White Bernie Bro Attacks Black Dude At Bernie Rally, Bernie Has A SERIOUS Supporter Problem by Tarrock in politics
[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 2 days ago (0 children)
This is hilarious. Bernie seems like an alright dude compared to the rest. Not that I support any politician but it seems like they can't find dirt on Bernie himself so they go after his supporters? Seems like a reach to me.
Kobe Bryant still alive? by Conspiracynut in ScienceFiction
[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 days ago (0 children)
The things people waste time & mental space on...
Interesting Bernie Sanders interview on the Today Show in 1981.. by Enza in politics
[–]astronautrob 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun - 10 days ago (0 children)
Seems like a decent guy no wonder he's being blackballed for the D nomination again
China’s only level 4 biolab is just 8 miles from origin of outbreak - coincidence? by magnora7 in corruption
[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 26 days ago (0 children)
Maybe, happens a lot with trivial stuff too tho
[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 26 days ago (0 children)
Also if it made it through reddit filters it can't be that much or a secret or conspiracy, can it?
Wasn't this just on Reddit a few days ago? Not trying to be a jerk but sometimes feel like stuff just gets moved from Reddit conspiracy to here after a few days. Why aren't there unique posts here? That's really the fun thing about this site not carbon copy stuff from Reddit.
Snow goes public with accusations against Saidit, starts a wordpress.com blog by Chipit in SaidIt
[–]astronautrob 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun - 1 month ago (0 children)
This contrived drama is not very interesting
State Tax burden for Richest and Poorest in 2018 by magnora7 in maps
[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 1 month ago (0 children)
Shout out Minnesota
nationalism vs. globalism by futurefunk in memes
[–]astronautrob 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 2 months ago (0 children)
This made me laugh so hard, thank you
Why Biden Is Leading by [deleted] in USPolitics
[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 2 months ago (0 children)
He's a pedophile dude, I don't think its a big secret.
[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 months ago (0 children)
I don't know if I understand either question. Idt any amount of being compromised is a good thing, I meant that most high level politicians probably are compromised in some way. Bernie is a career politician to think he's not compromised in some way is foolish but Biden is a straight up pedophile so it's easy to see why they're pushing him
What do you think of Andrew Yang?
2 months ago by astronautrob to /s/politics from self.politics
[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 months ago (0 children)
Biden is leading because he's the most compromised I'm sure. But I'm not sure any candidate who gets this far isn't compromised is some way so whata gonna do.
Trump Impeached...What Next by Morphos1759 in news
"What Next" will probably be that the circus will continue, the "two parties" will keep disagreeing on amything that actually helps the common man or the country, & keep unilaterally passing bills that continue to take our liberties, money, etc. Idt its a big mystery at this point
Donald Trump is not President anymore? by Racist in AskSaidIt
Read my man
When Laws Are Unjust, Just Men Become Outlaws by x0x7 in politics
Never been afraid of gettin older, I'm much more nervous about these public servants
What our snowflake society has come to by astronautrob in Sociology
[–]astronautrob[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 2 months ago (0 children)
Perhaps no one cares but I think some people do. I have a lot of friends who text & talk in this way, and don't see a problem with it, so I don't know if it's about people caring or not caring more so than narratives that can prevail in society if it they are perpetuated enough. I agree it is a distraction & meant to divide us or drive wedges in society (which is the overall job of the media in general) but I don't agree that no one cares. I think people think a lot about how they communicate vua text or online, &I think that is coloring both or in person interactions &our online ones. Thats the main problem I see in the whole thing. I could care less whether someone puts yes no pk with zero or 100 exclamation points. But when the narrative is that people need to speak a certain way, loke example given about the doctors office, then it starts to get to me a little bit. It puts too much on the interpretation instead of the intention. It makes it so however the receiver interpreters what the person says is more important that ehat the intention was, which makes everyone responsible for everyone elses feelings. Thats my maon problem in a nut shell, not that I think it's important or people should care but just be aware. If some people in society start adopting this or see this as correct &some don't we won't be able to speak to eachother properly.
