Opinions on BAP? by Mr_Tee in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I never liked him, even before people found out who he was. I'm not at all surprised he's Jewish, but I would dislike him regardless. It's funny how people figured out he was Jewish without him ever saying or doing much that really hinted at it. In the end he not only turned out to be a Jewish, but a raging zionist. He clearly seems like controlled opposition to me. He is some kind of social sciences professor at an Ivy League school, and yet even after he got doxxed he was never fired, cancelled or really harassed, which is extremely suspicious as many people have been completely cancelled and destroyed for far less. Could just be Jewish privilege, but I doubt it.

BAP is Jewish, and we live, struggle, and persist in a world created by Jews.

They didnt create it. They are corrupting and destroying it. Not all Jews, but the majority of the ones who have power and influence.

In the end it's amazing how right a lot of alt righters were about Jewish power. Almost everything they said about it has been proven right the last several years, and more evidence just keeps piling up every day. Even a lot of lefties are coming around to that after watching zionist psychopathy in real time in Gaza, and the fact they are getting cancelled too is proof that its not "the left" driving cancel culture and censorship, its Jewish power. You can recognize a lot of the same unhinged hatred towards whites they display towards Arabs, and really any group that opposes them on anything. Most leftists are way too conformist to ever really oppose Jewish power effectively though, which is why Jewish power has been so masks off on punishing any of them that openly support Palestinians.

Dutton Affirms Scum (2018) -AJ IQ is 110 by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't have a link handy. I believe it's not from one particular study, but rather various samples from Israel that were used in IQ and the wealth and Nations and an updated follow on study from that book.

One thing that stands out to me is this. There are supposedly something like 6 million AJs in the US. That's a pretty large number. Yet the samples we are talking about when these high IQ numbers pop up in some cases consists of just dozens of people. Larger samples from the early 20th century are apparently just thrown out as conveniently unreliable(and not surprisingly these are ones that tended to show AJs as below average). So we aren't talking about samples of hundreds of thousands, or tens of thousands, or even thousands. We're talking about a handful of studies, each usually comprising like dozens of people, taken from things like Jewish private school admission tests from the 1950s.

The OP lists some Wisconsin study that is supposed to be earth shattering because it has a sample that includes DNA confirming they had ashkenazi ancestry, but this is a strawman unless you somehow think there is an epidemic of people posing as Ashkenazi Jews and this somehow drags down their scores, but I've never realized that was a thing, or that it somehow adversely affected the tiny sample scores we do have. So the genetic confirmation of this small Wisconsin study is irrelevant. Much more relevant is the small and geographically specific sample of this study, which because of its small size and lack of wider geographic representation (from a state that isn't really known to have a large Jewish population) isn't significant. I'm also curious what else this Wisconsin study shows. Were these mostly AJ's with German ancestry? Is the proportion of European DNA the same as AJs from say New York? And specifically what European DNA did they have and at what percentages? What the hell even is Ashkenazi DNA? My impression is that Ashkenazis are mutts. I hear around 25% non European-be that "khazari", "semitic", or whatever- but then I also hear they have some genetic similarities to Southern Italians. Is that Southern Italian like DNA considered part of the 75% that is European? It all seems to be subject to the whims of what the particular Jews conducting the studies prefer the truth be, or prefer to emphasize. Ultimately I don't even give much of a shit. I dont find Jews to be particularly interesting, although their massive wealth and influence, and the consequences it brings, kind of forces you to give a shit.

What the actual truths are regarding Ashkenazi genetics and even intelligence are less important to me than what Jews themselves believe and how it shapes their modern day behavior.

Dutton Affirms Scum (2018) -AJ IQ is 110 by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is only one large representative sample of ashkenazi Jewish IQ scores, and it is from Israel, and it effectively destroys the myth of abnormally high Ashkenazi IQ. They averaged 103. Basically average. Dutton focuses on American Ashkenazi Jews for some reason, but admits there arent any large representative samples of them so goes on this long torturous and highly dubious explanation for why he thinks its probably 110.

I remember reading an article from Dutton on a subject I have personal knowledge of that was based on a claim I knew for a fact he was mistaken on, and this could be easily proven just from mainstream media articles. So the fundamental thesis of his article was based on something he got completely wrong, and which actually supported nearly the exact opposite of what his article claimed. I stopped taking him seriously after that.

Elon Musk to sue the ADL by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They hurt his bottom line because he did things that pissed them off. He was a disobedient member of the elite. He could have just gone full Jeff Bezos and do whatever they want in order to continue enriching himself, but to his credit he stuck his neck out opposing them on some things, especially censorship.

Elon Musk to sue the ADL by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He won't get awarded anything. The ADL is full of lawyers, and can call on thousands more Jewish lawyers and boot licking goys to come to their aid. Any judge that decides against the ADL would then be targeted by organized Jewry, and as all judges are lawyers and politicians(and disproportionately Jewish), fully understand Jewish legal/media/political power and/or are active agents of Jewish power.

The ADL, and for that matter the Jewish establishment, regard any criticism of Jews that mentions them being Jewish as antisemitism, and even the criticicism of individual Jews that mentions anything anyone who can be characterized as "bad" ever said bad about Jews as anti-Semitism. Hence the ADL continually trots out what they call Jewish tropes as being off limits, regardless of whether said Jew/s objectively fulfil the description of such "tropes". So now Musk will feel obligated to ban anything Jewish power regards as antisemitic in order to prove that he's not antisemitic. This is the same game the ADL and organized Jewry have successfully played a thousand times before.

The best way to deal with this is to showcase Jewish hypocrisy. When they accuse you of pushing antisemitic tropes, point out they have continually used anti white tropes, or anti arab or anti muslim tropes or anti christian tropes, or tolerated and defended the use of such "tropes". Beat them at their own game. Use their weaponization of ethnic and racial grievance politics and word play against them.

Elon Musk to sue the ADL by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

By arguing about whether “antisemitism” has or hasnt increased on twitter, Musk has fallen into the ADLs trap. He should be arguing that the ADL is against free speech and is a blatantly anti white, anti christian, anti muslin and anti arab hate group.

If they accuse you of antisemitism or call you a white nationalist just yawn and reply by calling them anti christian Jewish nationalists.

Anti White redditors defend African American pummeling White man who used the word "boy" in an argument by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I figured out why the mods here allow the sub to be taken over by bad faith trolls spamming demoralization, fishing, and shit posts. We’re being replaced.

I think there is a resurgence of shill activity here because at this point in time DAR has not yet learned to be multi shitpostorial. The mods are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. DAR is not going to be the monolithic alt right sub it once. The mods are going to be at the center of that. Its a huge transformation to make, DAR is now going into a multi shill shitposting mode and the mods will be resented for their leading role, but without that transformation debatealtright will not survive.

Anti Whites celebrate and gloat about White replacement by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Any time i look at this subs posts all i see are shitposts from salos alts. Nasser, 8thmonitor, radicalcentrist etc.

This sub has zero value now. Anyone coming here who could be red pilled now just sees an endless stream of retardation. Its worse than if the sub was banned. The only question is whether some of the mods allowed this on purpose.

Did genetics prove that COVID affects and kills East Asians at higher rates compared to other races? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There was a study that suggested ashkenazi Jews were far more likely to have some kind of enzyme that helped provided resistance to the virus. I dont think any further studies were done on the subject(outside of top secret ones in Israel), but it is a little suspicious and makes one recall earlier efforts by the Israelis to create bioweapons that targeted Arabs. I don't know if covid was created in an Israeli bioweapons lab and then later released into Wuhan in order to frame the Chinese, but I certainly wouldn't rule it out. Of course even if it was true no one would ever be allowed to objectively research such a thing.

Did genetics prove that COVID affects and kills East Asians at higher rates compared to other races? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The notion that Asians were more susceptible to covid was quickly debunked early on in the pandemic when it spread like wild fire through Europe and elderly people in Italy were dropping like flies. Followed by it spreading through the US and elsewhere. Overall it seems that Asian nations fared a little better than most, and as Robert Kennedy Jr pointed out, there was a study that suggested Asians were less susceptible to it, with the same study showing evidence that Ashkenazi Jews were even less susceptible to covid that just about anyone else.

Anti Whites celebrate and gloat about White replacement by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

However, the brazen Anti White hatred and shitlib delusion is a solid insight into how the enemy thinks

Tell us who "the enemy" is salos.

Why has Israel not banned pornography? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How would Israel not banning pornography somehow debunk that Jews control pornography? So you're claiming that if Israel did ban pornography that this would prove that Jews control pornography, and the fact they don't debunks this notion? Explain your logic. I don't even have a strong opinion on the Jews control pornography claim, but Israel banning or not banning porn has no bearing on it.

Supreme court strikes down Biden's student loan bailout program by send_nasty_stuff in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This was just an election year gimmick by Biden's handlers in the first place. They knew who was on the supreme court and knew it would be certainly struck down eventually. It served it's purpose. Helped Biden with younger voters who werent enthusiastic about him and harms republicans in the next election as these younger voters will remember who struck it down and think the Dems legitimately tried to help them with student debt.

