OUTRAGEOUS - GC speakers harassed by BLM activists in London - Trans, Inc. hijacking other good causes! by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]Questionings 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Touché, I should've watched the video, I'm honestly quite surprised and believe me when I say that their feelings lean towards the minority within the black community.

I think they're mistakenly affiliating being a radfem with being right leaning as that's how they make it out to be on social media when it doesn't particularly have any relation to your political views. I've seen racist radfems but there are plenty of Liberal ones too. At the end of the day those women definitely do not represent me.

OUTRAGEOUS - GC speakers harassed by BLM activists in London - Trans, Inc. hijacking other good causes! by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]Questionings 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Black British woman here.

I can guarantee the protesters harassing those women were white because a lot of the black community, particularly black feminist women, aren't with the trans stuff.

BLM has been hijacked by extreme leftists and most of these vocal actovitists only support it simply because it's a left wing ideology and not because of legitimate care. These people view being black as a secondary trait rather than a primary one and as such view us in a very one dimensional way, seeing our blackness as the only component of our identity and seemingly forgetting that black people can face other forms of discrimination as well as racism, such as sexism, homophobia, ableism ect. Black people are just people and a lot of people seem to forget that we all have differing viewpoints.

It's silly to judge a whole movement off of the actions of a few unhinged individuals and l wouldn't view their actions as typical of the movement. As a black gender critical woman it irritates me to have this trans stuff overshadowing the movement especially when it's something I completely don't agree with.

CNN calls women "individuals with a cervix" but prostate-havers are still "men" by Terfenclaw in GenderCritical

[–]Questionings 29 insightful - 1 fun29 insightful - 0 fun30 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The worst thing here is how primitive this all sounds. Humanity is regressing.

A GenderCritical Discord that I recommend by waterdog in GenderCritical

[–]Questionings 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There's literally no moderation on discord, not by a politically correct overhead. You have quite a lot of freedom depending on what server you're on. It's moderated by the owners only who I would imagine have the same viewpoints of you and therefore won't censor you.

You can report comments which results in the server being shut down but as I said, if you're all like minded people I can't see why anyone would do that. You also need to provide proof via a screenshot so unless you're in the server you can't report anyone.

Liberal men are full of it. by Questionings in GenderCritical

[–]Questionings[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To me it would look odd if I wrote transwomen and then women e.g, transwomen are different from women. It's not that big of a deal, and someone already pointed it out to me. You get the point of what I was saying.

Liberal men are full of it. by Questionings in GenderCritical

[–]Questionings[S] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's just my way of distinguishing between transwomen and women. The word natal just reinforces the difference implying that one is natural while the other is not

Apparently there's no difference between neo-vaginas and natal women's vaginas and I'm wondering how true this can be by Questionings in GenderCritical

[–]Questionings[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"So, first off, they're not the same and yes, a gynecologist can tell the difference."

Funnily enough one of the reasons why I asked is because I was on a trans subreddit where one of the users said their doctor told them he couldn't even tell the difference. It should be illegal to lie to people like that, especially when it further perpetuates their delusions.

"in which case it will self lubricate with the same mucus that is in the bowel"

Not really similar to a female vagina though. I'd imagine the rate and consistency of lubrication wouldn't change like it does in women. Thank you for the comment though it was very insightful.

Apparently there's no difference between neo-vaginas and natal women's vaginas and I'm wondering how true this can be by Questionings in GenderCritical

[–]Questionings[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Also the argument that "lesbians should date transwomen" is homophobic and sounds dangerously akin to homosexual conversion therapy. No matter how much a TiM modifies his body, he is still a man."

I agree completely. My main post however was an argument I had seen, on this website no less, why lesbians should date transwomen. No one is obliged to date anyone for whatever reason The modern world is a circus.