How pathetic is it that LGBDropTheT is still private? by aHobbitsTale in LGB_Discussions

[–]jay-day 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's still being private is really funny though. I know that them dogpiling me because I'm a gold star was what caused it but I didn't know that me bringing up homophobia in the radfem community was also an issue. Gay men also did that, were they also kicked out?

/s/LGBDropTheT is private right now by cqtz in whatever

[–]jay-day 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep. I vividly remember as soon as I wrote I've always known, and I have never been with men, the avalanche of comments started. It still kind of hurts because several of them were my friends, they helped me when my insomnia was worse than usual, they helped me get through my grandfather passing away in October, and they would take the time out of their day to check up on me, but they turned on me so quickly. Even after I supported and defended the LGB several times for six months it still wasn't enough, the group just assumed I was an awful person.

The irony is that many people in that group believe they are better than the Wokies.

/s/LGBDropTheT is private right now by cqtz in whatever

[–]jay-day 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This would be the 50th time some lesbian left but this time and every time this happens, they cant imagine a lesbian not being as retarded as them in their man hating politics so it must be the illuminati or some psyop...even though this would be lesbian #50 doing this.

It's weirdly comforting that I wasn't the only one lol.

/s/LGBDropTheT is private right now by cqtz in whatever

[–]jay-day 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not sure why the mod "went nuclear." It lasted for about a day in a half, and it didn't spill out into other posts, it was mostly directed at me, and she only messaged me twice to take my stuff down, and had very brief dms with me later on. The later messages we had in dms she didn't seem as if she was completely pissed off or anything. I'm not sure what happened with her. Or why she would have been this upset over any of this. Some here are saying she's an incel, idk I never really interacted with her before.

The part of "One woman was talking about how some lesbians take a while to feel comfortable admitting they have 0 interest in men" isn't exactly true. It was one user having a very different conversation from my post with me over how she slept with men and how she has "lesbian" friends that suck dick when they're drunk, she then asked me when I came out, I answered, mentioned how I've never been with men, and that seemingly set off a wave of users there talking about having sex with men and other things. The post I made wasn't about any of this, it was just about the user platypus saying there were "two types" of lesbians, one being fine with sleeping with men. But, other users began hounding me about sleeping with men, and one user started asking me about how not all lesbians are revolted about dick and why I would have a problem with that. Dicks weren't mentioned at all, I'm still not sure why she thought about that lol. This kept going and I did have a break down, as shown here, because at the time I had no idea why I kept getting wave after wave of comments some of them were like interrogations, some dms asking me about very personal details, others were claiming I said things I didn't say, and others were accusing me of hating them. Whenever I replied back to those accusations the other person would move the goal post, and make it about something else, again. Looking back, it was the first one that commented the two paragraphs that derailed the conversation, and made it about something else, while I was still talking about the ovarit post. I, at the time, thought having a screenshot, and even a link to the conversation, on what I was referring to would have prevented misunderstandings but I was wrong. I got overwhelmed with the massive mob that was after me, many of them were my friends taking part in it. I'm not sure if it was the first or second post but one of them got to 70 comments. I made a post explaining the situation, but TumbleweedFireflies in a couple of minutes took it down, and said "You don't accept anyone other than "gold star" as being a lesbian, and that's OK. But you don't get to bring that battle here. You don't get to throw a tantrum when others have compassion for late-bloomers, you don't get to blame lesbians for internalized homophobia or comphet, you don't get to prescribe intent and put words in our users mouths that they didn't say, and you sure as hell don't get to invalidate lesbian struggles growing up and recognizing their homosexuality just because it didn't match your timeline or awareness. You can be true to yourself without gaslighting everyone here..." Again, as you can seen in the screenshot it was about "there being two types of lesbians" that I was talking about, not anything she mentioned. I wasn't even thinking about the gold star stuff, I never even talked about it before this mess happened, I wasn't talking about any of that with the original post. She allowed my angst post on how I don't want to be a lesbian anymore to stay up for a day and a half, in which several users there were saying they were happy about, but my post trying to get the mob off of me was taken down. I think I have my defense post saved somewhere. I tried to get the post back up because the messages got worse, and that the mod was accusing me of saying things I didn't say, and the one person that was on my side messaged her about it. She accused him of being me, and instantly banned him. Afterwards, I don't know what she did or said. I don't get why she went off. Or why she even cares.

But, I was surprised when my friend messaged me about the sub being made private. It didn't effect the group at all. It's not that big of a deal.

All of this from one post I made about two short comments I thought the group would have a laugh at. Despite all of the hate I've gotten, I do hope the group is brought back, hopefully not with the incel mod this time. I still agree with the movement, even if that one group is filled with jackasses.

Anyway, thanks for reading. I wrote this out after seeing this, sorry if it's a bit all over the place.

*Edit: I forgot the mention in my dms with TumbleweedFireflies I said what she was accusing me of was slander at that point, and she agreed with it(?). Told me to get a lawyer. https://imgur.com/8WRcjlq

More lesbophobia from Ovarit. This time from the Loving Women circle. by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The first woman was saying there are two types of lesbians, they weren't talking about social conditioning they were stating some lesbians are ok with having sex with men, that what she wrote. If she was talking about what your projecting she wouldve said that, not that there is a "type of lesbian." The other one admitted she was wrong later, just saw that right now, so I'll leave her out.

