Elon Musk says Japan will "cease to exist" if birth rates do not rise.

SamiAlHayyid · 2022-05-10T04:58:57+00:00

The immediate thing I noticed about that Tweet is that if we replace 'Japan' with literally any White nation, Musk would have been totally cancelled. It's also rather unfortunate that it would probably never occur in his libertarian mind that this is so. Notice how (https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-with-declining-population) Japan is the only non-European country with negative population growth, and that there is dead silence from all of the global bigwigs on it afflicting half of Europe, notably excepting when they want to use it to promote immigration?

It appears that exposure to Elon Musk causes similar symptoms to those of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Symptoms include ranting about how Musk is a 'fascist' when he clearly isn't; Musk constantly being on Left-liberal minds and being shoehorned into all sorts of narratives with which he clearly has no relation; exhibiting hostile attitudes toward anyone perceived as sympathetic toward Musk; and wishing death upon both him and them.

There is already much regurgitation on Twitter about how this is a 'racist dogwhistle', etc.

Perhaps more disturbing are the comments. I read one that said something like 'Japan should let in 600,000 [644,000 is supposedly the amount of total Japanese lost each recent year] immigrants'. Obviously someone completely oblivious to how this has worked out for every Western country.

Only a total moron would believe that a minority-Japanese 'Japan' would still have people concerned with it. Notice that there are no equivalents to 'weeaboos' for mixed-race countries because everyone knows deep inside that they're all shitholes and only pretend they believe otherwise for emotional, faux-moral reasons; that is, that it is in some way 'bad' to acknowledge this simple fact?

After all, just when you have ever heard a White person say: I wish I was born in Brazil? It's always Japan or somewhere like Sweden, isn't it? No matter the ideology, no matter how fucked up the person in question is, nobody says: 'I wish I was born in the Sudan'. And literally nobody will say: 'I wish I was born in [a majority non-Japanese] Japan', after the fact. There will be no 'weeaboos' for that future Japan.

It is because what these people value about Japan (e.g. 'anime') would simply not be there without the Japanese ethnie. Without this group, they will not see any more value in Japan than in Sudan.

The Japanese situation is far worse than anyone knows. The Covid baby bust is accelerating things.

https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14509875

The number of babies born in Japan in 2021 is estimated to have declined to around 805,000, a figure not expected until 2028 in the shrinking country

It appears that South Korea has also experienced negative population growth for the first time in 2021:

https://www.dw.com/en/whats-behind-south-koreas-population-decline/a-60210895

The country's total population of nearly 52 million is set to decline 0.18% by 2021 year-end, for the first time since the country began collecting census data, according to figures released by Statistics Korea.

The government institution in charge of statistics and census data also mapped out a worst-case scenario, according to which the present population will drop to around 12 million by 2120 — around 23% of today's population.

Moreover, Statistics Korea predicted that the average age of the population is set to rise, from a median of 43 in 2021 to 62 by 2070.

SamiAlHayyid · 2022-05-10T04:10:17+00:00

Twittard responses to this are hilarious. The first one I saw was something like:

I thought that Ukrainians were the fascists.

Basically, some 'anti-fascist' dipshit who doesn't understand that neither side is actually 'fascist', and now having seen the odd 'fascist' on both sides is now experiencing cognitive dissonance thinking 'Wait... both sides are fascists? I've been supporting fascism all along!?'.

I couldn't help but reply with something along the lines of that he was a degenerate Twittard untermensch, only to have my account locked in literally less than five seconds after tweeting. Lmao.

That's still better than back around 2015 or so when I made an account, liked a few tech pages and then randomly had it locked without even posting anything.

I think Twitter is probably the worst of the surface websites. It's even worse than Reddit, because at least there I can call someone a degenerate Redditard without being instabanned. YouTube and Facebook at least aim to be porn-free, whereas Twitter and Reddit are chock full of the most degenerate filth imaginable. That level of asymmetry is astounding and reflects the depraved mind of its creators: porn everywhere; anti-White bilge everywhere; but mean words against poor little fragile snowflake Twittard degenerates are unacceptable.

SamiAlHayyid · 2022-04-06T03:21:18+00:00

I seem to remember that an entire group were practically all doxxed on Discord. Probably 50 or more people.

I also remember someone claiming that a private group with only four people in it was also banned. Since only those four had access to the group, Discord admins must have the ability to look even inside private groups as well.

However, I know that Joel Davis has had a very large Discord group going for a long time. So I'm not really sure what it is that gets Discord admins themselves doxxing people and or banning groups.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-09-03T06:41:41+00:00

Covid itself could at most be only some kind of prototype. Nobody is going to make a bioweapon that intentionally predominantly kills the old, sickly and obese. They're exactly the people that are the least threatening. You'd want to kill the exact opposite—the young, the healthy and the fit. Covid itself was probably not intentionally released, leaving only the options of it being unintentionally released (e.g. the 'escaped from Wuhan laboratory' narrative) or simply not a bioweapon (e.g. the 'Chinese eating bats' narrative). Either way, the 'China virus', 'Kung Flu', 'Winnie the Flu', etc. labels seem apt. It is senseless for a foreign power to release something so imperfect in China; the narratives spewed by China (e.g. 'Western bioweapon') should be rejected out of hand.

There's obviously something gravely wrong with the way China portrayed Covid. Early last year we saw a constant stream of videos ostensibly coming out of Wuhan portraying a city with streets full of dead people, rooms full of body bags, people having seizures and randomly dropping dead on the job and Chinese language interviews claiming, for example, that all medical staff at entire hospitals were infected and/or already dead and that nobody was left to deal with the large number of patients showing up...

It's totally at odds with what the rest of the world has experienced. If there is some plot behind all of this, they're clearly part of it, releasing videos that in retrospect seem either as though they must be staged, or as though whatever was killing these people is not the same thing the rest of the world is dealing with. They painted some sort of horror-movie scenario. Remember when they were so desperate that they were literally barricading the people in Wuhan within their own apartments by physically obstructing the entrances from outside?

Shouldn't these things be happening in the rest of the world? Well, it very clearly isn't, not even in countries like America, Brazil or India where the official number of deaths is far higher than the figure given by China for itself. We shouldn't be comparable with the nightmare Wuhan scenario; we should be far worse. But where are the hospitals in which the staff are 100% sick or dead? The streets in which we should be seeing corpses rotting away?

So why would China almost certainly be blowing whatever it was that they had out of proportion? And are they the only ones lying about it, or is there a plot involving much more than just China?

I won't speculate on the Covax since Covid itself is something that can only point in a direction that would in most circumstances seem already far too conspiratorial for my tastes. But why is there such a discrepancy between the Wuhan scenario and the global scenario once Covid was imported, probably by Chinese construction workers, into Iran, soon finding its way to Italy and then rest of the EU, while these worthless idiots like the American Democrats downplayed Covid and claimed that it was just being used as an excuse for a racist closure of borders? That was, of course, before they developed their current view of Covid, which instead involves overplaying it and being obsessed with forcing the Covax on people. These morons can't get the balance right, getting it wrong on both accounts. Take it more seriously before it overwhelms entire nations. And stop trying to 'jab' everyone in an attempt to undo the consequences of your own incompetence; take it less seriously now that we've seen that, whatever happened in Wuhan, it clearly wasn't a microcosm of what we're seeing globally. If the aim of Covid is to justify everyone getting the Covax, everyone has played their roles remarkably well, both downplaying and overplaying Covid at the perfect times—downplaying to allow Covid to spread, and then shifting to overplaying to allow the Covax to spread. This whole thing is testament either to the stupidity of the many, the sheer genius of a select few, or both.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-09-03T05:48:44+00:00

At least the CCP is trying to undo some of the catastrophic damage that they've wrought upon China, which is more than what could be said for Western political parties, practically all whom are so twisted as to perceive damage as 'progress'. The CCP has flirted with Confucianism and traditionalism more generally for quite some decades.

Unfortunately, traditional culture is still subordinate to this materialistic, modernistic, feministic 'socialist culture', which leads them to attempt outrageous things like trying to make Confucius an action-movie warrior hero. Confucius was, of course, hardly a fan of combat, tactics, and everything else associated with the 'world of war' (Wu), and instead emphasized learning, poetry and everything else associated with the 'world of letters' (Wen). The flagrantly anti-nationalist and anti-traditionalist CCP continues to misappropriate Chinese history for its own aims. Confucius would not approve.

'Lil Nas X': the bum-drilling crap artist. Indeed, it probably takes an outright queer to think that that false pregnancy photo is a good idea. The baby bump is literally a metaphor for his next album. The reasoning? The album is 'his baby'.

A quick YouTube search for this guy reveals he is total cringe. Just look at this music video with a whopping 339 million views. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6swmTBVI83k It portrays some Wakanda black paradise nonsense, except permeated with obvious queer influences. The whole thing reeks of homosexuality, especially the blatantly sexualized last minute or so, which may as well be a semi-CGI version of a gay black male porno.

Who would have thought that this genre, well known for its 'toxic, hegemonic masculinity' and its portrayal of the world as consisting merely of concrete jungles full of non-stop crime, flash cars, and drugs—one in which women have a very clear place as objects of desire—would itself become fully-pozzed? A quick perusal of his videos shows, for example, that women, far from being accorded their usual roles, are practically non-existent in them. Those roles—of scantily-clad people gyrating around on-screen—are still there: but the women have been bizarrely replaced by black men. He goes a step further: sometimes they're not scantily-clad, but nude and censored. I can't imagine Lil Nas X being very popular with fans of Snoop Dogg and his less pozzed ilk. I imagine they'd think that Lil Nas X is an embarrassing faggot, and they'd be right.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-31T10:40:00+00:00

I don't even think a conclusive collapse is needed for people to start leaving. The DR probably would have already done this long ago if it was actually allowed to organize openly. Whoever remains stranded in mass society cannot hold out forever. Even if you block out 'entertainment' like 'Q-Force' and 'Blues Clues' by simply not having a Talmudvision, the kids will still be forced to go to school, and this is increasingly inescapable from a legal perspective. That Jewpanese San Franshitscan bum driller Iwata and his bum buddies (AIDS be upon them) were obviously right: "We're coming for your children", i.e. to indoctrinate them into Left-liberalism or, from their own perspective, to 'teach' them 'inclusion' and 'tolerance'. So even if you do not succumb to it, they know they just have to bide their time. They were never able to outbreed other groups and have only ever been able to grow their numbers through conversion. But being a licentious piece of shit is easy and has immense appeal to many people, who start off wanting 'to have fun' and soon find themselves submerged in the pozz. It doesn't take long before they'll be identifying as 'abrosexual', 'agender', 'alexigender' or some such nonsense... and there's not much that can really be done to deradicalize them at that point. The bigger the city the more hopeless it gets.

I would like to see thousands of Oranias across the West. There will be problems with both Antifa (but these people would almost always look very out of place and can only ever be caricatures of the 'Far-Right') and state infiltrators (these are the biggest problem because states have access to high-agency people whereas Antifa are lumpen trash and look the part). But they cannot 'Waco' any large number of Oranias without committing outright mass murder.

We've reached a dead end, which is why DR content creation consists overwhelmingly of mulling over philosophy and conversational livestreams. I think that once enough communities are formed people will actually flock to them, since racial consciousness will likely grow as demographics change, and the social situation is increasingly intolerable and is drawing all sorts of complaint by people who vaguely see that something is wrong but are blaming problems on wrong causes. People lash out at the symptoms and surface level problems, but do not know of, or do not problematize, the largely unseen root problems. Who will seriously attack liberalism, for example? They at best attack some facet of it, like feminism or mass immigration. But these things are inseparable from liberalism. Every group like Antifa, feminists and MGTOW grows; every public intellectual like Peterson, Reich and Zizek grows; vaguely populist leaders like Sanders and Trump owe their popularity to them; all provide largely wrong answers and keep people within the bubble. Most people cannot think externally to their bubble and will only develop strategies of action based on the options they feel they have. If no one leaves to set the example, then the overwhelming majority will feel that they have no choice but to stay no matter how intolerable it becomes, and will become only deeper submerged. Instead, they'll keep for voting for the faux-Right, revisit the wrong ideologies, blame persons (Trump bad, Biden bad) rather than problems and blame surface problems (e.g. Muslims) or pretend problems (-isms and -phobias) rather than deeper problems (e.g. immigration, without which there would be no Muslim problem to begin with). This does not mean giving up on nations; it is about back-up plans that would cause a great headache for the System if taken up by many people.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-30T11:43:03+00:00

There's actually at least two videos of this nonsense from the same woman:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1431375675903053829

The worse one is much less viewed. "I pledge allegiance to the queers":

https://twitter.com/i/status/1431379407332159495

Leftist reasoning on flags:

Flag symbolizing the nation = das fkn xclusion n oppreshun n sheit mang!

Flag symbolizing degeneracy = freedumb n equity!

The first time I had evidence of how utterly imbecilic they had became regarding flags was back when the video game Call of Duty: WWII (2017) had came out. I didn't play this game and the last one I played was released way back in 2011, but I remember how unpopular this was at the time. One of the complaints was that, for some utterly bizarre reason, players can set a rainbow flag, a bisexual flag, a trans flag and an asexual flag as your 'calling card'... but you can't set the flag of any nation, not even America where the game was developed, as your 'calling card'. Degeneracy flags, yes; national flags, no. From that point I caught onto how it made sense that, with national identities under attack to varying degrees practically everywhere, national flags themselves would also be under attack. Sexuality is exceedingly a permissible identity (excepting heterosexuality, which is 'oppressive') whereas nationality/ethnicity/race exceedingly are not (especially if these identities are also considered 'oppressive', e.g. black pride is safer than Asian pride which is safer than White pride). America having a Brazilianized demographic underneath a certain age does not render the American flag non-oppressive, either.

Fast forward four years and we have this worthless slag claiming that the national flag 'made me feel uncomfortable' whilst being fine with this idiot flag under which never stands anything but lumpen trash who thankfully are by and large the last chapters of their bloodlines.