Why is Trump sending more U.S. troops to Somalia? by dcjogger in politics
I will give neither of those things. The fact is content from 3 years ago is not good & to see it on the front page makes saidit seem out of date or that people aren't really participating on the site. So no I don't think patience nor kindness factor in to this situation. Granted I could of picked nicer words to say the same thing but that doesn't change the fact that it's terribly old content which in&of itself makes it bad content. The fact that this dcjogger yahoo almost only posts old articles that seem to paint donald in a good light is even worse.
[–]astronautrob[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun - 2 months ago (0 children)
I agree. It reminds me of the whole transgender bathroom thing 5-6 years ago.
[–]astronautrob[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 2 months ago (0 children)
People who speak like that sound silly & to try & normalize it is also silly. No one needs to speka like that or worry about putting exclamation points after everything to make someone else feel ok. It's snowflake stuff & this article attempts to normalize this way of interacting which to me is an issue. Above all I think it's a waste of time & energy.
[–]astronautrob[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 months ago (0 children)
I'm speaking about the op not anything to do with donald. People do have the freedom to post whatever they want, I agree, but the reverse is also true. I have the freedom to call posting a 3 year old news article retarded. Why waste people time? This is not good content. Me saying itd retarded is just an easy way of summing up that feeling.
[–]astronautrob[S] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun - 2 months ago (0 children)
This is what our snowflake society has come to, worrying about texting ok or whether or not you put exclamation points after something. They want us all to be these happy people on the surface while everyone is slowly dying inside because our moral fiber is so fucked.
What our snowflake society has come to
2 months ago by astronautrob to /s/Sociology from lifehacker.com
Trump gives CIA authority to conduct drone strikes by dcjogger in politics
I'm starting to think youre a bot dc, and not a good one. Every article you post is from 2017 & every comment you make is a just a string of hateful things, never anything productive or answering a comment. You really are the worst
Why do you always post articles that are years old? It's retarded
Is this Ukraine 2.0? Trump’s OMB holds up congress-approved military assistance I'm sure he is fighting corruption! by [deleted] in The_Donald
[–]astronautrob 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 2 months ago (0 children)
Are you really sure though?
You can see how ideologically posessed someone is by how little dialogue they participate in. by RatherSmallPotato in whatever
Maybe they're just shy
Trump resumes Nixon’s war on American news media by dcjogger in politics
This dude always posts outdated aritcles &never responds to any of the comments. It makes for a very boring post. Step it up dcjogger, lets see some quality content.
Idt people read newspapers bro
Good riddance! :-) Prince Andrew has stepped down from his royal duties amid growing backlash over his involvement with sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein by useless_aether in WorldNews
[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 months ago (0 children)
Yes I agree. I also thinks it makes us talk about one person, royal andy anus, instead of questioning why none of the other elites have been talked about. Why is it only andy doing an interview, that he "messes up", & then takes the fall? Why only him? Where are the 60min interviews for all the high level politicians that were connected in the US or other countries? They pick this out of touch old insignificant royal dude to take the fall &now no one is talking about anyone else who was connected to this thing.
Funny how this is the only person taking any fallout from this whole episode. Maybe it was on purpose, maybe not, but either way it's diverted the whole conversation which I'm sure was the whole point of this part of the circus.
11 reasons why no kike, not one kike, should have any entitlement to get to any bunker anywhere in the world.. by NOT1KIKE in WorldNews
[–]astronautrob 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 3 months ago (0 children)
I'm so disappointed in this terrible post
The Only Meaningful Thing To Happen On A Football Field In My Lifetime by EndlessSunflowers in WayOfTheBern
Nothing important happens in the circus ring, er I mean, on the football field.
In memory of the veterans that were killing people for "freedom" by zyxzevn in conspiracy
[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 months ago (0 children)
Super fascinating, I agree. I also find the period early in the gun powder age very fascinating &how the trainong for the individual foot soldier changed. Before the mass use of handgunners in battle military leaders would tell soldier to pick out an individual target &try to shoot &kill that target. As guns become more in use they changed to training the handgunners to instead shoot at the same level as fellow handgunners &to only aim at the mass of the other force instead of individual soldiers. It even more disconnected the soldier from killing than what was already taking place because of the introduction of long range missles. I wonder if when makong that switch more soldiers than not didn't like it &contributed to them "missing" more shots or not shooting at all.