The first one said there's a distinction and then "lesbians who aren't repulsed by sex with men." You put that in her mouth. Never said anything about pressure or being made to. Just that some lesbians are fine having sex with men. Which to me is lesbophobic, but people here say it's true so

I wonder why everyone commenting about this keeps moving the goal post btw. I've stayed by position but everyone keeps saying I said other things or talking about things that weren't what the post was about. It wasn't

  1. About societal pressure
  2. Experimenting
  3. Liking dick

It was about how there isn't two types of lesbians, that being one that is fine with sleeping with men. You and huffle made it about those things, because idk why insecure about sleeping with men?

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or perhaps you aren't stating your grievances very clearly? You posted those two comments in your thread about lesbophobia on Ovarit and I, like everyone else, was left scratching my head over what was so 'phobic about it.

It was a screenshot of a Ovarit user saying some lesbians are fine with having sex with men. Wtf. You guys are either so deep in the woke homophobia, or you aren't exclusively same-sex attracted. I guess you just don't like me calling that bs out because you all agree with it.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah anyone can see it https://imgur.com/3IG3Y8F

No mention of dick, just you. Everyone can see your replies as well.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I mean, if you want to redefine yourself just because some women who call themselves lesbians don't feel exactly the same way you do, suit yourself.

Well it's constantly happening every day lesbians saying they have sex with men, even here people are supporting it. So yeah, lesbian means bi now, I'm not bi.

I've been out as a lesbian for the past 17 years, and I promise you, no one has showed up to my house and tried to shove a dick down my throat just because a handful of bisexual women have appropriated the label.

I never said that. Just lesbian has lost it meaning, and it just means bisexual now. I think everyone commenting on this just wants to take me out of context. Also, it's not just a handful of bi women, it's cute you think that tho. I also like that you agree these are bi women, k.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Just so everyone knows the post is still up, and you can see how she brought up lesbian being ok with having sex with men out of nowhere, and how she hasn't stop talking about her and her friends having sex with men to me and on my posts. The original post was about a bisexual woman said there are two types of lesbians, one being fine with being with men, I thought it was bs. Huffle defended it, then a bunch of lesbians said they sleep with men, and are fine with it.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is a percentage of women who are completely homosexual and did sleep with men, for a variety of reasons which do not include sexual attraction and pleasure. Some did it in order to conform,others because they wanted a family and others because they were in a very deep denial,others because they did not want to hurt their parents etc.In some countries you can bet they did it in order to survive.That does not mean they were "fine" sleeping with men.

Initial post didn't talk about this at all, it's still up so people can see how you're blatantly lying. You didn't even say any of this in your comments. Your original comment was "I do not see any lesbophobia and I belong to the lesbian-repulsed-by-dick category. Care to explain why is it lesbophobic to point out that some lesbians are not repulsed by dick ,it just does nothing for them sexually?" Even though the original post didn't talk about dick. I guess you were just thinking about it at the time. Which most lesbians seem to do now. Why I'm not a lesbian anymore.

And then when I got tired of it all and said I'm no longer calling myself a lesbian you cheered it on. Just remember I'm still more of a lesbian than them for not ever sleeping with men, didn't give into homophobic views, and always knowing I'm attracted solely to women. The initial post wasn't about this, you and everyone else made it about this. Have fun with the lesbian community, sleeping with men, thinking about them and dating them. I'm going to be with women.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think this is the heart of where we disagree. I don't think a lesbian can be "not a lesbian". Female homosexuals are lesbians whether we ever accept it or not. Whether we want to be part of the "lesbian community" or not.

I want nothing to do with them. Too much of talk about having sex with men. Lesbian doesn't mean any of that anymore.

It was never an attack on you or gold stars, just a defense of non-gold star lesbians.

I never said you attack me, just defend lesbians being fine with having sex with men, like the initial post said. I know you defended lesbians sleeping with men. I never talked about anything you said in that post, at all. YOU brought that up, because YOU have to push having sex with men onto everything and everyone else. YOU haven't stopped talking about having sex with men to me and on my posts. I don't care that you sleep with men, but keep it to yourself, I don't want to hear it. Be around "lesbian" that have sex with men as much as you want, just leave me out of it. You're apart of the problem.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Like I said "The quick, in a matter of minutes, responses of me saying that lesbians can't be fine with having sex with men, with a wave of saying they've had sex with men, or they don't mind or don't find men repulsive, which got worse when I said I've never been with men, says otherwise. If that community is full of women who have been with men and are fine with it, or who become defensive when a woman is has not been involved with men, if that's what the lesbian community is about, I want nothing to do with them. I'm not going to sleep with men, ever. They won, they can have the word "lesbian." That community is full of women discussing having sex with men, men, and is pointless anyway." I never said anything that you mentioned in any of those posts. But guess what? It was still filled with how they had sex with men, and they pursued men, and were fine with it.

implying that the definition of "lesbian" itself should be expanded to include women who seek out and enjoy having sex with men

If lesbians can have sex with men and be fine with it, then they have extended the meaning to include that, great job everyone. As you said "I think the point of contention is with the idea that not all lesbians have an active aversion to men and heterosexual intercourse to the point that it would be repulsive and potentially traumatizing to even attempt it." Never even said anything about that either. But if lesbians are fine with having sex with men, then that's apart of being a lesbian. I'm not ever going to be apart of that community again. It's just about having sex with men anyway, so I'm done. I only like women, I only want to be with women, I've only been with women, the lesbian community isn't about that anymore. I'm done. I tired of hearing about having sex with men or dating men. Lesbian now just means bi or febfem, not for me.

