GCdebatesQT

GCdebatesQT

HeimdeklediROAR 2 insightful - 9 fun2 insightful - 8 fun3 insightful - 9 fun 2 years ago

Not really. Post structuralist philosophies advance many of the ideas of nominalism, and nominalism itself is still an extant position in philosophy.

I’m sorry, I just can’t bring myself to commit to the effort of educating you all on nominalism when it will achieve nothing. It just seems like wasted effort

HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun 2 years ago

But I’m rude when I say idk why I bother with you and your nominalism. Jfc dude.

HeimdeklediROAR 1 insightful - 10 fun1 insightful - 9 fun2 insightful - 10 fun 2 years ago

I mean yes? Also way to misgender me when you get frustrated.

FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 15 insightful - 5 fun15 insightful - 4 fun16 insightful - 5 fun 2 years ago

how can he misgender you when women don't exist since it is just a socially constructed category? Your gender doesn't exist, it's just a social construct. Your sense of being misgendered is a social construct you created. I'm not sure you exist. I imagine a series of static electricity discharges ran down a keyboards on a computer somewhere and created this account, created the random set of letters "Heimdekledi" and continues to create these incoherent posts.

HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

Heim is deliberately inconsistent with the nominalism. Things heim doesn’t like are real, but women are just abstract ideas. Dehumanising with a philosophical excuse of ‘but humans don’t real :)’

[deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 2 years ago

[deleted]