you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (15 children)

[deleted]

    [–]magnora7 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

    ...said the person calling others parasites simply for who they choose to love. Sounds pretty self-centered to me, tbh

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    Gay people aren't parasites just because their sexual choices, the LGBT activism become them parasites

    [–]magnora7 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    So really you hate activists, not gay people

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    I hate their ideas, i don't hate them as persons

    [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Why, though? I think homosexuality is immoral and not biologically acceptable but people are gay and can be gay. I love all people no matter what. The elite who push trans and gay agenda on young people through film and internet are the enemies of humanity.

    [–]slabgreen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    "not biologically acceptable" explain.

    Also, username checks out.

    [–]send_nasty_stuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    LGBTQ activist are 9 times out of 10 in favor of abortion, socialism, NWO, anti natalism, and anti western policies like immigration and cultural Marxism. Which is why they are promoted by the corporate oligarchs in the first place. They are the useful idiots Yuri Bezmenov warned us about. Sexual liberation is a form of control. E. Michael Jones's Libido Dominadi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control goes into this in detail.

    If you don't have time to read it here's an interview.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3lZiC2AWas

    [–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Eh, I'd say more like 6 out of 10. How many gay people do you know that aren't LGBT activists? There are a lot out there, you probably just don't interact with them because they keep to themselves.

    [–]send_nasty_stuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    6 out of 10 is enough to destroy the west.

    Give this a read if you get a chance.

    https://evolutionistx.wordpress.com/2018/12/08/an-open-letter-to-liberals-and-centrists/

    [–][deleted]  (5 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]magnora7 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

      So what? There are many more ways to contribute to the world than having children... if that's what you believe, then you must think Central Africa and Afghanistan are super great places: https://www.targetmap.com/ThumbnailsReports/7704_THUMB_IPAD.jpg

      [–]slabgreen 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      I second this. Human evolution isn't just genetic. A gay person may not pass on their genes (and this could change soon, given scientific advances), but they can pass on their labor and ideas. In this day and age it's rather absurd to suggest that having children is the only, or even the most significant, way to impact society.

      Also, can we all just take a moment to appreciate how responsible an admin u/magnora7 is?

      [–]PM-HENTAI 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      to be fair, there is a distinction to be made between raising a few kids in the first world(which has a deficit of new children) and spitting out 8 children you cant possibly afford to raise.

      gays aren't inherently parasitical, there are other groups you can give that title but little sense is being made here

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]slabgreen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        What?