[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 3 months ago (0 children)
You make way too many generalizations in your argument to respond to all of them. You're speaking about a whole military industrial complex, I'm talking about individual people who join the military. Again, I would never blame an individual part for the action of the whole. The military in its self is not a bad thing. Read some history, militaries throughout history have been of some benefit for the less "civilized" world (¬ just the Romans). But even taking the Romans as an example, the vets of the Roman army probably killed far more civilians than any modern military. The Romans made it a point of thejr warefare to kill any and all civilians in towns even after they've surrendered. When you're thanking a vet you're not saying thank you to the MiC, which was my point jn my original statement, you're thanking them for the sacrifice they gave to be in the military. Everyone makes spme type of sacrifice to be in the militsry, some more than others, &that's all that vets day is supposed to honor or recognize. That these people do or have done a job that requires a bit more sacrifice than your normal 8-5, that's all. We honor a lot of different jobs like this: police officers, teachers, paramedics, etc., it's a way of honoring those who do the jobs that are kind of shitty &other people don't necessarily want to do. No one os asking you to pledge your allegiance to the United States government.
[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 months ago* (0 children)
Murder & killing someone in combat is not the same thing. Vets who have killed innocents or civilians should not be thanked for their crime, I agree, but that is a very small percentage of vets. Most veterans have never killed anyone, &a lot have never even fired a bullet in combat. What the U.S. does after the war has nothing to do with the individual veteran. We have a waitress day. Would you not thank a waitress because restaurants make people fat, or x reaaon or y reason. Its not their fault really. There are a lot of good people who are veterans who fight the good fight now. To put them all one category because some soldiers kill some civilians in war is silly. Killing in combat, which few vets have done, is not a crime. Killing innocents is murder of course but even less vets have done that than killong in combat. Plus this cartoon mentions the CIA which is tech not a military branch, it's silly.
[–]astronautrob 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - 3 months ago (0 children)
You can thank a veteran & not support the MIC. The two are not mutually exclusive. Thanks to all the veterans who gave their time &lives in service.
How to Really End Shareholder Capitalism It’s now increasingly clear that maximizing shareholder value has led to minimizing everything else a corporation could and should do. by [deleted] in USPolitics
Excellent content. Lots of people think capitalism is capitalism but fail to realize how it's morphed in to this beast of corporate or shareholder capitalism. It is not the same thing.
VIDEO: Leaked ABC News Insider Recording EXPOSES #EpsteinCoverup "We had Clinton, We had Everything" by Chipit in news
Does it matter if he is dead or not? I feel like that's a big sitcking point for people & to me it doesn't seem to matter whether he is actually dead or not. Idk whether this video is psyops or anything, but idk about toally discounting it either. Isn't this video getting people to question the media? Whethwr the question is he dies or not does that really matter? Doesn't quesitoning the media, or knowing that the media lies, valuable in some sense? Not everyone is informed as some of us on here when it comes to things on conspiratorial nature so whatever gets people questioning the official narrative is a good thing in my eyes. I get they're trying to feed the narrative that he was killed when he probably wasnt, but at least this video will get some people to stop beliveing everything they hear from that stupid box.
The best way to handling annoying stray dogs around you by [deleted] in whatever
[–]astronautrob 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun - 3 months ago (0 children)
Probably because most of the US doesn't have a big problem with stray dogs. Not a big enough problem to write a whole post on it that is....this post is basically about how to kill dogs, am I correct?
Tired of seeing one sub take over All, some subs may cause a bad first impression for first-time users. by SpeakEasy in SaidIt
[–]astronautrob 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 3 months ago (0 children)
I'm good, thanks though.
Being active with quality posts and spamming are two different things. A lot of people are active on other subs but don't post nearly the amount of content that comes when a flood of new people all come from one place. It's a quality over quantity thing. Idt anyone wants anyone "silenced by force" on this site but we do like a bit of common courtesy & respect. We also appreciate quality posts that are enriching, funny, interesting, etc. This same situation happened when ice poisioning the 2nd came. There's an equilibrium to this site, that gets shifted when a new group comes, and we all have to learn to live in harmony. It generally happens naturally and I think this time will be no different. Everyone is welcomed on this site.
