Why aren’t you on Reddit? by TheBlackSun in AskSaidIt

[–]lipsy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Digg is technically still around, although it's owned by an ad placement company now.

What Are The Consequences of another Trump win for American feminism? by eddyelric in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Valid points, thank you. Made some edits.

What Are The Consequences of another Trump win for American feminism? by eddyelric in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think the best approach is to inject into our culture, at every decent opportunity, the fact (••fact••, She said) that institutional DEI ends up working against everybody's interests in the medium to long term.

Not just only against actually marginalized persons, who get punched repeatedly in the face right from the word go (...imagine telling dirt-poor Appalachian White people that they're going to have to spend the rest of their lives going around begging forgiveness for "their whiteness" and their "inherent privilege"... DEI actually fucking DOES that! Literally! It really does!)— but also, eventually, against the ultimate capacity for achievement of those who ARE graded on the DEI curve.

One of my best Friends (22 now, so, educated more-or-less entirely in woo-woo DEI-land) explained it to me thusly: "It almost doesn't matter what kind of work I go into; no matter what, the best I can rlly aspire to is to become seen as "the best Black Female (fill in job title here) out there". I'll never even get a SHOT at being "the best (job title) out there, periodt". Instead of a glass ceiling, it's a Black ceiling now, and damned if it isn't lower than the ceiling for everybody else".

She then went on to point out another cruel little twist, which is that She may well end up becoming "the best (job/hobby/whatever) ever, flat out" among Her friends, family and social circle—i.e., among literally everybody in Her life who ISN'T involved with that pursuit. ...🫤 whereas within Her field of endeavor itself, realistically She'll never be able to shake off the identity adjectives, so those higher tiers of achievement (or at least being recognized for reaching them) are preemptively closed off to Her.

She's absolutely right, of course. DEI encourages historically oppressed minority groups to be complacent, mediocre, and satisfied with "easy mode"—all of which will just perpetuate the effects of that historic oppression. Tyranny of low expectations etc etc. The cycle never breaks until everybody is ultimately measured by the same yardstick (regardless of whether they're given a boost to begin with).

Will Trump END the Gender Madness? | Interview with Kara Dansky by LoveScience in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's a great point, but I want to slap two provisos onto it.

Giving Biden the maximum benefit of the doubt for a sec, that instinct to write diversity mandates into blackletter might just be left over from a bygone era (Joe Biden is Silent Gen—too old even to be an "ok boomer")—back when that was the only real way to strong-arm (real, genuine) diversity past the George Wallaces of the world and into actual reality.

From more of a realpolitik angle, it IS 2024 and the Democratic Party absolutely IS at "peak DEI" (Jesus H. Christ let's hope, at least)—so it's also worth considering whether a critical mass of, or even most, Democratic power players actually think it's a GOOD thing to promote dime-store freeloaders by grading them on the DEI curve—and therefore would actually WANT Joe Biden to begin the process by immediately drawing race and sex boundaries around the candidate pool.

Will Trump END the Gender Madness? | Interview with Kara Dansky by LoveScience in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ah thanks.

Mostly disagree here—I don't think a preemptive commitment to pick a Female and/or minority candidate, all by itself, is enough to brand that candidate as a DEI freeloader. Basically, if demographic group bonafides are used to cross X number of names off of an impossibly long, conflict-laden list of possibilities and then a winner is selected from that shortlist according to actual merits / suitability / QUALIFICATIONS for the job —or (ahem ahem cough cough 2024 dems) wins the job fair and square on a ballot—then in my opinion that's a perfectly ethical, and typically pretty smart, way to choose a candidate.

I'm not going to start j'accuse!-ing somebody as a DEI hanger-on unless that person's trendy identity politics is explicitly trotted out as a reason for their selection —in other words, unless it's just casually thrown out there in the same breath as actual, objectively merit-, expertise- and/or experience-based qualifications/credentials.

What Are The Consequences of another Trump win for American feminism? by eddyelric in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Insofar as it pumps (or—one can dream—slams) the brakes on libfemmery, I'm all for it.