Do you think that Al-Qaeda really did 9/11? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

One of the more bizarre facts that have come out about 9/11 was that Zacarias Moussaoui apparently sent emails to others involved in the plot from Nick Berg's laptop. Nick Berg was the Jewish American who was later beheaded in Iraq by Abu Zarqawi after he inexplicably traveled there to work installing satellite dishes as a private contractor in some of the most insurgent heavy parts of Iraq. In regards to the laptop, Berg claimed that he just happened to be on a bus with Moussaoui and let him borrow his laptop to send the emails. The likelyhood of this being a coincidence is exceedingly small.

Do you think that Al-Qaeda really did 9/11? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The problem is that you can't make cell phone calls from an aircraft above a certain altitude. A. K. Dewdney performed experiments to determine what cell phone reception was like from both single and twin engine aircraft. He determined that there was a ceiling above which no cell phone calls could connect, which he estimated at about 1000 feet for a twin engine aircraft.

If this was true, that it is literally impossible for the passengers to have made those cell phone calls(or airphone calls that someone mistakenly described as cell phone calls), and basically the entire planet was told they made these calls, wouldn't it be inevitable that countless qualified people would point this out, rather than one dude named A. K. Dewdney? I mean there are at least tens of thousands of people on the planet who would already have the knowledge required to know whether the calls were possible, and millions more who are smart and educated enough to find out. But nope. Nobody thought to look into it until AK Dewdney(whoever that is) did some "experiments".

If the cell phone calls were impossible, then they weren't made from aircraft: They were made from the ground, by people pretending to be passengers on the hijacked planes.

How do you recruit numerous voice actors that can flawlessly imitate someone else, and have them successfully talk to those people's closest relatives and associates, and fool them all? What about the actual cockpit radio communications? What happened to the passengers themselves? How many people had to be involved with kidnapping and disposing of them? It just gets worse and worse the more you logically delve into a lot of these more elaborate 9/11 conspiracy theories, which unfortunately were devastating to the search for actual truth and is why the neocons/Israelis/bush admin were able to avoid scrutiny for their many questionable and dubious actions leading up to the attacks. Those legit questions were buried under a mountain of stupid implausible conspiracy bullshit.

Do you think that Al-Qaeda really did 9/11? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Flights 11 and 175 that hit the WTCs were probably drones, based on the KC 767 tanker. Flight 93 that hit the Pentagon was probably a drone.

There were passengers on those planes that called and talked to people about hijackers taking over the plane, as well as cockpit radio communications. What you are proposing is a conspiracy that was extremely risky to pull off without being detected and would have involved too many people. Much more likely that they simply either recruited and facilitated unwitting Muslim extremists to carry out the attacks, or more likely simply detected such an attack in the works and actively prevented efforts to uncover and stop it.

Do you think that Al-Qaeda really did 9/11? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I find it extremely unlikely they would have remained undetected and able to carry out the attacks had it not been for Bush and deep state neocons ignoring and even covering up red flags that people were already seeing as suspicious. My suspicion is that the Israelis/neocons knew what they were up to and were monitoring them and actively blocking things that would have nipped the entire plot in the bud.

Do you think that Al-Qaeda really did 9/11? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree the dancing Israelis are pretty much a smoking gun that Israel was either directly involved or knew the details of the attack beforehand. There just isn't any real innocent explanation for their actions, and we know for a fact they were mossad agents. That they were released and never questioned again and this was immediately buried in the media and memory holed is also further proof of how much power the Israelis and the zionist diaspora have over the US government and media.

Whether the Israelis directly had a role in the attack is harder to say. I don't believe the nonsense about drones or cruise missiles, and I doubt explosive charges were used to bring down the twin towers. There were clearly planes hijacked and flown into buildings and it has been sufficiently explained how the towers collapsed(WTC 7 is still suspicious though and it's possible that was greed and brazen chutzpah on the part of Larry Silverstein who wanted to collect on the massive amount of insurance money after being forewarned in some way of an impending attack).

The question to me is whether the hijackers and Al Queda were unwitting stoodges funded, protected and possibly even organized by Israelis and/or neocons, or whether they were simply Muslim extremists doing Muslim extremist things and the Israelis/neocons tried to prevent them from being found out beforehand. I think the latter is more likely, but given the depths of neocon depravity and false flagging we've seen with Ukraine I no longer put anything past them.

Jew math at it's finest! by Oyveygoyim in funny

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Lmao. 99% of your jew bullshit is painfully stupid schizobabble, but I have to admit referring to Europe as "Western Asia" is kinda funny.

Is anyone else increasingly apathetic about Ukraine-Russia conflict by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If Putin wants to install a new government, then he's letting millions of Western aid continue to flow into Ukraine.

Actually it's now hundreds of billions, not millions, and it hasnt changed the situation on the ground at all, but has convinced a lot of the world that the US is run by crazy people who cannot be trusted. A few years ago there was no end in sight to Jewish global hegemony, but this Ukraine mess is backfiring so badly that it's now conceivable, as it's US golem managed to do the one thing it should never do, convince the world to drop the US dollar. I doubt Putin is some strategic genius that managed to get the US to mortally wound itself as part of some master plan all along, but regardless that is looking like the end result of all this.

Is anyone else increasingly apathetic about Ukraine-Russia conflict by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

At this point I think it's safe to say the war has failed from the neocon perspective. Sanctions didn't cripple Russia. and once China, India, developing nations like Brazil, and now oil rich gulf states started siding with Russia it was game over. The risk is the neocons become increasingly desperate and continue escalating things. They've already risked nuclear meltdown, nuclear war, and getting caught carrying out acts of terrorism on European energy infrastructure. They even apparently attempted to assassinate Putin using a drone attack on the Kremlin, which is full on crazy, and are now launching cross border attacks directly on Russia. Since they have more or less gotten away with all of these things who knows what they're going to try next.

Is anyone else increasingly apathetic about Ukraine-Russia conflict by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Time is now completely on Russia's side. The Ukrainians are running out of men, and at this point are likely facing serious morale problems as this thing drags on and they face inevitable death or crippling injury. Much of the world has sided with Russia on this and the Russians have endured the worst of western sanctions and suffered little effects, while the end of US dollar hegemony is now in sight, and by extension the end of US power and influence. The neocons bet the farm on beating the Russians and there's no longer any conceivable way the Russians lose this. Never underestimate neocon hubris and incompetence. They bloodied the Russians for sure, but the Russians have endured far worse in the past and bounced back with a vengeance.

There's also increasing evidence that Jews are getting nervous and don't want to be seen by the Russians as responsible for this mess, which to me is a sign that many of them are coming to the realization that their Russian regime changing project has failed.

Did the majority of Native Americans die from disease or organized murder/genocide? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well I am a White Nationalist, I'm not a fascist though and I've never claimed to be one.

I'm neither a white nationalist nor a fascist, and unlike you I never claim to be either.

I don't encourage users to interact with the reddit posts either, that is to their discretion.

So why do you link to these posts over and over again for years? You said it's a waste of time to debate shitlibs, but it's apparently not a waste of time to spam concern troll posts for years on these reddit posts you admit you never have any intention of debating anyone on and would instantly get a person banned? When and where are you pretending such debates ever occur exactly? Obviously not in the place you literally link to, as you admit.

Did the majority of Native Americans die from disease or organized murder/genocide? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't feel I'm the best debater, I link the reddit posts as well if anyone here wants to try to debate with the users they can.

But you said yourself that debating them would risk a suspension(in actuality you know they would be banned), so why would you link to those posts knowing others would simply be banned?

I don't know what the definition of concern troll is

Oh I think you know exactly what concern trolling is. Everyone with a room temperature IQ who has spent any amount of time on the internet knows. It is universally bannable in any forum where you have a "team" or a side you claim to be on. This is literally the first sub I've ever been on where mods don't ban it consistently, despite it being explicitly listed as against forum rules.

Even though you know, I'll give you examples. An alt righter goes to a Jewish sub and says 'yo guys, I'm worried about the fact us Jews were heavily involved in the slave trade and people know this, so how can we counter our obvious involvement and profiting from the slave trade?'

Or another example is going to a black or BLM themed sub and saying 'how do you counter the fact that blacks kill way more whites than the reverse?' Or saying 'yo, we need to stop proving the "enemy" right by killing all these white kids like this recent example im linking to'. That is concern trolling, that is what you do, that is what you have always done, and until you are banned will continue to do, and you know this.

Did the majority of Native Americans die from disease or organized murder/genocide? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the reason I don't reply to shitlibs is risk of suspension and waste of mental energy.

But you just said the entire purpose of you spewing years of continuous concern troll posts that have gotten you periodically suspended and banned here is so we can better debate shitlibs. Now you're saying its a waste of energy and not worth the risk of suspension to debate them? Which is it?

I post those posts here in order to challenge users and to formulate counter arguments to common arguments the enemy makes.

But one sentence ago you just said it's not worth the energy and risk of suspension.

Tell me what the definition of a concern troll post is. Give us the definition.

If the Iraq War was a Jewish war why did most Jews oppose it? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Jewish neocon manipulation regarding Iraq is extremely well documented, by both the left and the right. Phiilip Giraldi and Micheal Schuer were relatively higher up CIA men, and in the case of Schuer had plenty of inside knowledge of how the Iraq war was launched, and they have laid out in pretty good detail who was responsible for the war and what their motivations appeared to be. Ever hear of the office of special plans? I mean the neocons were openly talking about how to invade and occupy Iraq and start a domino of regime change for Israel's enemies well before 9/11. If you believe the line that the war was fought for oil rather than for the benefit of Israel, then where is the oil? How does that explain our Libya involvement, or Syria involvement, or the neocon led Ukraine war?