Workers would be hurt by minimum wage hike by dcjogger in news
[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 months ago (0 children)
It's funny you put rich in quations like it's not a real group of people. To answer the first question, the rich are hurting the poor, which in includes politicians, or at least they are funded by them. Which alao answers the second question. Again we're skirting around the point. The fact that ceos, shareholders, bankers, no matter what their jobs are can make x amount in this country while a worker makes x amount is the problem. The fact that top earners wages have risen x amount more while workers have stayed stagnant is the point. To try & nickpick the issue does not negate the biggie situation. There is a huge class discrepancy thats getting bigger. The rich are getting richer, period. Min wage hike wont fix that but it at least gets the conversation in the ballpark.
Edit i do agree that it might be a ploy to get people to not unionize, which also needs to be in the conversation but they aren't mutually exclusive in my eyes. Talking about pay discrepancy& whay not can lead to a conversaiton about unions & workers right.
That figure may not include stock options or bonuses. Also, a lot of ceos report 0 for income so maybe that could impact the numbers. Ceo pay ratio is an interesting thing to look at,
Again who is fighting? "You can do better" is not a put down where I come from, its more of a motivational sentiment. Like "come on lets go bro you can do better". I love when people have good debate but the first link you posted was literally the first search on google. So imo you could of done better. Now the .gov link is very interesting. Honestly I'm not here to argue about min wage increase, I think gov intervention is anything is misguided, but the idea that it "hurts the works" is just a cliche. I don't see it as lying if the main topic of an article is to express the idea that ceo pay has risen by a lot while worker pay has stayed stagnant. That's really the point of this whole discussion. The numbers are just numbers the fact that ceo pay has risen &worker pay hasn't is the issue. Whether raising min wage fixes it, i highly doubt it, doesnt really concern me because i dont see it as a lasting solution even if it does. The issue of class inequality goes much deeper, its not going to change it people make 12 or 15 per hour. The rich will get richer unless major things change.
No one is talking down to anyone, don't try the victim card my friend its just a conversation. Look the point is the whole article is not based on the top 350 companies, it makes other points. The fact that worker wages have stayed stagnant while ceo pay has risen is a fact idk where the confusion is coming in.
Overall dc i think you just need some new friends my man
Both the articles do refer to the top 350 companies, you're right. But refering to something is not the same as the article being about something. Read the rest of it, the ratio of ceo pay to worker pay is not based on the pay of the 350 top ceos. You can do better my friend
That's just one site tho which also happens to be the first thing that comes up when you google ceo pay scale. Here's another, https://www.salary.com/research/salary/benchmark/chief-executive-officer-salary
Shows much different information with average ceo salary at 600,000 on the low end. Also the pay scale for ceo varies a good amount depending on what city you search in with bigger cities obviously having a much higher pay scale. But look we can post different websites all day the fact that ceo pay has risen while worker pay has stayed almost stagnant is the point. Not even mentioning that business now pay less taxes, along with the rich, etc.
Shows CEO pay raise compared to workers. Do you want me to post more articles just lmk.
Don't think that's a true statement.
It'll only hurt workers because CEOs don't want to make less money. We've had a minimum wage for years and haven't slide into a purely socialist country. Raising that minimum wage isn't going to help close the wage gap on the ultra rich CEO and the below poverty line minimum wage worker, but having the mindset that it will "hurt the worker" is brainwashing. The gap between what a executive makes and what a minimum wage worker makes is really the astonishing thing. We don't have to be a socialist or communist country to have a more balance perspective on wage and class discrepancy.
Assange reportedly posted this right before his internet was cut by [deleted] in conspiracy
Some of it is pretty familiar but for myself I've never heard of the trilateral commission. Very interesting. What I also find interesting is not all the members of the CFR is on the list either.
The Democratic Debate Was AWFUL, Trump Is Going To Landslide 2020, Admit it by Tarrock in politics
[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 months ago (0 children)
Politics is part of the circus, it's all distraction. Turn off the tv.
About 4,000 more U.S. troops to go to Afghanistan by dcjogger in news
Someone already made this point but this article is over 2 years old from 2017...how is this relevant now? I'm genuinely curious. Becuase as someone else also pointed out, it seems recently that Donald is going against the MIC so it makes this article seem even more irrelevant..
