news

news

bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

why? I mean, what is the rationale / justification for not collecting data on an important disease that normally has a lot of time and effort put into combating to save lives? Does it not matter?

or, would the data be uncomfortable for the narrative?

Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Coco is the flu.

This is all a hoax. Literally the flu.

redditbegay 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

IF it is only the flew, why were the deaths so way higher this year then?

Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

why were the deaths so way higher this year then?

  • Because they transferred patients from hospitals into nursing homes, which spread the normal flu and infected/affected a population too frail for life independence.
  • Thousands of elderly residents prematurely died, because their +80 year old lungs had respirators shoehorned into them (and inflated with excess positive pressure; for thousands inflating/breathing cycles), as an inexplicably presumed for the global flu remedy.
  • Then they started sponging up cause of deaths of every nature, and labeled them Coco.
    Poison, motorcycles, shark bites... Coco.
  • Least reported contributor: Massive increases in suicides ages ~30-45.

redditbegay 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

That wasnt in every state, only 5 afaik. That shouldnt account for a large number of the 200k deaths.

That should have been criminalized.

They labeled them all, because if you died of a bug bite, while having cancer, its not the cancer that they counted as the cause.

What are the numbers for the weakos sucides?