QT: Where are the “trans men” athletes winning against men? by BiologyIsReal in GCdebatesQT
[–]valleyoftherogue 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
It is all speculation of what he has, and I am sick and tired of the lies being told about Semenya claiming this MAN is a "woman" of any type. He was outed as 46 XY with DSD, and the DSD means nothing. It is the Y chromosome that makes him a cheater.
If DSD people have a Y chromosome, they have no business competing against women. They are MEN. Caster Semenya is a fraud who was outed as a fraud several years ago. He is a MAN, not an "intersex" woman, but a MAN. He is a cheater. Women should walk out of any competition he is entered.
[–]valleyoftherogue 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
This man is full of it. No matter how good women are athletically, they can never compete with out-of-shape, over-the-hill men in dresses like he is. That is because women are built completely different from men. Testosterone levels don't mean squat. You have size, weight, done density, heart size, hemoglobin differences, center of gravity differences, pelvic size and shape differences, leg bone differences and literally thousands and thousands of other physical differences between the sexes. Feminists knew this DECADES ago that women could never bridge the gap with men in athletic competition because of the biological realities of the two sexes. That is why separate categories based on sex were created, to give women a chance at fair competition.
[–]valleyoftherogue 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
They don't exist because they are women, and women are not athletically competitive with men.
To push for XYs to compete in women's sports is to support straight-up cheating and the abolition of women's sports.
Sex matters. Biology matters. Your feelings about what sex you think you are don't.
All: Do men and women need each other beyond purposes of reproduction? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT
Excluding transwomen from womanhood perpetrates the idea that there's a wrong way to be a woman! by RedditHatesLesbians in GenderCritical
[–]valleyoftherogue 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Judith Butler should be tried for murder--of the English language. She more than any other person is responsible for this linguistic b.s.
[–]valleyoftherogue 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
They are men. There is no such thing as a "trans woman"--only crossdressers and transvestites. Of course they are excluded from womanhood and anything else to do with women because they are men.
I am so sick of this gaslighting I can scream.
GC: How have you been socially punished for rejecting femininity? by worried19 in GCdebatesQT
I have never had problems because I have never worn makeup in the over 40 years I have been in the labor force and in a variety of occupations. I just don't care what other people think.
ACLU celebrates federal court ban of Idaho law, calls it a "victory for all women and girls" by [deleted] in GenderCritical
[–]valleyoftherogue 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago* (0 children)
It has hated on women for decades, from at least the 1970s when it took money from flesh peddlers like Hugh Hefner and started its insane campaign to call porn "speech," which it is nothing of the sort.
[–]valleyoftherogue 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago* (0 children)
The ACLU is a worthless organization for women and girls. It needs to be defunded out of existence.
This video needs to be seen by every politician in the country. They literally have NO idea what it is they are supporting. They think trans is simply another kind of gay, which the movement is nothing of the sort. They have way more in common with pedophilia groups:
QT (but anyone who can answer): is there a consensus within the trans movement/liberal feminism on the definition of 'woman'? And what is the source of said definition? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT
[–]valleyoftherogue 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
The definition of what constitutes a "man" is never a subject for debate.
That is the answer.
Do you think the treatment of natal women and passing trans men are the same, even though the trans men are being perceived as male? by Genderbender in GenderCritical
[–]valleyoftherogue 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
No man "passes." That is the bottom line. Bone structure doesn't lie.
ELI5 Judith Butler by Jalaces in GenderCritical
[–]valleyoftherogue 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
She is the Phyllis Schlafly of the woke left, and far more dangerous in my book.
"Assigned __ at birth" is a bizarre and goofy expression that should never be used by [deleted] in GenderCritical
DNA is the final arbiter. If there is a "Y" chromosome, that baby is male. No ambiguity about it.
REVIEW: 'The End of Gender: Debunking the myths about sex and identity in our society' by Debra Soh. Soh dedicates her book to “everyone who blocked me on Twitter.” by [deleted] in books
[–]valleyoftherogue 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Not reading it. Anybody who says it is a "myth" that "gender is a social construct" doesn't know what she is talking about. She is conflating the word with "sex."
Both: How do you feel about this interpretation of gender? by BrNated in GCdebatesQT
[–]valleyoftherogue 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
"Gender" is sex roles and sex-role stereotypes. That is it. There is nothing else to add.
There are ONLY two "genders" or groups of sex roles. There aren't fifty or one hundred or twenty--ONLY two groups:
masculinity and femininity. That is because there are only two sexes. Those "genders," a term I hate and use sex roles instead, which was the original phrase, are supposed to be complementary to each sex. They are a hierarchy, so the personality traits men don't like or the work men are too lazy to do or think they are too good to do, they force on women. It is as simple as that. We don't need to overthink it.
"There is no real feminism that does not have at its heart the tempering discipline of sex-class consciousness: knowing that women share a common condition as a class, like it or not."—Andrea Dworkin Right-Wing Women (1983)" by DistantGlimmer in GCdebatesQT
That book, Right-Wing Women, is arguably her best work. It just nails everything perfectly. Most of her books get bogged down with literary analysis, which is fine if you are familiar with the works she critiques, but this book just gets to the heart of the matter. The chapter on abortion is one of the best summaries of what it was REALLY like in the 1960s, with women dealing with the New Left. Dworkin knew what she was talking about. She also explains why mothers of those women on the left reacted the way they did.
So Sick of The Term "Sex Work" - a good post from our Reddit community that I wanted to share. by [deleted] in antipornography
[–]valleyoftherogue 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
There are a lot of people who try and justify the term in that thread. Even those critical of prostitution still call this "sex work." It isn't "work" of any kind. It is human rights abuse.
Men’s Rights Lawyer Eyed in Shooting of NJ Judge’s Family by usernamezerozero in GenderCritical
[–]valleyoftherogue 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
This has nothing to do with Epstein. This nonsense has been completely debunked. The attorney who committed the crimes was dying of cancer anyway and decided to off himself.
This man was infamous for filing frivolous lawsuits claiming men were somehow being denied their "rights." He was furious over Salas regarding a case she was hearing that he filed regarding the draft.
Time to put the Epstein conspiracy nonsense to rest. This has nothing whatsoever to do with it.
Both: What if we reframed the issue as "AFAB rights", "AFAB spaces", etc? by luckystar in GCdebatesQT
No. No incorporating trans nonsense lingo.
Did feminism cause the current state of transgender politics? by Kotal in GCdebatesQT
[–]valleyoftherogue 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Feminism had nothing to do with it. Queer theory, neoliberalism, and porn have given rise to this MEN'S "sexual rights" movement. It is a hate movement against women.
TRAs know Rowling has researched both sides extensively and wonder why she is still gender critical by RoundFrog in GenderCritical
The problem is it isn't opinion to state men can't be women and vice versa. It is material FACT that is being assaulted as "bigotry" all because a bunch of sexual fetishists want to be able to practice their deviant sexual acts in public. To heck with women's rights and safety.
Anger as rape crisis cenres recruit "self-identifying" women (Mail on Sunday UK) by endthewoo in GenderCritical
[–]valleyoftherogue 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
You can bet men who do this find it sexually arousing. That is why they do it. Never forget these men are sexual deviants.