Barbara Bush Was Not A Man—Convince Me by hennaojisan in whatever
This picture you posted though he/she especially looks like a dude tho. I've had to quadruple take because it almost doesn't look like a real pic of the barbarian but it is. He/she looks so man-ly. A lot of color pics of google images are of her when she is old af, which at that point its hard to tell. The older pics of he/she were all somewhat blurry & black&white which makes it hard to tell. This pic here tho straight dude-ish
Yea I've heard that story, shit goes deep with the bush family. The pics I was looking at were just google image search. Searched Barbara Bush old, Barbara Bush young, etc. The Bush 2 daughter it looks like has the same name is somewhat strange looking too....
[–]astronautrob 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 4 months ago (0 children)
Man just took roughly 30 mins of my morning gping through images of Barbarian Bush and her/his family & I've come to no conclusion on of my own. He/she definitely looks like a man in slme photos but others not so much (especially younger pictures of her/him altho there isn't a lot of those). This is somewhat interesting tho because of the Bush 1 presidency & the boy controversies that you mentioned. It would explain a lot. I always thought Bush 1 had some gay tendencies when you watch him speak, act, etc., & some of the old pictures of him make him look kind of gay (as much as someone can look gay). Anywho, good little morning search tho. Made me laugh a couple times at some of these pics Barbara Bush was such an ugly individual both inside and out.
The United States has spent EIGHT TRILLION DOLLARS fighting and policing in the Middle East. Thousands of our Great Soldiers have died or been badly wounded. Millions of people have died on the other side. GOING INTO THE MIDDLE EAST IS THE WORST DECISION EVER MADE..... by Void in The_Donald
Very interesting and yet very confusing. Dondald does seem to be giving the MIC the slip on multiple occasions, which is odd for modern presidents, but then he also rams thru a 15 billion (or trillion) $ defense budget increase when he said he was going to decrease it the same amount? A bit confusing but maybe that's what "they" want or maybe he is really railing against the MIC in a way that previous presidents haven't. I support no political part or candidate & think politics as a whole is a circus controlled by the elite buuuuuut some of the things that donald does makes me question this narrarive I must admit.
Democrats Hell-Bent On Tearing America Apart Ahead Of 2020 The phony impeachment inquiry is about wreaking havoc on the Trump administration ahead of the next election. by LibertyNation in powertrip
Everything in politics is part of the circus. Don't believe or even spend much time on anything dealing with Democrat or Republican, it's all distraction.
Wth is this ice poisoning thing & why are all the posts on new so strange by astronautrob in AskSaidIt
[–]astronautrob[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - 4 months ago (0 children)
Exposed them doing what tho? Also, didn't Chris Hansen get arrested for writing bad checks? Just wondering if Chris is helping from jail or is he out like on the street helping you guys...
[–]astronautrob[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 4 months ago (0 children)
Ah, I see, thanks for the brief. I'll sit back & enjoy till the dust decides to settle then
[–]astronautrob[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 months ago (0 children)
Really appreciate that!
[–]astronautrob[S] 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun - 4 months ago (0 children)
Correction, ice Poseidon.... my bad...still am confused what any of it has to do with real.life tho
Wth is this ice poisoning thing & why are all the posts on new so strange
4 months ago by astronautrob to /s/AskSaidIt from self.AskSaidIt
Trump caves to the nanny state on flavored e-cigarettes by dcjogger in politics
[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 5 months ago (0 children)
There it is. Love it bro keep it coming!
[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 months ago* (0 children)
Lol nonsense, such a dismissive attitude. I'm not going to do the googling for you champ but look it but there are many recent studies showing at least a link in e-cigs and the risk of cancer. There are even some studies that are showing a direct link. There are also a ton on article's& studies that show the opposite, thats the point of disinformation. Also, let us not forget the new lung disease that vaping users are coming down with. So you tell me, where is this nonsense coming from? These studies are very recent and vaping is what only 5-6 years old when looking at the general public. Think on a couple years what the studies would come out with. It seems that vaping is causing individual consequences much quicker than cigarettes do or did.
Be that as it may you didn't answer my question or make it any clearer how this is a consirpicy. All you did was try to deflect with negativity& a question that you could answer yourself eith a little research. Step up the debate bud, lets here some good rebuttals not this "nonsense" you just put in the ether.