That Twitter account has some pretty funny videos:

"I'm also male but I'm also agender, like, I'm 20% male and 80% agender": https://twitter.com/i/status/1432133359657013251

"We also know that systemic racism is the reason people of colour tend to be more food insecure than White people": https://twitter.com/i/status/1432043037392347146

"You seem to think I'm making some kind of request? I was just informing you of my correct name and pronouns so you know how to refer to me. Intentionally misgendering a student is actively creating a hostile learning environment and discriminating on the basis of gender identity." - says a 'they/them' named 'Shade': https://twitter.com/i/status/1431283433972641793

Full-blown chimpout goin' on n da educashun: https://twitter.com/i/status/1430900436232380423

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-27T13:46:36+00:00

If I were to speculate at this point on why the American case numbers might still be inflated—and this goes into ground that is too conspiratorial or speculative for me ordinarily—the first thing that comes to mind is that they want to transition power from Biden to Kamala. Biden was needed to get rid of Trump because Kamala is too 'radical' or 'Leftist' for many voters. Getting rid of Trump was needed to give the GOP establishment a chance to retake their party and restore elite control of both parties. But Kamala is who I think they really want, and Biden indeed needs to go now that he's outlived his usefulness.

That would also explain why CNN and perhaps some of the other big media has started turning against him on the Afghan thing as well. Normally the MSM has shielded the Democrats from criticism just as effectively as they subjected Trump to their own, i.e. few mentions of the border crisis, practically no mention of continued Antifa-BLM riots in Salem, etc. past the handover. They tried to paint a picture in which Trump was the source of instability and therefore that Biden's ascension meant a restoration of stability, something easily disproved by looking at websites like riotarchive.com.

See, for example, the latest videos posted there on August 23 in Portland. There's clearly still Antifa-BLM-Black Bloc types clashing with police. As an aside, careful with your volume if you click play on any of those.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-27T13:29:09+00:00

I'm skeptical the numbers are actually inflated, since high levels of Covid cases clearly negatively impact the popularity of whoever is in power. When Trump was in charge, sure, it made sense to inflate the numbers because they knew it would shift public attitudes in Biden's favour, and the establishment/media never for a moment let the global masses forget how much they hated this man. All these neocons and spooks like Comey and other establishment fogies flipped to the Democrats, whereas they were Republicans before Trump's ascension.

But now they're clearly negatively impacting Biden's popularity as well, with the number of cases and deaths hardly lesser than this time last year, despite this being before the Covax. They desperately needed Biden as a sort of compromise candidate to dupe enough people who would not vote for someone with a very 'Leftist' reputation like Kamala upfront into voting for the Democrats. It makes more sense to downplay the numbers now in order to protect their man Biden.

Countries reporting very low numbers are the ones I find suspicious. Vietnam can't even solve its decades-long HIV epidemic, mostly from intravenous drug usage which is also rife there.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-27T12:24:37+00:00

I haven't heard of anything yet either, but this provides all Western countries currently there—not just Americans—with a golden opportunity to make a case for staying, particularly with the Western media putting a huge amount of attention on this bombing right now.

Now, I don't think they'll stay either, because I don't think the new Taliban rulers want them there. They want the West out, and then they need to eliminate both the non-Pashtun "National Resistance Front" rebels up north along the Tajik border and Jihadist opponents. The rebels appear to be supported by the Indian media which is exaggerating their accomplishments, just as the collapsing government was supported by India donating large amounts of equipment, all of which was swiftly abandoned and now belongs to the Taliban (or Iran, with plenty of troops fleeing across the Iranian border), but they look like they'll be crushed soon. It is said that the Chinese media is already praising the Taliban, thus taking the opposite side of the Indian media.

So all I can see happening is either:

A sudden invasion threat is made, which leads the Taliban rulers to extend the deadline because they know they would swiftly lose what they've spent two decades trying to regain if they refused, or;
A bungled evacuation with some people who were supposed to be evacuated literally left behind. I think this will be the likely outcome past August 31.

I've also heard that the US and the Taliban are sharing information to fight Islamic State. Could be just a wild theory doing the rounds.

The POS Biden is currently blowing hot air over the dead Americans. "We will not forgive. We will not forget." Yeah, whatever, Joe. Did he learn that one from Anonymous?

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-27T11:37:16+00:00

Has it, though?

New Cases Reported:

USA: 169,953

Russia: 19,630

Total Reported Cases Per 1M population:

USA: 118,061

Russia: 46,741

Sure, America is larger than Russia but nowhere near larger enough such that America could conceivably be said to be doing better than Russia per capita. I don't think there is any country that could seriously be said to be handling whatever this is very well, and the countries who look comparatively good in reports like China and Vietnam also happen to be the countries most likely to repress inconvenient information. This community wouldn't exist if we were Chinese nationalists talking about the CCP/Xi in the same way we talk about the Democrats, Biden-Kamala, J's, etc.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-27T10:54:47+00:00

You can also add Christians to that list as well. They see Christians as being predominantly White and therefore predominantly oppressors because they're judging the whole religion by the state of it in the West, i.e. indeed overwhelmingly White. They aren't exposed to the massive Christian-identifying non-white masses in Africa or LatAm because many of them know very little outside of the West itself. American troops were in Iraq... but most Americans didn't even know where it was on an unmarked map (63% I think was the figure I read). Nigerians and Indians watch Hollywood films, but Whites don't watch their Bollywood or Nollywood films. All around the world people many non-American people were more invested in Trump v. Clinton or Trump v. Biden rather than their own damn elections. It was certainly the case where I am.

This then leads them to all sorts of odd conclusions; for example, claiming that Easter or Christmas (yes, I know that these are technically Pagan and aren't celebrated by all Christians) should not be celebrated while believing that all other religious celebrations are acceptable. Of course, plenty of non-whites would also be impacted if there was a whole campaign across the West to rid us of those two events, but they identify Christianity too closely with Whites to see that. They just think that some Churchgoing White guy with his wife and four kids is being dragged downwards which is good for equality's sake, and not the Churchgoing Okechukwu with his ten kids.

It's similar to how films almost always cast Whites in the role of villains. This goes back a long way, e.g. the Empire in the Star Wars films were practically all White males, and it was only some years later when they started to 'diversify' the Empire itself to add women, aliens, etc. That was probably a mistake from their viewpoint, because it makes the most sense for them not to 'diversify' the villains. In doing this, they probably unintentionally made Leftoids more sympathetic to the Empire.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-27T09:13:40+00:00

Notice how opportune this is for globohomo. Instead of getting their remaining people out, the bombing can effectively serve as an excuse for attempting to delay ('we've been interrupted, we need more time!') as well as an excuse for taking more Afghans with them ('See! There really is a threat! So we must take more Afghans!). Two birds with one stone. The Islamic State, who I've barely heard anything about in two years, suddenly seem to be wheeled out yet again right on time to serve a role as a bogeyman to justify staying longer and taking more people.

Indeed, I can't even figure out what Islamic State's Wilayat Khorasan branch would do this for, as it doesn't seem to benefit them in any obvious way at all. Surely they understand that it will at the very least encourage the West to stay longer, and at most, it may lead Western states to overcome their general aversion to war and decide that they need to re-enter for some time. What's the word for things like this? 'False flag' is one. How about 'gay op'?

I guess the closest explanation I can come up with is that maybe they know that those trying to flee tend towards being the worst type of Afghans (trannies, queers, feminists) and they want to get as many of these people as they can before they escape to the West where they'll be beyond reach. Either way, Afghanistan (part of Wilayat Khorasan in IS' terminology) would be rid of them whether they were killed or not, and it seems like letting them fly away is less risky. They believe that Allah will cast them all eventually into Hell anyway, so it does not make much sense to take such a large risk just to send them there sooner.

There's essentially a nationalist Islamism against a colourblind globalist Jihadism clash here. Islamic State is extreme-Left on race (I read recently that they burned all books in Mosul University back in 2014-16 that contained mentions of race or ethnicity, although such works weren't their only targets), whereas the Taliban are essentially "Pashtun First".

I'll be paying attention to how the Taliban change the education system in Afghanistan. They definitely have a 'Gender Studies' program in Kabul University (see: https://web.archive.org/web/20201023003233/https://feminist.org/news/kabul-university-to-open-first-gender-studies-program-in-afghanistan/), and I'm sure that it will be one of those fields abolished and everyone involved in propagating it in serious trouble. Good riddance. Islamic State removed almost all of higher education excepting a few hard science fields like chemistry (in Mosul University, they tried to turn the chemistry faculty into a chemical weapons production plant) at the universities they controlled in Iraq/Syria. The Humanities and Social Sciences were basically abolished with the obvious exception of Islamic Studies. Most of those fields are certainly no loss—'Gender Studies', 'Black Studies' and 'Indigenous Studies' are clearly unscientific, are not accepted as sciences even in today's Clown World, and should be axed everywhere. The rest of the Social Sciences and Humanities also need a serious clean-up. If you've ever studied Sociology you'll know the whole field has shifted from Far-Right to Far-Left over the course of its 170 or so years of existence.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-27T03:51:28+00:00

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEVLIAzlnHA

Odysee: https://odysee.com/@martinezperspective:2/Interview-with-Martinez-Perspective-video:0

He conducted himself pretty well, though he could have had a more concise definition for the 'Great Replacement' and 'race realism'.

I'd say, for example, that race realism is at its simplest the belief that race is real. More accurately, it refers to a belief-system in which race is regarded at the very least as an objective category—it doesn't matter what the specific beliefs contained within it are so long as they lead to that conclusion, though they usually are overwhelmingly biological-psychological.

Race denialism refers either to the absence of such a belief-system, or a belief-system in which race is actively disregarded as real (e.g. as a 'social construct').

I mostly agree with the views he expressed throughout. I'd be Rightward of him on feminism, though interestingly I think that even though he seems slightly more moderate on that, he places too much focus on it. For me, feminism is a surface-level problem rather than a root-level problem, and I'm not for focusing on surface-level problems. I'm also much less pan-European, though it's obvious that all Europeans share the same enemies at the current time and therefore should fight against them together. Obviously these are trivial differences.

Hopefully some Leftoids get wrecked soon.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-27T03:34:39+00:00

This. Also, 'Russophobia' is socially acceptable because Russians are predominantly White. Positing that Russia is the 'greatest threat' to America fits perfectly into the predominant anti-White and 'anti-racist' narratives (Whites are the real problem, non-whites are not the real problem) while positing, say, China, would not. Leftoids cannot accept China as an enemy because they would automatically be in the position of 'racist White supremacist oppressors' against 'non-white victims'. So any scapegoat of theirs must be White, and indeed they all predominantly are. 'Police', 'Russians', 'Republicans', 'Trump supporters', 'neo-Nazis', etc. Notice how not a single one of their enemies is predominantly non-white, despite Whites being < 10% of the global population? What's the chance of that being the result of impartial minds? Around about zero?

Furthermore, it means that the two 'White powers' (supposedly a term used by Brezhnev to Nixon) oppose each other, which again serves the anti-White narrative in a very obvious way. Afrocentrists, 'Critical Race Theorists', J's, and other people who are ardently anti-White salivate at the prospect of Whites killing each other over some delusion like the Russiagate false narrative, one so obviously hokum in light of the fact that Trump would have long been jailed if any conclusive proof was found. The fact that he's not jailed means that they never found proof despite the obsessive search by these Comey, Mueller and Sztrok types who the Democrats deified for a time, because they wrongly thought that these men would be the key to finding the conclusive proof they wanted to rid America of Trump. Of course, if they had conclusive proof he would have been in jail long ago—the reason why he hasn't been jailed is because they haven't been able to provide it.

Nonetheless, plenty of Democrat trash were sabre-rattling with Russia at the time because war with Russia is something they already find unconsciously desirable (the two most powerful groups of Whites killing each other strengthens non-white power and gets the world closer to having a 'racial equality' that, unknown to them, has already been long surpassed). Democrat Whites obviously think they hold way more cards than they actually do, and so bizarrely think that they are the beneficiaries of racial inequality when it has obviously been the non-whites who have held the upper hand for well over 50 years. For example, many of these people won't even call the police if a non-white commits a crime against them, because they either justify the crime (he's just desperate, oppressed, underprivileged, etc.) or because they know deep inside that they are going to be the 'bad guy' for doing so. Neither of these things would be true in any White supremacist society (nobody would attempt to justify non-white crime, non-whites would never be the 'good guy' in conflicts with Whites).

Spot on about leftoids and the media. All of the unthinking lumpen trash automatically become Leftists because it is the only narrative to which they are exposed. To become a Leftist one just has to internalize everything transmitted to them by the MSM, whereas to shift to our side it takes one to explicitly reject the content of these largely unavoidable transmissions. That's far too difficult for most people, who prefer others to think for them so that they can indulge in hedonism, etc. The West is one massive echo chamber in which one is bombarded constantly with the same general messages—from television, internet, teachers, role models, celebrities, public intellectuals, all the way from childhood to the grave—to the point that they seem to most people objective, unquestionable truths.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-26T09:47:22+00:00

It's worth mentioning that it's come to fruition—MartinezPerspective is apparently going to talk with Politically Provoked tomorrow, and then get into some debates later on. It's great news, since he's an educated and intelligent content creator who has authored numerous books, and yet does not give a 'nerdish' vibe. He also has plenty of practice since he has had some serious conversations with many Omegle users sometimes going for an hour or so. For me, this is great news.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-12T14:34:18+00:00

I think AFA is what they call themselves in a wide range of countries (Anti Fascist Action). I think they came from 1980s Canada, where they came out of either the skinhead or heavy metal counter-culture. Of course, the original Antifa who inspired the current crop were the KPD's armed wing in 1930s Germany, crushed by the Nahtzees. Either way, they've become a disease in practically any big Western city. These "post-Left" extremists were very open where I went to university, and one bisexual openly Antifa female was literally employed there at the time.

On Reddit I once found a literal Antifa Satanist M2F tranny who is part Amerindian. Built itself a little shrine to pray to Satan. Pure insanity. The Reddit profile is now one year inactive, the Twitter profile of this person is banned, there is also an inactive blog whinging about failed relationships with men.

Keep us informed on the happenings in Denmark. It isn't a country one hears about in the Anglosphere.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-12T13:07:16+00:00

I just had a look into "Enhedslisten" and, yeah, they're the Leftmost party in the Danish parliament. Nasty.

