"Misogynist" – the word is sexist by SnowAssMan in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I prefer the word misogyny as it avoids the "men also deal with sexism" angle. If you want to talk about women, a female specific word is best.

So, the censoring on ovarit by WrongToy in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OP, can you explain what you mean?? Your post is incoherent.

Why do radical feminists call their boyfriends and husbands Nigel? by stunaep in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nigel is a common UK name. It just means a common guy. Nigel isn't really common in the USA, so if the meme was based on the USA it would be "Brad."

Holocaust Denial Arguments: Despite cracking The Enigma Code, the British forces found no record of killings by gassing. by HibikiBlack in conspiracy

[–]bluetinfoilhat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well what difference does it make it they were shot dead versus gassed??

What is it with the T using racism to attempt to justify worming their way into sex-based classifications they don't belong in? by CleverFoolOfEarth in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was trying to be funny. My point is if a man is a white supremacist he will also hold hateful views of women.

What is it with the T using racism to attempt to justify worming their way into sex-based classifications they don't belong in? by CleverFoolOfEarth in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is an overlap in men who are sexist and men who are racist. Very few white supremacist are feminist. The reason they use race is because these are racist men who believe black women are "less womanly" and less "feminine" than other groups of men. This thought is a cornerstone of anti black racism. Remember that Asian economist from "psychology today" who used pseudo science to say black women are objectively/scientifically less female. Misogynstic men think that being beautiful makes a woman more womanly than an ugly women-- which is obviously false. Being a woman is not a sliding scale where good looks or having dainty features means you are more female. They also believe that some races are scientifically more attractive which is false--- but even if that was true that wouldn't make the "ugly race" less male or female.

What is a butch transbian? I want to understand. by bolla_top in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

A man who doesnt want to put in any effort and gets off on the ridiculousness and logical conclusion of trans ideology.

Ovarit is shit trasophobic and their rules are stupid Women dissapointed me againg by Ireallydothink in PinkPillFeminism

[–]bluetinfoilhat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What is the right reason to oppose transgenderism.

A leftist gets asked whether his Twitter account had been hacked after he posted that he believes Kyle Rittenhouse to be innocent. by Chipit in NotTheOnion

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow, I had no Ackman was an asshole. Disgusting.

New California law will force retailers to have ‘gender neutral’ toy sections by NutterButterFlutter in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Put toys together by category not gender at all. And stop the color coding of toys. Not all girls toys have to be in pink/purple and not all boy toys need to be in blue/green, etc.

The Trans Manifesto by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is funny that prostitution is seen as such a huge inherent part of being a trans women. Obviously they need prostitution to both subjugate real women and for them to live out their gross fantasies of what it means to be a woman.

My kindergarten class… by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Call me a bigot but I think all men who want to dress like women have a paraphilia. It is one thing to dress in a feminine way, but a full on "women costume" seems like paraphilia and it is sad little kids have to deal with this.

Prolific "radfems" being gaslighting male-worshippers by tallowcandle in BlackPillFeminism

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Calling women and pregnancy breeding is not feminist. Do you hear yourself?

Racial makeup of people IDing as non-binary? by anxietyaccount8 in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It seems that non binary is mostly a white thing. butch black girls would just ID as a trans man. I think this is because generally in the black american community anyways it is disproportionately gay men and women who transition. AGP are far rarer and there doesn't seem to be much pressure for straight black women to ID as part of the LGBT( because the black community is more homophobic).

Why is the UK "Terf Island"? by Rage-Xion in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The UK is more advanced is passing wide reaching laws. The US and to a lesser extent Canada is more decentralized so pro trans laws are not applied nearly as much.

Intersectional feminism is failing Indian women by BiologyIsReal in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Intersectional feminism wasn't meant to accommodate women outside the USA. It was meant to explain black american woman's experiences in the USA.

How is this sort of drag not seen for what it is: misogynistic caricature of women? by swordinthestream in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

A major focus in drag is making disparaging comments about women's vaginas and biology though. They aren't just wearing dresses and make up. They are putting on fake breast, hips, etc. They aren't dressing like David Bowie or Prince.

The Dangerous Denial of Sex by bluetinfoilhat in GenderCriticalUSA

[–]bluetinfoilhat[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

story

Transgender ideology can take on a comical character, as in a recent American Civil Liberties Union commentary objecting to sales tax on tampons and similar products while pondering: “How can we recognize that barriers to menstrual access are a form of sex discrimination without erasing the lived experiences of trans men and non-binary people who menstruate, as well as women who don’t?”

