What's the max do you think that a White Nationalist US President could do?

VacaLeitera767 · 2022-12-22T03:27:57+00:00

Every political victory is preceded by a cultural victory. A pro-white (and, especially, anti-Jewish) ideology will have to become the dominant force in american society before a White Nationalist can even be elected, let alone govern effectively. Trump was elected without a majoritarian cultural base, which is why he was relentlessly sabotaged and couldn't deliver even the most basic milketoast promises. Same thing for the woke left. As long as there is no clear cultural majority, nothing significant will change, neither to the left nor to the right.

Provided a pro-White, or at least Jew-aware majority can be created, I'd say the most important thing by far would be launching an all-out assault on jewish dominance of institutions and ESPECIALLY universities. Most of the west's problems are downstream from the fact that a hostile elite has hijacked many of the levers of power and used them to burst a hole in culture. Establishing quotas could be a first step on that front.

There is reason to be whitepilled about this possibility, as a substantial portion of ethnic minorities could also be coopted by a hypothetical anti-jewish coalition. Initially, we will need to compromise on many of the more racially-oriented stuff and focus on the root cause (Jews) instead of directly fighting the effects (anti-whiteness and replacement) and alienating potential non-white, anti-jewish support.

VacaLeitera767 · 2022-12-13T15:44:37+00:00

I would recommend the work of spanish philosopher José Ortega y Gasset, more specifically the book "Revolt of the Masses".

Basically, the premise is that the astounding material successes of european liberal societies and the displacement of danger and suffering from everyday life has altered the nature of human existence to such an extent that it has turned the masses into a group of spoiled, indocile, violent teenagers, who take all the comforts of modern life for granted and do not realize that their existence and maintenance depend on enormous efforts by past and current elites in the development of science and technique. Instead of being grateful to their intellectually and morally superior peers (the excellent men), and accepting their naturally subordinate place in the social hierarchy, the masses now believe they have the right to shit out rules for everybody. This classification of "mass-man" is not based on economical background, but on pure moral and intellectual quality. The middle and upper-classes are, in fact, more likely to behave as "mass-men" than those who live a life of hardship or poverty.

The existence of average men has been elevated to such a high tier that true excellence is no longer recognized, and even despised. The unqualified masses of people now occupy institutional spaces that used to be reserved to the excellent few. The same thing applies to public and natural spaces, which are swarmed by intellectual children who previously would have been banned from such spaces, not even feeling slightly bothered by that fact, since they have no moral capacity to appreciate them. The good things in life, which used to be reserved to those deserving of them, have been massified and thus destroyed.

Scientific elites themselves have become degenerated as increased specialization means they no longer have the general historical and civilizational knowledge which had previously been required of ruling elites. While very competent in extremely specific fields of study, they are ignorant when it comes to history, philosophy, politics and the functioning of society, despite feeling entitled to have a say in such matters. That filthy criminal rat Fauci is a perfect example of such a despicable man.

I must however point out that Gasset should be classified somewhere between paleoconservatism and classical liberalism and believes fascism and national-socialism, just like bolshevism, are degenerated, violent, destructive impulses by the spoiled masses. In the 1920s and 1930s he correctly predicted the inevitable failure and demise of these ideologies, and says any alternative to liberalism must first recognize and incorporate its successes.

VacaLeitera767 · 2022-10-31T11:28:03+00:00

Go f*ck yourself. The scum of humanity, backed by George Soros and the NY-based globalist complex, just unseated a president whose voter base was essentially white or mostly white. Imagine being retarded to the point of believing the media's narrative about the Amazon.

VacaLeitera767 · 2022-10-07T14:10:34+00:00

Ciro ran a very anti-Lula campaign. Most of his remaining voters will probably go to Bolsonaro.

Despite Tebet supporting Lula, most of her voters are center-right and will end up voting for Bolso. It will be very close, but Lula is slightly favored.

VacaLeitera767 · 2022-10-07T14:06:15+00:00

The right-wing has been tremendously strengthened in congress and on the state-level. Bolsonaro has swept the entire country, excluding the backward Northeastern region, which votes for Lula because he governed as a kind of "father of the poor".