Like I said lesbians can talk about having sex with men all they want now. I'm not going to be apart of the lesbian community anymore. I'm not calling myself a lesbian anymore. I don't consider myself a lesbian anymore. I fully believe there isn't hope for lesbians now.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The amount of comments of people talking about lesbians having sex with men just proves my point. The lesbian community is this now. I really wished you stop talking about sleeping with men. Take it somewhere else, away from me.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Like I said with Red- I've come to realization that even though I don't call myself a lesbian anymore I'm still more of a lesbian than them for not ever sleeping with men, didn't give into homophobic views, and always knowing I'm attracted solely to women lol.

You have your community of women that are fine sleeping with men. Have fun.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't care anymore. You defended them, you started the whole conversation that sent a bunch people after me for saying lesbians don't like having sex with men. Apparently lesbians are fine with being with men, and it's normal. I'm not a lesbian anymore. You and other lesbians can talk about having sex with men all you want. I'm done with this. I'm not a lesbian. I've left the community.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's about being repulsed (pushed away) or turned off by men, and being attracted to women. Febfems aren't lesbians by definition. Lesbians aren't into men, or I thought that's what it meant. If "lesbians" are fine with men, then it's not a group for me. No offense, truly, but you're bi and I don't think you can really understand how this feels to have "your own" tell you you're some kind of outlier, or that lesbians can be with men. You have a bigger group and more people you can relate to, I don't, 'lesbian' have lost all meaning, my community thinks I weird for not being with men, and me saying lesbians aren't fine with sleeping with men is controversial. There's no point anymore. I'm not sleeping with men, I haven't slept with men, the "lesbian" community isn't for me.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for the supportive comment. I've come to realization that even though I don't call myself a lesbian anymore I'm still more of a lesbian than them for not ever sleeping with men, *didn't give into homophobic views, and always knowing I'm attracted solely to women lol.

Even though lesbian is supposed to mean a homosexual woman the "lesbian" community is filled with women that have been with men and were fine with it, *even view it as a natural process of being a lesbian, or they never knew they liked women, and constant discussions about how they slept with men. That's not me. They can have that weirdly men centric community.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

that means it's still an option for you, you just don't have a PREFERENCE for it.

Bisexual with a preference for a certain sex.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Athelhilda4: I’ve never thought of it this way, and I agree. Sometimes I feel that the born this way narrative and the stories of gay people who knew they were gay at six year olds has created a culture where late bloomers are met with suspicion. Not everyone has a strong sex drive with obvious attraction.

MyLongestJourney: I do not see any lesbophobia and I belong to the lesbian-repulsed-by-dick category. Care to explain why is it lesbophobic to point out that some lesbians are not repulsed by dick ,it just does nothing for them sexually?

The quick, in a matter of minutes, responses of me saying that lesbians can't be fine with having sex with men, with a wave of saying they've had sex with men, or they don't mind or don't find men repulsive, which got worse when I said I've never been with men, says otherwise. If that community is full of women who have been with men and are fine with it, or who become defensive when a woman is has not been involved with men, if that's what the lesbian community is about, I want nothing to do with them. I'm not going to sleep with men, ever. They won, they can have the word "lesbian." That community is full of women discussing having sex with men, men, and is pointless anyway.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've accepted that the "lesbian" community is filled with bisexual women and men now. The word has lost its meaning. I don't think I'll call myself homosexual in casual conversation because its not really used like that where I am, most people, even other gay people would probably give me a weird look. So right now I'll just say gay. Looking back I noticed when I said "I'm gay" men stopped pursuing me fully, so that's a plus. I know "gold star lesbian" is a thing, but my God people hate them, I don't need more of that right now, and I'm just tired with the "lesbian" community currently.

I wonder if when they said "ok" with sleeping with men they meant like, "if there were a gun to my head" or "if I had to be a prostitute as to not die in the cold"? I don't think I could stomach it personally but perhaps some women are more able to momentarily put aside their feelings of disgust and discomfort in dire circumstances than I am. I don't think that makes them better than you or I, seems rather pointless in developed countries.

Are you referring to the Ovarit post or the comments? Or both?

On second thought I'll call myself a gold star here, just to make some people mad lol.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm happy I never did that to myself. I never forced myself to do something disgusting.

I'm done by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

More lesbophobia from Ovarit. This time from the Loving Women circle. by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It just sounds like those are bisexuals again. This just reminds me of homophobes telling lesbians to sleep with both men and women to be a 100% sure. Even if they never had a crush on a woman, the lack of attraction, being uninterested, and the discomfort with men should be present. If they've been interested, attracted, and/or comfortable dating and sleeping with men, they're bi, but they may prefer women.