Yet it’s one thing to claim that a man can “identify” as a woman or vice versa. Increasingly we see a dangerous and antiscientific trend toward the outright denial of biological sex.

“The idea of two sexes is simplistic,” an article in the scientific journal Nature declared in 2015. “Biologists now think there is a wider spectrum than that.” A 2018 Scientific American piece asserted that “biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male.” And an October 2018 New York Times headline promised to explain “Why Sex Is Not Binary.”

The argument is that because some people are intersex—they have developmental conditions resulting in ambiguous sex characteristics—the categories male and female exist on a “spectrum,” and are therefore no more than “social constructs.” If male and female are merely arbitrary groupings, it follows that everyone, regardless of genetics or anatomy should be free to choose to identify as male or female, or to reject sex entirely in favor of a new bespoke “gender identity.”

To characterize this line of reasoning as having no basis in reality would be an egregious understatement. It is false at every conceivable scale of resolution.

In humans, as in most animals or plants, an organism’s biological sex corresponds to one of two distinct types of reproductive anatomy that develop for the production of small or large sex cells—sperm and eggs, respectively—and associated biological functions in sexual reproduction. In humans, reproductive anatomy is unambiguously male or female at birth more than 99.98% of the time. The evolutionary function of these two anatomies is to aid in reproduction via the fusion of sperm and ova. No third type of sex cell exists in humans, and therefore there is no sex “spectrum” or additional sexes beyond male and female. Sex is binary.

There is a difference, however, between the statements that there are only two sexes (true) and that everyone can be neatly categorized as either male or female (false). The existence of only two sexes does not mean sex is never ambiguous. But intersex individuals are extremely rare, and they are neither a third sex nor proof that sex is a “spectrum” or a “social construct.” Not everyone needs to be discretely assignable to one or the other sex in order for biological sex to be functionally binary. To assume otherwise—to confuse secondary sexual traits with biological sex itself—is a category error.

Denying the reality of biological sex and supplanting it with subjective “gender identity” is not merely an eccentric academic theory. It raises serious human-rights concerns for vulnerable groups including women, homosexuals and children.

Women have fought hard for sex-based legal protections. Female-only spaces are necessary due to the pervasive threat of male violence and sexual assault. Separate sporting categories are also necessary to ensure that women and girls don’t have to face competitors who have acquired the irreversible performance-enhancing effects conferred by male puberty. The different reproductive roles of males and females require laws to safeguard women from discrimination in the workplace and elsewhere. The falsehood that sex is rooted in subjective identity instead of objective biology renders all these sex-based rights impossible to enforce.

The denial of biological sex also erases homosexuality, as same-sex attraction is meaningless without the distinction between the sexes. Many activists now define homosexuality as attraction to the “same gender identity” rather than the same sex. This view is at odds with the scientific understanding of human sexuality. Lesbians have been denounced as “bigots” for expressing a reluctance to date men who identify as women. The successful normalization of homosexuality could be undermined by miring it in an untenable ideology.

Those most vulnerable to sex denialism are children. When they’re taught that sex is grounded in identity instead of biology, sex categories can easily become conflated with regressive stereotypes of masculinity and femininity. Masculine girls and feminine boys may become confused about their own sex. The dramatic rise of “gender dysphoric” adolescents—especially young girls—in clinics likely reflects this new cultural confusion.

The large majority of gender-dysphoric youths eventually outgrow their feelings of dysphoria during puberty, and many end up identifying as homosexual adults. “Affirmation” therapies, which insist a child’s cross-sex identity should never be questioned, and puberty-blocking drugs, advertised as a way for children to “buy time” to sort out their identities, may only solidify feelings of dysphoria, setting them on a pathway to more invasive medical interventions and permanent infertility. This pathologizing of sex-atypical behavior is extremely worrying and regressive. It is similar to gay “conversion” therapy, except that it’s now bodies instead of minds that are being converted to bring children into “proper” alignment with themselves.

The time for politeness on this issue has passed. Biologists and medical professionals need to stand up for the empirical reality of biological sex. When authoritative scientific institutions ignore or deny empirical fact in the name of social accommodation, it is an egregious betrayal to the scientific community they represent. It undermines public trust in science, and it is dangerously harmful to those most vulnerable.

Mr. Wright is an evolutionary biologist at Penn State. Ms. Hilton is a developmental biologist at the University of Manchester.