The fact is that the result was a lot better than expected. Polling firms and the media have been completely demoralized. There is still a small possibility Bolsonaro may win, if he reconverts protest votes in the Southeast, where media brainwashing of the middle-class has been most severe. The largest cities all swinged bigly to the left, while the countryside swinged to the right. Europeanized middle-classes (very exposed to the western media and cultural environment) have partially embarked on the "save democracy" narrative. The advance of US-style progressivism among the urban population has also been substantial. On the other hand, the right-wing consolidated its dominance of the growing evangelical sector and the parts of the middle-class that is less exposed to GloboHomo. Bolso also did very well among the young. There was an expectation that the youth would go far-left, but it didn't materialize.

The governors of the three largest states and hundreds of mayors are going to campaign hard for Bolso, so it's not at all impossible for Lula to lose votes. There is also the shock factor. The narrative of Bolsonarismo being defeated has been crushed. Bolsonarismo has taken over the entire country, despite the totalitarian far-left media environment. If he wins, he will be able to impeach judges and crush the communist supreme court. If Lula wins, he will face a ferocious opposition and won't be able to buy congress as easily as he did last time.

VacaLeitera767 · 2022-09-28T15:19:41+00:00

》 That is Leo Pericles' 'Popular Unity' party.

There are tons of small far-left parties in BR. They are all controlled auxiliary lines of PT and Foro de SP and do the "dirty work" of radicalizing specific sectors such as college students while being kept at a healthy distance to avoid contaminating Lula and the party's image among the conservative working-class population. They're breeding grounds for future militants and also help put college students (the children of the elite) "into line" by creating a far-left totalitarian atmosphere inside educational institutions.

UP is just one more of these auxiliary lines, but Woke and middle-class oriented instead of marxist-lenninist/stalinist like PSTU, PCB and PCO. I'd say their emergence was ineviatable as the organized LATAM left needs to cultivate this new US-centric woke element which has grown exponentially in the past few years. It's a sign of the direction in which the left is moving but not a threat in itself, as they will never be electorally relevant outside of public universities. Their base and down-ballot candidates are mostly middle-class white women screaming about abortion and fascism and so they're not really a racial nationalist movement like the the EFF. Despite the rise of US-style identity politics I don't think actual black nationalism will ever fly in Brazil. The left will incorporate some aesthetic elements and pay lip service to them but they'll always be kept at bay because it's simply not viable and are ultimately seen as a threat. As destructive as PT and PSOL are, they're still predominantly White (ironically, southerners have historically played an outsized role in the brazilian left, a legacy of the more egalitarian/european culture which contrasts to the colonial structure of the rest of Brazil).

》 How did things regress so far in less than four decades?

The far-left has had a totalitarian grip on Brazilian public universities since the 1970s (the worst sin of the military government was not purging them). As a result the cultural and media environment is PC and leftist. This is why change must happen above and not below. Long-term the masses are irrelevant. At most they can serve as a base for improvised "reactionary" governments like Bolsonaro's, but without robust elite and institutional support that simply cannot last. Globo (previosly conservative but now libshit media empire) is watched daily by most brazilians and has had an enormous role at mainstreaming Gays and Trannies through their telenovelas. Right now they're about to (again) take down a president and elect Lula. I'm convinced that without Globo campaigning relentlessly for him Lula wouldn't stand a chance against Bolsonaro.

(Edit) to get an Idea of what I mean by "totalitarian atmosphere", mostly white students at Brazil's biggest university are greeted on their first day of classes by a deluge of leftwing militants, flyers and posters saying things like "bolsonaro out", "negrx and pardx resistence", Sao Paulo black soil, feminists against bolsonaro, LGBTQIA against bolsonaro, transvestites against Bolsonaro, "blacken the university", "union of communist youth", "insurgent favela", "trotskyist collective", "vulvular revolution", plus a brazilian flag with the writting of "blacks, indios and pardos". It is simply impossible for normies to resist the pressure. I've been elsewhere in Latin America and it's even worse. This continent is a rotting mess and is done long term unless by some miracle there's a total fascist takeover.

https://www.reddit.com/r/brasilivre/comments/tim2wn/como_q_tanka_a_usp/

VacaLeitera767 · 2022-07-08T15:05:09+00:00

A bit unrelated of a side note, there is a close relationship between LATAM left and narcoterrorist gangs (the clearest example being FARC in Colombia, which has been legalized after a US-supported "peace deal" and is now a "progressive" political party with a permanent congressional quota - to say this is grotesque is a gross understatement).