As far as, y'know actual feminism, i.e., radical feminism? well... never in American history have elected officials ever rlly stood for any of the core principles of radical feminism, and I'm not holding my breath for that to change anytime soon. (Most major victories of U.S. radical feminists has been won in the courts, few by legislation or executive/agency fiat.) So rlly it's mostly neither here nor there which party holds the reins.

Will Trump END the Gender Madness? | Interview with Kara Dansky by LoveScience in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The simple act of considering whether Trump might be the lesser evil in this election does not make you a Trump supporter and not a feminist

It certainly doesn't. It just means that You're voting against the other candidate, more than You're voting FOR "Your" candidate—where those are equally valid types of motivation, just like both carrots and sticks count for something everywhere else in life.

In fact, i have this pet theory that the average voter is MORE likely to end up casting a vote in Her/his own best interests if She/he heads to the polls with the explicit intention of protest-voting against the other candidate—basically because there's no chance of any stan/fanboi effect where the voter's judgment is clouded by infatuation or fandom-style excitement. Just more likely to be a clear-headed vote, is all.

Will Trump END the Gender Madness? | Interview with Kara Dansky by LoveScience in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

wUt? when was this....???

I'm not going to mind-read anybody, but I WILL yell from the rooftops that Kamala Harris—regardless of whether she was ever chosen as a "DEI hire"—absolutely represents all of the skin-deep, fundamentally fake "diversity" that's been codified into DEI programs. Like, okay, so half her lineage is Afro-Caribbean, fine—but Harris is a petit-bourgeois, double faculty brat from Berkeley, who was raised with every structural and familial advantage imaginable and then some, who has NEVER faced the kind of adversity that diversification initiatives of the 80s/90s were once scrupulously designed to help genuinely disadvantaged persons overcome.

She's pretty closely analogous to the Black students who get into elite U.S. universities with DEI boosts even though they're literal princesses or scions of cheiftains in their home country in Africa. Boosting the credentials of persons like that isn't just fake diversity; it's an active injustice (kinda like "legacy" admissions, but that's a whole 'nother conversation).

That weird jive-turkey accent she inexplicably drifted in and out of, at rallies where enough Black people were in the audience, REALLY did her no favors with Black voters in Compton or Lynwood or north/east Long Beach (nor probably any other Black neighborhood in America). It's ilke, look lady... if there's ONE group of people who KNOW you're not African American, KNOW you're not from the hood, and absolutely do not expect or want you to pretend you're from the hood... that would be, um, Black people from the hood? What a profound embarrassment smh. That specific cringemaxxing cost Harris the votes of several Black people I know personally, so, imagine how many hundreds of thousands of Black votes she hemorrhaged across the country from that. Just be yourself, it can't be that hard.

The instant I saw this I knew it was a TIM, before I even read the username. No woman would ever write something like this by googlyeyes6 in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm American (born and raised through childhood abroad, but I've been here in the states for a minute now). Yr question is kinda funny because I've set foot in exactly two Bath & Body Works in my life, and those were in Kuala Lumpur and Metro Manila. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Took me a loooooonnnggg moment to decipher "BBW", too lol.

—BUT— I think I know what You're talking about now—My dentist's office hands out complimentary mini bottles of Purell that are encased in these neon-colored like... geodesic cage type thingys made of silicone? So if You mean those, then yeah. Fellow bro😅

What the “Most Anti-LGBTQ” Election in Decades Means for Trans People by WrongToy in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sir, I'm heterosexual, and this is a Wendy's.

.

you being bitter you no longer have the power to center yourself as the most precious, vulnerable and important person in any problem that affects everyone

Well aren't you fucking cute. Assuming you're still pissing your deep-seated mommy issues all over Lesbians here, please remember that radical-feminist Lesbians over here—on planet earth—have alws predominantly been political separatists i.e., the exact polar opposite of wanting to insinuate or crowbar themselves into everybody else's business.

Will Trump END the Gender Madness? | Interview with Kara Dansky by LoveScience in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hahaha. I work in a blue-collar trade, and I'd probably need a Y-shaped stick and a big helping of divine intervention to dig up ONE person in my trade who voted Dem this year. And I'm in Southern California.