Gender critical USA will be revived by bluetinfoilhat in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i meant sub saidit!! LOL.

/r/MGTOW banned by Vulptex in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

but not because of your sex, race, sexual orientation.

/r/MGTOW banned by Vulptex in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I disagree. And I find those who don't think it is a big deal tend to be people who are rarely the target of hate speech.

/r/MGTOW banned by Vulptex in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because they are not just discussing their life but creating a bizarre anti woman religion.

/r/MGTOW banned by Vulptex in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They were not just expressing free speech but hate. And the reason they got down is because a poster there was planning on mass shooting. That is how toxic that spot is.

/r/MGTOW banned by Vulptex in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]bluetinfoilhat 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

They took too long banning it. That subreddit really spread that ideology wide. If only YouTube would start banning similar content. I am not libertarian when it comes to free speech.

THE World Health Organisation (WHO) has been accused of being "sexist and paternalistic" by suggesting women of childbearing age should not drink alcohol. by Chipit in WorldNews

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This thread misses the point. They are telling all women under 40 who AREN'T pregnant that they shouldn't drink. They aren't naturally saying pregnant women shouldn't drink which is known by everyone.

How Liberal Elites Use Race to Keep Workers Divided—And Justify Class-Based Inequities. Liberals have abandoned history, because they have to believe they are superior to both elites of the past and the contemporary working class, at the same time. by Chipit in politics

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Another second generation american telling us to downplay anti black american racism in the US?? Color me shocked?

Minimum marriage age per state (all but 4 ALLOW child marriage) by [deleted] in maps

[–]bluetinfoilhat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

we need to pass a nationwide age of consent for sex and marriage. It shouldn't vary by age. And while relatively few minors are married in the US the fact the loophole exist is dangerous.

TiM claiming to be on his period asks for advice on finding a period tracker for "AMAB transwomen" complaining that it's difficult to find a period tracker for TiMs because TiMs don't menstruate or bleed. I think it's time for a pandemic or something to give these boys something real to worry about. by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A period is a shedding of the uterus. It is not a fluctuation of hormones. I think even this should be considered an appropriation of a medical condition.

Why can’t lesbian just be female homosexual? by CuntWorshiper in Lesbians

[–]bluetinfoilhat 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A lot of women who promote "political lesbianism" are actually lesbian(as in exclusively attracted to women) and accuse straight women who find it offensive homophobic. So it is not just "bi-hets" or straight women pushing this. Some-- not all--- lesbians who are separatist feminist/radical feminist think deep down all straight women can be made into a lesbian.

Young black woman doesn't feel like a woman. Why? Because she black, fat and has natural hair (locs). 🥺 by censorshipment in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am a black woman, and while I don't want to dismiss other black women and girls experiences I hope they would stop projecting this idea that black women are "treated as men." It is not true at all-- and most black women are gender conforming(and black women are not perceived as being tom boys, butch, or whatever as a group).

I think that in the past 10 years social media has been constantly publishing those "studies" that black American women aren't getting married or are the top pick on dating websites. Some black women and girls are starting to internalize this.

But all this gender stuff that black women aren't treated like women is a lie regardless of some people saying black women are not beautiful or dainty. I think it is troubling when some black women who are racially self loathing project this is a mainstream attitude among most black American women.

Young black woman doesn't feel like a woman. Why? Because she black, fat and has natural hair (locs). 🥺 by censorshipment in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am a member of black ladies sub on reddit, but I can't comment. I wonder if it is because I used to post on GC??

The joke that is r/ActualLesbians by FuckTheHypocrites in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes the fact they aren't self aware enough to stop with the anime avatars is interesting. They are into anime because a lot of anime presents women in infantilizing, over sexualized, cutsey, and pedo-ish ways. Also a lot of autistic people like anime(a subtype of anime) because it is easier to pick up social cues and it is a way of escapism.

The US media yet again conflates GC women with Republicans : INSIDER “With at least 36 bills and a new law, Republicans across the country ramp up attacks on transgender athletes' rights. None of this was ever about fairness.” by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wish some radfems/gender critical women would protest outside of CNN, MSNBC, NPR, etc and demand they give a fair shake and a full segment to gender critical women and criticism of the transgenderism movement from a left perspective.

Gender Propaganda at Work by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 15 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 3 fun16 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

The gender euphoria seems gross. Like having to give trans women boners by role playing with them.

