Erase Errata - Rider

TropicalParadise · 2021-03-15T18:49:42+00:00

Dear bobbobbybob, in the immortal words of bobbobbybob: "stop whining".

TropicalParadise · 2021-03-14T21:53:04+00:00

You are welcome to smoke weed in s/court I don't know about any other subs. however, most drugs are illegal in s/court like crack, meth, alcohol, fake-weed, poop-huffing, etc.

TropicalParadise · 2021-03-12T01:30:23+00:00

summary of thread:

me: Im looking for hope.

you: the FBI

me: but the director is arresting innocent protesters

you: true but THAT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TOPIC, STOP WHINING! IM LEAVING!

mk, Im just to tag your ear with an "es" for emo-stupid. run free lil es bobby.

TropicalParadise · 2021-03-10T02:05:32+00:00

comment recently found on internet: "Mel, as always love you and your shows. I still have a deep concern regarding the vaccines. Trump stated at the CPAC for people to go out and get the vaccine yet every woke person knows it is deadly so why did he say that and if he and the Military know it is bad why are they not stopping it?"

TropicalParadise · 2021-03-08T03:26:18+00:00

SODOM-AND-MAGNORA: you have been found guilty of e-felony harrassment and shall now fed to a giant mouse trap.

TropicalParadise · 2021-03-07T00:54:21+00:00

oh now im hating on the FBI because i call out the director for their bs. In your reply before this one you said my comments about the FBI are accurate. So make your mind, am I accurate or full of shit? I admit I went on a wild tangent, whats the big deal, why is going off on a wild tangent such a taboo? Maybe you should take a deep breath, stop gas-lighting, stop projecting, stop being full of shit and nujack swing on my nuts.

TropicalParadise · 2021-03-06T12:59:47+00:00

You are full of shit and refusing to answer a simple question. The topic is hopium. Im looking for hope. Am I supposed to give a shit that you are now worthless as a judge?

TropicalParadise · 2021-03-05T21:22:11+00:00

Do you approve or disapprove of FBI Director Wray calling 2021 capital protestors "domestic terrrorists" and "white supremacists"?

TropicalParadise · 2021-03-03T05:27:56+00:00

You are supposed to agree or disagree with whatever you want to. Please tell me if i'm wrong about anything and I'm just being paranoid. Lets start with the first point: doing "FBI" searches shows basically FBI's frontpage making the clear statement that their top priority is investigating innocent people who protested in government disapproval at jan.6 "capital riots".

TropicalParadise · 2021-03-02T15:31:37+00:00

its called weed, duh. side effects include spelling errors, cussing a lot, questioning authority, cures cancer, highly addictive and illegal in some corrupt courts but defininately not in this court. do you have a better judge who can spell gud? then they could step up and say what should be said but they don't. they are not here. this is all you got and more to the point all I got. if I could find a better judge and a worthy court, or place that is interested in justice, that would be Great, but until then Im flipping this couch over and making a court. I was already planning on posting some examples of good courts around the world, like I remember seeing a three judge court declare that bill gates and soros are to blame for the fake-virus and lockdowns. I do agree "corona virus disease 2019" is a fake-disease and a fake-virus, because no one has isolated the virus and a virologists did a test of 1,200 covid-pos samples and found only common flu virii. there has been many statements from various large medical communities saying about the same that this is the old flu virus and there is no pandemic and the fake-vaccine should be avoided.

I make a good point about the FBI and your only reply is some weak type of subtle gaslighting. You don't even say wether you agree or not agree. I guess your a hung jury. Failure to defend the FBI is still failure and /the/ FBI does not give me the hopium feelings that I crave. The search continues.

