censorship

censorship

log in
sign up
subreddits
search
sidebar

Wikipedia has become a one-sided 'thought police' for liberals, cofounder warns. "In short, and with few exceptions, only globalist, progressive mainstream sources — and sources friendly to globalist progressivism — are permitted"(justthenews.com)

118 points117 points120 points submitted by Chipit
all 34 comments

[deleted] 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun 2 years ago

No shit, type Zionism or Kalergi plan and wiki brings up Anti-Semitism and White Supremacy.

Ermbern 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

I just read a very long page titled “Zionism” so I’m not sure wtf you are talking about.

Brewdabier 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun 2 years ago

Yeah like YT they have removed a lot, well if you don't like history just delet it and re write it as the jews did.

JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

Nineteen Eighty-Four

Robin 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun 2 years ago

If only there was an alternative, ... https://wikispooks.com?

wristaction 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

There are a lot of alternative wikis out there.

Robin 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

Indeed. I recommend the 911 test to see how "alternative" they are.

e.g. https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/9/11_attacks

JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

As good as WikiSpooks?

WhiteZealot 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun 2 years ago

Support and contribute to Metapedia.

JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

And https://InfoGalactic.com and https://WikiSpooks.com and soon our https://GiraffeIdeas.wiki.

You might also like https://Conservapedia.com/Conservapedia

[deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun 2 years ago

If you search for:

Larry Sanger wikipedia biased

You will see that he's been very upset with Wikipedia since 2002, when he left, and hasn't managed to succeed at much else since then. He'll complain about Wikipedia to anyone who'll listen, and probably makes more money bitching about the website than he does on anything else. Even if some of his complaints are legitimate, he seems to be a professional shill for the right-wing extremists who are unable to post disinformation at Wikipedia. Uncorroborated, misinformation and disinformation cannot be accepted for publication at Wikipedia. Sanger is - it seems - a shill, with no credibility. His approaches are so obviously biased toward extremist disinformation. His latest work is here: https://larrysanger.org/2021/06/wikipedia-is-more-one-sided-than-ever/

Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

This is a personal attack, not an argument. Explicitly against saidit policy.

Because there isn't an argument against what he's saying. He's right. Wikipedia's NPOV has been ruined by leftists who only allow their own politically extreme point of view.

[deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 2 years ago

Chipit - I am merely offering some history about the source and why he's got an axe to gind. It's that simple. I didn't say that Sanger is a bad person or anything about his personal life. We should cross-examine sources, just as Sanger has done to cross-examine Wikipedia. There are right-wing writers on Wikipedia, for what it's worth. Regarding the points he'e made, there isn't much legitimately corroborated material on the so-called "The Biden Family Ukraine Scandal", or the "The Biden Family Chinese Deals", or some of his claims about the so-called "Antifa/BLM riots". There are serious holes in all of those arguments, due to lack of evidence, or also evidence to the contrary.

Let's pick "Antifa/BLM riots" as an example. First, during the BLM peaceful protests, 'antifa' was only a few people in each state, and not organized nationally. Portland had the only organized group that could be called 'antifa'. The Trump admin made this seem like an organized national movement at the time of the peaceful BLM protests, a small portion of which became riots. 99% of the BLM protests were not riots, but of course Sanger wants us to believe the disinformation about this. There are also numerous videos, shared at places like Reddit's /r/PublicFreakout that offered definitive proof of white, out of town, agitators in full black gear, torching buildings and murdering unarmed, peaceful protestors. Wikipedia has a responsibility to avoid disinformation and phrases like "Antifa/BLM riots". Do you agree?

Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

https://thenationalpulse.com/bidenleaks/

Go check Biden's laptop yourself.

First, during the BLM peaceful protests, 'antifa' was only a few people in each state, and not organized nationally.

[citation needed]

Portland had the only organized group that could be called 'antifa'.

[citation needed]

The Trump admin made this seem like an organized national movement at the time of the peaceful BLM protests, a small portion of which became riots.

[citation needed]

99% of the BLM protests were not riots, but of course Sanger wants us to believe the disinformation about this.