Did you mean that even they are shifting on immigration while Antifa/post-Leftists are sperging out at all of these people enabling "fascism" or however they are framing this immigration attitude shift by the Danish Left?

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-12T11:25:20+00:00

Do you mean that the posters are made by the Danish Left?

The way that you titled this post, I thought you meant something like a growth in Antifa extremism against the odd situation of having what looks like a shitlib ruling party which appears to be out of lockstep with global left-liberalism on immigration but is in all other respects socially far-left. Naturally some leftists will claim this is a "social fascist" party or some such nonsense because they are too radical to accept even the mildest of compromises or deviations.

Are Antifa as big of a problem in Denmark as they are in, say, Germany?

Trying to justify immigrant violence through wars which Denmark had very little to nothing to do with seems particularly low. It sounds suspiciously like the lazy transference of excuses from Anglosphere countries into Denmark, without regard for how ridiculous they sound in the Danish context. Surely they can come up with something more convincing than that? Why should Danish people accept that they should suffer because of an overwhelmingly American crusade to bring globohomo to Muslims?

I heard something recently about the EU making threats toward Denmark over its immigration stance.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-09T04:29:51+00:00

Both Destiny and Vaush have plenty of tricks up their sleeves. This is part of why their cult followers deify them.

For example, whenever Vaush is criticized over why his private life is essentially bourgeois while he professes to be a communist, he pulls out the consequentialist card, i.e. if I accrue wealth that deprives some non-Marxist bourgeois of getting it instead, and on top of that I'll put the money to "good use". Of course, he spends it all on himself.

This is of course an easy weapon for Vaush to wield because Marxists tend towards consequentialism anyway, i.e. harming whoever we dislike is okay because our intended goal is utopia.

It's stupid for people to go into debates with these two without prior studying all of their previous "debates" and taking note of all of their strategies (and all having counter-strategies planned ahead) beforehand. They obviously have a goodie bag of strategies prepared before they go in, which they pull out and deploy throughout. One needs to understand both the contents of his opponent's goodie bag and have his own own superior one containing strategies his opponent is not prepared to counter.

This Sean Last guy is very much into empirical data, so the usual "source, do you have a source for that claim?" trick isn't going to work against him, at least.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-08T08:48:18+00:00

This thread strikes me as bizarre. I don't know anyone who has been Covaxxed, or infected. I'm not Murican, though.

Have you noticed the volte-face, the U-Turn, that the American Left have made on the Covax?

2020: We can't trust Trump or the Republicans. The vaccine is being rushed in time for the elections. Trump is trying to take credit for the vaccine and is using it as an electoral weapon. We need to delay the vaccine for as long as possible so that he can't use it to his advantage.

2021: Everyone who doesn't get the vaccine (yep, the exact same ones they were condemning in 2020) is literally committing attempted murder. Being anti-vax is just for Trumptard MAGAtards. Trust the science. I enjoyed my free cheeseburger, fries, and weed. The vaccine is so awesome that I'm going to get the manufacturing company's name tattooed on my arm. Anyone who claims they've had an adverse effect from the vaccine is just a moron, and should be ostracized.

The GOP recently released an excellent video highlighting this hypocrisy by showing statements by Kamala, Cuomo and a few other morons, where they say that they don't want to take what they basically thought of at the time as Trump's vaccine. And, as we know, practically anything associated with Trump immediately becomes morally bad and/or factually false and should be cancelled in their eyes, e.g. HCQ or Goya Foods.

Also notice how all those videos of China from early 2020 with people dropping "dead" in the street and body bags everywhere so obviously don't match what the rest of the world is seeing, despite the pandemic statistically being far worse now than then?

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-08T04:39:55+00:00

The only thing that surprises me is that they didn't do this en masse back in 1994. I always thought it was bizarre looking at a map of Africa and seeing names that so obviously have nothing to do with blacks. They're everywhere, and proof of how Whites (and Arabs, in some areas) either built or at least directed the building of so many contemporary African cities. Some names still survive, like Port Harcourt in Nigeria and Porto-Novo in Benin. This even holds true for entire nations, e.g. Niger is Latin for black and Sudan is Arabic for black, Ethiopia is derived from the Greek words for "burnt face".

Of course, there have been plenty of name changes. For example, Salisbury to Harare, Leopoldville to Kinshasa, Elisabethville to Lubumbashi and Stanleyville to Kisangani.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-07T12:04:27+00:00

It wasn't till that long ago that I didn't even know who this Destiny fool was. Then I looked into Vaush, since there was a time when I kept hearing about "BreadTube", and flicked through that "debate" the two of them had.

Vaush seemed almost likable in comparison to this guy. Just compare their voices, for starters.

Both of them also have a cult following the size of a small city, who practically deify them as some sort of "debate Gods". Destiny can never lose a debate according to his cult followers; Vaush can never lose a debate according to his own cult followers, either.

Destiny has got to be one of the most soy-fuelled internet celebrities around. Maybe being half-Cuban is something to do with it - Cuba is full of queers and their government loves them (despite this very same government trying to erase queers back in the 1960s).

They're saying this Miyo character has only been doing this for two months. Probably just harming himself trying to defeat Destiny so soon. I'd pay to watch Jared Taylor or some other experienced debater rip Destiny and/or Vaush to shreds.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-06T12:30:00+00:00

This reminds me of an Iraqi refugee in America who, after having survived the Ba'ath, IS and all of the other groups in that region, was killed by a black male in a drive-by shooting.

I think there was a post made here not long ago about how certain American cities are statistically more violent than many of those cities who hold the reputation of being among the world's most violent.

And I remember years ago the claim that Detroit was so murderous that American soldiers in Baghdad were statistically less likely to be killed.

It is thus no surprise that a number of amusing terms are used to describe these cities by those who despize them: Shitcago, Chicongo, Detoilet, and San Franshitsco (the latter alluding also to the poop epidemic), as examples.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-06T02:10:50+00:00

Another example of this can be found in the video game Fallout 3 (2008). A highly organized group of uncontaminated humans called the "Enclave" try to recivilize the post-apoc wasteland. Their means to achieve this involve exterminating all mutations by contaminating all water with a substance that will poison only those who are mutated. The protagonist canonically completes the game by defeating this faction, thereby ensuring that the anarchic wasteland continues on.

Order = bad, anarchy = good. Check. Anarchy canonically wins.

The pro-order, evil faction is "Nazi-ish". Yep, they want to exterminate everyone for reasons of purity. The mutated are analogous to the J's; uncontaminated humans, to the Aryan race; poisoning water supplies, to gas chambers.

An additional howler is that the Enclave is descended from the pre-apoc US government. "US government are Nazis". Check.

This reasoning also plays out on a smaller scale elsewhere in the game. For example, there is a tower inhabited by bourgeois types insulated somewhat from the wasteland. Here there is a man who wants a much more anarchic nearby settlement to be nuked for little reason other than that it spoils the view that he has from the top of the tower. He also shoots random people from there with a sniper rifle as some sort of fun hobby.

So, the forces of order again come off as cartoonishly evil, and nuking the settlement is indeed considered an "evil" act within the game's own "karma" system.

The game is thus overwhelmingly the product of left-liberal minds. It presents the anarchic wasteland as worth defending from the forces of order, who are additionally the closest thing to a legitimate successor of the US government. Fascinatingly it doesn't even portray the wasteland as anything short of horrid, but it still wants you to defend it against the greater evil of a people whose ends are so obviously desirable but whose means are essentially the Holocaust. We should thus defend savagery against civilization rather than have the Holocaust happen again.

It is worth mentioning that the same highly exclusive force are also the antagonists in Fallout 2 (1998). However, in Fallout 1 (1997) the antagonists are in many respects the precise opposite, highly inclusive to the point of wanting to unite everybody through subjecting them to extreme mutation. Here, mutation is not grounds for extermination but the criteria for entrance into a sort of Kalergite mixed race assimilating everyone it encounters. They basically flipped the villains from being degenerate commies wiping out all true diversity through radical inclusion to their polar opposites, i.e. exclusive human purists/supremacists aspiring to kill everything mutated.

The Ukrainian Metro game series in some ways is even more clownish. In Metro Last Light (2013) there is a scene in which literal Slavic Nazis measure a man's skull. They find that his skull is larger than they find acceptable, which they believe is the result of mutation, and thus promptly shoot him in the head.

The Just Cause video game series also follows this same kind of reasoning. For example, in Just Cause 3 (2015) the protagonist is in a functional open-world ruled by a cartoonish dictator. You have to overthrow his nationalistic, orderly regime so that a bunch of moronic leftists who couldn't run a bath properly can take over.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-05T14:56:26+00:00

The author's names being those of a yehudi and a muslimah is simply a microcosm of racial replacement. Two foreigners ranting about how the indigenous peoples of the land should be governed, and from within institutions that are ostensibly to serve the indigenous. They will, of course, try to tell us with a straight face that, despite such invasion and replacement indeed happening before our very eyes, that our eyes deceive us (ignore the author's names, goy!), that it is in fact a "conspiracy theory", and so forth.

There is a certain jargon used by such self-styled "anti-extremism researchers" who publish in obscure academic journals and publish obscure books. It is, in fact, an entire academic subfield, the same as any other. Like any subfield, it has its "elite", such as Tamir Bar-On. De Benoist actually had at least one response to one of the many attack pieces on him by this odious quackademic published in one of their own journals.

As expected, this EU document drips with this same jargon. It indicates a sheer ignorance of the subject matter, reducing all things to "hate" and otherwise simply misunderstanding everything. That Wojak, Doge and Pepe seem to have these people in paranoid hysterics (yes, a cartoon frog is a "hate" symbol!) is particularly amusing.

If our 2D friends become the new swastika, it will be harder for these soycialists to maintain the pretense that they are anything short of the much more dysfunctional and queer version of full-blown commies that they are; with the EU their Soyviet Union.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-04T03:13:57+00:00

Think about it. A relative backwater country that endured decades of Leftist stupidity like:

having their country seized by a very J'ish group of Communists for several months around 1919 until the Romanians kicked them out;
then having their country seized again by some of those very same Communists in the immediate postwar period, this time with the help of the much larger USSR, and;
going through the 1956 uprising, which saw plenty of repercussions visited upon their country

... now has a more promising future than America, which endured none of that. Man, how things turn on a dime.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-03T14:32:23+00:00

Yeah. That being said, plenty of BitChute channels are blocked in the stupid EU. I clicked on some random channel in a comment section and the reason for which it was blocked in the EU was something like "Terrorism and Violent Extremism". I never heard of the user handle before, and it was probably a nobody. By contrast, Martinez's channel "only" has "hate speech" and one other reason provided for the block.

I didn't know they used Twitch. I'm well aware of their censoriousness. Even that noxious Infrared channel was suspended from there.

Zoltanous actually went against Infrared on there. I didn't watch it, and the followers of both sides predictably said that their respective guy won. I'm not big on video content and only watch a select few people consistently, so I have no opinion on who won.

Zoltanous is much more like BPF than Martinez. Zoltanous also privately went against Martinez on the latter's livestream but there I felt that Martinez was the obvious winner, with Zoltanous sticking too closely to this "fascist" ideology thing whereas Martinez is much less ideological and much more compelling to me. Martinez can also keep a level head when need be, whereas Zoltanous lost his temper both against Martinez, effectively "rage quitting", and much more recently in a rant against some admittedly very "toxic" people who found his remarks (admittedly, I think these remarks were in poor taste) about the holodomor with Richard Spencer intolerable.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-03T13:26:24+00:00

Yeah, this channel practically came out of nowhere, but now it's quite popular in various circles who only share in common that they're politically engaged.

The only up and coming personality I follow who has been on there is Zoltanous.

MartinezPerspective also claimed in his last Q&A that he'd be willing to debate someone on there if they ever send him a message to arrange something, but nothing has yet became of that.

At the moment they've got plenty of progs and far-leftists. Need more of all the other groups. I think I've seen one libertarian. I can think of only three people who could fairly be considered "our" guys.

How did that channel get started? Just a genuine interest in bringing people with conflicting views together for the viewer's entertainment?

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-03T06:06:31+00:00

Aren't these surveys seem to be getting these results with all races of men as well? Since it is unlikely that many men external to an ethnic group would be partial to the ethnonationalism of that ethnic group, surely these figures are higher among Whites only?

Of course, such results seem to totally contradict commonsense. WN is practically non-existent outside of Leftist nightmares, which is why they have to constantly expand the criteria of what constitutes WN so that they can then apply the label to all sorts of political opponents, like Trump. Hence we have this bogeyman Trump, a "WN" who hires Mexicans, dates black women, coauthors a book with a Japanese man and owns property as far away as India. Hilariously, Trump has way more connections with non-whites than practically all of those smug leftists who call him a WN. He even has a quasi-cult of Indian worshippers, who deify him. Doesn't seem very "racist" to me.

How are they defining the criteria that indicate sympathy with WN? Surely there's some trickery going on, such that all sorts of men are just being regarded as "implicitly" WN. Unless something explicit like support for an ethnostate is asked, it is too big a jump to say that there is X percentage of WN sympathizers among any group of men.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-03T04:35:46+00:00

They'll remain American in name for economic reasons. They know the gravy train would end entirely if they seceded.

Many non-Hispanics would leave. Initially a deluge and then a trickle as even some of the most sympathetic non-Hispanics leave because the "schools went downhill" or there's "too much crime" (they'll never admit their problem is "too many Hispanics"). Plenty of Hispanics would also leave, including some of those who voted for the ruling party and regretted it. Only those non-Hispanics who can't get out for financial reasons, or who are adapting well to becoming "White Hispanics", "Blaxicans", etc. since their old identities like "White American" and "African-American" would be repressed in this society, will stay, a la South Africa, where only poor non-blacks or true believers in the "rainbow nation" remain, and almost everyone else has emigrated.

The Democrats would become an opposition party, with no shot whatsoever at returning to power. Eventually they'd be supplanted by another party as the main opposition. All of the current American parties would not be operating there. Green and Libertarian parties and ideologies have very little popularity in Latin America. The only significant libertarian party, Costa Rica's "Libertarian Movement", for example, is simply a conservative party. "Liberal" parties are always either socialistic (e.g. Honduras' Liberal Party under Zelaya) or conservative (e.g. Colombia's Liberal Party).