TropicalParadise · 2021-03-01T13:28:13+00:00

Good feedback. The FBI seems to be doing some legit work (also not much corruption crackdown) but why does their top priority seem to be "investigating capital rioters"? one protestor was shot and killed by a cop and the footage looks staged. also 4 cops died of natural causes but were blamed on protestors. seems like the FBI administration is corrupt at the top and cracking down on people who question trust in institutions (sometimes wrongly called 'conspiracy theorists') and they are working together with whoever staged the capital cop murder of a protestor instead of investaging the cop(s) and the whole psyop that includes obvious election fraud, corrupt politicians (including trump), fake protestors (including alex jones) successfully leading protestors around like sheep (entrapment) etc. Dear e-judge candidate, What is your opinion of the FBI administration? Is there a working system of administration oversight or is the entire system a failure and basically needs to be fired. the FBI do suck in billions of tax payer bux /yr but the pentagon sucked up over 35 trillion tax payer bux in past 20 yrs and then said oops were dont know what we did with the money and also the pentagon got caught mutliple times that a lot of their employees were/are collecting child porn. so the pentagon should definately be fired imo. understandablely its hard to fire stuff when you are like the size of an ant on a foot ball field and some top hat penguin motherfucker is hollar-ing at all the players to GET THAT ANT and the players are like 'we cant even see this fucking ant, what is this asshole trippin so hard on?' anyways, an ant doesnt care, it can sprout wings and fly away and doesnt have to be inter-mixed with football. but people dont have any good natural defenses, they are almost like cows and sheep except people got talking and tool making and forming leagues of justice. maybe im wondering off from the spirit of this investigation and of s/court ? im getting lost in metaphor maybe losing focus on the mission goals. An offense to s/court is on the verge of being expressed. s/court is offended by something. more than a dog barking at the wind. more like a human who can walk carefully around traps by shouting about them to teammates. back to the topic at focus: do you agree with my initial review of the FBI? that there may be good members but the admins are bad.

TropicalParadise · 2021-02-28T19:17:37+00:00

As a test of your judge skills: please review the hopium investigation on s/court and give some feedback. Do you think the image of kids in cages is a fake?

TropicalParadise · 2021-02-24T17:50:36+00:00

you can be whatever. but court is shut down for now. im not feeling well. acouple of nights ago bad fever all night. doing better but still in recovery. my spidey senses were telling me there was some e-crime brewing but doesnt seem to be any now.

TropicalParadise · 2021-02-20T17:45:18+00:00

the image was deleted before I could see it. would you like to press charges to s/court ?

update: now the image is working and I can see it but have not decided on any conclusions yet.

TropicalParadise · 2021-02-15T18:42:13+00:00

This is an elucidation of the phrase "[lets rock]", a motivational thought, for those on the fence about wether or not to speak up about scandalous issues.

TropicalParadise · 2021-01-18T15:30:35+00:00

you are full of shit and completely stupid. election fraud isn't really election fraud? come'on. the law suite was a test to see if scotus is corrupt. and we found out they are corrupt and the cheif justice is pals with Epstein.

TropicalParadise · 2020-12-17T03:54:58+00:00

That does not help me understand what 'judiciously cognitive interest' means. obviously they declined to answer directly, but the reason given does not make sense to mevand i have been asked to make a judgement about wether or not our system of justice is a failure. i am the one asking and the one answering, so that means I personnally will decide on all the rules and my own opinion, not say gee seems like im out of my league here and i should just step back go with the flow. maybe they think 'judiciously cognitive interest' a clever and irrefutable agrument by being confusing. anyone could make a creative guess as to what they meant like 'texas, you shouldnt be interested in other states doing massive election fraud' but then texas could agrue that they determine what their own interests are, not an outside party, and we have a serious dispute that needs a mediator and a judge and the supreme court could and should help resolve but they didn't and this is the failure of scotus, in my opinion. I can not tell if you agree with my opinion or not.

Its "just legal speak" does not change my opinion. The people demand justice and scotus failed to deliver. This doesn't need to be rocket science, but even if it is like rocket science and their is some esoteric legal-babble related reason for this failure, then I would still fire the judge(s) and call them criminals for trying to cover-up massive election fraud with esoteric legal-babble.

If you are trying to agrue that election fraud is a bullshit story put out by politicians, then I would disagree. The long list of election fraud evidence is not something put out by politicians and clearly proves there was massive election fraud.

TropicalParadise · 2020-12-16T23:24:28+00:00

spelling correction: judiciously

TropicalParadise

MODERATOR OF