sorted by:
new
hottopinsightfulfun

This is on the front page of r/politics. by Orangutan in politics

[–]aviewfromoutside 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It does constitute evidence. Think it through. If you say something but don't believe it, then it is likely to be less true than if you do believe it.

This is on the front page of r/politics. by Orangutan in politics

[–]aviewfromoutside 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They have less proof, because they don’t believe in it. Or they do believe in it, in which case OPs statement holds.

This is on the front page of r/politics. by Orangutan in politics

[–]aviewfromoutside 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

But it’s not the same logic, because the premise is dishonest. If they don’t truly believe in the devil, then the basis of their argument is obviously wrong. Which means they cannot admit they are telling lies. Why should I disbelieve them?

What's it going to take to make the world work, make it good for as many people as possible and give opportunity to everyone? Serious answers please. by aviewfromoutside in AskSaidIt

[–]aviewfromoutside[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Outlaw the upvote. Outlaw following people. Make it a legit town square! Down with influencers.

What's it going to take to make the world work, make it good for as many people as possible and give opportunity to everyone? Serious answers please.

by aviewfromoutside to /s/AskSaidIt from (self.AskSaidIt)