Another thing to remember is that the early 2000s were a different time. We actually still had a free internet at the time, and Jews were understandably worried about the blowback from being blamed for the Iraq war, and in fact the neocons had to lay low for a time and reinvent themselves as shitlibs because of negative reaction to their Iraq war and failed occupation, so imagine if Jews had openly and publicly embraced the Iraq war the way they are embracing the Ukraine war? With Ukraine they no longer have anything to fear because they now have the internet on lockdown so they can be as openly war mongering as they want to be and no one is able to openly discuss it, least of all the current left that is nothing like the left of 2003, and is now just controlled opposition run by war mongering establishment Jews.

That's not to say there aren't a few antiwar Jews, but they are rare these days, and are considered fringe and not part of the Jewish mainstream anymore. Even Seymour Hersh has been banned from Jewish run media just for daring to say out loud what everyone already knows.

What are your thoughts on this attack on an asylum seekers camp in Ireland? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The mods have banned other users simply for posting stupid shit, even though the posters weren't misrepresenting themselves, and nothing came of it. They(or more likely one or two of them) usually ban shit from mentally ill Jews that make other Jews look stupid. Wasnt that Jaques dude that was obsessed with the holocaust recently banned? Salos himself was banned under other alts and saidit admin were fine with it, and Salos has posted way more stupid concern troll bullshit under his nasser alt than he ever did as salos6000. So I'm not buying that excuse. Virtually every post here now for the past several months is a concern troll post. This sub has become a total joke. I see way more based shit on the actual front page of saidit than I ever do here, where its just jew shills responding to each other's posts(or posts they made under a different alt).

Did the majority of Native Americans die from disease or organized murder/genocide? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've taken a look at the reddit posts you link to in your countless concern troll posts and I never once saw any evidence you or anyone employed any of the points people bring up here. Not once. Where are all these debates with shitlibs you claim to be engaging in?

What are your thoughts on this attack on an asylum seekers camp in Ireland? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The problem with the moderation in this sub is that 1) the sub is slow with few users so no one is willing to invest too much time or effort into modwork

It probably takes how long to delete a post or ban an obvious troll, a minute? These posts stay up indefinitely and the trolls stick around for years.

2) the mods are being actively threatened by Magnora7 and can't ban people for stuff like concern trolling anymore.

According to who? Like 1 or 2 years ago when this site was undergoing constant DDOS attacks by mentally ill Jews who continually harassed and threatened Magnora, he did take action on a fascism sub that banned obvious Jew trolls, who went whining to him, but Magnora has been MIA for over a year now, and even in those instances, the trolls in question were somewhat arbitrarily banned right off the bat with zero warning.

Our trolls have been warned over and over again, given every opportunity to stop and just post honestly, clearly break the rules of the sub, and you can find plenty of examples of people being banned in the front page subs or from the site for far less. U also had some people banned here for less and Magnora never said anything. Salos's primary alt, salos6000 was banned and magnora never said anything

And if what you say is true and you can't ban trolls like salos/nasser, then what good is the sub or the site anyway? If you are completely powerless to prevent it from being overtaken by bad faith trolls, who then use the sub for intelligence gathering and manipulation, then the sub does more harm than good and it wouldn't exactly be a bad thing if it was shut down and moved elsewhere.

What are your thoughts on this attack on an asylum seekers camp in Ireland? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My username is 8thmonitor because my street is literally named 8th.

If this was true, I doubt you would openly say it in a sub that is itself obviously monitored. I was semi joking about the AI thing, but a look at your post history doesn't seem genuine to me. Looks like you are intelligence gathering.

What are your thoughts on this attack on an asylum seekers camp in Ireland? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, well being high trust has been our undoing, so always giving people the benefit of the doubt when they haven't earned it isn't a good policy in the times we find ourselves in.

Race/ethnicity and IQ differences. by FarRight in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

IQ tests aren't total bullshit, but I think they have limited value and just give a sample of some overall cognitive function while having huge gaps that include much harder to test for and more abstract abilities.

In terms of race, it doesn't really matter what the data shows. Data which conflicts with the establishment narrative is simply censored, suppressed, manipulated, memory holed, and it's authors blacklisted. Some of this manipulation comes from the so called right, but not always in the manner shitlibs pretend.

Ultimately though it doesn't even matter much what differences exist. I think most races are roughly equivalent with a couple outliers on both ends, including one serious outlier on the low end, but there are many subtle but crucial differences that IQ tests probably barely touch on or are completely blind to.

What are your thoughts on this attack on an asylum seekers camp in Ireland? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What exactly do you want this sub to be? What am I (still not salos) or radical centrist or 8thmonitor doing wrong exactly?

Intelligence gathering, manipulation, research, monitoring(gotta wonder what 7thmonitor, 6thmonitor etc were used for, is this some AI monitoring version 8.0?).

We all want to have free debate and opposing viewpoints, but we know for a fact the other side does not, so you have to wonder what value this sub currently still has if all it serves as is an intelligence gathering and fishing expedition for the current ruling propaganda/censorship regime, even if some of the bad actors really are just mentally ill or eccentric freelancers(which I increasingly doubt).

What are your thoughts on this attack on an asylum seekers camp in Ireland? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think it's getting close to being time to find a new home. Almost every post here is some cringe concern troll or shill post from radicalcentrist, salos/nasser, blork3d, some name that acts like an AIbot called 8thmonitor etc. It's just time to move on I think, the mod behavior here really cant be explained innocently. There is something really strange going on with this sub. Most of the mods are probably genuine, but are mods in name only, but I don't trust a couple of the more active ones. This sub just seems totally compromised.

If jews controlled everything for thousands of years, why haven't they killed all white people by now? by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nobody says they controlled "everything" for "thousands" of years. Another stupid child like strawman argument.

They have wielded enormous power going back to the beginning of the Rothschilds multinational banking empire over 200 years ago, but not enough to just kill everybody you simple fuck. Since WW2 their power has grown exponentially though and we have entered a phase where there isn't much they can't get away with in the west. They still aren't powerful enough to simply kill every white person on earth, although there are likely some powerful ones who would do exactly that if they could. The danger is that eventually they will be that powerful, and in the periods and places they have achieved near total power in the past like early bolshevik Russia, communist Ukraine, and Palestine(now Israel and it's Palestinian "territories"), it's been a bloody nightmare for non Jews, and we are increasingly seeing hints of this in the US where they use their massive media power to incite violent mobs that rampage with impunity.

As of right now they are powerful enough to successfully coerce the west into demographic suicide, and there is mountains of circumstantial evidence that is exactly what many of their most powerful and influential are up to. They are also powerful enough to pass laws in an ever growing number of countries making public criticism of them effectively illegal, while censoring, blacklisting, harassing and increasingly imprisoning critics, all while launching bloody proxy wars against nations they perceive as enemies.

Obviously not ALL Jews do this, nor does it require some highly organized conspiracy. It simply requires a lot of highly ethnocentric and generally like minded ones with a lot of power, wealth and influence who don't even need to be told who their enemies are and what needs to be done to them. Add to that an untouchable highly militarized nuclear armed apartheid ethnostate to use as a base of operations, and it's safe to say the west and humanity as a whole is already in pretty deep shit right now.

Mark Dice goes mask off in the 2nd half of his video by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The best part is Stewart has tried to cancel people by accusing them of "antisemitism" for saying things that aren't anywhere near as incendiary or blatant. It's also a good example of how unfunny Stewart is. You can find plenty of comedians that rag on whites in ways that are actually funny, but this is the best this mediocre boring fuck can come up with.

Mark Dice goes mask off in the 2nd half of his video by Dragonerne in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Then at the end he peddles some shit about the "illuminati", which is considered an acceptable conspiracy theory allowed on youtube because it blames some group that doesn't even exist for things which are clearly being caused by a (((group))) that clearly does exist.

Homeless Black man charged with murdering two White strangers in Oklahoma because of their race by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The only reason he was charged with a "hate crime" is because this happened in Oklahoma and some prosecutor decided to charge him with it. This is why people like Soros use their money to elect prosecutors they want. They know decisions like this are completely arbitrary and left up to prosecutors discretion. Had this happened elsewhere it would likely have been swept under the rug.

To illustrate this point, you have numerous murders and attempted murders where the black perp specifically ranted about race AS he was attacking white people, and no hate crimes charges were even suggested and of course no media coverage. Just look at the shooting where a white family and a 6 year old girl were shot by a black man yelling "I don't even like white people"(which is a bit of an understatement given he was at that moment attempting to murder a family of them). The media claimed it was all because a basketball rolled into his yard but no mention of race or his comments as he shot a 6 year old girl. Or the black man that ran over a white bicyclist at a stop light and then got out of his car and shot him while shouting about white privilege. Nope, definitely not a hate crime in Soros DA ruled Los Angeles.