The Cartels, especially Sinaloa, would immediately be ramping up operations there. Soon they'd be corrupting the new ruling party's politics, aiming to move their product to the rest of America.

Other ethnonationalisms would benefit in the rest of the US.

Illegal immigration and people smuggling would obviously increase, with it being used as a comparatively easy to enter transit point to enter the rest of America.

English would probably survive for a generation or so to facilitate communication between the races. Eventually Mexican-Spanish would supplant it because the education system would actively promote it over English, ensuring that young people will all have it as their first language.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-02T14:45:25+00:00

Yeah, that Troy Iwata character, who is unsurprisingly one of the usual suspects. Jewpanese. The Japanese side is obviously paternal.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-08-02T14:15:15+00:00

If we had units of degeneracy with which measurements could be made, we'd find that 2021 was the worst recorded year yet. Let's have a look at some of the most egregious examples over the last three months alone:

May. Outright pride parade propaganda in Blue's Clues, complete with nine different alphabet flags. Sickeningly has 142K likes against 124K dislikes on the official YouTube upload. Yep, those who aim for the sexualization of children have already won in America.
May. The "Emma" US Army recruitment ad, complete with "two Mums" who "get married". Join the Army just to pick up experiences or skills; that is, there is no appeal to anything beyond hyper-individualistic self-fulfillment.
June. Official trailer for Q-Force released on YouTube. Combines sexually explicit dialogue (a character literally named "Twink" is introduced in the first second and two words of the subtitles) with a cartoonish graphical style; that is, exactly the right combination to indoctrinate children. More encouragingly this filth only has 8.1K likes against 102K dislikes. First episode comes out in September.
July. San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus releases an ostensible "anti-homophobia satire" video, the main message of which is that children should be indoctrinated into harbouring pro-alphabet views. Obviously a confession of what they desire masquerading as trolling, satire, a joke, etc. for optical reasons. It isn't a "joke" when it actually describes a real development happening in children's cartoons and in schools.

Who knows what the rest of this year and beyond will bring, though the sheer depravity of it all amuses me. It also reminds me that, surely, objective evil exists. This evil is not merely a statement of preference, but a presence, one combined with sheer insanity to become both immensely powerful and highly contagious. It's an all-encompassing Satanic asylum of planetary proportions out there. I think it's fair to say that we haven't seen anything quite like this in recorded history, but so long as one is "honkpilled", living through it is fascinating. Modern tech will preserve much of what happened in our time, and if this evil ends, all this will serve as a stark reminder to future generations: "Here is what not to do."

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-19T03:52:12+00:00

This line of reasoning is hilarious. Are you so thick-headed as not to realize that having your black ancestors (nope, you aren't deserving of having the capital B you so desperately want to force others into using) chucked onto a slave ship does not make you the indigenous people of America?

Why would the Amerindians want you in America anymore than any other group? Get off indigenous land and bugger off back to Africa! Invader!

Oh, but wait, you don't want to go back to Africa because you're a literal queer. You'd probably be stoned to death in a well-deserved case of jungle justice. Yep, even blacks don't want anything to do with you, and your ancestors know that it was worth getting on that slave ship just so that the motherland could have one less degenerate contaminating it today. What are your pronouns, by the way? Xe/Xir? Angry, black and queer? Also, stop being transphobic and participating in hate groups like LGBdroptheT! Bigot!

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-18T03:32:13+00:00

Hilarious how those who claim that 'immigration built America' conveniently leave out the race of the immigrants.

What the 'normies' and their shepherds have done is take the achievements of White immigrants, and replace the immutable reasons of their achievement with mutable reasons (e.g. culture, and their favourite, 'values'). Then they can indulge in a fantasy in which Ngubu, Okechukwu and Mudzahir will adopt our magic 'values' and then achieve more of the same things. They'll be like non-white White men, free and equal under the rule of law—there will be Ngubu Nietzsche with his bestselling Tha Gayest Science and Sheeeit, Shitavious Schopenhauer with his bestselling Tha Worldstar Hip-Hop and Tha Will To Get Reparashuns, and Tyrone Tesla with the flying pyramid.

Notice, of course, that there is nothing exceptional about 'American values', which are also the same as Australian values, British values, Canadian values, French values, Haitian values, and Liberian values. Yep, Haiti's constitution is literally modeled after the US/French constitutions, Liberia's after the US constitution.

It looks like 'American values' are not guarantors of those much desired first-world living standards and whatever other ends that 'American values' are considered as the best means for achieving. Of course, the values exceptionalism types like Fukuyama simply claim that the values themselves remain ideal, and that places like Haiti and Liberia have simply implemented them poorly. All Haiti and Liberia have to do is double-down and implement them correctly. When they get it 'right' then they'll soon join the ranks of the superabundant, consumerist first-world.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-18T02:39:10+00:00

Can two black parents create an Asian kid?

Can two Asian parents create a White kid?

Can two White parents create a black kid?

What we mean by race is simply the fact that all of these questions can only be correctly answered with a resounding "No". Those who believe in race rightly don't care about any of this other stuff (continuum fallacy, '99.X% similarity', etc.) simply because no amount of scientific meandering is even remotely going to turn that resounding "No" into a "Yes" or even a "Maybe".

Your style of argument could just as easily be used to attack dog breeds. Sure, dogs probably are overwhelmingly genetically identical. So what?

Can two Great Danes beget a chihuahua?

Is a chihuahua as equally capable of being a police dog as a Belgian Malinois?

The answers to these questions are evidence enough of the existence of dog breeds for most people. Yet strangely when we substitute 'Great Dane' for one race and 'chihuahua' for another in the first question, suddenly the egalitarians amusingly try to backpedal and declare such arguments unsound.

It's hilarious how Western 'science' is so transparently hellbent on trying to provide quasi-scientific explanations for Left-liberal ideological views. The same people who argue this nonsense are incidentally most of the same people who believe that the male-female distinction is also 'fake', and who simultaneously use the 'born this way' argument and the 'sexuality can change over the course of one's life' argument. Hmm... we see a pattern here. Those who want racial distinctions abolished also want these other distinctions abolished. The 'science' in all three cases is subordinate to purely ideological and quasi-moral reasoning. The presupposed assumptions and the reached conclusions are numerically identical.

Until two black parents can create an Asian kid (i.e. never), there will always be a need for racial classifications among humans. End of. Keep denying race all you like—it's transparently obvious that the underlying reasons for doing so are based in ideology. Eastern European and East Asian geneticists, who overwhelmingly accept race, will bury Western science.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-16T07:18:02+00:00

The top comment:

Whose streets?

Pajeet's streets!

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-16T05:32:56+00:00

Chinese propaganda, as problematic as the CCP are, is vastly superior to American propaganda.

Compare the Russian, Chinese and American recruitment advertisements: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2Rr6Uu2C4Y

Russian - Average and what I expect to see. Young White man enlists.

Chinese - This one is very impressive in a technical sense, but it has an obvious and excessive 'Hollywood movie' or 'first-person shooter game trailer' feel.

American - This one is laughably atrocious... and yet it is the top Google result for: US Army recruitment ad. White or White-passing woman named 'Emma'. Has 'two Mums' who 'get married'. No appeal to nationalism or anything beyond oneself. Just enlist to gain skills, experiences, or something else related to self-actualization. Pure, unadulterated Clown World propaganda that makes any sane person not want to enlist. Rambo out, rainbow in.

There's four other American ones as part of this series that are similarly atrocious. Three blacks and one Asian male. One has to wonder just what kind of moron decided to make this propaganda 60% black.

Back to Taiwan, the West exceedingly seems to me to be in the wrong here. The 'strawberry generation' is totally degenerate and Taiwan is one of the few Asian countries to have gone as far as to legalize 'same-sex marriage', admittedly, despite the majority of public opinion being against it. Obviously Whites shouldn't kill and die for the 'rights' of Taiwanese queers to 'marry'. Marxism is pseudoscientific drivel but generally not as putrid as full-blown Western left-liberalism. The CCP isn't anywhere near as moronic as the US Democratic Party; Xi isn't anywhere near as moronic as Biden-Harris.

America will do what if China launches a full assault on HK or Taiwan? Make noise. The longer China waits the more that this is certain, since the more multiracial and left-wing America becomes the more it will become insignificant like Brazil and Mexico already are. America declaring war on China at that point would be like Brazil declaring war on China. China today would easily steamroll over this 'post-racial' America. They just need to keep waiting till the American military itself hits 'majority-minority', which won't be much longer than America overall. Huge numbers (of all races) will go AWOL and some (Asians, especially ethnic Chinese) will even outright defect once war breaks out. Mass riots would break out in the Chinatowns long before Chinese troops hit American soil.

Surely the fuss here is coming from more degenerate Westerners angry that their liberalism, multiracialism, etc. is leading them to lose power (note, of course, that plenty of them, especially the leftist ones, misdiagnose the cause of their decline, wrongly believing that a greater dose of the poison will cure them of the lesser dose of poison they have already swallowed) to a (marginally) less degenerate, more 'master morality'-motivated rival. They do not understand why the Chinese do not wish to assimilate to this silly category of 'humanity' like they themselves do, and become like those self-defeating ethnomasochists or total racial egalitarianians who on their present course will exceedingly become minorities in their own homelands and, eventually, merely historical footnotes who future peoples will only speak of contemptuously if of at all.

Just look at how delusional the comments are. Japan will defeat China. China is 'isolated', even when almost every African and Middle Eastern state recognizes China over Taiwan and votes alongside China and not the West where they clash in the UN. America and Western Europe would also nuke China if China nuked Japan. China's ethnocentrism and 'racism' weakens them.

Then you have the typical barking mad leftists attacking the main commenters with even more stupid takes. America and Japan are 'fascist'. China dindu nuffin to the Uyghurs, that's just Western propaganda. Taiwan actually 'belongs' to China (did anyone ask the native Taiwanese whether they are 'actually' Chinese, esp. when they are genetically closer to Filipinos and Malays?).

The Western 'left' and 'right' are both so woefully stupid... the latter just a little lesser than the former.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-14T04:33:33+00:00

Looks like some of the violence is spreading into minority areas. I don't know the story behind any of these videos.

Looks like full-blown black youth gang chimp-outs, probably multiple fatalities:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/g9TauzkVUHEH/

Black mob kept at bay by warning shots. Could be private security men defending a wealthier area, or simply minority vigilantes?

https://odysee.com/@wayoftheworld:7/southafricanracewar:c

Backup: https://www.bitchute.com/video/RYl3Z9Z4sVH3/

Black looters stealing crates of alcohol from a brewery:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Opcez4Uq58pD/

Black police clearing out black looters in Johannesburg:

https://odysee.com/@CosmicEvent:5/War-Zone-in-Johannesburg-South-Africa:2

Backup: https://www.bitchute.com/video/7xR4VvI6UHAF/

Looting, too few police or security to stop them:

https://odysee.com/@helixmaxter:6/southaf:3

Gun store looted, purported to be in Zulu-majority area:

https://odysee.com/@jesseperezcasanova:d/gun-store-looted-in-south-africa:9

Dying black looter on street (warning: blood)

https://odysee.com/@PsychoticCacophony:d/DONWbcPEeRi14Jlq.mp4:5

Black police purported to be joining in the looting, moving stolen items into their vehicle. They then drive off, allowing the black mob to continue looting:

https://odysee.com/@PsychoticCacophony:d/Yw94vp0Biufm_qFt.mp4:3

Backup: https://www.bitchute.com/video/nuEe3BpCQp6B/

Police vehicle flees a gigantic mob:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/gJF8gVtOzFvI/

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-13T14:41:17+00:00

Whilst one really doesn't want one of these morons to be conducting a life-saving surgery or something similar on you, this generally seems like a positive development:

Firstly, it faster causes harm/instability than if they did not do this. Practically any form of harm/instability is good; for example, it distracts the System and forces them to focus less on hunting dissidents, and it faster makes people inclined to give up on varying worthless identities that merely impede the development of racial consciousness (e.g. 'Americanism').

Secondly, it makes the State inept. The more people like this who get into the halls of power instead of more competent people, the more likely they are to be the ones hunting down dissidents. We want these people tasked with that job rather than higher-agency people specifically because they're stupid. Likewise, we want people like this to handle Left-wing extremism, because they're either sympathetic to it and or too inept to address it, and so enable it in practice. Open Left-wing extremism is almost always good.

Thirdly, like so many things, it blurs the line between reality and comedy. The whole article would have been outrageous and unbelievable until relatively recently... but in 'Clown World' it is an objective reality. Unless people become accustomed to such things, it will again lead to people generally withdrawing from the wider society.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-13T14:08:52+00:00

The thought of this guy accepting a hypothetical 1% Jewish Israel is beyond hilarity. As soon as I read his absurd reply I immediately thought that he's just 'saving face' because he's been caught out.

Everyone here knows full well that everyone other than a few batty Jews who vote for insane parties like Gesher or Meretz doesn't see the end of the anachronistic 'Jewish state' as acceptable. A quick perusal of the comment sections of Israeli media reveals that there are countless Israelis who feel that they're on the verge of a new Holocaust at the hands of the Arabs. If Liebermann does not support a coalition with Likud (and he didn't, which helped Likud's downfall), we will beat him and his supporters until they accept, they say. These people are having a meltdown now that Netanyahu is gone, because they know full well that the new government (a literal coalition of insane Left + sectarian Right + Arabs, united basically only by opposition to Netanyahu) is the pathway to the end of the Jewish state.

So either 'ShalomEveryone' is some crazy Leftist yidiot from the fringe Left of Israeli politics and is in no way representative of the average Israeli, a troll, or simply lying with the intent of convincing us that analogizing mass immigration to genocide isn't actually the 'gotcha' moment that it is when the average Jew is faced with it, stuck trying to deny it is 'not genocide' when it happens to others, but is the 'Holocaust 2.0' only when it happens to him.