Twoxchromosomes on Reddit now posting transition pics, and is basically a trans sub now. by GConly in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I feel like they are doing it on purpose, I wonder if they planned to bait women into an argument so the sub is completely erased or taken over by a trans moderator.

BREAKING: Wyoming House PASSES Mandatory VOTER ID LAW by NewsJunkie in politics

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In theory it isn't racist, but clearly they are looking for ways to suppress the vote. Hopefully democrats will create campaigns so people on the margins to get a proper state ID and get their legal papers together. The minute I turned 18 my mother rushed me to get a state ID. Adults should have formal legal papers.

Aetna is expanding coverage for gender-affirming surgeries by bluetinfoilhat in GenderCriticalUSA

[–]bluetinfoilhat[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They never explain how mimicking so called cis women is gender confirming since biology has nothing to do with being a woman.

Elliot Page and Emma Portner Announce Plans to Divorce After 3 Years of Marriage: We 'Remain Close Friends' by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Another trans widow.

Pornhub just removed most of its videos by anxietyaccount8 in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I just searched and there is still not a thread about it. So weird for such a big topic

r/AskWomen is besoming crazy as well by Lingenfelter in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because in the US white people have always been the majority and racially speaking are the "oppressor." Same with straight people.

r/AskWomen is besoming crazy as well by Lingenfelter in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why shouldn't women be able to ask a question directed to say straight women if the topic is about straight relationships??

‘Trapped’: The American women and girls forced into marriage by bluetinfoilhat in GenderCriticalUSA

[–]bluetinfoilhat[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can be both...

Bringing back this sub-saidit by bluetinfoilhat in GenderCriticalUSA

[–]bluetinfoilhat[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well people often complain about how all spaces are US centric. So the general gender critical is for all countries, but US specific ones should go here.

Bringing back this sub-saidit by bluetinfoilhat in GenderCriticalUSA

[–]bluetinfoilhat[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Who is they?

Bringing back this sub-saidit by bluetinfoilhat in GenderCriticalUSA

[–]bluetinfoilhat[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This one focuses on US specific gender critical issues.

The sex binary is not a ‘Western construct,’ gender identity is by BiologyIsReal in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Gender is also not a western construct either. Lets not erase the gender restrictions and roles foisted on non western women.

Officially lost my best friend over gender theory by RealWomenResist in GenderCriticalUSA

[–]bluetinfoilhat 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am so sorry. It is weird how women will throw other women under the bus. Her post was homophobic. I would try joining radfem groups. They don't have to be political, just a way of meeting like minded women.

A blue check saying that WOC are masculine so it is RACIST to believe transwomen are not women and only RACISTS feel that way... This makes me feel amazing as a black woman! by throwawayfuckreddit in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If this were true black men would also be mistaken as black women, yet they are not.

I'm so fucking done with 'non-binary' by Beth-BR in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

non binary.

Homeless women to have protection of single sex shelters by dandeliondynasty in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trans women can have a separate wing within the male shelter if they fear other men, but they don't belong in female spaces.

New GenderCriticalUSA sub created by bluetinfoilhat in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is no splintering. Most people post on multiple radfem/gender critical groups anyways.

New GenderCriticalUSA sub created by bluetinfoilhat in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

People will still complain about an article being US centric even when people do that. You can't win. Also I sometimes prefer to hear from my country women and want to weed out other opinions. There is a time and place for global focus and a time for a more national one.

Will We Really Go Back To Normal? by joy1090 in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She was considering playing a trans man.

Will We Really Go Back To Normal? by joy1090 in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think in the next couple years we will see a huge backlash as people outside the LGBTQ and feminist community become aware how horrible the trans movement is. Someone like JK Rowling being attacked and Halle Berry is helping as nothing they said was even offensive.

Why can't trans men and non binary people create their separate PSAs and forms? by bluetinfoilhat in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Similar to the push to use "partner" when talking about straight women who have been domestically abused. People are entitled to call their boyfriend or husband a partner but when creating a PSA it is important we note a persons sex as it factors into what is happening to them. Using the word partner is a way of erasing male violence in many situations. Like what is the point of a campaign getting women to have their "partner" do his fair share of chores. Clearly we are communicating a gendered issue. Lesbians and straight women need separate PSAs.

"If you dislike being a woman you aren't a woman!" by limegreen in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Some people hate their nationality and race that doesn't mean they aren't from or part of those groups.

A new gender critical website. Not the website that the GC mods are creating. by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]bluetinfoilhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Honestly we should call ourselves Anti-gender.