censorship

censorship

log in
sign up
subreddits
search
sidebar

A mother discussing losing her daughter to transgender ideology gets removed from YouTube for "hate speech"(instagram.com)

322 points321 points324 points submitted by [deleted]

[deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

I'm not transsexual, that's not even possible. My sex is male. I'm transgender: my gender is feminine. The difference between the two is that the former pertains to reproduction and the latter to ones role in society.

I don't have gender dysphoria, which is by definition a state of distress. I am not in distress. There is nothing to be distressed about. My sex is male, I have no problem with that. I can act in a manner that's natural to me, speak in a manner natural to me, dress how I please, and perform feminine tasks. There is nothing to be distressed over.

[deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

You are insane. There is no "gender as a social construct". That is by definition, INSANITY. Get your head straight, boi.

[deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

I didn't say it was a social construct, I said it was a social role. The former is something arbitrary that is not necessary, while the latter is objective and very necessary.

I can no longer trust that this discussion will be constructive, for you have falsely quoted me with words I have not said, thus will cease further replies in accordance with the pyramid of debate.

[deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Well, you use mumbo-jumbo that only people in your spheres of deviance and degeneracy are proficient at using, because they refer to things that sane people don't think about. As such, it's hard having any kind of discussion. But that is made on purpose. Do you realize this? Those who drive the agenda of normalizing insanity are very much behind the creation of a language that refers to delirious notions that sane people have no reference framework for, specifically so that discussion cannot ever be productively carried out.

This is a division through language, part of a "divide and conquer" doctrine that works perfectly at destroying what's left of our society because the insane simply WILL NOT express themselves with sane language. As such "but nobody understands us" becomes the perfect rationale for bigotry: "fuck you stupid normie, you don't understand anything" and similar things. I'm not attributing this statement to you, but I am attributing the attitude displayed in that statement to at least some of the community of insane lefties, trannies, etc.

[deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun 3 years ago

How the fuck is gender a social role. Please explain this. If women are blocked off from doing things in society, it's not because of "gender" it's because of society. Your gender and your sex are the same. Explain how one is real and the other is simply a "social role", or else people here will continue think of you as being a confused person. You do seem confused though, you seem to be mixing up gender roles with identity, which is sad. A woman isn't a woman cuz she can cook. Plenty of women can't cook. That doesn't mean a buff woman working a hard "man" job is then of the male gender. That's confusing and insane.

Not calling you insane, so don't bring up the pyramid. I want you to discuss this so Said it can see.

[deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Even if you where calling my insane, I'm much more lenient on name-calling than I am on misquotes, which is the biggest thing that frustrates me. But, no, you aren't insulting me, and I haven't taken it in any such way.

You don't need to check every box to be a specific gender, rather there is a spectrum from feminine to masculine, which at times becomes vague, but is usually quite clear. A woman who can't cook is still a woman, but less so than one who can, and that's assuming that the ability to cook is even a feminine trait to begin with. There are plenty of other traits that woman has that makes her a woman.

If one is biologically female, but dresses like a man, behaves like a man, has a masculine name, can't cook, and has a masculine job, are they a woman or a man, for the purposes of social interaction? Would it be correct to assume that person would like feminine or masculine activities? Would it be correct to use masculine or feminine pronouns — for what reason do we use pronouns — and for what reason should we use pronouns?

I personally believe that for the purposes of social interaction that this individual is indeed a man. It would be more rational to assume one who is masculine would prefer that which is masculine, rather than that which is feminine.

The question of pronouns depends on your view of society. If you believe that we should be a sex culture, and that the purpose of pronouns should be a way to find potential mating partners, which I assume is why they evolved in the first place, then you would use feminine pronouns in this instance. If you instead believe that we should be a social culture, that pronouns should be a way to more easily associate people with either masculinity or femininity (and thus more accurately make assumptions about them), then you would use masculine pronouns.

I personally believe we should be a social culture. I would like to note that sex cultures are based primarily upon the sin of lust, thus religious arguments for sex cultures are much harder to make.

You are free to disagree, of course.