you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MaximilianKohlerreads microbiomedigest.com daily[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Well the "great tool for eugenics" is an antibiotic that is extremely common, and often for trivial things like acne.

In my opinion the situation is quite dire: https://old.reddit.com/r/worldpolitics/comments/a4yeq0/since_there_are_no_rules_here_i_might_as_well_use/

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's possible. There are definitely harmful affects associated with antibiotics.

Vaccinations are far worse in my opinion. Newborns receive the hepatitis B vaccine at birth.

I've never known anyone with hepatitis b, so it seems inconceivable to me that a new born would need to immediately receive this. That's just scratching the surface of the vaccine risks.

[–]MaximilianKohlerreads microbiomedigest.com daily[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're misinformed about vaccines. You have a tremendous amount of information at your fingertips via a simple web search. Use that instead of making ignorant guesses.

There are some knowledge resources in these comments: https://archive.fo/MpwmK#selection-2331.8-2335.0

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Would you also accuse the Supreme Court of making ignorant guesses?

Any possibility that you are misinformed about vaccines?