Organized crime in Brazil has essentially been born of a symbiosis between far-left militants and petty criminals who lived together in prisons during the 1970s. That's why the largest and most deadly criminal syndicate in BR is called the "Red Command". Lula and the PT have close associations with murderous criminal factions. Communists viewed organized crime as a means to terrorize and destabilize the middle-class, conservative, implicitly White society. Leftists not only tolerate, but actively associate with and support, bloodthirsty criminals and murderers. As the US descends into third-world status, expect the same thing to happen there. Brazil had lower murder rates than the US until the 70s. Things can go downhill pretty fast when you let communists run loose. This is why they need to be quickly liquidated whenever they start to crop up.

VacaLeitera767 · 2022-07-08T14:44:24+00:00

What exactly is the background of this document?

Since the 1980s academia in most LATAM countries has been under near-totalitarian control by the far-left (which has also transitioned from third-worldist nationalism to woke and identitarian internationalism in recent years). 1970s dictatorships failed miserably in stemming the rising communist tide, they merely managed to delay the process by a few decades on the political front. Everything you read on that constitution is consensus among Latin American "intelligentsia". The only thing that has kept them from realizing their goals so far was the general conservatism of the population, which is changing b/c a lot more people are getting college-brainwashed these days.

As an aside, mind telling us more about the next Brazilian election?

Brazil has a more complex situation. It's a more conservative society than Hispanic America with a large evangelical sector. The rise of a lib-con mass movement in recent years (based around philosopher Olavo de Carvalho and Koch-funded libertarian groups) and the supremacy of Bolsonarismo on social media and on the streets have drowned the left and kept Brazil from drifting as far as the rest of LATAM in these last ~4 years. However, the economic situation has definitely strengthened the leftist opposition, and the intention to do the same thing that is being done in Chile clearly exists among Brazilian globalist elites, although I suspect that they won't be able to do much without risking serious social unrest, possibly a Civil War. Conservative sectors (ruralists, police forces and evangelicals) dominate Brazilian legislative politics, and they are increasingly radicalized in the face of the left's overreach.

The situation is further complicated by the division within the left itself. Lula is in essence a 1980s Marxist dinosaur with anti-Western leanings. However, the younger wing of his party is forcing him to partially pivot towards US-style progressivism. His presidential ticket however is different from what we're seeing in Chile or Colombia. It's less explicitly radical and a bit more 2000s-style. B/c PT is in a historically weak position they need to ally themselves with conservative sellouts to have a shot. The biggest problem for Brazil in my opinion isn't even Lula, but the far-left activist Supreme Court.

VacaLeitera767 · 2022-06-08T15:21:44+00:00

Latin American census data is very misleading because it's based on self-identification. These numbers reflect perceived skin color a lot more than they reflect race. Chile is majority light-skinned mestizo and Argentina is mostly castizo. Same for Paraguay, where barely any Whites live at all except for White Brazilian settlers and German Mennonites.

VacaLeitera767 · 2022-06-08T14:24:01+00:00

Bolivia is an Indio-majority country and its government is full commie with Indio identitarian tendencies. Probably the country with the highest amount of inter-ethnic tensions in South America. On the other hand, there is a sizable community of Low German Mennonites in Bolivia, who live fully segregated from mainstream society. This is the most traditional Mennonite community on the planet and they have birth rates that are higher than even the Amish (around 8 children per woman). The Bolivian government has so far mostly left them alone, but certain sectors view them as a threat to national sovereignty since they have settled in an area that is close to the Brazilian border and could soon constitute a majority in huge swathes of rural Santa Cruz department). Speaking of Santa Cruz, it is the only Bolivian department with a mestizo (and not Indio) majority and is the stronghold of the right-wing opposition. Long-term, the potential for secession is there, on ethnopolitical but also on geographical and economic grounds.

Chile, while having a superb quality of life in comparison to the rest of LATAM, is going through a Bolshevik coup attempt. There has been a wave of far-left protests in Chile since 2019 that has culminated with the astroturfing of a constitutional assembly and the election of leftist uber-woke president Gabriel Boric. The sham constitutional assembly has the goal of doing away with the Pinochet constitution and is as anti-white as it gets, with quotas for Indio representatives and headed by a textbook Soros feminist and LGBTQ "indigenous activist". The Chilean left is a trainwreck and the most culturally/racially extreme in LATAM. Very concerning political situation overall, although the Chilean Right is also strong and getting more and more based. The country is divided. Southern Chile (especially Araucanía region) has a high amount of Central Euro descendants and is overwhelmingly right-wing, despite local racial conflict with the indigenous Mapuche.