[citation needed]

There are also numerous videos, shared at places like Reddit's /r/PublicFreakout that offered definitive proof of white, out of town, agitators in full black gear, torching buildings and murdering unarmed, peaceful protestors.

[citation needed] and suddenly Reddit is a credible source?

You're arguing against yourself. And losing.

JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun 2 years ago

LOL and A+ for good work.

[deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 2 years ago

Chipit - you do realize, I hope - that you are attacking me in both of your statements, providing no counter arguments - other than one link - and expecting me to offer arguments. Regarding the one bit of evidence you want to use, thenationalpulse.com is entirely focused on extreme right-wing propaganda and disinformation. It's not a credible source, as you must know. You're proven with that link that you are not concerned with credible sources. Work on your arguments, supported by reliable, corroborated evidence.

JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

There are serious holes in all of those arguments, due to lack of evidence, or also evidence to the contrary.

There are serious holes in all of socks' arguments, due to lack of evidence, or also OVERWHELMING evidence to the contrary.

thefirststone 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

he seems to be a professional shill for the right-wing extremists who are unable to post disinformation at Wikipedia

Based.

[deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 2 years ago

*biased

(What's wrong with the letter 'i' in this word, that it must be left out. Moreover, your comment is biased.)

thefirststone 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

I'm biased toward being based, I agree.

JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

But is Larry Sanger actually wrong?

Or are you providing doubt, distraction, and bullshit cover excuses as you always do to serve your authoritarian depopulation agenda?

wristaction 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

If you've ever dug in with an edit, you understand the techniques left-neoliberals use to manage "authority" and the depths of their will to maintain control over every stray implication of a fact regardless of how subtle. It's breathtaking because, like jannies, they do it for free.

wristaction 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

You haven't seen a shitlib in full, white-knuckles narrative control mode until you've seen a the talk page for an article about a Democrat politician yellow-boxed and locked.

JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

True.

JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

they do it for free.

Partly true, partly false.

There are countless think tanks, NGOs, corporations, CIA fronts, Mossad fronts, and other secret agencies that have ARMIES of shills paid to maintain the "official narrative". Of course there are also countless ideological minions and brainwashed sheeple to also do their bidding.

ArcturianDeathTrap 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

Now that the facility of the digital tooling is more granular and refined, and theres no shortage of weak-minded grunts that are powertrippin to do what theyre told, by the telepath aliens in human disguise or transdimensionals with the ability to manipulate all digital processes or the government, as zealous intern lords over the online conversation or jannies of pre-crime trends, this is all now easier to implement when it will matter the most to our future: silencing anti-alien dissent after "arrival."

The Roswell trojan horse and social infiltration to pressure the farce of 2020, is paying off. Abductees/contactees with negative experiences of the 40+ species will be flagged as "agents of disinformation" and limited for "preemption of public criticism."

https://conspiracies.win/p/12jJGa0ULZ/world-economic-forum-makes-onlin/c/ https://reclaimthenet.org/world-economic-forum-makes-censorship/ https://archive.vn/FlcML

https://fair.org/home/us-censorship-is-increasingly-official/ https://archive.vn/44N5l

https://cheapskatesguide.org/articles/normals-free-speech.html https://archive.vn/WVDGU

https://www.technocracy.news/technocracy-rising-world-economic-forum-announces-global-coalition-for-digital-safety/ https://archive.vn/7BBGX

https://newspunch.com/judge-blocks-floridas-law-on-social-media-censorship-targeting-big-tech/

https://taibbi.substack.com/p/a-case-of-intellectual-capture-on https://archive.vn/PiAB5

JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

Perhaps to counter their propaganda we should develop our own mythology:

A newly discovered race of interdimensional extraterrestrial alien conspiracy theorists are determined to expose the matrix of rigged Zionist systems to liberate humanity.

Of course in the process of waking up the masses this myth will self-destruct as it's revealed to be just a sugar coated capsule containing the many critical red pills necessary for the health and sanity of humanity in the global ruling class war.