More lesbophobia from Ovarit. This time from the Loving Women circle. by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think pressure from society will make lesbians say or do stuff like that. Your friends just seem like their bi. I really think we need to stop letting this stuff slide, experiencing homophobia doesn't mean they can be homophobic. When we let this stuff slide they just continue it. They were in college so they were adults, they had all that time to figure it out.

I've been out since 15, never was attracted to or was comfortable with the idea of being with men before that, never been attracted to men or have been comfortable with the idea of being with men afterwards. I didn't need to figure out I didn't like them, it's just how I've always felt.

More lesbophobia from Ovarit. This time from the Loving Women circle. by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The two commenters said lesbians can be ok with sleeping with men, which no, lesbians aren't ok with sleeping with men. All lesbians are not attracted to men. It's simple. The fact I have to type this out twice in the span of a couple of minutes shows me this is a bigger problem that I originally thought.

More lesbophobia from Ovarit. This time from the Loving Women circle. by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

with a man or that they'd be willing to suck dick if they were drunk

Yeah, no. That's not what lesbians do or would be fine with. Your friends are just lesbophobic, and aren't lesbians. *It's also horrible they're saying stuff like that. It's a big reason why men harass lesbians. We give way too much lenience to lesbophobic women. I hate that this is so common, and so many of us just let it slide, it's partly why we're in this mess of erasure.

Maybe it's just me, but I've never had any doubt, even just the thought makes me uncomfortable and disgusted.

More lesbophobia from Ovarit. This time from the Loving Women circle. by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Platypus is openly bisexual. Femlez34 is a "lesbian" but has said things that suggest otherwise, talks about her ex-boyfriend often, seems to be a political "lesbian."

Based on their comment history.

More lesbophobia from Ovarit. This time from the Loving Women circle. by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Stop Hiding behind Gender Identity! (How has this not been removed yet?) by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I won’t lie, I handled it poorly. I threw up all over my own bed… literally threw up…

I'd say he handled it in a reasonable way. Finding out your "partner" has been 1: lying about who they are. 2: has attempted to r/pe you through deception. 3: trying to make you change your sexual orientation. Yes, that would make anyone sick to their stomach.

I hope he's doing better now. My God...

Miss Seahorse Regrets by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah this is definitely a parody. The- Pink 'News' instead of PinkNews. The date saying May the 24rd of MAY. It's funny af tho lol

"Lesbians flirt with me everywhere I go" 🤣 by DickFreeBacon in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 20 insightful - 12 fun20 insightful - 11 fun21 insightful - 12 fun -  (0 children)

https://imgur.com/a/lAMbUZP 😭

It reinforces my belief that straight men can't tell the difference from being friendly/polite, and flirting.

Day 1 of Volunteering at My LGBT Group. It’s Mostly Trans and Nb People by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Probably because doing traditionally "boy" activities not anything as controversial or objectionable as identifying as the other sex.

She said her father had her do the "boy activities" because she was more physically capable than her brothers. Which yeah, you sometimes need help with work. Does she think her father thought "well she's a female so I can't have her mow the lawn...maybe she's not really a woman after all." Most of the time people are willing to give jobs to a healthy, and able person regardless of sex. But no, she skipped all of that and went to surgeries because women=weak. The sexism, the misogyny.

Turns out she isn't younger than me, she's two years older than me. Will update that info.

Day 1 of Volunteering at My LGBT Group. It’s Mostly Trans and Nb People by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I am be gutsy, but not that gutsy. There's an LGB/t anime group here. Not touching that. I have my limits.

Because no gay man ever disagrees with the gender cult by DickFreeBacon in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

The comment section is a trip: https://imgur.com/a/HicQO3W

Asking 958 Cisgender People if They Would Date a Trans Person by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is the most recent study I could find with this large a group and that I didn't have to pay to view the article. If anyone knows of any that have been done recently, I'd love to see them.

(Warning: SA mention) I’m So Happy! The Email I Sent About the Reddit Lesbian R•pe Fantasy Group Was Published on the Website Women Are Humans! They Even Included Links to the Usernames! by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Important thing to note. The username of aimless is spelt correctly but they linked to another user that has the same name but without the dash. I emailed them about that with the link to the correct user.

Update It's been corrected.

(Warning: SA mention) I’m So Happy! The Email I Sent About the Reddit Lesbian R•pe Fantasy Group Was Published on the Website Women Are Humans! They Even Included Links to the Usernames! by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's on the front page, and everything. I'm so glad I reached out to them, I was starting to think they'd just ignored it.

Day 1 of Volunteering at My LGBT Group. It’s Mostly Trans and Nb People by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When the woman asked for any names I go by I got confused because my full name, nickname in "" and last name were on the zoom call. So I just said my nickname again and she said "OK, but any other names?" And I said "no?". They looked all confused lol. It took me late in the meeting to figure out why she was asking lol. I knew about pronouns thing but I haven't heard much about the chosen name stuff.

Day 1 of Volunteering at My LGBT Group. It’s Mostly Trans and Nb People by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If I had to guess, I'd say the 30-year-old and possibly the NB gay man would freak out. I'm not 100% sure on the NB gay man's because he seems to want please everyone. We'll see what happens, can't rule out anything.

Day 1 of Volunteering at My LGBT Group. It’s Mostly Trans and Nb People by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If I get to help other LGB people I'll deal with it. Where I live there isn't much of an LGB community, so it's very isolating.

