censorship

censorship

oneinchterror 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

He already has been. His head writer was just doxxed and forced to resign for posting edgy comments online.

magnora7 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Really? Got a source on that?

sproketboy 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

magnora7 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Thanks, I wish I could read the whole article without giving them my identity though...

I found one everyone can read: https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/10/media/tucker-carlson-writer-blake-neff/index.html

So basically they found out a hidden online username of the writer, dug through years of posts, and then the worst they could find they're firing him over it. Some of it is pretty bad, but this also seems like cancel culture destroying more targets they don't like. However some of the stuff the guy said is pretty cringey. Nothing violent though. How did they figure out this guy's pseudonym in the first place though? And no one seemed to care to dig in to this until the guy got popular enough to be worth taking down.

magnora7 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

It's just wild to think that if Soros was being challenged by Tucker, he could just hire a few people to investigate Tucker staff, dig up some dirt like this, then create a public controversy out of it, and get him fired.

But also at the same time if the guy hadn't said those things in the first place then there would be nothing to dig up... so there's some that falls on both sides of this thing

Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

This seems to be part of an ongoing agenda. There are even stories locally that I suspect are PsyOps. Basically, either some anon digs up somethig someone said or wrote many, many years ago, whether it be racist or "anti-Semitic"— they providing little evidence for their claims — the person blamed steps down or self-censors and loses his/her job.

The esoteric meaning behind these stories concerns: Self-censorship; self-censoring yourself for fear of being caught for saying something now that could be used against you 40 years later and repercussions of spoken and written word. That you can lose your job and your career for simply saying something many years ago, even if there isn't any evidence.

I suspect those blamed are part of the PsyOp.

whistlepig 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

The weird thing is why he admitted to it so readily... It would be good to know why he didn't think plausible deniability was an option.