What happened to hitler after WW2? by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We've always gotten the dumbest trolls. They definitely aren't sending us their best. Radicalcentrist was dumb enough to not even change his name before completely reversing himself on every argument he ever made here and suddenly pretending to be a retarded version of a white nationalist.

Let's be real here,most people here dont deny the holocaust, but know it happened and believe it was good. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The OP almost made it two weeks without a holocaust post before falling off the wagon again. I guess that's progress.

Cancelled! – The Occidental Observer. Quite a day in "Shut it Down!" First Tucker now Kevin MacDonald is banned from Twitter. shudder. by Fitter_Happier in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

At this point almost anyone who is intelligent, open minded and pays attention to current events is JQ aware to some extent. They may not be willing to publicly speak about it, but they know. You have to be completely oblivious and delusional not to at this point. The evidence is absolutely overwhelming.

Breaking News: Tucker Carlson leaves Fox News. Don Lemon leaves CNN. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is partly why I was saying it was so stupid to jump on vax conspiracy bandwagon like so many conservative grifters did. It was always meant to discredit, deplatform and target people for lawfare, and that's exactly what it has and will continue to be used for. It was a classic Cass Sunstein style trap.

Breaking News: Tucker Carlson leaves Fox News. Don Lemon leaves CNN. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It was inevitable. Jewish power hated him and wanted him gone, and they pretty much always get what they want in the end. He should have ran for President. I wouldnt be surprised if part of the reason Trump was encouraged to run was to prevent Carlson from running.

Even if Carlson couldn't win the nomination in 2024, it would still be good for him to run if financially possible in order to keep his name and voice in the news and to reach people while he still has such a huge following, because from this point on he will be ignored and deplatformed by Jewish power, as all other major media is owned by Jews aside from Twitter, which isn't really a platform that suits Carlson.

Do you think the whole climate change denial movement is funded and led by Jews? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not really. This seems like a red herring to me. They don't have a critical stake in this either way and likely play both sides, wanting to be SEEN as fighting climate change for PR purposes and because some of their Muslim enemies(and Russia) rely on fossil fuel profits for global clout, influence and military spending, but understanding that going too far could also hurt much of their near term wealth.

It's important not to recklessly blame Jews for things that are far fetched or don't make sense, and Jewish shills will of course aid in this and then highlight it in order to discredit critics. There is so much we know for sure they are largely responsible for, and for which a strong case can be made if not outright proven that there's no reason to add endless new conspiracies that only serve to muddy the waters and delegitimize accurate and provable criticism of them.

Traditionally it has primarily been big oil that funds climate change denial. I have to admit I haven't kept up on who owns what in terms of fossil fuel driven companies these days, but in the past it hasn't been something Jews dominated. Maybe that has changed in recent times as Jews seem to own just about everything of importance thanks to the massive transfer of wealth to Jewish hands starting during the Reagan years and accelerating massively under Bush Jr, but fossil fuels are a risky business because of the horrible optics, long term global damage they cause, and inevitably vanishing reserves, and Jews normally play the long game on things. I could be wrong and they could have a lot of hidden hands in fossil fuels, but if that's the case research it and then prove it, don't just blindly speculate.

Charlottesville tiki torch marchers charged with 5 year felony "burning object with intent to intimidate." by Blackbrownfreestuff in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is why oligarchs like George Soros buy prosecutors offices. They know when they control these prosecutors, or at least vet them, they can basically charge anyone they want with anything, and when they also control the media, courts, social media, banks, politicians, internet infrastructure, the domestic intelligence and surveillance bureaucracy, and have the most powerful well funded lobby groups on earth, there isn't anything anyone can do to stop them. We now live in a dystopian oligarchy.

The funny thing is that when all this was going on back in 2016/17, I didn't even like the alt right, and felt like I had little to nothing in common with them. I still don't in many ways, but I know exactly where this is heading, and it won't stop with the alt right. They are just the canary in the coal mine. Eventually any and all critics of Jewish power, "left" or "right, will be targets, and even people who they think MIGHT become critics or who might not have a favorable view of it. In fact we are more or less already seeing this, or at least the beginnings of it. It is still kind of in the testing phase where they see just how much they can get away with, but they will never stop doubling down. Elon Musk probably knows this. He is basically a 90's liberal but they have pushed the overton window so far in the direction they want he is now labeled far right just for pushing for a level of free speech that is a far cry from what we had just in the late 1990s to early 2000s.

Some independent journalists recently attempted to file a freedom of information act request regarding the "manifesto" of the Nashville transgender shooter, and they found out that no lawyers would even dare touch it, and these weren't some fringe journalists either. One of them was Glenn Greenwald. All the lawyers they reached out to were too afraid. I mean this person massacred school children, and yet they are too scared to be seen as looking into the shooters self declared motive. When your society is that far gone there's no saving it.

The system is probably going to collapse eventually, but in terms of the damage and destruction that will be caused, they are just getting warmed up. Many of these people are flat out psychopaths. They are the people that caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people in the middle east and now hundreds of thousands in Ukraine, and don't even bat an eye or lose a second of sleep over it.

Why were Jews given an ethnostate after WWII but Gypsies weren't? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You are comparing the wealthiest, most well organized, aggressively ambitious, ethnocentric, sharpest elbowed group on earth, who already had a near stranglehold on western media, to a mostly illiterate group of scattered nomads that had zero wealth, zero influence, zero organization, zero media influence, and no real ambition.

The answer should be obvious. Jews also have the advantage of having an established religion attached to their ethnic identity, so they could call for the establishment of what is essentially an ethnostate under the guise of religion. I don't even know any gypsies but as far as I can tell they never had any desire for any kind of state, nor are they supremacists like Zionists are. I also don't think there are that many Gypsies worldwide, certainly far fewer than Jews.

What are your thoughts of this story of a tory councillor's racially prejudiced remarks? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not Arab, I chose Nasser's name for no particular reason at all.

I mean the name didn't choose itself. You typed out the letters Nasser for some reason. Is that one of the names you use to spy on Arab nationalists and Palestinians and you were too lazy to make a new one so just re-used it for when you subvert and troll alt right subs?

Why is Christianity acceptable to White Nationalists but Islam is not? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But christians don't worship semites. They worship what they believe is a divine entity, god. Now they do believe that this divine entity briefly took the form of an iron age Aramaic speaking semitic man 2000 years plus ago, but that doesn't mean they worship semites anymore than Jews worship bushes or fire because they believe god once spoke to them as a burning bush.

Why is Christianity acceptable to White Nationalists but Islam is not? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why is Christianity acceptable to White Nationalists but Islam is not?

Are you completely ignorant of European history? Christianity became a widespread established religion when it spread throughout Europe, where many of its now well established traditions arose. By contrast, Europe's history with Islam is primarily one of conflict, with non European Muslims repeatedly attempting and failing to conquer Christian Europe.

This entire post is just you playing dumb about a history that everyone on planet earth who isn't literally retarded is well aware of.

Hitler loved his people so much that he sent child soldiers to die to the soviets. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not mentioning the holocaust in a post challenge: FAILED. Again.

For The Record, NPR Absolutely Is US State Propaganda by [deleted] in politics

[–]oligarchracy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's oligarch propaganda, most of it's funding comes from wealthy "donors", but since the oligarchs also own US politicians it's also accurate to say it's US state propaganda as well.

Why is it that Antifa is actually active in working class white communities feeding poor people and helping single mothers while all that the alt-right does is protest Drag Queen Story Hour and other frivolous luxury shit that no working class person gives a fuck about? by Republicanalsex in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Saying antifa in anyway are here to help working class whites is like saying the KKK is all about helping poor black families. It's a patently absurd statement, but obviously you know that.

Antifa is an anti white Jewish astroturfed movement led, funded, and protected by Jewish power but made up largely of shabbos goy drug addicts, troon goons and assorted fuck ups.

Why is it that Antifa is actually active in working class white communities feeding poor people and helping single mothers while all that the alt-right does is protest Drag Queen Story Hour and other frivolous luxury shit that no working class person gives a fuck about? by Republicanalsex in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are literally talking to a known long time DAR troll, going back to the days of reddit. He was banned from the sub in reddit when we had mods that actually gave a fuck and could be trusted.

How would you react to your child engaging in racially prejudiced behaviour? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nasser...As a non-white what do you teach your kids about the scapegoating, racial incitement, violence, discrimination, political persecution, and double standards whites face in the US today? Do you teach them that is ok? Also, do you have any reddit links to posts that talk about that?

How would you react to your child engaging in racially prejudiced behaviour? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

White racism is the ultimate form of human evil within western liberalism so as such most of the replies are obviously on the son's side.

It's reddit. It was bought by zionist war mongering Jew oligarchs after grass roots users built the popular subs and made the site popular, and then turned into anti white pro Jewish propaganda that censors alternative viewpoints and bans users with opinions they don't like in order to manufacture consent and astroturf peer presser. It's filled with shills, feds and trolls, which is why you love the site so much and link to it in almost every post. Most people are conformist and will conform to whatever they believe the popular view is and offers the path of least resistance, hence the Jewish obsession with controlling and heavily censoring social media.

Without traveling to that cesspit of a website to read the already predictable comments or the likely made up story, I would do what the parent did in this situation and punish the kid for attempting to bully his sister and damage her property.