Day 1 of Volunteering at My LGBT Group. It’s Mostly Trans and Nb People by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a program at my college. It's for gathering, and advocacy for LGB/t students.

[Re-uploaded] Ovarit’s Treatment of Lesbians: Blatant Lesbophobic and Homophobic Rhetoric. Site-Wide Bans and Purges of Lesbian Members by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

got a bit tired about several things as I am not really a 'good good radfem'

Something, something, class consciousness. Something, something, political purity. That's what they always say. Sounds nicer than "don't criticize us" I guess.

[Re-uploaded] Ovarit’s Treatment of Lesbians: Blatant Lesbophobic and Homophobic Rhetoric. Site-Wide Bans and Purges of Lesbian Members by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Stay amazing friend ❤️

[Re-uploaded] Ovarit’s Treatment of Lesbians: Blatant Lesbophobic and Homophobic Rhetoric. Site-Wide Bans and Purges of Lesbian Members by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Right now we're doing everything through zoom calls, so at least it's not in person for now. My first interview the guy asked for my pronouns, not the worse thing, but it gives me a peak on what'll be like. Who knows, maybe it won't be so bad, best to stay optimistic.

sad news about a gay relative of mine by ThaMitchie in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry about all of this. Maybe we can do something here in memory of him? Or a fundraiser for the funeral arrangements?

[Re-uploaded] Ovarit’s Treatment of Lesbians: Blatant Lesbophobic and Homophobic Rhetoric. Site-Wide Bans and Purges of Lesbian Members by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I thought you were bi because of the symbol next to your name so I was confused for a bit lol. I guess keep doing what you're doing, spread the word, and if you're able support any LGB Alliance group. Thanks for your allyship! I not used to straight people caring unless they're related to a LGB person

How Ovarit feels about homosexual parenthood by stunaep in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He is. I've know him since freshmen year of high school, so eight years now I think. We became friends because we were both bullied hard for being the few openly gay kids. His brother, and some of his family are supportive, and my parents are supportive of gay people so they just kind of adopted him. I don't really have a lot of family members, at all, so he didn't need to go through the coming out process with a different family. Gays got to stick together.

Marriage equality isn’t about LGB people. It’s about *checks notes* disabled people. by julesburm1891 in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 7 insightful - 9 fun7 insightful - 8 fun8 insightful - 9 fun -  (0 children)

L: Non-men loving men (males)

G: Fujoshis

B: pansexual, omnisexuals, queers (straights)

T: idk

D: Disabled people

+: Straight people

[Re-uploaded] Ovarit’s Treatment of Lesbians: Blatant Lesbophobic and Homophobic Rhetoric. Site-Wide Bans and Purges of Lesbian Members by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're very authoritarian. The homophobia and horseshoe sexism is "shut up lesbo I know what's good for you!"

It's why we need to grow the LGB drop the T movement, so we don't have to rely on any outsiders. I just applied (and was accepted) to volunteer at an LGBT organization to help the LGBs in my area, and to hopefully passively change minds. Find some fence sitters and help steer them away from the homophobic sexists gendie stuff. See how it goes.

[Re-uploaded] Ovarit’s Treatment of Lesbians: Blatant Lesbophobic and Homophobic Rhetoric. Site-Wide Bans and Purges of Lesbian Members by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Radfem motto is "The personal is political" so no matter what, everything is political. A person is a political statement, their actions, beliefs, existence, etc. Because everything is a political statement, they may be acting in opposition to another political viewpoint, which is also an attack on them. If lesbians aren't human beings that can believe in a variety of different things, they're just a political group that means all lesbians (a political group in their eyes) can be opposition to their politics, since it's a choice they're choosing to be anti-whatever radfem beliefs. You can see lesbians going from human beings that just happen to be homosexual to 'lesbians' being "anti or pro certain political beliefs." Or:"Gay men are just misogynists so gay men are anti-women." Instead of: a gay man can just so happen to be a misogynist but there is nothing inherent to being a gay man with being misogynistic, because gay men are human beings therefore can vary in beliefs and so on.

"The personal is political" If used excessively, it can be very dehumanizing. You are no longer a person; you have become a political statement. You're more of a billboard than anything at that point. Because radical feminists have a long history of politicizing lesbians (see political "lesbians"), this commonly happens with us. Lesbians are just mega radical feminists that sleep with women because f•ck the patriarchy. Instead of just lesbians being homosexual.

Of course, all parties are guilty of this, putting their politics above humanity. They become so engrossed in politics that they lose sight of the fact everyone's a person not an walking ideology. We must fight oppression, erasure and trans people forcing themselves on others, but we must all remember that not everything/everyone is a walking political statement. It's sometimes just about basic human decency, being able to say "no" to sexual advances without being called a bigot, lesbians and gays not having to constantly "unpack our genital preferences," and real women having our own spaces away from males. Some things shouldn't be made into political statements.

and most radfems are straight. Heterosexuals don't have a great track record of being respectful to homosexuals.

Sorry for the long post, I just find all of this to be very interesting.

