were communsit 'Jews' and non-Jews aligned with him, the old Trotskyist bolsheviks, now in the US and elsehwere under the neocon name, were killed off due to opposed communsit ideologies, not becuase they were 'Jewish'.

You wrote:

...that even persecuted the Jewish nationalists that opposed the regime.

By 'Jewish' nationalsits, you mean 'Jews' who wanted to pillage, plunder and make a homeland in an occupied Palestine? 'Jews' were fine up until 1922 when Lenin sought to liquidate the most nationalistic 'Jewish' groups with a 'Jewish' led Bolshevik group, that I touched on in my 10 part post on Bolshevism.

Now, I'm not going to completely whitewash the Jews away from the crimes, all the more when it comes to comparing it to the supposed Holocaust since I do believe there were Zionists mixed in with the Bolsheviks, but I don't think people should judge an entire group because of the crimes the worst of them commited, all the more when there was an intentional effort involving a lot of money from the Vatican in order to ruin their reputation.

Of course not, just like how you shouldn't blame the Jesuit order for communism when clearly they had nothing to do with communism, let alone supplying Bolsheviks with arms and funding. I won't completely whitewash the 'Jews' either because Jews don't exist. They are a ghetto religion and a stolen identity.

there was an intentional effort involving a lot of money from the Vatican in order to ruin their reputation.

Reductio ad Absurdum fallacy if I've ever saw one. So, this entire post you wrote is to scapegoat the Vatican, presently Khazar, Edomite, Caananite, Ashkenazi controlled, because anti-Semitism, when 'Jews' are not even semitic?

The Jesuits were also supporting the anti-Semitic movements in Europe simultaneously too, with it going way back to their initial writtings in La Civilita Cattolica.

The order was anti-Edomite, anti-Khazarian, anti-Caananite, yes. They sought to keep usurious 'Jews' from subverting the Church, they failed.

All of the rest of your quotes are hearsay. I could publicaly say thigns about Hitler and in 100 years someone could claim I was a Nazi because of it.