Or say if your child used a racial slur or racially assaulted a non White peer, how would you react to it and/or punish them?

If they said a racial slur I would treat it the same way as if they were swearing, although it would depend somewhat on what the supposed "slur" actually was. For the second part, what does "racially assault" mean exactly? If they physically assaulted someone and it wasnt a situation where they were standing up for themselves and others or defending themselves, I would punish them, beyond that it would depend on what exactly they did.

BAP(Bronze Age Pervert) drama in dissident Right scene on the internet by JuliusCaesar225 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't.

What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The term far right in the current western context is meaningless now. It's just Jewish terminology. It's a propaganda term used to marginalize and persecute perceived enemies, it's meaningless. Are all zionists far right? They practice extreme supremacism. Not in the modern context, because the term only applies to non Jewish whites because of who makes the definition.

The Chinafication of America Comes Disguised as a "Ban TikTok" Bill by boston_blackie in politics

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This smells of Jewish power trying to increase their control and censor the internet, disguised as attempts to counter China so they can get Republicans to ramrod this shit through. They prefer Republicans do the dirty work because they know this will piss off a lot of younger people, so they can kill 2 birds with one stone. Increase their media control and further sink the Republican party. And of course their dimwitted and blackmailed shabbos goy republicans like Lindey Graham will do as they are told.

What are the arguments for segregation? by KimiORabu in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you talking about all girls and all boys schools? Not clear on what you're suggesting. I've never heard anyone say they are immoral or result in inequality. They are simply done to prevent distraction. As a parent I could see value in having a girl go to an all girl school, and probably less value in a boy going to an all boy school, although in both cases the schools are going to be private schools that are better across the board, and in nearly all cases would be religious based schools, so you would have to be less worried about degeneracy and anti white hatred being taught in them or simply being part of the daily culture they are subjected to.

Why your beliefs about the holocaust is a lose lose situation. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Most jewish people in real life don't bring up the holocaust or give their kids PTSD over it

I don't know what the percentages are, but I remember reading about studies researching Jewish kids suffering PTSD over continuous holocaust indoctrination, generations later. Just seems like a bit much.

Also, how many times do you keep bringing up stuff like the slave trade,holodomor,or any other atrocity to same how blame jews for it?

This is to drive home the point that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Jews have done a lot of fucked up shit and currently don't publicly get blamed for any of it, while very publicly blaming whites for all manner of things, past and present. Sometimes using the rat tactic of pretending to engage in self criticism as "fellow whites". In fact blaming Jews for anything is considered "hate" or antisemitism, while Jews themselves have a built an entire cottage industry of blaming whites for shit. In some cases it's a multi generational family business.

As for your last part, I have no idea what you're talking about but intellectually honest people is a fancy way of saying"People who eat up nazi propaganda".

Well that's the game you guys play. Anyone who criticizes you is a nazi, or uses nazi propaganda. It ties back in to your holocaust obsession and how you use it to shield yourselves from criticism. And yeah obviously I do think you're Jewish, because who else would get so continually worked up over criticism of Jews?

To answer your earlier question about the attempted murder of 6 million Germans, there was some yid term for it, nakam I think.

Revolver.news shares out a BAP article? Color me impressed. by send_nasty_stuff in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Libertarian adjacent? I just read the article and I was definitely right about the bloviating part. To talk at length, especially in an inflated or empty way. He's always just seemed like style over substance to me in my limited exposure to him. Was not the slightest bit surprised he went to Yale and is some Ivy league professor in some largely useless field.

Revolver.news shares out a BAP article? Color me impressed. by send_nasty_stuff in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'll add that I wouldn't be fundamentally opposed to a libertarian merit based society where the smartest and hardest working among us are given the most power and the lazy and most dysfunctional sometimes have to suffer the consequences of their behavior without always being bailed out by everybody else.

The problem is that we don't live in a merit based society. We live in a Jewish dominated oligarchy that deliberately opposes a merit based society on the grounds that it would threaten their monopoly and would give more power to whites who actually are the most productive, humane, cooperative and competent. Not all Jews would oppose such a society, most are probably just oblivious NPCs unaware that among them are a hate filled Jewish mafia that rule over the rest of us incompetently and with malice. Still, anyone who fails to acknowledge this mafia like Jewish behavior only serves to perpetuate it.

Also, the fact that black dysfunction is never blamed on black behavior doesn't mean that is always the case with all groups at all times and anyone who complains about oppression and discrimination is just a whiner. That blacks are the source of their own problems and Jews are a source of white problems are not mutually exclusive. Both can be true. This is a trap libertarians fall into.

Why your beliefs about the holocaust is a lose lose situation. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Point is you guys work yourself up into this never ending holocaust frenzy, to the point you literally give your kids PTSD. Of course this obsession doesn't extend to any atrocities you yourselves committed or helped cause, not even ones happening NOW, much less 90 years ago.

People are over it. Yeah sure the sheep will eat whatever you feed them, and opportunists will cash in on your holocaust obsession or go along to get along, but intellectually honest people are done with it. Time for you guys to either build a bridge and get over it, or for us to acknowledge you never will and this is just another example of your self worship and ethnic narcisissim and we have to protect ourselves and our societies from your neurosis and insatiable desire for revenge(even though most of us were on the side that saved your asses in ww2).

The mods of blackpeopletwitter, all non-black by Gravi in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This may be an april fools joke, but I'm willing to bet the majority of mods for whitepeopletwitter actually are Jews.

Revolver.news shares out a BAP article? Color me impressed. by send_nasty_stuff in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

BAP is a cringe ziocon who is protected by and even promoted by Jewish power. Color me unimpressed.

Many many 'biological refuse' would need to cull themselves in order for a rebirth.

Yeah wtf does that even mean, that stupid people commit mass suicide?

Possibly the idea of youth venturing out to find new lands and challenges should be re-explored.

Once again, wtf does this even mean in practical terms? What new lands? Most youth don't even venture off their couch anymore. There's a ton of things people SHOULD do, but simply saying kids should do this or that means nothing and solves nothing.

This is just the usual BAP libertarian bloviating. It's an ideological dead end with no practical solutions on anything aside from embracing being an asshole using a colorblind libertarian form of eugenics. Have no loyalty towards your people, just embrace might makes right cull the "weak" bullshit and ignore the reality of rampant ethnic tribal lobbying that's leaving you demographically replaced and overtly discriminated against by those with money and power goy.

BAP is completely worthless at best. Harmless chest thumping controlled opposition.

BAP(Bronze Age Pervert) drama in dissident Right scene on the internet by JuliusCaesar225 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ive never followed him closely or read much of him. Mostly just know him from what others left right and mainstream have written and tweets ive seen of his. The mainstream media promoted him as some alt right thinker and leader, like tgey did with richard spencer, which made me suspicious.

I never liked him and I wouldn't like him regardless of whether he was Jewish. I know Woods and others have been documenting a lot of the pro zionist statements he's made and neocon connections he has. That's one of the things that alerted them in the first place that something wasn't right with this guy.

Woods never seemed to like him from the beginning over important philosophical and strategic differences, and to a lesser extent optics, and like me, Woods wouldn't like him regardless of whether he was Jewish. Woods does get caught up with online drama a lot, but he usually goes after the right targets, its usually not just petty bickering and infighting. These are people that give bad advice and cause more harm than good.

BAP(Bronze Age Pervert) drama in dissident Right scene on the internet by JuliusCaesar225 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Woods problem with BAP isn't simply that he's Jewish and concealed this, but that he's always been a bit of an embarrassment to the alt right that has a lot of bad takes(which would be true regardless of him being Jewish), gives extremely bad advice to dissidents, and has consistently urged the alt right to stop criticizing Jews and Israel and actually praises Israel as some masculine based society we should emulate, as if that would be possible given anti white Jewish control of US and western society and their aggressive attempts to use all means at their disposal to continually block white attempts to be even a fraction as ethnocentric and nationalist as Israeli and diaspora zionist Jews are.

It's not clear if BAP does some of these things because he's genuinely trying to be subversive and destructive towards perceived enemies of the Jews, is controlled opposition, or does them because he's a fucking dumbass who doesn't understand Jewish privilege or that it doesn't extend to genuine white advocates. It doesn't help that some extremely cringe anti white zionists and Jewish establishment types have promoted BAP. To make matters worse his Jewish parent/s appear to be Israeli "holocaust survivors", which calls into question BAP's motives even more.

I agree that Fuentes is bad news generally, but he's apparently right about BAP.

Why your beliefs about the holocaust is a lose lose situation. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Take a few who've lied about being in the camps and then use them to claim everyone was lying.

He's not simply talking about people who lied about being in the camps. He's talking about actual camp survivors who were caught lying. It's not a small number.

Your description of death by cyanide gas is certainly horrible, and it makes you wonder how cyanide was used as a means of "humane" execution in the US for over half a century later, and is still a backup method in several states. Humans are some terrible creatures, and in the spirit of "whataboutism" one could also describe in graphic detail what the victims of carpet bombing, incendiary bombing and atomic bombings went through in equally horrible terms. Imagine what people in shelters full of children at Dresden and Hamburg went through as they were trapped underground being cooked alive. Survivors like Kurt Vonnegut described scenes that looked like something about of Pompeii, with carmelized corpses caught in agonizing death poses, clutching their children.