Does this guy seriously think he can mislead me into believing that he believes that if Israel becomes 0% Jewish through mass immigration, that is all fine and well... and that the only thing that is wrong with Israel becoming 0% Jewish is if they are explicitly exterminated!? Take that to the average Israeli and see how fast they would say: "No, I do not want Israel to be 0% Jewish under any circumstance, not mass immigration, not sterilization, not mass murder."

Indeed, I wonder why he even brings up 'sterilization', which does not fit his own definition of genocide. Let's look at an example of how incoherent this guy's line of reasoning is:

White genocide is not happening because the only criteria for genocide is explicit mass murder. (Note that this is an explicitly anti-White talking point found everywhere on Reddit and other mainstream sites by those who see White genocide as desirable)

There is no white genocide. Whites aren't being kidnapped and bused over to concentration camps to be slaughtered. Whites are also not being rounded up and sent to killing fields to be massacred.
Then immediately equates sterilization to killings/holocaust in his reply above, altering his definition of genocide:

Nope, no mass killings, no mass sterilization, means no holocaust.

So, which is it? Is it not a new Holocaust if Israel became 0% Jewish through forcible sterilization, then? And, more to the point, if genocide can be expanded to include acts of non-killing, why should the combination of mass immigration+miscegenation+White flight not be included? Because sterilization is coercive? Well, so are the processes leading to White genocide, according to decades of polling data which consistently shows that Whites have overwhelmingly called for lower immigration and the fact that no Western country ever held a referendum on it? So, given that both are coercive, what other options does he have to try to break the equivalency and claim that the former is genocidal whereas the latter is not?

There are none. He already has his mind made up and aims to structure all of his arguments to reach a conclusion that he is hellbent on preserving; namely, that Whites should peacefully accept extinction whereas Jews are 'exceptional' in some way and should not. We already know that this guy is a Jewish supremacist/exceptionalist (or is a troll pretending to be one) and therefore that he applies different standards to his own kind:

When it comes to Jews, they know how to outperform all other ethnic groups/races.

Jews built America, you're welcome! That's why America is a superpower and Brazil is a third world dump. Remember, Portugal used to be a world power until they made the colossal mistake of expelling Jews out of Portugal.

Former white countries are no longer rich because us in the tribe are no longer there to run things.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-12T14:17:57+00:00

So if Israel becomes 99% Arab and black through mass immigration, you won't say that's tantamount to a second Holocaust even though your lot have become a measly 1% of the population? That would be good to know... except... you're obviously lying. You'd be one of the very first to cry out "muh Holocaust!".

You don't seriously believe anything you just wrote. Disingenuous cretin. Open borders for Israel! End Jewish Apartheid!

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-01T12:12:14+00:00

There was also a very large eugenics movement in Bismarckian Germany. Many things that people associate with "far-right" politics long predate fascism and often have leftist origins. In Germany both the SPD (literally an explicit Marxist party until as late as 1959) and the "Christian democratic" Zentrum funded Germany's own eugenics institute.

It's hard to say why there's such a discrepancy between the more universalistic times of Christian-dominated Europe and the Roman or British Empires and these more eugenicist times like that of Sparta, the last of which was during Darwin's time up till the postwar period. The whole taboo around eugenics from a non-Christian perspective only really picked up mid last century.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-01T11:29:45+00:00

Whites don't really have it in them to "do eugenics" on such a scale. They're the world's least ethnocentric people and have always found universalism appealing, whether Roman, Christian or liberal. It is this same universalism that animated the "White Man's Burden", based on the absurd assumption that racial equality should exist and that where it is lacking (that is, everywhere) it is our moral responsibility to save other peoples from "poverty", "eternal damnation" or whatever. A secularized version of this mindset obviously still exists today, but is derisively referred to as the "White saviour complex".

It is just that the "larger" world made pseudo-diversity more difficult. We are lucky that Africa wasn't Romanized and that the Romans did not import masses of "Dindus Nuffinus" and "Gibsus Medatus" on the ships they already had thousands of years ago. Foreigners practically applied the killing blow to Rome as it was - the Goths were literally refugees fleeing the Huns, who later turned against Rome. The Huns themselves genocided their way across Europe until they themselves were exterminated. European Colonialism was always relatively benign, thus the third-world has a massive and highly unmixed population that would be much smaller and much more mixed if colonialism was even half as severe as ignorant leftists claim it was. The only place that is something of an exception to this rule is the very mixed Americas. Most of Africa is still 99%+ black despite a few numerically insignificant mixed groups like the assimiladoes, basturs or Americo-Liberians. These groups wouldn't even be a million combined, out of Africa's billion plus population.

The internet is a tough one, because at face value I find it generally negative. It's chock full of stuff that is degenerate or just plain banal. Selfies, social media, porn, cat videos. "Smartphone zombies" everywhere. It didn't usher in the techno-utopian age many thought it would.

You're obviously correct in that much of this isn't intrinsic to the internet, and if people like us controlled it instead, well, it couldn't be any worse than what it currently is at the very least. It would, for example, have a much more educative emphasis rather than being a time sink and entertainment source that seems to make people dumber while the only things that seem to get "smarter" are the phones they use to access it.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-01T10:49:51+00:00

France is pretty much done for and this is a common view among people who are DR or DR-adjacent. Gottfried and MartinezPerspective are two of those content creators who have expressly stated this view. Martinez rightly observes this merely comparing the French sports teams to those of Sweden or Spain. The French team is practically a Francophone African team; the others are actually still predominantly European. Yes, in spite of Spain having masses of Hispanics and MENAs and Sweden plenty of MENAs and blax. Yes, despite the rightfully deserved poor reputation that Sweden receives in these quarters, France comes out worse. But it is hardly surprising that the birthplace of much of liberalism is likely to be the first to reach the tipping point.

One thing that might delay the whole wider collapse is that the rapid and accelerating degeneration of a few of these countries will likely raise racial consciousness in those Eastern European countries who are at the very least a few decades behind. Of course, it may well be that people continue not to associate these undeniable declines with their causes. But it is okay to lose some countries if that is the only way to save the rest.

My guess is Macron no lesser than 54% and RN no higher than 46%. Le Pen #1 and the Maricon #2 in the first round. I can only wish that Melenchon beats Macron for second place since RN would actually defeat Melenchon in the second round. But the Leftists know the score and we'll probably see a big turnout for the Maricon in the second round from those who vote Green Left (EELV, etc.), Red Left (PS, PCF, etc.), the "centre" (Radical, etc.) and many LR voters. That just leaves CDP, DLF and the rest of the LR voters to vote RN in the second round.

Another outcome I wouldn't mind is a centre-right candidate going to the second round instead of Macron. The Leftists will vote still that person over Le Pen, and so we'd still get someone better than Macron. But I'd still rather a far-leftist so that an RN presidency becomes possible (RN would get practically all of the LR voters, probably even much of the "centre" like Macron's own LREM in that scenario). It's sad that the younger French who are more partial to RN are being held down by older voters who won't live long enough to suffer the consequences of their voting choices.

Italy has much better prospects than France. I don't like Berlusconi, Salvini or the 5SM, all of who simply sap strength from a proper nationalist party. Hopefully they'll all go away.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-01T08:19:09+00:00

Yep. Iran also talks from time to time about building an intranet but never gets around to it. Yet we all know that if the Islamic Republican regime gets overthrown the internet will be a big part of the cause, i.e. because it facilitates organization as it did in the Egyptian uprising and because it assists the proliferation of liberal or other unwanted ideologies and propaganda. Such regimes clearly underestimate how virus-like Westernization actually is, one that can only be resisted through self-imposed isolation, through quarantine, and the internet is easily the biggest medium through which it spreads.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-01T08:07:05+00:00

Literally the only pro-tech argument that I can think of from the top of my head is that rapid de-technologization would drastically increase the chances of invasions of our homelands. For example, if America ceded its nuclear arsenal then China could simply obliterate America while the rest of the world meekly watches in horror of what China could do to all of the lesser powers.

Removing these practical considerations I'm overwhelmingly partial to Gemeinschaft over Gesellschaft, i.e. modern society. The proliferation of technology has been one of our biggest problems. Ideological multiracialism wouldn't exist without planes and modern ships "shrinking" or "connecting" the world. No Ebola, HIV, Spanish Flu or Covid, either, all of which are imported. Life expectancy in Africa was around 30 precolonialism, but is prolonged by that racist White man medicine, which now means that four billion blax is a serious possibility. People wouldn't dream of "seeking a better life in the West" because they only develop these ideas through comparing what they see on television or the internet (through phones and computers) to the cesspool around them. It goes without saying that most of these inventions are overwhelmingly products of White ingenuity used in ways which harm and will continue to harm the descendants of their creators.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-07-01T07:39:27+00:00

Indeed. All the Greeks I've met look the same as Arabs. Bashar Assad looks more White than any Greek I've seen in real life (the more "public" Greeks on TV or wherever are much more White). I think Syria is about 40% Southern European? Some 50% Eurasians are more White-passing as well (although plenty go the other way and look entirely Asian).

I wouldn't be surprised if many of these people are below 50%, with the rest mostly Turkic and Arabic. That's one of the reasons for why I find pan-Europeanism a la Faye stupid. The only European-residing people less White than Greeks would be Albanians, who are just flat-out Turkic + low IQ. Plenty of White groups need to be protected from each other as well, otherwise they just become as rootless as Anglosphere Whites.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-06-30T04:28:35+00:00

It could only ever lead in a direction that refutes Leftist narratives. They pigeonhole this into the same box as IQ and race science, i.e. only malicious people raise such questions.

It's the same thing as how countries that were decolonised last (South Africa, Hong Kong) are vastly superior to those decolonised first (Haiti, Liberia) or untouched (Ethiopia, Thailand). Nobody can seriously argue that colonialism was destructive in lieu of this observation simply because the exact opposite should be true; that is, that countries colonized for lesser time periods should be less dysfunctional, and countries colonized for greater time periods should be more dysfunctional. But that isn't just plain wrong, it's the exact opposite of reality.

The Leftist psychological reaction to this reality is simply to deny it, reach into a bag of canned responses to pull out the usual excuse and then repress and ostracize whoever raised the question. Try raising this topic in a university if you have any doubts as to how it would play out.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-06-29T09:15:37+00:00

I think it's more that for every thinker of the Right you have several degenerates like De Sade (incredibly degenerate even for our time) or Foucault, or people whose views enable degeneracy even if they were personally relatively normal, like Rousseau and Voltaire. Both of whom the last King claimed destroyed France through their inspiring of Robespierre and other revolutionaries. This then leads people to believe that Leftists are more intelligent or something along these lines. Of course this discounts that many of these "Left" thinkers are far-right today, like Proudhon. It also discounts how many Leftist thinkers are charlatans. Althusser, for example, wrote a book about Marx's Capital, but confessed late in life to only reading Marx's early works, and may have never read Kant or Aristotle, despite lecturing about them.

People like Comte and Le Play also belong in the Philosophy section, since Sociology was part of Philosophy for many decades after its foundation. Sociology was incredibly conservative until the 1890s or so when liberals like Spencer and Ward came to be its leading figures. German sociology remained largely this way till the postwar period.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-06-29T08:07:01+00:00

Caesar, JFK, etc.

I'd say he's analogous to America's Majorian. After Majorian all Roman "leaders" were essentially racial outsiders or outright puppets of racial outsiders. Biden is obviously the latter, the likes of Kamala both pull the strings and are the former. Of course, Trump has arguably been the same with Kushner, whose name amusingly autocorrects to "kosher".

Patriot

Sure. Few of us care about American "values", though. How do you think people morally justified, and continue to morally justify, the current state of affairs? They certainly did not appeal to any set of values foreign to America.

Aren't the RINO/neocon types back in charge? I think this was quite predictable, i.e. blaming "Trumpism" for the GOP's decline when it's simply just demographics plus the inability to actually embrace this very same "Trumpian populism" and take it further than mere rhetoric. That being said, a bunch of these neocon types are hanging around Biden, having gone back to their original position on the Left. Naturally I hope they all leave, so that the Left can have, and be blamed for, the noxious "build democracy in the Middle East" types.

On the macrolevel I don't have much option but to agree. The only thing we can do on the societal level is try to replace the GOP voting bases' ideas with our own, and thus have GOP hardware running on our software. Some of the embrace of our terminology by more mainstream personalities indicates that all this content creation and proliferation might be making progress in that regard. However, I'm seeing people spiral off in directions like founding new political parties, which seems to me a complete waste of the limited time we have left.

On the microlevel I obviously disagree. The only option I can see is community building, some of which is certainly happening. "Retaking the nation state" seems delusional at this point. We have to salvage what we can and accept the loss of the rest at least in the short-term. And indeed the decline of the cities is more and more the problem of deracialized persons and racial others, and thus it is not our problem if the opioid epidemic or some other problem destroys such places. Even a standard Republican exceedingly has to admit that they're all Democrats there, even if he finds nothing else problematic about the American urbanite, and should arrive at much the same conclusion.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-05-06T11:02:05+00:00

Speaking of overt, criminogenic anti-Whiteness, have at look at what someone found inside a BLM social media group:

https://odysee.com/@wayoftheworld:7/antiwhitereality:0

There's a great deal of genocidal, violence-inciting propaganda in there, including 'White Existence is White Supremacy' and 'It Ain't Murder When It's For Equality'.

The first statement is remarkably explicit. At the very least it claims (and this is how White Leftists will attempt to downplay its genocidal potential) that Whites who simply identify as White rather than as 'human' are problematic. That is, the mere act of identifying with race over 'humanity' makes one the same as any other 'racist'.

But the better interpretation is the face value one, as claiming that Whites regardless of how they identify are problematic. This more direct and obvious interpretation, in which White is simply an ascribed characteristic, which is how the overwhelming majority of people see 'Whiteness', rather than a matter of self-identification, effectively means that even deracialized Whites are problematic. They are simply problematic by virtue of immutable characteristics; that is, the very things that they have no power to change. Solving the problem can only mean destroying those who possess those characteristics, after all, nothing that Whites could actually do (including actively working against their own racial in-group) would stop from them being White.