The pnly reason i posted on this submission is because i believe people try to find conspiracy in everything. Case in point in this post here. Thry want us to spend our time pn sillyness like this. It's the goal of disinformation. If yoyre taking time and braincells talking about a e-cig conspiracy then youre attention can't be on what really matters.
[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 months ago (0 children)
That doesn't clear anything up. Still the question would be why did they ban it instead of just changing the law so the they get a cut from the proceeds of the vaping industry now? Would be much easier than banning vapping & they wpuld still get their money. They would get to keep the money plus more & still get to depopulate faster. The fact that vaping is giving people cancer FASTER than smokong is what throws the monkey wrench in thw whole narrative for me. The main agenda of the elites is to thin out the peasant population so anything that is contrary to that I don't think fits the bill. Banning vaping instead of changing the law runs contrary to that so doesn't seem to fit.
[–]astronautrob 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 5 months ago (0 children)
But confused here. How does the banning of e-cigs help any of the elite? If they are causing cancer, which would aid in depopulation, why would anyone at the top want to ban them? Maybe the argument that then these people would have to turn to regular cigarettes but that seems far fetched. Why not just buy up the vap companies & make a monopoly while still killing the peasants? Sometimes I think we look for consirpicy in everything & it's just not the case...
There are unseen creatures that we share this Earth with. They do not come from other planets. In the Koran they are called Jinn. The Jinn can create hallucinations, psychokinetic effects, cattle mutilations, crop circles, ufos, apparitions and other paranormal phenomenon by EndlessSunflowers in whatever
1999: The Ryazan Incident by Robin in history
[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 5 months ago (0 children)
me irl by hotsaucedeluxe in me_irl
Man, some of these are really bad...idt this is how the meme is supposed to go either..
Oh wow, “new research says it’s OK to stay single and die alone.” Hmmm, I wonder who would want to encourage white people to live meaningless, childless, lonely lives? by Jesus in conspiracy
Hmmm idk. The narrative of the higher ups wanting to specifically depopulate the "white race" always seemed murky to me. For instance, why is gov funded planned parenthoods are generally located around poor african american or latino neighborhoods? Why would a gov, who is presumably controlled by the "higher ups", fund a program that depopulates the african american and latino "races" much more than the "white races". That seems like it would be counter productive. Are they just trying to depopulate everyone? Also, what about the Christian establishment (mostly "white people" right?). They don't seem to be telling white people to have less babies. Are the higher ups not in control of this area too?
Idk just some thoughts, there are other examples but thise a re few that has always made me question the depopulation of the "white race".
What I think is much more likely is they (being the higher ups) dont gaf about how many of this race or that race there is as long is there is strive and division between the "races". Or another likely scenario is that they are building the foundation for a race war in the US. But shit like "these people want to depopulate the 'white race" is bs to me. Race is made up thing, a social construct. What we should really be worried about is these people depopulating our fellow citizens (which is how we should see everyone who is human but more specifically who are American) no matter what the percentage of melatonin they have in their skin. They are trying to make us think of it as this race vs another race, when really they're trying to depopulate anyone not playing the game. Stop falling for these race division tactics, no one cares if you're white black brown or blue, they just want to keep us divided so they can keep doing whatever they want.
But I hear ya Jesus, you gotta find the love tho.
Tulsi Gabbard and Just Some of her Connections Part 2 by Jesus in conspiracy
Hey Jesus what do you think of Andrew Yang?
This one seems to a bit of a reach...
David Koch, billionaire industrialist and libertarian political activist, dies at 79 by r721 in news
[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 6 months ago (0 children)
Are they really going to refer to this dude as a libertarian....?
"Jeffrey Epstein dead in apparent suicide" by NoOil in news
Mmm yes I see his account has only been active a day. When you say shill, do you think these are real people who are getting paid to push certain ideas or just random people?