The bolsheviks carried out some mind blowing shit in their day as well, all sorts of fatal torture, burying people alive, dropping them into vats of acid, pouring water over living people in public squares in the dead of the Russian winter and leaving their frozen corpses on display as a warning to others. It was your boy Trotsky, the "good bolshevik" who was in charge when all that went down. No one even knows how many German women were raped and beaten to death and executed by the Soviets at the end and directly after the war. In the spirit of never again, why aren't there countless Hollywood movies, school lessons, museums and memorials about those and so many other ww2 atrocities? You and I both know the answer to that one.

Oh yeah, and since we're on the subject of cyanide poisoning, shortly after the war, a group of Jews from Israel attempted to murder 6 million German civilians with what I believe was cyanide. The only reason they weren't successful is the British caught them and put a stop to it at the last minute, and then let them go back to Israel. The British not only allegedly saved you from the Nazis, but they saved you from yourselves, and look at how you repaid them. None of them were tried for the greatest attempted mass murder in history, and in fact some went on to become prominent Israeli politicians and the leader is celebrated as a great poet. To this day they are still treated as "tortured" anti hero's out for rightous revenge in Jewish/Israeli media, and I believe there was even a recent docudrama that put them in a positive light. It's hard to take your claims of never again seriously when you treat people who were caught literally trying it again as heroes. I guess bringing that up is "whataboutism" too, amirite?

Why your beliefs about the holocaust is a lose lose situation. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It simply didn't happen. A hundred thousand Jews (maybe 200k?) died from typhus and malnutrition caused by allied bombing of food and supply lines.

Given the Nazis were going full Ghengis Khan on the Russians, it doesn't pass the bullshit test to say they would have declared Jews off limits to atrocities. Yes Jews have a proven track record of greatly exaggerating claims of persecution, before, during and after the war up to the present day, but it's naive to think the Nazis weren't ruthless enough to carry out some of the claims made against them. They had the means and motive.

Keith Woods Interviews Ron Unz today at 3pm Eastern by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's certainly possible that Unz website is simply used to track dissidents and keep them all on one site where they and their arguments can be monitored, and one has to be a little suspicious that his website hasnt been taken down, or that he even managed to get it off the ground to begin with before it being destroyed. The ADL was also suspiciously slow in going after unz, and to my knowledge hasnt really made a dent in his wealth, despite what amounted to public taunting by Unz. Taunting which could have been seen as a way to gain "street cred" in a preplanned public show.

Still, despite all of this he seems credible and his website is a good source of info. Surely not ALL Jews are fine with the destruction of the west and the complete unchecked power they have. There has to be at least a few ones like Unz, so I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt while retaining some healthy skepticism. Unz after all probably does help defuse actual anti-semitism by showing that hey not all of us are like that, and there has to be at least a few self aware Jews capable of understanding this.

Why your beliefs about the holocaust is a lose lose situation. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because of Jewish obsession with the 6 million number, no mainstream historian could ever cast doubt on the number, as Jews aggressively gatekeep such investigation and will destroy anyone who says otherwise. Seeing as how most of these historians were themselves Jewish they don't even have to threaten most of them. After the end of ww2 British intelligence estimated 4 million Jews died, and while I have no idea if that number is accurate, its one of the few unbiased estimates by people with first hand knowledge of the situation.

I listened to David Cole talk at length about the issue, and this was after he had done everything possible to get the Jewish bounty off his head removed and was trying to point out that the hardcore Holocaust denialists were wrong, and he came up with a death toll of about 3.7 million, give or take several hundred thousand. He claimed that he believes the Nazis did experiment with gas chambers in a couple of camps, but that it is extremely unlikely gas was used for mass executions at auschwitz, and there is no hard evidence of that and much evidence that contradicts it. His take seems the most objective and plausible that I've seen. He has no real reason to lie and if anything has much reason to error on the side of exaggerating the Holocaust.

A few years ago I did spend a little bit of time looking into how they arrived at the 6 million number. At the time I was generally accepting of the Holocaust narrative, including the 5-6 million number and had already heard of all the claims you just made, and I was setting out to convince alt righters to drop this holocaust denial shit, so I was expecting to see some pretty conclusive evidence. I was shocked by how little there was, despite all the usual claims that "the nazis kept meticulous records". In the end they really did have to fall back on inaccurate census claims because the nazii records wernt as precise, all encompasing and unanimous as you claim. It seemed like they basically set out to cherry pick what evidence they could find to support the preexisting 6 million claim. Obviously to retain some credibility they had to say well it could have been as low as 5.5 million, and I think it was Raul Hilberg who kind of covered their lowest acceptable numbers bases by going as low as 5.1 million. The Hilberg study was probably the most credible and extensive, and even then there were numerous glaring holes, assumptions, and leaps of logic that I immediately had questions that I never found any attempt at answering.

The Vad Yashem names list isnt reliable. It has so many duplicate names and so many people on the list were found to actually be living, and the organization itself is so biased that no intellectually honest person would give it any creedence. Which is a shame because many people on the list likely did die as a direct result of Nazi atrocities.

Why your beliefs about the holocaust is a lose lose situation. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Putin invaded Ukraine after nearly 10 years of ethnic cleansing in eastern Ukraine that killed 14,000 people following the Victoria Nuland/cia coup in 2014. During that same time the newly installed Jewish led Ukrainian regime was systematically armed to the teeth by the US. By 2022 Ukraine had one of the largest armies in the world. Once Zelensky was installed as president he repeatedly and needlessly crossed every well known red line Russia had set out in explicit language, culminating in his rhetoric about going nuclear and launching a nuclear first strike against Russia, that not coincidentally happened a week before the invasion. Zelensky is a dimwit but there's no reason he would have said that if he wasnt intentionally trying to cause an invasion as his neocon handlers hoped.

Russia initially went in light because they thought they had enough contacts with people friendly in Ukraine to simply topple or contain the zelensky regime without much bloodshed, but it was a trap. US/Zelensky regime intel had already comprised lists of Ukrainians to round up and imprison/execute in the event of the invasion and the Zelensky regime put it into action the moment the Russians invaded and decimated pro Russian elements in the country and quickly made it clear to the populace that they would tow the nato line or face his paramilitary thugs. There was an epidemic of videos of allegedly pro Russian ukrainians or simply Ukrainians that werent anti Russian enough being, beaten, tied up and duct taped naked to poles while they were mocked, which propaganda outlets like reddit heavily promoted at the time.

It has already been explained to you many times that Putin isnt completely controlled by Jews, which is why they want him gone. He is a pragmatist who understood Jewish power and was willing to deal with the devil when necessary, but he is careful never to be openly antagonistic to Jewish power while still doing what he could to limit it, and is well aware that the last few generations of Russians have been heavily inundated with anti Nazi propaganda and ww2 myths from the cradle to grave and such rhetoric still has power. Is Putin based and red pilled? No, he's a boomer who grew up with the same propaganda all Russians were, but he has also seen the grimey underbelly of international Jewish power in the looting of post Soviet Russia and it's clear he was not a fan and simply bided his time until he was powerful enough to do anything about it.

Why your beliefs about the holocaust is a lose lose situation. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The term "whataboutism" is some stupid manufactured shitlib term used by neocons/neolibs in an attempt to obscure jewish misbehavior. You see it from shills on reddit all the time, and hear neocons in the media use it non stop.

So if for example some establishment neocon/libs are blathering on and on about how Russia invaded Ukraine, if you point out the US did worse to Iraq and numerous other middle east countries, or point out Israel routinely bombs neighbors and occupies Palestinians, they bring up this stupid nonsensical made up word whataboutism thinking that will somehow shut down all debate.

So yeah I'm not surprised you'd use the term so you can blather on and on endlessly about the holocaust.

Why your beliefs about the holocaust is a lose lose situation. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you're admitting people died but it wasn't 6 million, but the other day i saw someone claim it was a hoax and the only people who died was the allies fault.Which is it?

I admit that I don't know for sure exactly what happened and precisely how many were killed and how they died. I'm honest about it. I certainly find it plausible that the Nazis intentionally killed large numbers of Jews and/or let them die, and every person who killed captive people should have been held responsible, as did happen in the case of the Germans. I have reasonable suspicions about the 6 million number though. I think that was most likely a propaganda number they arrived at and they have simply stuck to it because to do otherwise is to raise even more questions about the honesty and accuracy of many of the claims.

Lastly, as far as Ukraine goes what lies?The war is happening in Ukraine and i thought putin was a jewish puppet as well?So are you trusting jewish controlled putin?

Jesus christ if I were to list all the lies, exagerations and misinformation I would be here all day. Ghost of Kiev ring a bell? What about snake Island, what about the nuclear power plant we were continually told the Russians were shelling but turned out to be the Ukrainians, nordstream 2? Etc etc.

If you want to continue to play stupid about Ukraine then how about the Iraq war? We KNOW Jewish neocons(who are back at it again in Ukraine) lied repeatedly about that war. Are you denying that? Who was held accountable for the hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths that war and the others the neocons caused in the middle east? Name one Jew tried for war crimes related to any of that. Meanwhile were busy hunting down some 97 year old German woman because she was a teenage secretary at a Nazi camp 80 plus years ago.

