news

news

Rah 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

The simple answer is: there is never enough guns to supply a civilian batallion.

SMCAB 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

I hear that, I kind of just meant on a personal level.

I'd rather have three firearms and endless ammo than 17 firearms and ammo for two of them. A lot of my buddies came to mind when I saw the title.

Rah 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

The problem is that preserving a firearm for a hundred years is easier than a hoard of ammunition. Both arguments make a lot of sense, and its all about the two sides recognizing entropy is a thing, and despite things making a lot of sense, sometimes stuff go to a way that makes fiction look bland, and its at that time when things that dont make much sense save people. Such as the survival master from the Balkan wars who relied on selling lighter fluid during the conflict