Argentina is the best of the three in terms of the absence of anti-White politics, by far. Anti-White identity politics is close to non-existent in Argentina and Uruguay, despite far-left politics also being strong down there. The reason of course is that Whites are still overwhelmingly dominant in the country's upper and middle classes, and "Europeanness" has historically been a bedrock of Argentine identity which distinguishes that country from the rest of South America. Unfortunately, the demographic situation deteriorated a lot during the late 20th century due to mass immigration from neighboring countries and due to sky-high mestizo birth rates. Argentina's Europeanness still dominates the national discourse and identity, but in demographic terms, there is no White majority to be spoken of any longer. The majority are what we would call "whitewashed" castizos.

VacaLeitera767 · 2022-05-15T02:06:06+00:00

Brazil - news media (excluding smaller left-wing and a few Bolsonarista outlets) is overwhelmingly Americanist and thus anti-Russian with the narrative completely dominated by the same libcon stuff you see in Europe and the US. The majority of the political establishment also sucks up to the West. Ukrainian flags were on display on public billboards all over my city a few weeks ago. The results are predictable - most regular people have bought the default narrative that Putin is the bad guy, although very few actually care about it.

The government tries to maintain a more neutral stance because the agribusiness sector is heavily dependent upon Russian fertilizer imports. Also, Bolso feels alienated from western leaders and has been betrayed by the rats of the CIA and by the US government (who are funding hostile globohomo ideology and oppositionist "new left" movements inside Brazil despite the most pro-US president in history - talk about being a shitty ally) and so he himself now tries to stay on friendly terms with Putin.

Funnily enough, the place where you will find a lot of outspoken Russia sympathizers is left-wing political parties as well as universities, which are dominated by the Maoist-Trotskyist-Stalinist far-left. (although recently the younger crowd has been abandoning the old soviet-bolivarian ways and leaning more towards spewing wokeness and covert CIA talking points - to them, Russia is "fascist" and a threat to LGBTQ rights and to the existence of Trans people, which is all they care about). Lula (left-wing leader) while in the presidency had taken a third-worldist stance, generally friendly to China and Russia, but is now walking on a thin line trying to please both his commie base and globohomo media, NGOs and the US regime, whose support he needs to beat Bolsonaro in the October elections.

VacaLeitera767 · 2022-05-12T15:11:23+00:00

There is nothing really exceptional about the current inflation. There have been worse energy price shocks before, in fact, oil prices more than quadrupled during the 1970s. 1970s inflation was a lot worse. People today are richer and the composition of their goods basket has changed. Food and energy account for a much smaller proportion of total spending, which is the reason why the methodology has been adjusted.

It is certainly possible (but unlikely) that inflation might skyrocket to the 20s and perhaps even 40s in the coming years in case the Fed refuses to induce a massive recession to avoid social unrest. That could be a huge political problem for the globalist system and could benefit dissidents, but economies have survived worse rates of inflation in the past. Latin America had systemic 40%+ inflation during the 1970s and still managed to grow their economies and improve living standards. German Hyperinflation was actually not as bad for the overall population as the deflationary effects of the 1930s depression.

It may lead to some unrest and dissatisfaction and probably to the Democrats being defeated this year and in 2024 (Trump 2024 is almost a certainty) but people who think this is some kind of systemic apocalypse are fooling themselves.

VacaLeitera767 · 2021-04-29T23:29:24+00:00

A part of it is because of right-wing culture warfare but most of it is simply reality rearing its ugly head - France literally IS disintegrating, that is an objective fact that people can only ignore for so long. Something tells me France will be leaving the GloboHomo block with a bang and it will have a cascading effect similar to that of the French revolution or May 68. Glorious (but difficult) times may be ahead.

VacaLeitera767 · 2021-04-29T23:23:24+00:00

It's an epidemic, not a doomsday scenario. The same garbage was being propagated about Brazil until last week, but now that the situation stabilized the filthy, ratlike journalists have found a different target - you can be sure that if the Indian government weren't Hindu nationalists you wouldn't be seeing nearly as many of these hyperbolic pieces.