How Ovarit feels about homosexual parenthood by stunaep in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Surrogacy is disliked by Radfems because they believe it is abusive to women, and to them it's a type of prostitution. A woman is being paid by the couple to use her body. I'm generally ok with a woman that happens to be pregnant, is unable to take care of the child or just doesn't want a kid and at that time comes across a couple that wants to have a child, to me this is just adoption. I do get weirded out when it's a couple (same-sex or not) paying a woman to get pregnant. (Not a radfem btw, but being a trans-exclusionist lesbian I come across them a lot.)

Furthermore, many radfems are anti-natalists. They consider procreation to be morally wrong. Some for reasons such as eugenics, overpopulation, the negative health effects pregnant women face, and because pregnant women will be in some way tied to the father.

How Ovarit feels about homosexual parenthood by stunaep in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are some horror stories with heterosexual parents. Torturing their own children, abandoning them, and even selling them off into human trafficking. If a same-sex couple can give a child a good and loving home, they can face any troubles that surrogacy and adoption might bring. Every single family on earth has issues, so let's not single out same-sex parents when it comes to this. I think that user is experiencing what they call internalized homophobia.

I believe adoption or taking care of kids in foster care are great options, there are many children that are already here in need of a good home. Most of whom were abandoned by straight people, but let's gloss over that. At the same time I 100% understand that many same-sex couples aren't willing/able to go through all the legal stuff, aren't able to financially go through all that, or it's illegal where they are. If they want to have a kid they can pursue that however they feel is best.

[Re-uploaded] Ovarit’s Treatment of Lesbians: Blatant Lesbophobic and Homophobic Rhetoric. Site-Wide Bans and Purges of Lesbian Members by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've been thinking about posting this for awhile since I've seen a post here about Ovarit's members disgusting views on gay men but the one I saw awhile back is gone (I think). But I saw stunaep's post (give it a read here: https://saidit.net/s/LGBDropTheT/comments/9a63/how_ovarit_feels_about_homosexual_parenthood/) and decided to post this. This might be a part 1, as I've seen various lesbophobia, homophobia, and biphobia there I just need to find it again. I've experienced lesbophobia and homophobia from radfems. Many of them believe homosexuality is a choice, or that gays are "made" from trauma, that lesbians are just very strong willed feminists (usually women that were abused by men. Glad to see classic homophobia making a come back...) and gay men are just very committed misogynists.

The Thread: https://ovarit.com/o/Lesbians/85214/has-anyone-else-been-noticing-an-uptick-in-homophobia-in-gc-spaces

Had to reupload to show usernames.

Look at this abomination. by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

All these flags being added and yet still no lesbian flag included lmao. It's better than the intersex addition (not much of a compliment), that one almost gave me a stroke

How Ovarit feels about homosexual parenthood by stunaep in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My best friend, who is like a brother to me, is a gay man. He's experienced being disowned, and has been bullied since elementary because he's somewhat effeminate, and has the "gay accent." He's 6'1'' and is still afraid to be in public with his boyfriend. Yes he's a man, but a gay man is still a gay man, and homophobes will target them same with lesbians.

Ovarit is filled with straight people, I read the site time from time as they have the latest news on the gender wars. The Gender Critical circle for example there is very homophobic, lesbophobic, and biphobic, if you speak out against any of it there you will be branded as a "double agent," and chased off the site.

You did this to yourselves- NB angry that they created a new binary + some Homophobia by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, almost like you're human beings! Do these people really think that "women" and "men" are monoliths and that everyone that is a woman is exactly the same? How is this happening? How are people so stupid?

We could've all realized that you can act, dress, and have certain interests while still being a man or woman. That a woman with short hair is still a woman, and a man who enjoys knitting is still a man. Because gender roles and stereotypes are arbitrary, restrictive, meaningless, and change over time, culture, and person to person. We could have made more room for both sexes to be themselves without denying biology or erasing gays and lesbians. But nooooo, the they/thems had to turn it into a whole thing, setting us all back 50 years.

Lesbians Have the “Cotton Ceiling” and Gay Men Have the “Boxer Ceiling.” Is There a “Ceiling” for Bisexuals? by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lesbophobia encompasses both homophobia and the specific negativity and prejudices experienced by lesbians. It's a blend of homophobia and misogyny. In the context of transbians attempting to force themselves on lesbians, they frequently use both homophobia and misogyny, so I felt it was apt to use it.

Lesbians Have the “Cotton Ceiling” and Gay Men Have the “Boxer Ceiling.” Is There a “Ceiling” for Bisexuals? by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 11 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

What do you mean you wouldn't want cut up genitals??? Bigot uwu

Lesbians Have the “Cotton Ceiling” and Gay Men Have the “Boxer Ceiling.” Is There a “Ceiling” for Bisexuals? by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hmm I would personally pick the Pantaloon Ceiling

Lesbians Have the “Cotton Ceiling” and Gay Men Have the “Boxer Ceiling.” Is There a “Ceiling” for Bisexuals? by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Some terms I can suggest are

Briefs Ceiling or Trunks Ceiling for bi men.

Panties, Silk, Polyester Ceiling for bi women.

I believe that lumping bi men and women together with homosexuals ignores the sexual harassment they face from TRAs that are unique to them. They are already invisible in many aspects of life, but it's extremely important they should not be in terms of sexual harassment and coercion.