The second statement is also thinly veiled incitement to genocide. We can see here that the 'racism = privilege + power' argument which has been used to racialize 'racism' itself is now being applied to 'murder'. That is to say that 'racism' is something that only certain people (the criteria for inclusion into the offending category is strangely race itself) can be responsible for. This slogan extends this reasoning to the act of killing itself. It is not 'murder' if the oppressed kills the oppressor. It is only murder if the oppressor kills the oppressed. Now racialize the oppressor-oppressed dichotomy in the way that the White Left and non-whites do. White maps onto oppressor. Non-white maps onto oppressed. The message becomes remarkably clear: It is only murder if Whites kill non-whites. It is not murder if non-whites kill Whites.

But those two perhaps aren't the worst. There is one that simply depicts the execution of Whites by blacks, accompanied by the remarkably straightforward slogan 'Yes All Whites'. The message couldn't be clearer: Yes, all Whites need to be killed like the ones in the graphic. No, it is not 'All non-deracialized Whites'. It is not 'All non-leftist Whites'. They are not 'Nazis' or 'Trump supporters' in that picture. Just ordinary people. Perhaps they even vote Democrat and support BLM. It simply means exactly what it says. All Whites.

We can similarly analyze other statements found there, like 'White Life Doesn't Matter', 'All Whites Are Nazis' and 'Do Not Resuscitate White People', but what's the point? The conclusion of all of these slogans is effectively the same; namely, that Whites are evil and should be killed. First, they draw vile pictures and write vile words expressing their intentions; next, they attempt it.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-05-05T10:52:47+00:00

Sociology by Giddens & Sutton (might be 7th ed now?) is definitely one of the better sociology textbooks around.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-26T04:01:30+00:00

I agree with this comment 100%.

Generally speaking, I think they somehow conflate 'moral right' with 'factual right'. And therefore 'moral wrong' with 'factual wrong'. Certain things that probably come from memes, such as 'hate facts', exemplify this way of thinking. Whatever contradicts their idea of correctness is both 'evil' and 'wrong' at the same time. This is how they come to reject observations (ones that seem empirically factual to us to the point that denying them would just seem flat-out delusional), such as black dysfunction, J dominance, etc. regardless of how much evidence is presented to them—because 'racism' strikes them as 'morally wrong', all the evidence must also be 'factually wrong'. Thus, 'hate facts'. Of course, somehow we're external to their 'social engineering', which puts us in the position of being observers or outsiders watching those 'inside', who effectively seem brainwashed or indoctrinated. It is not clear to me why some people are affected more than others (some, like myself, never went through it; others 'woke up'; most seem deeply and irreparably affected by it).

I prefer to analogize baizuo Leftism to a cult, though if it develops a clear substitute for God, then it is probably a flat-out religion. It certainly has all the trappings of a cult. It now even has an apocalyptic/doomsday vision (a climate disaster will happen in the year 20XX, and like religious groups with the rapture, etc., this number will continue to be pushed forwards simply because climate change is at most a 'slow burn'—there will be no specific day that the world ends). Those photos of Whites submissively grovelling (and in large numbers, too) before blacks. Those screenshots of academics engaging in ritualistic, Bolshevik-style self-criticism. 'White privilege' being a racialized 'original sin' that applies only for Whites; victimhood and the 'burden of racism' being its flip-side for non-whites. The parallels seem to grow every so often.

Pelosi's comments about Floyd's 'sacrifice' are the latest example I can think of. We have already seen some strange things going on with Floyd and some of his predecessors like Trayvon, such that we joke about him becoming 'Saint Floyd'. And all over his death ostensibly being because of a White man—after all, which black has ever been canonized because he was killed by non-whites? To be killed by Whites is the single criteria for black canonization. His deification (see, for example, https://img.apmcdn.org/c1da69cfb422d7008816f573c47f956a5f0f5fe7/square/789663-20200610-floyd-file-photo03.jpg, which literally depicts Floyd as an angel complete with wings and a halo), his being beyond criticism (any mention of his crimes is simply 'racist'), and so forth. To then posit that it was essentially necessary for him to die in a way that could be blamed on Whites (as evidence of, and in order to highlight, our sins) just shows to me that the cult even has sacrifices, too.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-26T02:50:20+00:00

Funny how the comment he's replying to is just so obviously wrong.

'What's the race of the guy that killed 8 Asians in GA?'

Huh? It was six Asians. It's amazing how well they can ignore whatever doesn't fit their narratives. Not only does he ignore the other two deaths, focusing on six Asians, but he replaces them, such that he ends up with eight Asians.

Unsurprisingly this nonsense appears to have been written by an Asian man. Who of course embraces 'wokeness' when it suits him.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-25T03:27:06+00:00

These double standards apply everywhere. The reason why is because non-Whites know that 'ethnocentrism', etc. works in a way to which Whites are strangely blind. Hence,

Mexico is 'anti-racist' when it comes down to their northern border wall... while at the same time they wall off other people (and these people also happen to be far more similar to themselves) at their southern border.
As you observe, Turks are 'anti-racist' in Europe (accusing today's Germans, Dutch, etc. of being fascists and genociders). They're also 'racist' in their own country, e.g. excluding Kurds, denying the Armenian Genocide.
Check out how much flak 'Love Island South Africa' is currently getting because of its majority White contestants, which is 'unrepresentative of Africa's demographics'. The same blacks (and Whites) who complain about this obviously zero problem whatsoever with television shows or sports teams being 100% black (which, to them, is 100% diverse), including outside of Africa.

Whites are the only people who don't get it. Everyone else is only instrumentally 'anti-racist', using the rhetoric of 'anti-racism' to further their (ironically) 'racist' interests. Be 'racist' and 'ethnocentric' or simply die off. It's that simple.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-24T08:19:25+00:00

There's at least three that everyone's missing:

AfricanAnger and DoubleReverse (both accounts are inactive).

We even have a literal AHS'er, though I don't think he has commented in this sub:

fruitjack (0fruitjack0 on Reddit), see, for example: https://www.reddit.com/r/AgainstHateSubreddits/comments/mwcr8b/saiditnet_farright_reddit_clone_for_fascists_was/gvhrfc6?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-24T04:44:52+00:00

Frustrating how that guy even found his way in here undetected, while essentially posing as one of us, e.g.:

https://saidit.net/s/debatealtright/comments/768s/meta_i_really_like_the_banner/r64h

I suspect that 16Mega and loki88 (two of the 'Iron Left' mods, the third is fschmidt) are the same person. And that both accounts were banned, which is why fschmidt claims to be the last mod of that group. For starters, 16Mega claims to have a Jewish mother [see third comment down on his profile], and to be 'half-Uyghur', https://saidit.net/s/news/comments/76hx/worship_in_the_white_house_that_is_what_we_all/r6jp).

loki88 also claims to be Jewish: https://web.archive.org/web/20210423023531if_/https://www.reddit.com/r/Fuckthealtright/comments/mwb8s7/major_victory_farright_reddit_clone_saiditnet_was/

He has another Reddit alt, going by the roman numerals for '88', with which he is now trolling r/saiditnet. https://www.reddit.com/user/--LXXXVIII--/

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-21T11:47:57+00:00

One of them looks to me as though it depicts a darker man sucking off a White-passing man? Not only are they going to be grossly confused about race, they're going to be grossly confused about sexuality, too...

'Like, dude, all these books are telling me I should be liking men. Not just men, but like, Somalian-looking men and shit. But I like women!? What the hell, man? Maybe there's something wrong with me! I need, like, some kind of conversion therapy... so I can be just like the men in the books!'

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-21T08:57:52+00:00

They'll probably aim for it after they get child sex transitions fully normalized. You can foresee the language they'll use:

'If children can both consent to and have sex changes... just why exactly can't they both consent to and have sex?'

Making identity 'fluid' was a marvelous tool for alphabet people, since it allows them to skirt around obstacles like the age of consent. It is, for example, becoming increasingly easier for kiddy fiddlers to simply claim 'I'm truly a little girl trapped in a man's body, stop it with the ageist transphobia! There is no age difference, and even if there was, it's just a number!'. Terms like 'Minor Attracted Person'—obviously intended as a replacement for the much more taboo term 'pedophile'—are not becoming increasingly prolific for no reason.

It's getting exceedingly difficult to think of any form of sexual deviancy that isn't legal, even more so any form that won't be legal by the end of this decade or so.

Those illustrations are so clownish and crude to the point of hilarity. Try picturing the kind of 'person' who drew them. We should all thank our lucky stars we grew up before this really began unfolding.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-20T06:08:11+00:00

Their 'argument' or 'reasoning' when encountering the term 'Cultural Marxism' can be plotted out as follows:

P1. You have used the term 'Cultural Marxism'.

P2. Nahtzees also used a term akin to 'Cultural Marxism'. (Note that they often write this as though it's some great discovery that they deserve a pat on the back for, 'See, I'm sooo good at detecting Nahtzees!')

C1. You are doing something 'Nazi-ish' and so must be a Nahtzee (guilt by association, 'quacks like a duck, it probably is a duck').

C2. Because you are a Nahtzee, you are also 'anti-Semitic', 'racist', etc. (the consequences of being a Nahtzee)

P3. But I am not a Nahtzee. I'm a Leftist. I'm inclusive, tolerant, etc.

C3. I win. You lose. Your argument is 'wrong' because I 'exposed' you as a Nahtzee and I am 'better' than that.

This same type of 'argument' can also play out when someone uses other taboo terms like 'White genocide'. But 'Cultural Marxism' is one that I have personally observed this happen with numerous times (e.g. at r/ConsumeProduct before its ban). Sometimes the term isn't even used by the person they want to 'defeat', but they'll assume that you implicitly mean it and then follow on with the rest of this 'argument' as though you used it anyway.

Obviously this kind of argument is unsound. All that the Leftist is attempting to do is assert a sort of quasi-moral superiority over his opponent and then conflate his supposed quasi-moral 'correctness' with a factual 'correctness' ('I'm a "better" person than you, which [somehow] also means that I am more correct than you'), which both verifies and falsifies nothing.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-20T03:54:11+00:00

Something that's been on my mind lately is very similar to this. It's how terms I could have sworn originated in our circles have somehow became co-opted and redefined before entering the mainstream. Let me explain:

I used to be active on the TRS forum around 2016. And there I could have sworn that people used the term 'woke' to refer to 'having awakened to the Left/System and becoming very Right-wing in response'. Several years later I heard a quackademic using the term 'woke' to refer... to herself. But this woman wasn't even remotely 'woke' in the sense I understood it. She's a White bisexual in a relationship with a literal Jew. One of her quackademic friends is an openly Antifa lesbian. Later I started to see it online. By late 2018 'woke' had developed its current meaning. Nowadays 'woke culture', 'wokeness', 'wokesters', etc. are ubiquitous terms even in the mainstream 'Right' media.

And what about 'based'? It used to mean something like 'that sounds very Right-wing and that's good'. Now I've seen literal feminists use it to mean something like: 'that sounds very feminist and that's good'.

And what about 'redpilled'? Now I see literal feminists using the term 'pinkpilled' to mean 'I became aware of the "patriarchy" and am now committed to feminism'.

The one I'm most sure about is the current term 'cuck' which, I could have sworn, came from the Alt-Right term 'cuckservative' around 2015-16 to mean: 'person who claims to be Right-wing but is insufficiently so, who heavily and weakly compromises with their opponents, to the point that they are in practice Left-wing'.

Now I see literal Far-Leftists use 'cuck' to refer to people who are insufficiently Left-wing (e.g. the viewers of 'Vaush' or 'Destiny').

Did these terms originate somewhere else first, and I'm just getting the origins wrong? Or are they really our terms, having drifted away from their creators to develop new meanings, with every Leftist and 'normie' out there completely unaware of their origins?

Returning closer to your original point, I've also noticed that various terms that cannot really be co-opted by other groups ('White genocide', 'Great Replacement', 'Cultural Marxism' being three of the best examples) have undergone a somewhat similar change, whereby instead of developing new meanings, they are simply branded 'conspiracy theories', etc. and became taboo. 'Good' people apparently do not mention or believe in such things. Mentions of 'Cultural Marxism', for example, inevitably attract some smug Cultural Marxist who will proudly mention something about the supposed 'Nazi' origins of the term—a transparent attempt at guilt by association.

Likewise, despite the 'Great Replacement' having become taboo, terms such as 'replacement migration' effectively mean the same thing, except in language that the System accepts—'replacement migration', far from problematizing it, frames it as 'necessary' and even 'desirable'. Thus we have an example of a term that appears to be taboo for little reason other than its 'Far-Right' origins, whilst newer terms have been invented to replace it simply because it seems that there must be a term to refer to this very real phenomenon.

Similarly, 'White genocide' was effectively replaced by a term that means the same thing, except in a mocking, non-critical and non-serious way: 'Mayocide'. Again, it appears that people accept that 'White genocide' is real, but have simply invented a replacement term which is essentially supportive of it ('White genocide' clearly problematized this very same phenomenon, which is why it needed to be replaced).

We can, of course, also see the System/Left co-opt and create other terms ('peaceful protest' is constantly used to 'de-problematize' violent, destructive Far-Leftist riots, which makes the crushing of such riots seem more unjustified in the eyes of the masses, helping to ensure that there will be no crackdown on them).

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-20T02:30:58+00:00

Where I am (not America, which is where he, and probably you, are making your observations):

Chinese people (Koreans and Japanese are practically non-existent) are heavily cliquish. Most associate with their own kind and speak their own language except when forced to interact with racial others. It is rare to see Chinese women with White men. Same thing with Indian, actually, who are also everywhere.
South-East Asian women with White men is very common. Can't go anywhere without seeing them kind of common. This has been going on since the 1970s or perhaps slightly earlier, where various matchmaking services existed in this country with the explicit purpose of matching up White men looking for wives with South-East Asian women looking for husbands. Perhaps the proliferation of WM-SEA women couples is partially the result of this having become a business model. Furthermore, the fact that the women relocate here rather than the men relocate to SEA strongly suggests that women enter these relationships with the expectation that they will be the ones to relocate. I think that the participation of SEA women in such services would be borderline non-existent if the expectation was the reverse, because they themselves would gain much less from importing White men into SEA than being imported into White societies.
White men who I've talked to without exception claim that they go for Asian women because White women are too 'feministic' (they have never replied by claiming that they find them more attractive or any such thing). It's the usual 'Asian = submissive' idea (though there's also a strong 'Asian = fiery tempered' idea that seriously clashes with the former).