The Mexican-Amerlcans in my ≈55% Latino, ≈40-45% Mex-Am neighborhood also flipped red in maaaddd numbers this year. Lemme tell You all, this had every bit as much—if not more—to do with being "latinx"ed for 2-3 solid fucking years, and just unceremoniously dumped into the same mental bucket as Cubans in Florida (and even Tejano Mexican-Americans in the Rio Grande Valley, who are nothing like Californios politically), from afar by Dems who were just too good to ever show up here and MEET them, than it ever had to do with staunch Catholic social conservatism[§].

You know who came here to meet Californio Mexicans? Donald Trump came here. He also went to the South Bronx, East Oakland, 3rd Ward New Orleans, Orange Mound, and Opa-Locka to hang out with Black voters and just... talk to them, and LISTEN to them.

.

.

.

[§]: Zzzlong as we're here... Imputing "staunch Catholic social conservatism" to the average Mexican (or to the average Mexican immigrant to the US, or to the average Mexican-American—n.b. these are three wildly different average profiles) is another colossal fuck-up. In the same way you don't rlly find U.S. revanchist Evangelical "prepper" weirdos with 64 guns and 7 teeth apiece outside that one mostly-empty blotch of Idaho and Montana, you don't rlly find a whole lot of staunchly conservative, devoutly Catholic influence on Mexican politics outside the Frontera Norte — i.e., the strip of northern states along the Calif/Arizona/N.M./Texas border. (Sure there are more devout Catholics all across Mexico than you can shake a stick at, but, outside of the Frontera Norte, they tend to maintain a commitment to secular politics, as most Catholics worldwide have done for centuries.)

Just so that nobody reading this comment underestimates juuuust how different the Frontera Norte is from the entire rest of Mexico: When the Mexican Supreme Court decreed the legalization of same sex marriage in 2009 (n.b.: six years earlier than this happened in the USA), there was a genuinely earnest Nortexit movement—where, for a tenuous few months, that northern strip of Catholic Redoubt states came VERY close to declaring secession and independence from the rest of Mexico. It didn't ultimately happen, of course, but the point is... MOST of Mexico is not at all a Catholic so-con haven, and indeed the US itself has lagged behind its southern neighbor on iconic liberal social causes like LGB rights. (Mexico has the same system of federalism as the USA, with states making and enforcing almost all their own laws—in fact, Mexico's constitution was very closely and deliberately modeled on the American one—so there's the same wild diversity of political valences among Mexican states as there is among U.S. states. At least two states in southern Mexico, Guerrero and Oaxaca, are even more trans-captured than Washington state or California has ever been, if You can believe that!)

Will Trump END the Gender Madness? | Interview with Kara Dansky by LoveScience in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

(Oooh, hello lipsy! So nice to see you. This is TortoiseMouse)

Hey Girlfriend. ❤︎

.

Wow, the Democrats really made a lot of mistakes, huh

Yuuup. And so far, insanely enough, they just seem to be doubling down on exactly those mistakes—with a special emphasis on all of THE LEAST popular planks in their platform (ahem ahem cough cough men in Women's and Girls' sports cough cough SNORT).

Maybe it's some sort of short-term face-saving thing? My gawd do I ever hope it is, because if this represents the ongoing direction of the Dem party for any sort of medium to long term, they'll never win another federal election ever again (and if we have a couple extra drinks and start daringly extrapolating everything in straight lines, even California will come home to Reagan's and Nixon's GOP within 12 years).

Will Trump END the Gender Madness? | Interview with Kara Dansky by LoveScience in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's more than just sneaking dicks into every imaginable Women's and Girls' space (and children's too, soon enough—the party alrdy embrances openly pro-pedophilic legislators like Leigh Finke of Minnesota, who is also a TIM because of course he fucking is).

You can't do that without censoring more-or-less every imaginable at-scale channel of communication that We the People have, so, the Dems have dutifully been hurtling towards being the party of neo-Stalinist mass censorship like good little catamites and handmaidens, with almost the same insane level of commitment with which they've alrdy fashioned themselves into the purveyors and pushers of neo-Lysenkoism (gender ideology and associated packs of lies).

