propaganda

propaganda

log in
sign up
subreddits
search
sidebar

The latest New York Times report on the Nord Stream pipeline bombing is something else. According to NYT’s anonymous US government sources, the pipelines were blown up by a “pro-Ukrainian group” It’s actually insulting how stupid it is. But Sy Hersh's and Matt Taibbi's anonymous sources are bad.(caitlinjohnstone.com)

15 points14 points17 points submitted by Chipit
all 4 comments

jagworms 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 year ago

The US Deep State is a "pro-Ukrainian group" They blew it up.

William_World 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 year ago

that's a good article actually, usually nytimes won't admit to false flags

Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 year ago

Okay so....are anonymous sources bad, or not?

Because you seem to be saying that it's okay for Seymour Hersh to use a single, fake, discredited source for virtually all his reporting for decades. He has falsely reported debunked stories about the knights of Malta, the bin laden raid, and his source keeps using the same phrase - "it was a goat fuck". It's the same discredited source on all his fake reporting.

https://mobile.twitter.com/wesleysmorgan/status/1626359040652484608?lang=en

So are you saying you don't believe NYT and you don't believe Hersh?

Or are you saying that you do believe NYT and you do believe Hersh?

Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 year ago

I said when Sy Hersh's and Matt Taibbi use anonymous sources, it's bad. When the New York Times does it, it's good.

Always punch down on the little people and trust elites, you'll never go wrong that way.