TRA claims every cell can be sperm or egg by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]YallHoes 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No ...

TRA claims every cell can be sperm or egg by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]YallHoes 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't catch it. Please repeat what you said before

What are your arguments against "clitorises are small penises and penises are large clitorises"? by YallHoes in whatever

[–]YallHoes[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

English is weird

What are your arguments against "clitorises are small penises and penises are large clitorises"? by YallHoes in whatever

[–]YallHoes[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What does "kind of" mean in the sentence? Doesn't "cats kind of are small dogs" mean "cats are dogs"?

Philosophers and philosophy fans claim either "transgendersim is valid while transracialism is not" or "transgenderism and transracialism are valid" because, reasons ... by YallHoes in GenderCritical

[–]YallHoes[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you for letting me know. I was so confused 😩

Philosophers and philosophy fans claim either "transgendersim is valid while transracialism is not" or "transgenderism and transracialism are valid" because, reasons ... by YallHoes in GenderCritical

[–]YallHoes[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Please don't mind that nathan username. It's not my username. Not sure why a new username was archived along with the thread

This TRA claims "there is a spectrum between the two sexes and one can become less of a man and more of a woman", thoughts? by YallHoes in GenderCritical

[–]YallHoes[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Awful analogy. Noone is "straight". They're just too homophobic to accept their gay desires. Accept the reality

Also, again, awful analogy because "sexuality" is nothing but an illusion in the mind, a bunch of "feelings" constantly influenced by culture and society like "transgenderism" is about feelings, while sex can be detected and observed outside the mind and is not influenced by culture and society

It's like saying no one is 100% straight, but you can be 100% gay

Lmfao. Change it to: noone is 100% "straight" or gay

You don't have logical arguments in the face of that. All you have is anecdotes and "I feel I'm into [insert group]" and feeling ain't proof

The only reason some people acknowledge noone is "straight" while claiming someone can be gay is because those who claim to be gay are constantly oppressed. They are in no way, shape or form the same as those who claim to be "straight". Normalize "conversion therapy" for those who claim to be straight so we can guide them toward the right gay path, and then everyone will acknowledge noone is 100% gay either. Until then, "you can be 100% gay" is to protect the oppressed group, and "you can't be 100% straight" is to help the rest discover themselves