Why your beliefs about the holocaust is a lose lose situation. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The allies liberated a total of 700,000 people from the concentration camps at the end of the war. Not a few people saying "hey, they were killing all of us," but 700 fucking thousand.

But then that begs the question, if these were extermination camps and the Nazis were hell bent on exterminating all Jews, why were there so many survivors? It's a logical question. These people were in these camps for years. If someone is deprived of food and water they can die in weeks, if not days.

The Russians took nearly 100,000 prisoners at Stalingrad, of those I think less than 6,000 survived the war. No elaborate gas chambers were required to get rid of them. How is it that these extermination camps had many hundreds of thousands of survivors who lived years, but almost no German POWs survived after Stalingrad? If your goal is to exterminate someone, what the Russians did to those German POWs is what you would expect to see.

What about the families of the 6 million deceased? Still around for the most part and can vouch that yup, the Germans killed our family member(s).

Well then it should be relatively easy to prove it was 6 million. Instead whenever I see how that number came about they talk about "census figures", which if you want to come up with an accurate number has numerous severely problematic issues. Why aren't census figures used to come up with a precise number of killed in the holodomor? Why is it if I looked at encyclopedias for every year since the holodmor I can find a dozen wildly different estimates of the number of killed, but the 6 million number has never been changed or revised. That's highly suspicious.

Why your beliefs about the holocaust is a lose lose situation. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Let me ask you this. Was dropping atomic bombs on civilian cities any less cruel than deporting them to camps and killing them? I mean both were horrible, but the US knew full well what radiation did to human beings, as they saw first hand the horrible deaths of scientists exposed to it, and yet they dropped the bombs anyway.

If the war in Europe had dragged on they would have dropped those bombs on German cities too, I mean the Germans were who the bombs were originally intended for, hence the heavy Jewish involvement in the Manhattan project, and they were going to do this before anyone had even heard of gas chambers.

Christians, especially Evangelicals, much more philosemitic than atheists. So much for muh based christian nationalism. by Idoloboretz in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But it's not most younger christians, it's not even a substantial percentage of younger christians. I was a younger christian and I never saw any of that, and I was in a mainstream denomination, not some fringe group. I also encountered other denominations and the only group I ever encountered anything remotely like what you claim are a small group of southern baptist types who weren't really considered mainstream christians.

Why your beliefs about the holocaust is a lose lose situation. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"The Holocaust" happened in that large numbers of Jews died during WW2. Not nearly as many as Germans, Russians, Japanese, and Chinese, but surely many died, including by what amounted to flat out murder.

What I would also say though is that we also know for certain a lot of the primarily Jewish claims regarding this event that were accepted on good faith turned out to be lies and exaggerations That is proven fact. For instance it wasn't anywhere near 4.5 million killed at Auschwitz. That is proven fact. Other wild ass claims I was raised to believe turned out to be largely bs as well.

So the issue becomes this. When you lie continually, and when people catch you lying continually, people tend not to believe you. It's a classic case of the boy who cried wolf. If you've been caught lying repeatedly, any intellectually honest person would then have to take a second look at some of your other claims to ensure they weren't lies too, except with "The Holocaust" no one is allowed to do that, because if you do you're a nazi, a bigot, etc. We are expected to believe everything you claimed without any further examination, essentially forever.

Now I could find 10 examples of shit Jews are lying about just by reading a daily news feed. I could just google the word Ukraine and find dozens of shit Jews are blatantly lying about right now. So watching them lie continually in real time, why the fuck would I just take their word for it about shit that happened 90 years ago that we already know they have been caught lying about, and which they have relentlessly used to guilt trip, enrich themselves, wage destructive murderous wars, and advance various agendas?

Send in the Clowns. Yellen and Garland perform back-to-back surprise visits to Ukraine, Philip Giraldi by Fitter_Happier in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, obviously. It was most likely what Seymour Hersh said happened, give or take some small details here or there. The funny thing is that Hersh's details reveal that this operation involved a fairly large number of people, so there is zero chance this could be covered up forever, and probably cant be covered up right now, hence Hersh was able to uncover it pretty much right away.

The nordstream operation will probably go down as the dumbest and most self destructive false flag in history.

Christians, especially Evangelicals, much more philosemitic than atheists. So much for muh based christian nationalism. by Idoloboretz in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, they don't. You have a bizarre distorted view because you're Jewish. The only thing you know about christians is what you've been fed in your Jewish bubble and what your limited mental capacity allowed you to glean from afar.

But don't worry, even though your a total piece of shit Jesus still loves you lmao.

Send in the Clowns. Yellen and Garland perform back-to-back surprise visits to Ukraine, Philip Giraldi by Fitter_Happier in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Didn't you hear? The neocons had to drop the Russians did it line after Seymour Hersh spilled the beans, and now conveniently it's been leaked to their favored media outlets that "us intelligence"(which has no reason to lie amirite?) believes it was a ragtag "pro ukrainian" group that just magically pulled it off with no state backing or knowledge. Over 250 feet under under frigid ocean water in the middle of the baltic sea, and they now expect everyone to believe a bunch of ukrainian bubbas perfected the art of deep sea diving, located the exact location of the pipeline, rented a boat packed with explosives they somehow obtained, and dove under 250 feet of water, attaching this shit ton of explosives to the pipeline, somehow setting it off, and then escaping without being detected. And of course no evidence of any of this happening was provided because....reasons.

Trust us goys, when have we ever lied to you about what's happening in Ukraine?! Nothing to see here, case closed. You can stop blaming the US now bigots. Obviously anyone who would doubt such a totally plausible story has to be a Russian shill.

Christians, especially Evangelicals, much more philosemitic than atheists. So much for muh based christian nationalism. by Idoloboretz in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I also love when people try to claim Christians are "based" because rebel flag waving racist rednecks in the South are "evangelicals".

But who actually claims they are "based"? I don't recall any serious dissidents saying this. They may be stupid, they may be gullible, and they may be the target of relentless Jewish hatred, subversion and manipulation, but no one actually says they are in any way based, red pilled, whatever you want to call it.

Now a lot more people are actually Jew aware than we're led to believe, including a lot of Christians. It's mainly just boomers that give money to Israel and say shit like Israel is our greatest ally etc, but younger Christians, especially catholics, tend to be at least nominally aware of Jewish hostility and subversion.

Send in the Clowns. Yellen and Garland perform back-to-back surprise visits to Ukraine, Philip Giraldi by Fitter_Happier in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Jewish obsession with Ukraine just keeps getting creepier. Sending Yellen and Garland to meet with Jewlinsky is just such a bizarre thing to do. Both occupy cabinet positions that are supposed to be concerned with domestic issues, and yet they cant help themselves. Always pushing their global agenda. Always politicizing everything. Always pushing war and more US meddling. That Yellen and Garfinkle are already seen as these jewish globalist caricatures just adds to the clownworld lunacy.

I think they understand the US is heading for collapse so they are increasingly obsessed with regime change in Russia. Controlling and parasitizing off Russia in a post american hegemony world is seen as vital to them, and Putin stands in the way of that.

The closer the US seems to get to collapse, the more desperate they seem to be to milk it for every last bit of world bullying and Jewish global agenda setting they can before it happens, even tho that only ends up accelerating the collapse.

I was talking to a semi based Asian friend recently. One of the few people i talk about this kind of shit to IRL. He thinks the kikes are just detached from reality at this point, and that they pretty much already lost when the internet came about, and all the fucked up, evil masks off shit they’ve been pulling since only digs their hole deeper. Censorship makes them feel better but only hides the steadily growing backlash from their view. Too many goys already know, and all this shit does is add to the number while proving them right. But they just cant help themselves. Jews gonna jew. They couldn't stop even if they wanted to. Their leaders are always going to be the most psychopathic risk taking among them, and they will never stop doubling down.

Do you think trans are a big problem in the US? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It would be great if people would actually speak about who really promotes this trans BS.....

I mean, it's pretty fucking clear who is promoting it. The only question is why?

It’s obvious to me that it's right out of the Frankfurt school playbook, where breaking down western sexual morality is an intentional strategy. I mean several of their 20th century pseudo intellectuals explicitly talked about this kind of thing, and this trannie shit is just the ultimate example of this in action. These people never stop moving the overton window.

Whether Jews are legitimately more into this than others is hard to say for sure, but I'm going to go with it's just another example of them trying to play stupid head games because some of their charlatan Frankfurt gurus called for this and they noticed the most violently militant antifa/censor happy types tend to be trannies.

Like a hundred other disasterous, manipulative failed Jewish ideologies and movements, it's all a bunch of snake oil bullshit that has no real basis in reality. But, thanks to their total media domination, wealth and lobbying power, we’re all being force fed this shit until it eventually backfires bad enough they decide it's no longer in their interests to push it.

At light speed, Einstein's equations break down and nothing makes sense by hfxB0oyA in Physics

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

More like Hilbert's equations. On general relativity, Einstein likely passed Hilbert's work off as his own, or at the very least relied heavily on Hilbert to do the heavy lifting and then refused to give him any credit. It was part of a long standing pattern with Einstein where he piggybacked off the work of others and pretended that he and he alone came up with everything, a notion which the media continues to promote.