Obviously I have no idea what's going on in America, where the Asians tend to be ethnically different and various communities are probably at different levels of cultural assimilation than here (no Asian community here could be considered even remotely integrated, even SEA women overwhelmingly have SEA friends, including when married to White men). Lastly, I don't believe that women are very visually attracted, so the general appearance of White men (and, indeed, all studies I've read seem to put White men at the top) is likely subordinate to other, more extraneous factors, most notably, access to material resources. Finding a husband is obviously very different to rating pictures of men, which is how those studies operate. Furthermore, stereotypes such as 'Asian woman = gold digger' and to a lesser extent 'woman = gold digger' do not exist without reason—but they would seem to be much more baseless if women did not prioritize access to material resources over other factors.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-18T09:33:54+00:00

They'd definitely rather be viewed as 'oppressed' than 'oppressors' within the usual dichotomy. I also noticed plenty of Asians—including, strangely, some who were fresh off the plane from Asia—who were 'woke' as hell. Although also very 'racist' when it suited them. I was surrounded by various types of non-whites like this in university (which was overwhelmingly majority non-white).

There I knew this Malaysian-Chinese guy who had perfected this to a fine art. He'd be an 'anti-racist', using all those 'woke'/'SJW' arguments when the interests of Whites came up against others. He'd also sound very 'racist' when talking about other types of Asians, including mainland Chinese. Actually, he called often them 'chinks' and 'undesirables' when I talked to him in private. He also hated being confused for a Chinese mainlander, feeling embarrassed when people spoke to him in Mandarin, which he could not even speak. Once he even outright claimed that he did not want to work with a group of mainland Chinese, to which he was uproariously denounced as 'racist' by the (older White female) teaching staff.

I believe that the proliferation of WM-AW couples is for largely material reasons. I suspect that AW implicitly understand that White societies are generally superior to their own homelands, and see WM as a ticket out of poverty in a way in which men of other races simply cannot be (because non-white men are poorer, non-white homelands less accepting of immigrants, etc.). This is also probably why such AW are usually from more dysfunctional places like Thailand or the Philippines rather than Japan or South Korea (where people are less desperate to leave home to live in some inferior, multiracial cesspool like London, Toronto or Vancouver).

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-18T01:42:18+00:00

They actually wish it in a strange sense, too. Narratives about -isms and -phobias don't really work unless one can find 'examples' (where 'example' effectively means anything that can fit the narrative even if a whole lot of mental gymnastics are required to do so).

So blacks/Leftists actually like things that can be vaguely construed as 'racist' to occur simply because they can then point to them and say: 'See! Racism is real after all, and this here 'proves' that we aren't full of crap like you Far-Right people be saying!'

In that sense, they're probably real happy to discover phenomena like this, simply because they can then posit the existence of a group 'responsible' for it (Whites in general) and say that it is 'proof' of a sort of 'stealth genocide' of blacks. 'Whites be tryna' genocide we kangz! Dey still be wayciss even in the current year, dey jus' jealous of our black excellence!'

Of course, if we worked out the real reason (which they don't actually want to know, because it would ruin the narrative), we'd find that it is just some side effect of modernity (plastic in the water, etc.)

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-17T04:55:22+00:00

Psyche yourself up as the average black, or someone thoroughly indoctrinated into baizuo Leftism.

All of this just becomes evidence of systemic racism and an attempt to depopulate Africa.

Obviously that's intellectually lazy (as their pigeonholing of every event into 'racism', 'sexism', etc. is), but it's amazing how they can take practically any story and fit it into wider narratives which are believable enough for perhaps several billion people. People are genuinely stupid enough to believe that everything that happens is essentially one 'privileged' group (Whites/men/heterosexuals, etc.) doing something malicious to groups that aren't. That's pretty much all that Left-wing 'explanation' consists of.

It's also amusing how these narratives sometimes backfire. For example, the 'White racists are trying to depopulate Africa' narrative continues to lead to many blacks believing that White doctors come to Africa during pandemics to inject harmful things into blacks under the guise of a 'vaccine'. Obviously this leads to increased black deaths—the reverse of what both blacks and baizuo Whites want.

It is possible for African birth rates to become almost as low as those of, say, conservative Whites. South Africa is over 80% black, but its fertility rate is currently probably marginally lower than 2.40. Abortion is very common in South Africa and you can even see advertisements for abortion services in the street (e.g. signs with doctor's names along with phone numbers to call), showing that abortion has been normalized in South Africa. This is, of course, a good thing. Abortion damages whoever normalizes it. The last thing that we need are things that weaken us but no one else (e.g. our people having abortions while others do not).

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-14T06:17:45+00:00

This reminds me of some author (I've never been able to relocate where I read this) who posited that USSR was not the enemy of the West because it was (by the time that he was writing) 'conservative'.

It also reminds me of two incidents alleged to have involved Leonid Brezhnev. It is unclear whether either actually happened.

One incident allegedly involves Brezhnev and Thatcher (some other sources put it as Brezhnev and Callaghan). Brezhnev is alleged to have said: 'There is only one important question facing us, and that is the question of whether the white race will survive.' In the Thatcher version of this story, Thatcher allegedly stormed out of the room then and there, rather than answering Brezhnev.

Another incident allegedly involves Brezhnev and Nixon. Brezhnev basically says that the USA/USSR are the world's two 'White powers' and that they should be on the same side against Red China. He also mentions that if nuclear war breaks out between USA/USSR, the browns and yellows (he refers to them by skin colour) will be ruling the Earth. Nixon was supposedly silent, not replying to these remarks.

If these events were true, this has the amusing implication that a literal part-Tatar Communist leader was more 'racist' than Thatcher or Nixon. Some Far-Leftists have attempted to explain this away by claiming that Thatcher and Nixon were 'racist' and that Brezhnev was simply talking in language that they would understand, i.e. by appearing to be a fellow 'racist'. Obviously there is something off about this excuse given that neither Thatcher nor Nixon were 'racist' enough to even respond, let alone agree.

Personally I disagree about viewing the USSR as a continuity of the Russian civilization. But there are some who have believed it. For example, there was a Russian dissident who returned to Russia long after the revolution, claiming that the Bolsheviks had become patriotic. Because his opposition to them was on the basis of their internationalism/anti-Russianism, he thought that the differences between him and them were essentially gone.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-14T05:56:16+00:00

There's a few other similarities between America and the USSR also worth noting. Off the top of my head:

Both were founded by radical revolutionaries who were the Far-Left of their respective time periods.
Both were 'proposition nations' in which being considered part of the in-group involved appearing to adhere to certain mental states (attitudes, beliefs, ideas, etc.)
Both essentially have the same values (extreme emphasis on freedom and equality) but merely interpreted them in different ways (e.g. USA was traditionally about equality of opportunity and negative liberty; USSR aspired to equality of outcomes and positive liberty).
Both remind one of the importance of academic fields to politics (the Marxists routinely drew upon philosophers like Kant and Hegel and upon 'bourgeois' economists like Ricardo and Smith; America similarly owes a debt to Locke).

There are also some significant differences:

USSR started off as socioculturally and economically Far-Left and tried to move Rightward in all respects as it aged (e.g. tried to demolish the family until around 1926 when the government decided there were too many war orphans for them to deal with, Stalin put an end to tolerance of abortion, Gorbachev put additional restrictions on alcohol production in the early 1980s), USA started off as culturally conservative but is lurching socioculturally Leftward.
The USSR was rapidly decentralizing in all respects (while China only decentralized its economy). American power is going in the opposite direction (away from the states and towards the Federal Government).

Unwillingness to serve in the military (and rapid alteration of the military's demographics) also has parallels with the Roman Empire (the Roman military was already minority Roman before 100 AD).

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-14T04:05:56+00:00

Everything has to fit the dominant Left-liberal narrative, similar to how everything contradicting Marxism (the dominant Leftist narrative of its time and place) was outright banned or unpublished, such as all of the works of Nietzsche in East Germany, or Zizek's own Master's thesis in Yugoslavia.

George Zimmerman, a Hispanic Jew hybrid, becomes White when he shoots Trayvon Martin. Changing his race allows the shooting to fit the narrative of White oppressor and non-white victim where it otherwise would not.
Ahmad Alissa, a brown Syrian Arab when being bombed by the West, becomes White when he goes on a shooting spree (incidentally, Tariq Nasheed is one of the most vocal proponents of this narrative as well).
Rittenhouse is a White supremacist who intentionally went on a shooting spree, despite all evidence to the contrary.
Long is a White supremacist... despite killing two White people and outright claiming that his motive was sexual frustration rather than racial animus. We are supposed to ignore these two so that his victims comprise solely of six Asian women, which then nicely fits the narrative of White and/or male oppressors and non-white and/or female victims (Long is particularly useful for them because he can be used to fit both feminist and 'anti-racist' narratives).

All of these incidents are also used to push gun control narratives, which is an extra bonus.

I think this Wright incident is right on time simply because it highlights, probably even better than their response to the Rittenhouse incident, the sheer amount of idiocy and malice on the Left at a time when people need and benefit from a constant reminder of it. There is no way you can see that clip and not think that the woman was way more intimidated by this black thug than he was of her.

Why? For one, the power imbalance was so obviously in Wright's favour.

She was looking at someone who would practically be hailed as a hero (especially among blacks) if he killed her there and then, at someone who can behave with borderline absolute impunity. At someone who resembles the kind of trash she and her colleagues deal with on an almost everyday basis, which never ends well. Usually with the offenders getting treated with 'kid gloves', receiving a 'slap on the wrist' no matter what they do.

He was looking at some fat 'cracker' who he'd be a hero for killing, and who would be in deep trouble if she merely harmed a hair on his braindead head. But she did a lot more than just that, shooting him in sheer panic, so now she's going to be the female Derek Chauvin and the female face of 'waycissum and supremahzee'. At least the fact that she's female gives her a better chance than the abysmally little he's got.

This incident also puts the Democrats in a bad situation simply because they perceived Antifa-BLM violence as being motivated by anti-Trump animus. Now they are at a loss to explain this away. Like with every event of this nature, here's to hoping it leads to nationwide instability. 'Pigs' clashing with Leftists is always a good thing.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-07T07:47:24+00:00

I see no strong reason to believe it's either. And I don't think that those who 'study' this (because they think it's a 'problem' that needs a 'solution') really care about it either. What they want to do is fit the whole Trump Presidency into wider narratives and minimize the possibility of something similar happening ever again. This doesn't mean finding out their problems and addressing them sincerely. It means finding ways to fool them into reinterpreting their problems as no longer problematic (for example, by connecting their concerns to racism narratives and then shaming them for being 'racist' in the hope that they'll cease resisting) and then going on as usual.

Race > Class on the contemporary Left, so the predominant globohomo strand has an ulterior motive for interpreting it as demographics. This explanation much better fits their wider narrative.

By contrast, economic anxiety doesn't really fit their narrative. They don't want Whites to be viewed as losing in the economy or anywhere else, because they want to analogize Whites to the bourgeoisie, to people who 'have it all', who always succeed by ensuring that others can never challenge them. They simply pursue a racialized version of the usual bourgeois-proletarian dichotomy, one in which White maps onto bourgeois and non-white maps onto proletarian. White/bourgeoisie are 'oppressors'; non-white/proletariat are 'victims'. Anything that contradicts this narrative is deemed problematic—as victim blaming, perpetuating oppression/privilege, etc.

Remember, most people believe that Chauvin, Rittenhouse and a whole heap of others are 'White supremacists', despite having zero evidence. We, of course, have evidence to the contrary, such as that Chauvin had an Asian wife, which must be ignored or reframed in a way that fits the narrative. Being a straight White man whose interests clashes with those of any other person automatically gets one reinvented as a White supremacist. Similarly, a non-white who commits a crime 'becomes' White. It doesn't matter whether it's Ahmed Anissa (an Arab is a brown man when he's being bombed in the Middle East, but is a White man when he goes on a shooting spree), Marquise Love, or Zimmerman (both of whose photos in the media showed them as looking far lighter than they actually are). We see that this same 'logic' plays out with other groups. J's are White/Western when wanting Americans and their lapdogs to bomb Arabs or Persians; J's are non-white, non-western 'people of colour' under most other circumstances.

Has anyone noticed that news articles conveniently omit that Long killed two Whites for the same reason? To fit the narrative, he needed to be framed as 'racist' and 'sexist' in order to hit as many birds as possible with one stone... hence the real problem is not that he killed eight people, but that he killed six Asian women. Because the two White victims make him look much more indiscriminate, these two need to be written out of history so that the shooting appears to be part of a wider narrative; one of White/male oppressors and non-white/female victims. Long's actions have been great for the Left simply because they can be interpreted as fitting both the racism and sexism narrative. We know that if Long was black the outcome would be vastly different—the sexism narrative could still be pulled, but being of any higher race accusing blacks of being sexist is racist. The story would be useless to all wider narratives and thus canned quickly.

In light of these developments, for obvious reasons it is increasingly absurd to trust anything coming from the MSM. 'Economic anxiety' would paint as Whites as oppressed, victims, underprivileged etc. That's exactly the opposite of what the tens of millions of Left-wing cultists out there are used to hearing. Nobody is going to tell them otherwise simply because contradicting this narrative gets one 'cancelled'. This helps create a self-fulfilling prophecy, a feedback loop—they're told exactly what they want to hear both because true believers and those who don't want to upset them out of fear of punishment (and almost everyone fits one of these two groups) tell it to them. Thus their own narratives are increasingly 'objective truths', questioned only by 'ignorant', 'stupid' and 'evil' people who are 'inbred redneck hillbillies' wearing MAGA hats, and their Russian propagandist masters.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-07T04:03:22+00:00

He'd be right in saying that they were a stepping stone toward it, though they weren't the origins of it. Charles Wright Mills is probably more influential to American wokeness, with his open repudiation of labour and his open exaltation of the third-world. This, of course, was part of the process of the Left switching en masse from class to race, of the "Old Left" being replaced by the "New Left". It is thus no surprise that Mills is often labelled the 'father' of the New Left.