VacaLeitera767 · 2021-04-29T19:45:50+00:00

A little-known fact is that Brazil was basically founded by cryptojews who were expelled from Portugal because of their revolutionary intentions against the portuguese crown. In the 1600s and 1700s, "Bourgeoise" and "Capitalist" were basically synonyms for Cryptojews. Cryptojews used to dominate not only the "portuguese" slave trade but also most of the commerce between Brazil and Portugal. The Portuguese king had to resort to exorbitant taxes to reign in jewish economic power, and redistributed confiscated jewish wealth to the bankrupt Christian nobility.

VacaLeitera767 · 2021-04-24T15:21:32+00:00

What happened in Latin America in the 60s illustrates what you're saying. Short-sighted and intellectually limited military leaders took over with the aim of "crushing communists" but ended up strengthening them by their sheer incompetence and unlikeability, as well as total lack of understanding of social dynamics and the cultural sphere.

We need to change the culture and conquer the youth and we won't do that if we're represented by decrepit generals with a boomer mentality.

VacaLeitera767 · 2021-03-18T03:14:12+00:00

If they're interested in portuguese/brazilian literary culture (until the 19th century these two complemented each other and walked together) then I'd say go ahead, there is some really great literature by both medieval and modern portuguese writers and 19th century/early 20th century brazilian writers.

I would warn anyone thinking about learning Portuguese very strongly about contemporary brazilian "culture" (especially youth culture) being a depressing mess, and immersing yourself in this shockingly retarded environment, even passively, can only be detrimental to your intelligence and mental wellbeing. I say this as a brazilian btw.

VacaLeitera767 · 2021-02-18T12:47:30+00:00

Yes, that is true, there is a leftist and media campaign to racialize Brazil, ironically it is the upper class and "LGBTQ"-type people, who are alienated from mainstream brazilian culture that are buying into it, while it is largely ignored and laughed at by the mixed-race population.

Aggressive, virulent blacks are being shoved down people's throats, and I can already sense a backlash, this is going to be a monumental failure. Even the leftists themselves are acknowledging that their efforts are making brazilians' opinion of blacks more negative.

VacaLeitera767 · 2021-02-18T12:16:15+00:00

I don't know about the IQ part, but the shittiness of Brazil is exagerated by the alt right I believe. Half of the country (the southeastern and southern parts especially) is fairly functional. Most of the horrors and morbidity associated with Brazil usually come from favelas and suburbs of cities with large destitute populations, and as a middle-class person it is fairly easy to avoid all of that.

VacaLeitera767 · 2021-02-17T17:44:10+00:00

Yes, race is less strictly defined in Brazil but that doesn't change the fact that the upper and middle classes are visibly overwhelmingly European-descended.

VacaLeitera767 · 2021-02-17T17:42:03+00:00

Brazilians are on average ~70% genetically European, ~20% African and ~10% Amerindian.(https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-47572019000400495)

I don't think there are any studies that control for class but it is just evident that the upper classes are much less mixed than the rest of the population while the poor have way more african ancestry (I say this because I'm brazilian). Upper class neighborhoods usually have 90%+ white population, and kinky hair is a rare feature among elite people, usually the non-white blood they have is amerindian.

These are the elected representatives for the São Paulo state assembly, fairly typical upper middle class people, as you can see they look predominantly "white latin" with some slight admixture. https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww3.al.sp.gov.br%2Frepositorio%2Fnoticia%2F03-2008%2FDeputados%2520Novos-Geral.jpg&f=1&nofb=1

VacaLeitera767 · 2021-02-17T16:43:23+00:00

Because they want the semen of a guaranteed 100% nordic-looking European, which they can't get from brazilian sperm banks. They want a child with germanic facial structure, blond hair, and blue eyes. White brazilians look like iberians or italians.

VacaLeitera767 · 2021-02-17T15:56:02+00:00

These are elite women, so unlikely to be brown. They are almost certainly at least 90% European, which is the pattern for upper middle class Brazilians. White women are unfortunately also much more likely to be dykes than the more conservative brown women.

VacaLeitera767 · 2020-10-28T17:12:25+00:00

I brush my teeth three times a day. Still don't want to be forced cover my face like a fucking slave or muslima.

VacaLeitera767 · 2020-10-28T13:33:41+00:00

A victory for people who don't want to be forced by an illegitimate power to go around wearing gross, stinky masks while healthy because this is a moderately worse than average year for infectious diseases.

VacaLeitera767