Bigoted bi guys dare to have "genital preferences" when hot guy flashes his vulva at them by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Like they’re bi. Leaves me feeling deflated and not good

Them being bi doesn't mean they want a stranger sending them unsolicited photos of their genitals

(NSFW) A Guide for Gay Men: How to Be Respectful if You’re Hooking Up With a Trans Guy by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 14 insightful - 7 fun14 insightful - 6 fun15 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

The only good statement in this entire article is-

Hormones and surgeries don’t make the man

You're exactly right Niko "three holes" Kowell

(NSFW) A Guide for Gay Men: How to Be Respectful if You’re Hooking Up With a Trans Guy by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 11 insightful - 9 fun11 insightful - 8 fun12 insightful - 9 fun -  (0 children)

I went to go read that part again. Look at that creepy af face they drew for this part: https://imgur.com/a/ViGggsz

Are they "doing it" or are they about to get m•rdered? 😂

Oh those mad man-crazy lesbians by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is why there are so many lesbians that want nothing to do with the bi community now.

Who would've guessed "bi lesbian" is a political thing... by DickFreeBacon in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They seem to be able to tell the difference. That's why they say their sexuality is bi but politics are lesbian. I don't believe that the bi women that were close to the lesbian community were unable to understand the differences to what lesbians say (not being attracted to men yada yada) and their own (being attracted to both). Unless they either didn't listen, or weren't that involved in the lesbian community.

I get the reason why the LGB doesn't want to hear about bisexuals opposite-sex attraction. We want to center same-sex attraction, opposite attraction there isn't much to talk about as it's accepted everywhere. I don't believe gay men or lesbians want bisexuals to "pretend" to be gay, just focus on SSA in conversations in the LGB. I guess it's also because there are more bisexuals than gays and lesbians, and most bisexuals are in opposite sex relationships, so we don't want OSA relationships dominating the one community we have. It's similar to alot of criticisms that I hear from bi women on bisexual groups- that the bisexual spaces are too het centered.

Who would've guessed "bi lesbian" is a political thing... by DickFreeBacon in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She chose those quotes trying to prove that bi "lesbians" exist, but those quotes just show that those women were lesbophobic. Calling our sexual orientation a choice, what political group you align with, and being a "lifestyle."

r/gaytransguys gets their fee-fees hurt over how others use language by [deleted] in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 12 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Ok so let me get this straight, pun intended. Clock is ok with their boyfriend being straight, but is not ok with others viewing their boyfriend as straight? Clock is able to realize that just because their bf is straight doesn't mean they're straight? They're mad that complete strangers view them as straight lol

(WARNING: SA, lesbophobia!) IMPORTANT! There is a reddit group about abusing lesbians being ran a transwoman and men! Please help report this group! Link in description to report it. by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Spread the word. Share the screenshots, usernames, links, everything, these people are promoting r@pe, kidnapping, abuse and violence towards lesbians. They have lured in several women that have been abused, they all crowed around them and have convinced them that wanting to be kidnapped and r@ped is a healthy and safe thing to do. The women here sometimes post selfies and their locations.

(WARNING: SA, lesbophobia!) IMPORTANT! There is a reddit group about abusing lesbians being ran a transwoman and men! Please help report this group! Link in description to report it. by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reuploaded to show the group name!

‼️‼️‼️You can report it here: https://reddit.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=360001103212 ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️

Edit: This site supports conversion therapy. Preys on women that have been abused. Uses slurs. Posts content on lesbians being kidnapped, abused, and r*ped.

Edit: The creators of the group, and rpist/rpist supporters are: u/divergent_curiosity and u/aimless_ascendant. Both men wanting to rpe lesbians and lure in women that were abused. The creators are trying to hide what they are doing, and that they support and run the group!

https://imgur.com/rvU5U1w

Lesbians fighting against erasure are oppressors by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Scientology still has an agreed upon structured worldview lol. Queers are just, idk, they don't want to have any meaning or structure, because that wouldn't make them special anymore. It's why there is so many cancelling in their community, they have no agreed upon language, meaning, or anything. If words have no meaning, then they cannot communicate information clearly. They are essentially having several different conversations with each other. They don't talk to each other, they talk past each other.

So paradoxically: they thought this would make everyone more accepting and equal, but now everything and anything is and can be hateful and problematic. Just like anything and everything is or can be valid. It's all on equal footing. Everything is/can be someone's identity, and everything is/can be problematic. Everything is valid, everything is problematic.

Look at gender. Gender has no real meaning in the queer community. It can be clothes, pronouns, or hair. So because there is no meaning a queer that views gender as performative is being bigoted to a large portion of queers that views it as psychological, but the offended's view of gender could also be problematic. Since there is no meaning everything is equally as hateful and problematic as a cis-hets bigotry. Then cancelling starts. Then it devolves into them agreeing everyone is valid, and it'll start all over again. Everyone gets more paranoid. A house divided against itself cannot stand.

Lesbians fighting against erasure are oppressors by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

His post contains a lot of abuser messaging.

If lesbians asserts that lesbians aren't attracted to men: we are oppressing ourselves.

Lesbians demanding not to be erased and establishing boundaries: makes us oppressors, and we are harming all marginalized people.

So basically: lesbians are not allowed to protect ourselves. We cannot talk about our own sexual orientation. We cannot make decisions for ourselves.