Likewise, Marcuse claimed that the proletariat were no longer capable of socialist revolution because they were too 'bourgeoisified'. Marcuse put his hope in a coalition of the lumpenproletariat (which is exactly what the Left's voting base is today, a nasty combination of alphabet people, substance abusers and other degenerate Whites, with non-whites using the former as a tool to gain supremacy, and a Gracchite 'establishment' trying to keep this utter fragile shitshow together, one bound together by a hatred of their superiors, in order to keep themselves in power) to usher in socialism. Marcuse was also obsessed with 'sexual liberation'.

Their ideas also have atrocious foundations. Fromm, for example, basically combines the two garbage pseudoscientific paradigms of Freud and Marx, to end up with 'Freudian-Marxism'. The same garbage that the extremely degenerate and deranged J pseudoscientist Wilhelm Reich peddled. Scientifically, it is unlikely that anything of value can be created atop shoddy foundations. Thus Reich is best known for his absurd and baseless idea that a sort of sexual energy can be 'collected' in special 'accumulator' machines and used to cure physical ills. He even had these 'machines' built. People were supposed to sit inside these machines in order to be 'cured'. Being nude, I think, was supposed to make it 'work better'.

Actually, much of contemporary society clearly has their mark upon it. The Left's emphasis on 'reverse racism' rather than 'reverse classism' (thus, the Left problematizing the White race rather than the wealthy, and the rise of 'Critical Race Theory'), being a coalition of the lumpenproletariat while proletarian Whites are increasingly Right-wing voters, and sexual obsession (e.g. the sheer proliferation of genders and sexualities, such that the list of both is ever-growing) are all aspects of late modernity that they championed, even if they could not have possibly predicted all of its effects. Sure, perhaps they would have been uncomfortable with something like genderfluidity, but if they were, it is merely an unintended consequence of the things that they did support.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-04T11:10:03+00:00

Saw a Far-Left livestream where Keith's YouTube upload of "Why Materialism Is Absurd" gets brought up, because their 'leader' goes through the comments on their subreddit and some idiot posted it there hoping that their 'leader' would 'destroy' it. I suspect the original poster thought Keith was attacking historical or dialectical materialism rather than metaphysical materialism, and was simply too dull to realize that it wasn't some anti-Marxist video... So Keith's video gets brought up on this guy's screen.

At least four of his degenerate followers are somehow aware of who Keith Woods is. And in a typical, borderline illiterate fashion most befitting of their kind, we see them comment away:

isnt this dude a fascist

This dude is super racist

he's a fascist and deranged but there is certain kernels of truth that he will drop

He is Irish too which is worse than fascists

he has cool takes on modernity but he has the CRINGE IQ worshipping race realism

He's alright, but he has a bad (Breadtube) understanding of socialism and he's kind of boring

hes super boring

I think he is a HBD type

bro, I'd out argue and wring that skinny little neck, like mao said

He’s a twink

If you read his tweets you will see he is not your friend

'Leader' is 'Lebanese-American'. Somehow he then directs his aggression (of which he has plenty, almost certainly possessing some severe mental issues) at his own idiot, degenerate followers rather than at Keith. Somehow they're at war with the 'progressive' Breadtube types and the Chapos. Some brilliant purity spiraling going on in the social media ultra-Left, such that even though their side holds all the power, they themselves are completely marginalized as a small sect expending all their energy in sectarian infighting.

Something else worth mentioning about Keith is that a few people like Thomas Baden-Riess absolutely hate him (and some of their criticisms of him are quite sound). Personally I think he's contributing far more good than bad to the cause. If Far-Leftists know about him, well, he's getting the message out.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-03T13:54:02+00:00

That those who hold power use this same power to tell us that they have no power is one of the strangest things about the general Left. They're still playing victim when the 'oppressors' are older versions of themselves. Most of the leading Democrats—the 'community organizer' Obama, H. Clinton and Sanders most notably—were the 1960s-70s version of the Salem and Portland 'peaceful protesters'. Then they started wearing suits and ties, made some compromises with capitalism while pushing some Leftist reforms like welfare, Affirmative Action, etc. and otherwise focused chiefly on their social agendas. Hence, 'woke capitalism'.

I think the French Left is actually very powerful, but divided, which gives the Right an edge. Last election you could see PS under Hamon trying to swing back Left again, moving PS back towards Melenchon's space. Then you have the Greens who are making large gains on the lower-level elections. Then there's a whole heap of crazy parties like the once-powerful PCF and the 'New Anticapitalist Party' further dividing up the vote. Although there is some fracturing in the RN/Le Pen camp it seems like there are generally much less choices for the Right, hence more unity.

I also agree about the general thing about the economic Left being 'obsolete' to the masses. Marx wrote in a time when even he was noticing a drastic increase in abundance, but he could not have possibly foreseen the sheer superabundance of the contemporary West. Marxism has no appeal when normies are simply prioritizing self-actualization through satisfying material needs/wants. Ergo, 'pure Marxists' acting like it's still 1848, when there is still child labour and every man spends all day doing menial work in a factory owned by some bourgeois, just seem totally out of place in the post-industrial economy where plenty of people are self-employed and machines are doing most of the hard labour. A few Marxists have seen this, the 'tankie' types obviously haven't. They want to go back to the time when the Left wasn't as soy-fuelled... not seeing that 'woke capitalism' is probably just a natural development in Leftism rather than an aberration that could be undone. Contemporary normie life isn't about hard labour. It's about the 9-5 rat-race followed by a whole lot of television, porn, vidya games, partying and social media.

Having spent a lot of time looking at some quantitative voter statistics of Leftist parties in a few Western countries, 'economic Leftism' still has immense popularity with their voter bases. I don't think the 'economic Left' is yet a spent force. Yet 'woke capitalism' has some profound effects on the Left—capitalist stances like 'free trade' have become immensely popular where many Leftist parties once opposed them more than the Right. Of course, there is a Left-capitalist nexus on this issue. Leftists want free trade because they see protectionism as exclusionary, capitalists want free trade for self-explanatory reasons. They complement each-other very well.

Spot on about the 'intellectual destitution'. A hundred years ago it seemed that the Left was too intellectual and distanced from the 'normies' as a result. Now the Left is now in some ways opposite—completely 'lumpenified'. It is now the Right that has become vastly more intellectual—content creators like the EBL people are borderline impenetrable.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-03T12:54:05+00:00

Apparently he was born in Morocco, but closer inspection reveals both his parents were (probably) White. Similar to Alain Badiou. Supposedly, he is essentially Spanish. Either way, he is not French, whatever he is. Looking closely at him, he seems to be a French Corbynite.

The other guy I'm talking about has the very 'French' name of Gérald Moussa Darmanin. He is 1/2 or 1/4 Algerian. The non-whites are cheering this guy on in the comment section of Generation Identity's now defunct YouTube account, and they were always there trolling it back when it was active.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-03T07:34:15+00:00

Why was Generation Identity effectively banned by that Arab-French hybrid (Darmanin) who holds a high place in Macron's government? (The same government that the utter nitwits in this article hilariously claim is 'not protecting them' from the 'Far-Right').

Also, Melenchon is such a blowhard. This is the same guy that said many years ago that he had a fear of (actual) French people. And he is yet another foreigner, of Spanish and/or Moroccan background with no French in him whatsoever.

Two living examples of why multiracialism fails. These people hate the French and are a fifth-column simply because it is in their personal interests to be so.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-03T07:25:30+00:00

Also worth mentioning that Xi is outright pro-EU and anti-protectionism/pro-free trade, outright claiming that anyone who wants to put tariffs on China effectively just wants to do so because they're... 'racist'.

The only difference is that China perhaps understands that the 'Westerners are all racist' narrative is full of crap and they're simply weaponizing it, whereas White Leftists and non-whites in America simply believe it outright. The baizuo narrative isn't the same thing as the Red Chinese version of Marxism.

This is why you get the odd Chinese official saying something 'based' one minute and 'woke' the next. Same thing with Iranians like Khomeini and Ahmadinejad claiming ridiculous things such as that Iran has no BLM-style violence because it isn't 'racist' and America is. What an idiotic take. Iran has no BLM-style violence because they have no racial minorities, only similar peoples like Arabs and Azeris. And minorities aren't going to cause trouble simply because there is little to no sense of liberalism—if someone causes trouble, they get shot. In the West, we do the exact opposite, applauding them as heroes.

I think the comment that you're replying to simply leaves open the possibility ('can'). It is not claiming that Chinese or Russians do this or even that they care to do this. Only that they can increase their own power relative to their enemies if they can simultaneously spread both narratives (which, naturally, would divide White from non-white much more than the extent that they are already divided). Not just that they can, but that they should—it would make so much sense from their point of view to, for example, create both fake 'Far-Right' and non-white nationalist pages/websites in order to push both narratives.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-02T10:32:05+00:00

This. I always thought there was something off from when I first became aware of Russia's nationalist scene and how Russian nationalists hated the Putinist regime for, among other things, facilitating Central Asian immigration en masse. These Russian nationalists absolutely despised the Trumpians and other types who hold a (by Western standards) positive opinion towards Putin. The Putin regime is nasty in many ways—one example I remember is how they turned a blind eye to the assassination of Russian officers all across the country by Chechens after the war was over. The Kadyrov faction in Chechnya effectively allied itself to the Russian government against the other Chechen factions. Putin's lot then let them kill whoever they wanted to 'take revenge' on across Russia. To make matters worse, to keep Kadyrov loyal or attempt preventing another Chechen uprising that might lead to instability or increased American presence in the region, Russia puts disproportionately huge amounts of wealth into Chechnya. Such that Chechnya is very well developed and has been compared to Dubai. And about Asian immigration—it has been said that Moscow will be majority Muslim/Asian in a few decades and that the far-east is rapidly becoming majority Chinese.

There is also the problem of the oligarchs who held immense power during the 1990s in particular. Putin put himself above these people and got rid of some of them, but most of them are still there. Very few of them are ethnic Russians.

I think it has only been in the last few years that the true nature of Putin's regime has become known on the Dissident Right. It used to be that Putin held immense popularity. Especially around 2016 when I was most active on forums—I don't think anyone ever mentioned these truths about Putin's regime. They were things I only learned from Russians online, not Westerners. I think it is generally agreed upon that he is a civic nationalist who believes in a culturally Russian and not ethnically Russian Russia. This was first pointed out to me by someone who noted that there were two terms for what we have a single-term (Russian) for. One term is for Russians as an ethnic group. The other is for Russians as a cultural group (which is a label that is inclusive of Dagestanis, etc.). The Putin regime is simply 'nationalist' in the sense of the second group, not the first.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-02T09:50:31+00:00

I watched the whole thing and your characterization of this guy is spot on.

He's trying to make a name for himself as a sort of 'pure Marxist', and to do this he has to attack other Leftists in order to elevate himself above them. Ergo, his attacks on 'Vaush' and 'Destiny' because these two seem to be some of the trendiest of the YouTube activist Left types right now. I keep hearing about 'Destiny' but know nothing about him. 'Vaush' is a gamer channel that recently turned overtly political, and as a result he is losing some subscribers (i.e. non- or anti-political gamers) and gaining some others (i.e. political Left-liberals) as he transitions his channel away from gaming and into politics.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-02T09:43:20+00:00

This video is pretty much 'Left Antifa' vs. 'Right Antifa'. Or DSA vs. the Red Guard.

Pretty sure the guy on the left is Vaush and not a "fanboy", a typical Sandernista/BLM type.

This 'Infrared' Arab character is so radicalized that we effectively get some kind of messed up horseshoe effect going on. Putin is better than Navalny, because... Navalny is racist? Liberals are the real racists and fascists and Vaush is unknowingly serving some sort of Anglo-American racist order? So we end up arriving at a "Putin good, America bad" conclusion for all the wrong reasons.

All this video demonstrates is why these activist Leftists have so much energy, influence and numbers but always lose to the mainstream Left. If Obama and Sanders remained like this all of their lives rather than donning suits and ties, we wouldn't have the problem of the Democratic Party being like it is right now. As it standards, the Vaush supporters and the Infrared supporters clearly look like they're willing to shoot each other before they fight anyone on the Right.

The whole video is an embarrassment. To me, Vaush comes out looking like less of a douche in the face of this ultra-aggressive fool who barely mentions anything about M-L. Which is strange, because Vaush should be someone easy to beat by practically anyone who from either end (Antifa/Post-Left or Dissident Right), owing to the fact that he probably knows nothing about the pseudoscientific paradigm of M-L. Come to think about it, Infrared probably doesn't know much more, either. His goal is obviously to be a popular 'pure Marxist' by attacking Vaush, Destiny, Chomsky and whoever else he needs to 'demolish' in order to achieve his goal of being the #1 100% most pure Far-Leftist that ever lived.

SamiAlHayyid · 2021-04-02T08:18:49+00:00

This. Generally the Right prefers civility and construction, which is why you get very little in the way of Rightist graffiti or vandalism. On the other hand, practically every sizeable Western city (parts of Lisbon and Marseilles being some examples I'm aware of) is covered with miscreant's scrawlings, of "ACAB", "Antifa", the old hammer and sickle, "Fuck 12" and whatever else happens to be in vogue on the activist Left at the current time. There are absolutely no 'Right-wing' counterparts to these slogans. I have never seen a spray-painted swastika in real-life, for example, despite the obvious Left-wing retort obviously being: "Oh yeah, well what about the swastika then!?"

The Left is far more destructive and prone to violence than the Right. The only thing that stops them from a full-scale revolt is how utterly "lumpenified" they have become. But if a shooting match starts and Republicans (irrespective of who starts it) start shooting back, the police/military will soon be fighting right alongside the Antifa militias. Sure, both institutions will probably experience defections, but on the institutional level they'll stick with the Left/state against the Right/opposition in any shooting match. It is simply delusional to believe that if the Left/state come, for example, to seize everyone's weapons, or if Antifa start invading the homes of Republicans en masse, that the military will simply launch a coup because they're "really on our side". They aren't. They're on the side of whomever is in power, pays their wages, and is the safest bet all round.

SamiAlHayyid