Most doctors don't read research papers

SMCAB

And most congress people don't read the laws they vote on, sometimes, they aren't even given enough time to do so.

Whatcha gonna do about it? Grab a helmet.

Fuck cloudflare

Musky

I had noticed.

IkeConn

The people in my family that took it are still alive. The one that drank the Fauci Kool Aid is dead and buried.

Tom_Bombadil

This is not surprising.

He's a charlatan.

Drewski

Yep, I've been getting Captchas for a while now, rather annoying. The thing that works for me is using TOR Browser and the archive.today onion: http://archiveiya74codqgiixo33q62qlrqtkgmcitqx5u2oeqnmn5bpcbiyd.onion/ still have to solve the Captcha but at least it's not an endless loop.

In-the-clouds

“They are claiming they are going to put a safe device on the market”

said Ryan Merkley, who leads the Physicians Committee’s research into animal-testing alternatives

“And we see his lie as a way to whitewash what happened in these exploratory studies.”

This May, the FDA gave the company approval for human trials.

In-the-clouds

This is the first time I encountered a CAPTCHA on archive.ph. Are you also seeing that? So archive.today would not show the content. But archive.org showed it.

Drewski

archive.today mirror | archive.org mirror

JoseDowman

t isn't just the subversion of science and its conversion into a platform for politically driven propaganda. It's also the destruction of scientific research as a way of improving our understanding of reality. The collapse in disruptive or impactful research over recent decades has coincided with a flood of marginal (and mostly wrong) papers, noise drowning out signal and reinforcing tired paradigms at the expense of advancement. Meanwhile technological advance has stalled out. For all that we pat ourselves on the back for how rapidly technology moves, everything we use today is merely a refinement of technologies developed decades ago. Moore's Law has done much to conceal the absence of anything genuinely novel.

zyxzevn

Placed under corruptScience due to Biolabs.
Could also be posted under conspiracy and politics.
Full interview on twitter - https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1691228480556429312

zyxzevn

A death from kidney failure, is not a death from covid.
So statistically it helps not to die from covid.
That is modern medicine for you.

chadwickofwv

That is rather interesting since it has almost 100% chance of causing kidney failure within 2 weeks of use.

TheStandingResident

Oh cool.

iamonlyoneman

you can get nattokinase pills, you don't have to eat fermented soy for breakfast

TitsAndWhiskey

Lol fuck that shit

TitsAndWhiskey

Educate me on that word, if you don’t mind.

zyxzevn

off-guardian was started when guardian started publishing lies. So they named it after that news media.

TheStandingResident

Though it was a guardian article.

zyxzevn

It is right there in the text.

TheStandingResident

How's this study bad?

thoughtcriminal

There's a ton of bad science regarding the effectiveness of masks that people cite claiming it's proof masks work and mandates were justified. Yet when you present them with good science that concludes that masks most likely have no effect, they claim it's not enough.

One of my favorite "bad science" studies on masks that often gets cited is this one from the CDC: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7106e1.htm

They even have a nice graphic that shows you the percent increase in safety like it's an RPG and equipping a mask boosts your stats or something. The study itself is complete garbage which is also noted by the tiny barely legible text at the bottom of the image which states "Not statistically significant."

TitsAndWhiskey

Ugh thank you. So sick of the bullshit.

UncleWillard56

This is because academia isn't about knowledge or truth anymore, it's about money. That's why these studies courses flourish. They're not Humanities and they're definitely not Social Science, they're this weird hybrid beholden to neither. It's just a bunch of "professors" with no real academic purpose, forming a circle jerk to "peer review" their crappy papers. That leads to publishing and then, the holy grail, getting their dumb ideas translated to academic and corporate DEI programs where the real money comes in.

zyxzevn

For full overview of early treatment look at:
http://c19early.com
http://c19ivermectin.com subsection ivermectin
http://flccc.net for protocols and interviews with real doctors

zyxzevn

Original at

CorruptScience