I'm essentially some linear combination of a secular classical liberal and a pro-labor populist—so, pretty much exactly what the Democratic Party and American "liberalism" stood for between apprx. 1900-1980—so, frankly, I'm overjoyed to see the 2024 Dems get their asses kicked up and down the block and then handed to them on a platter. There's just no way the party is going back to anything like its ACTUALLY liberal former self until its current incarnation is completely gutted.

Will Trump END the Gender Madness? | Interview with Kara Dansky by LoveScience in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

not voting in Harris in the proper way (I didn't know about that)

Which is/was a far greater issue because, in 2020 when Harris DID run in the Democratic primaries for president (the nomination eventually won by Biden), she finished dead last—IIRC the only primary candidate to secure a grand total of zero delegates for the nomination... And moreover, Harris has had the lowest running average approval rate of any Vice President since the advent of modern polling.

So, generously, Harris was a totally unproven candidate—BOTH on the federal level, AND against any actual Republican opponent. (In the elections that Harris won for San Francisco district attorney and U.S. Senator, her only opponents were other Democrats.)
Less generously, the only available datapoints for her viability as a candidate for president indicate that she was a BAD candidate.

What the “Most Anti-LGBTQ” Election in Decades Means for Trans People by WrongToy in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You alws have the right to refuse treatment from any given clinician, regardless of Your reasons. In response, the facility would be legally within their rights to tell You to go seek treatment elsewhere (possible exceptions for A&E/ER settings where care is needed stat), but You would absolutely have a huge lawsuit on Your hands if any healthcare provider tried to compel or coerce You to accept treatment from a provider You weren't comfortable with.

This writeup comes from an oncology context, but I'm not seeing anything in there that wouldn't apply equally well to obGyn. Also, the scope of that write-up extends all the way to patient refusals that clearly ARE bigoted, racist, etc.

What the “Most Anti-LGBTQ” Election in Decades Means for Trans People by WrongToy in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

is there any evidence that Trump or Vance are actually anti-gay, anti-lesbian, or anti-bisexual?

Only an administration full of raging homophobic bigots would mount a whole campaign FOR gay rights, focusing on the parts of the world where that challenge was greatest. Obvi.

What the “Most Anti-LGBTQ” Election in Decades Means for Trans People by WrongToy in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's funny that you'd choose the WBC of all things for a comparison. They've alws excelled at choosing the most vile words imaginable for their protests—but they've also been 100% non-violent, and their protests NEVER went beyond making scenes at public events (or at least, events held IN public).

Trans activists—with their hair-trigger violence (by men, alws perpetrated upon Women... typical cowards, never taking on an evenly matched fight) and their obsession with trying to sabotage people's private lives and livelihoods—make the WBC look like angels by comparison.

The instant I saw this I knew it was a TIM, before I even read the username. No woman would ever write something like this by googlyeyes6 in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

•_______•

how do you do fellow... bros?

The instant I saw this I knew it was a TIM, before I even read the username. No woman would ever write something like this by googlyeyes6 in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

What is a "hand sanitizer holder"?

TIM university basketball player Harriette Mackenzie criticized for playing on women's team; female player pushes him by CeruleanCarbon in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

We're just rlly good at hiding the bodies. And at bluffing/covering for those of us who hide the bodies.

Whoops, I probably wasn't supposed to say that

Believe data, not activists: Transgenderism among kids is mostly a fad by bluetinfoilhat in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's not just 'a fad' if it leaves you sterilized, mutilated, or otherwise damaged for life, or if it robs you of any semblance of halfway normal adolescent socialization.

Sarah McBride Becomes First Openly Transgender Member of Congress by allenwrench in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Last few years I've noticed this trend of renaming them "the Framers". (Surely You've seen this too; it's everywhere.) This never occurred to me until now, but is that (among other things) an attempt at "de-gendering" them?

Sarah McBride Becomes First Openly Transgender Member of Congress by allenwrench in GenderCritical

[–]lipsy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Second place or worse in the embarrassment sweepstakes compared to Germany, where there's more than one super clowny tr00n in the Bundestag and basically everybody has just played along with the whole act (even years before the recent laws that hand out €10,000 fines for "misgendering").

Oh, and, over in the UK... the first real-life South Park character in parliament was a Tory of all things.

flip out over "misgendering"

You mean like this?