Interview with Paul Miller "Gypsy Crusader" by FreakyFalangist in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Seems a little glowy to me. I'd be wary of anyone who wears a skull mask. Even if he's genuine, you have to be careful with people that are these ultra edgy over the top caricatures. Antifa are primarily bait. They intentionally bait people into doing things that will get them doxxed or prosecuted, while the antifa troon goons are protected by Jewish power and wealth.

Belgium’s House of Representatives recognises Holodomor as genocide of Ukrainians.Debunking the"jews control Belgium"narrative. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How do you know this?

He'd have to be pretty stupid not to know or at least suspect. Are you saying Lenin was some totally clueless dumbass? His sister allegedly said he didn't know, but let me let you in on a little secret that might be a shock to you. Jews sometimes lie when it's advantageous to them.

Belgium’s House of Representatives recognises Holodomor as genocide of Ukrainians.Debunking the"jews control Belgium"narrative. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It would make him eligible to immigrate to Israel as a Jew under Israeli law.

Belgium’s House of Representatives recognises Holodomor as genocide of Ukrainians.Debunking the"jews control Belgium"narrative. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just because one or two of the bolsheviks out of 100 people was jewish doesn't make it a jewish conspiracy.

Just one or two eh, is that all it was? lmao.

What are your opinions/rebuttal to these arguments against Holocaust denial? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Nasser....tell us what YOU think actually happened regarding the Holocaust.

WTF happened to TDS/TRS? by send_nasty_stuff in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There is a growing body of hard and overwhelming anecdotal data that the vaccines are dangerous.

Tell me what percentage of people who have taken the vaccine died from it? 20%? 10%? 2%? .02%? .002%? .0002%? The vaccines been out for 2 years now. I want to know what you claim the actual percentage is, because we have a test sample of over 5 billion to go by and its been 2 years since the vax rolled out.

All the people behind the vax are anti white Jews or WEF types that have multiple anti white projects.

ALL of them huh. So anti white Jews plotted to kill Jews en masse, at a greater rate than non Jewish whites since they have a way higher vax rate, because why? You understand this has always been the problem with the covid vaccines are a Jewish plot claim right? Same with the elites. They have taken the vax at a far greater rate than the trailer park bubbas.

Calling the vaccine pushback a 'vague conspiracy' is incredibly misguided and wrong.

Depends on what you mean by vaccine pushback. You can think the vaccines arent sufficiently safe or tested enough for your own personal liking without claiming they were part of some conspiracy to depopulate the planet or whatever the fuck the constantly evolving conspiracy flavor of the month is at the moment.

WTF happened to TDS/TRS? by send_nasty_stuff in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I would never trust anyone who would dumb down or change his views in order to please some audience or appeal to a greater group of people like all these conservative Inc grifters that continue to peddle vague covid vax conspiracies. There's a difference between genuine dissidents who believe in conspiracies when the evidence and logic warrants it, and these conspiracy hobbyists that simply glob on to any movement that will pretend to accept their pet conspiracy theories, some of which are intentionally spread by Jewish shills in order to sow discord and discredit critics.

WTF happened to TDS/TRS? by send_nasty_stuff in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Which is retarded because literally every single normie that's even slightly anti System either regrets or avoided the MRNA shot.

Thats not really true. Most viewed the issue as largely irrelevant aside from some healthy skepticism. The ones obsessed with the issue were generally lolberts, scientifically illiterate conservatards, borderline hypochondriacs, and people being intentionally subversive or grifters trying to cash in on anti vax hysteria or avoid antagonizing their audience.

Leather Apron Club is Wrong - Polygenic Scores Conclusively Indicate Ashkenazi IQ is about 107-112, among other egregious errors and omissions by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

B/c the Wisonsin Jews are actually genetically representative of the Ashkenazi (German) Jews in general, in contrast to the Israeli AJews

Why would that be? Wouldn't Jews in say New York be more representative of ashkenazi Jews overall and Israeli Jews in particular present a larger cross section of them than ones in Wisconsin?

I think it is - but labelling it a "smoking gun" at all combined with the tone of your responses i think exemplifies a general emotional investment in this topic (shared by a lot of people here) that i think that is completely unnecessary. I'll explain

I could quote you numerous times in this discussion where you seem to be claiming this wisconsin study is definitive proof, ie a smoking gun. My use of that term accurately describes how you are presenting a study that doesn't really show anything dramatically different than what we've already seen from the Jewish intelligence crowd who have been repeatedly caught exaggerating unrepresentative and biased studies.

The "high Jewish IQ" argument is extremely problematic for our opponents to make because it is a total capitulation to the racialist/hereditarian view of intelligence.

Not really. The argument is often made independent of race, and the neocons have repeatedly side stepped or even refuted differences in IQ based on race while still arguing Jews are genetically more intelligent.

These facts are devastating to the current multiracial/liberal/anti-white project.

Even if that is true(and I would dispute that), there is still mountains of additional evidence that is equally devastating to their project that they simply censor and ignore, with even more evidence on the way given advances in genetic research.

So, given the perspective and the evidence, it should not be contentious that AJs have a trivial IQ advantage.

A trivial verbal IQ advantage that could largely be explained by environmental factors, yes, but that isnt what you are claiming.

Look, you admit that you believe 20% of IQ can be explained by environment. If there is ANY group on this earth that has THE most advantageous environmental and cultural factors in boosting IQ scores, it is askenazi Jews. By far they have the most accumulated wealth of any group, with all the advantages that would bring. In addition they have a culture that places a huge emphasis on academics and literacy/language ability far above any other group I can think of, again, to their credit.

Given this one would expect that they have maxed out this 20%, and IF that was the case, there are certain things one would expect to see, and we DO see these things. We see higher verbal IQ scores, the part of IQ that is unquestionably the most influenced by environmental/cultural factors, while also seeing slightly below ave non verbal scores, the part of IQ tests that most would agree are the LEAST influenced by environment and the most influenced by genetics. Is this a just a cohencidence? We see wealthier Jews in the west scoring better than relatively poorer Jews in Israel, and before that newly arrived Jewish immigrants to the west who scored lower on such tests but whose descendents saw an apparent rise in IQ scores based on verbal IQ, which again, is what one would expect to see if environmental factors were at play.

You also seem to completely dismiss the point LAC makes that coincides with this, that Jews tend to pile up verbal garbage points in areas that can boost IQ scores but aren't particularly impressive, or important in creating and sustaining successful technologically advanced civilizations from scratch, something ashkenazi Jews have zero track record in doing. This doesn't mean they COULDN'T ever do it, but unlike northern Europeans who HAVE done it, over and over again, it's not evidence in their favor, nor is their continued lower non verbal IQ scores, despite their wealth.

During the early 20th century when inventions were largely carried out by individuals using their own cognitive skill and creativity, rather than corporations and large organizations, which is what we see now, Jews were largely absent. In a Japanese study I saw on the subject of invention, it found people of Scottish ancestry proportionately had a more impressive track record than any group on earth. I believe the English were 2nd. with Germans and other northern European groups also at the top. The English probably CREATED most of the scientific fields we now study, and it takes a lot more intellectual horsepower to create something than simply do well in it after its been established. Full disclosure I am neither Scottish nor German. I'm just a dumb mick who also has no reason to praise the English(I have relatives that would disown me for doing so).

Anecdotally this all matches up with what I've seen personally. Havent been impressed with Jews in terms of intelligence, not even when I viewed them favorably. They do tend to be media junkies, be well read and very academic minded, and to be fair the ones I've known arent exactly elites, but the same could be said of the other groups I've encountered who I'd rank higher in terms of innate intelligence based on personal experience.

WHISTLEBLOWER: "The FBI Doubles Down on Christians and White Supremacy in 2023" sets sights on "Radical Traditionalist Catholics" by FreakyFalangist in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So whatever happened to all these investigations into Merrick Garfinkle weaponizing the justice department the GOP was supposed to launch when they won congress? Doesnt sound like Garfinkle's too worried to me. He knows the GOP is nearly as controlled as the Dems and Mccarthy is a loyal shabbos goy who will never launch any meaningful investigations, which is why they couldn't get rid of him.

Instead we get the GOP playing the same role in the kosher sandwich they always do, going after critics of Israel, supporting neocon warmongering, lowering taxes and regulations on their Jewish donors, and distracting people with the same irrelevant sideshow bullshit.

What do you think of Nick Fuentes? by sneako in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think he's an idiot. Dumb as a box of rocks, but with an overabundance of self confidence, which are the most annoying idiots there are.

Why does the alt right simp for white women so much? by sneako in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a testament to the tolerance of wypipo. I mean the alt right are supposedly some of the most intolerant whites around, and yet they've put up with a level of dumbass trolling for years that some Jew run sub on reddit wouldn't tolerate for more than 2 comments. Probably his first post would have gotten him permanently banned.

Why does the alt right simp for white women so much? by sneako in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Lol this is my view on salos/nasser. No doubt he’s a lying troll, but he’s probably some Puerto rican antifa tranny or some shit. Definitely too dumb to be ashkenazi. Could be mizrahi though.

Leather Apron Club is Wrong - Polygenic Scores Conclusively Indicate Ashkenazi IQ is about 107-112, among other egregious errors and omissions by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Whoa cool it with the antisemitism.