Lesbians fighting against erasure are oppressors by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't get it either. It's like the situation of there being so many bi women that are open about their male attraction but will fight you tooth and nail to call themselves "lesbians," even if they have a husband/boyfriend, or want to have one. Calling themselves "lesbians" would just make everything more difficult for them but they still just want the word for some reason. But they'll also complain about bisexual erasure lol. I guess it's just selfishness pure and simple. They don't care about actual lesbians, but they want to change definitions, alter history, and make actual lesbians be quiet about it. Because their feelings and comfortability is more important. Same thing with transbians. The queer movement is just selfishness.

But don't for a second say pansexual is the same as bisexual!!!

Lesbians fighting against erasure are oppressors by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Calling it a religion would imply that it has some sort of structure.

Lesbians fighting against erasure are oppressors by jay-day in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe, just maybe, if you get mad at homosexual women for defending themselves...you're the problem?

Transplaining ‘queer’ history - the irony by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 11 insightful - 6 fun11 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

The problem is transbians legit believe that watching lesbian porn makes them experts.

Self-ID is idiocy by CleverFoolOfEarth in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Honestly who knows at this point. She was in high school (maybe still is?) at most points, and she has several LGBT flags in the background, so by my guess her parents bought them for her. The "homophobia" from what I see on some of the vids is her parents not getting what nb, asexual, pansexual, queer is. It's hard to tell if she is actually having difficulty with hateful parents, because as I brought up with Jules she does things like make offensive Jewish jokes and then gets mad at her friends for laughing at them.

Self-ID is idiocy by CleverFoolOfEarth in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The only sliver of hope was that she doesn't (so far) want to go through any medical transition. She's made several videos on having ED and having hyper-fixation, just hasn't made the connection yet

Self-ID is idiocy by CleverFoolOfEarth in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No worries. It was an interesting read. To my knowledge I don't have any Jewish ancestry, and I was raised by non-religious parents, I'm an ex-atheist but converted to Catholicism in 2017, so what I know about Judaism is from research and scripture. But being an outsider looking in isn't the same as being Jewish, so I didn't want to make any statements on her, other than that inconsistency. I'm not sure if she went through any process of conversion, but then again I am not looking through her entire Tiktok she has posted consistently for years (kind of impressive tbh). What I've seen was her saying she has Christian parents a family, so I guess she converted since I know that the Jewish lineage is passed on through the mother, but then she made videos on hating religion so 🤷‍♀️she made videos on Anti-Semitism, but in another she talks about making offensive Jewish jokes and then getting mad at her friends for laughing at them lol

Self-ID is idiocy by CleverFoolOfEarth in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I looked through her Tiktok, she says she's Jewish but also her parents are Evangelical Christians. So I guess she converted to Judaism? But she also doesn't like religion and is not religious.

Went from straight to lesbian to aro/ace pansexual nonbinary queer. Always uses words like "became" and "labels" when talking about sexual orientation, so probably just a weird straight girl.

She has three eating disorders.

Diagnosed with 5 mental disorders

Everyone in her family hates her (supposedly)

Has ADHD, abuses her ADHD medication, takes all four of them at once which can fuck you up.

She kins Hannibal Lecter. Has a fixation on him killing and mutilating his victims. Her friends have asked her to calm down on the Hannibal obsession.

Said she was homophobic before

She gets into fights with everyone.

Idk how old she is, but I feel bad for her putting her cringy phase online for everyone to see. Hope she gets some actual help someday.

European Lesbian Conference :p by MarkJefferson in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Trans-women are always the ones with the most overtly manly physical features.

How will they get their kicks when there are no single-sex LGB spaces left to invade? by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And to answer the general question, they will start invading single-sex private spaces such as parties and orgies because dopey white knights will bring them to be "inclusive."

Next they'll go to do this in straight people's spaces lmao. See how well that works out. We're just a test run, we're a smaller and more vulnerable group, when they get bored they'll hyper focus on another group to cry bully. But, as we all know trans people don't know when to leave people alone, and when they take things too far.

Do these women ever consider that gay men have been trained to be nice to them even when we are uncomfortable? Christ, the number of times I've had women thrust sexual shit on me and I've had to pretend I'm okay with it only for them to later think I'm secretly bi is too many to count.

Of course not they're the women that do it, they have no idea what gay men have to go through. Sorry you've gone through that btw.

Celebrating Lesbian Visibility Week with my dick out on /r/ActualLesbians by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 13 insightful - 10 fun13 insightful - 9 fun14 insightful - 10 fun -  (0 children)

This is so transphobic, no transbian looks like that! Give them a bigger head, defined jawline, smaller eyes, large shoulders, broad chest, narrow hips and skinnier legs! Stop trying to give trans-women unrealistic beauty standards!

Where to even begin with how yikes this one is by CleverFoolOfEarth in LGBDropTheT

[–]jay-day 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trans men are men - but if they say they're lesbians, they're lesbians and must be accepted into your dating life.

AMAB trans/nbs are male but if they say they're lesbians, they're lesbians and must be accepted into your dating life.

They can be men or identify as men and still be lesbians. Lesbians must be accepting of them. Either way lesbians must be attracted to men. If you don't accept that then you're a bigot. Since you're a lesbian you're a TERF and it's ok to punch and stab you :)

(as long as you "consent" though.)