Why is it not true? The questions surronding his "death" are many, to say anythings not true seems a bit premature
Seems like a 24 hour post limit, or somthing similar, would be a great idea by astronautrob in saiditCleanup
[–]astronautrob[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 6 months ago (0 children)
Seems like a 24 hour post limit, or somthing similar, would be a great idea
6 months ago by astronautrob to /s/saiditCleanup from self.saiditCleanup
Translation: CFR gofer ready to help with obvious agenda to have tyrannical government regulate speech and words spoken/written on PRIVATE platforms. Gabbard is an Obvious Plant, like all of them by Jesus in conspiracy
[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 6 months ago (0 children)
Who is a better option? Not that that is a reason to elect someone but don't you think someone who is in politics is going to part of some groups? I see you post a lot about her being a plant but I don't see that you recommend any type of replacement or even a name of another person who would be a good president.
What would happen to America if a jew like Sanders got elected president? by geroa in AskSaidIt
[–]astronautrob 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun - 6 months ago (0 children)
Nothing, the president doesn't have any real power. Everything would proceed according to the story, nothing would change. People think the president has all this power but he's just a character in a much larger narrative that more powerful people are trying to play out on a much larger scale.
“She’s Dangerous”: GOP Insiders Fear Kamala Could Be the Next Obama by lara in politics
[–]astronautrob 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - 6 months ago (0 children)
Lol, I don't think all these Kamala Harris posts are going to be well received here. We are a bit more advanced community than say your average reddit subgroup. This isn't going to work here Lara. If someone is paying you to do this you should advise them to save their money.
The reality of the Holocaust is best encapsulated in one factoid by [deleted] in pizzagate
Why is this posted in a pizzagate subgroup?
The biggest health threat for the majority nowadays by [deleted] in magnora7
[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 7 months ago (0 children)
Are you saying the US is comprised of 90% babies and only 10% adults?....
The Jewish role in the Russian Communist revolution. by HibikiBlack in conspiracy
[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 8 months ago (0 children)
Is it though? There seems to be way more condemnation of Jews in this thread than anything to do with Bolsheviks. Also, why does thr same exact post show up every week about Jews this or Jews that? I've seen this Jews + Bolshevik posted probably 5 to 6 times in the last month, why? Why when I go to the new section of this site it's looking more and more like a voat "ruck certain groups" circle jerk? Why does the creator of this site defend such posts and site this discussion pyramid when it's not being followed?
Look I'm all for a good discussion or debate but this isn't either of those. This is someone spaming the front page with what they believe or don't believe. Why not just pod this once and move on? Why is it the same exact post every week and why is it the same three people having a fingering contest about who can hate stuff more? And why are you in here defending it? This post isn't about Bolshevik s its about Jews & Judaism, for you to say otherwise is disingenuous and factually wrong. Read the comments my friend its all about Jews. This stuff gets boring & it degrads the site. This is just my opinion of course you run your site the way you want but I've come to respect you for what you are trying to do & seeing you defend this post makes me sad.
Ok your point is taken but I still don't see the point in posting this every week. We get it you guys don't like Jews for whatever reason, cool, but flooding the site with the same irrelevant info every week is just annoying & idt rates very high on this discussion pyramid you guys get wet over.
But Lenins idea for russia much different than what Stalins russia came to be. Stalin purged almost all the old Bolshevik leaders, etc., so I still have trouble seeing the significance of this.
[–]astronautrob 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun - 8 months ago (0 children)
Don't understand the point of these posts. So what if there was a large population of jews in the Bolshevik party, what does that prove? Also, Lenin was a lot more accepting of jews than Stalin. Once Stalin came to power the real purges began.
Americans are suddenly defaulting on their credit cards by dcjogger in news
[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 9 months ago (0 children)
That's an article from 2017.....
How to be a friend with magnora7? by [deleted] in magnora7
[–]astronautrob 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - 10 months ago (0 children)
I'm trying to get banned from this faggotnigger site. by faggotnigger in Banned
[–]astronautrob 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun - 10 months ago (0 children)
Don't think it's gonna work bro
How do you know when you're striking a nerve and the corporate news machine is trying hard to smear you "Fox mentions Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for 42 days running – 3,181 times" by EndlessSunflowers in WayOfTheBern
[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (0 children)
Or are you just controlled opposition?
r/BlackPeopleTwitter bans non "black" users by prometheus in MeanwhileOnReddit
[–]astronautrob 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun - 10 months ago (0 children)
Terrible "joke" it's almost like they used it as an excuse to try and call out different subs
Love how they say they got tons of positive feedback too...awful