A lot of these spammers seem to be from New Jersey. by VantaFount in saiditCleanup

[–]OmegaUser296 0 insightful - 3 fun0 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

 weeding the garden

Honestly rn it seems more like burning the weeds, weeding the garden is routine and done often. Once it's out of hand the best we can do is just burn it, burn it all!

  • This was satirical please don't ban me lord magnora7

Saidit Rules for Moderators by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So allowing moderators to have specific to community rules would ruin Saidit? As long as their rules are within reason the rules of communities are meant to guide the community and avoid un-wanted or repeated discussion.

Saidit Rules for Moderators by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Okay regardless of "In good faith & on topic" what about the individual sub rules? We're still allowed to ban based on those right?

Example: If a comment or something is in good faith and on topic but breaks a subs individual rules can they be removed?

Saidit Rules for Moderators by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Not to rat but rule 2, u/JasonCarswell I believe you've violated the law.

Saidit Rules for Moderators by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Understood

Saidit Rules for Moderators by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So if it is on topic and in good faith but breaks a rule of the sub we can't remove them? Then what is the point of individual sub rules.

Saidit Rules for Moderators by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay well look at s/unc0ver for example. It has rules that don't define off topic and could be broken while staying in "Good faith" and "On topic" so can I remove if they break the rules of the sub even if their still supposedly "On topic" and "In good faith"?

Reddit admins are apparently removing every thread that mentions the father of the alleged El Paso shooter and his connection with MK Ultra by magnora7 in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]OmegaUser296 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Comments section of that post in a nutshell right now:

Person1: Their removing anything to mention it can someone tell me what's happening

Person2: [Removed]

Person1: It's removed what was the comment

Person2: Me posting links to the stuff their censoring

Their not even f**king trying to hide that their censoring this stuff. The Reddit admins are just nuts right now. I mean their censoring stuff and just ignoring everyone's speech of how unethical their censoring is.

This page is hardly readable in dark mode by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah I noticed this issue awhile back but didn't bring it up. Although yeah reading the API documentation it gets annoying switching between light and dark mode for me (I use dark mode when browsing normally and testing my extensions and light mode I have to turn on when looking at the API documentation)

FBI founded by a Masonic Shriner faggot, they fucked up on 911, dropped the ball on Epstein now warn 'conspiracy theories' are a new domestic terrorism threat, Total Fucking Clowns. by BillionDollarEgg3 in news

[–]OmegaUser296 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's exactly what I was thinking. The original title it had cross-crosspost was much better and didn't seem like just name calling.

Edit: Fixed a spelling error

Moderator Toolbox for Saidit in open Pre-Release by OmegaUser296 in ToolBox

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I mean you are right that the limits are set pretty high as is.

I did the investigating and I found that the error is actually some drunken error with the code of the 3.5 version that my code is based on of the Reddit mod toolbox, I believe back porting a later version of the Module will fix it.

TL;DR: The Error looked like an API error but once I got the Network monitor open and debugger open it showed new things that caused me to notice it was in fact a problem with the code.

EDIT: In case I didn't make it clear you don't need to up your API rate limits anymore. It was just my code.

Moderator Toolbox for Saidit in open Pre-Release by OmegaUser296 in ToolBox

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hey so I was preforming some testing with the "Mod Matrix" which is a section that is meant to show a readout of all Moderators, their actions, and totals, and percentages.

I noticed a slight issue that once again is just API.

I think one last boost to those API limits will fix the remaining issues that are being experienced in this and other parts of the extension.

Moderator Toolbox for Saidit in open Pre-Release by OmegaUser296 in ToolBox

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah I'm saying "Open Pre-Release" Due to the fact that I want feedback on it aswell as I want to iron out the issues I myself discovered with it before any official launch.

This Sub Exists by OmegaUser296 in HolocaustSkepticism

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

2 worst Examples of Reddits Powermods or similar situations.

Gallowboob and N8thegr8

You Might Want to Uninstall VLC. Immediately. by Mnemonic in TechSec

[–]OmegaUser296 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

[Update 8:35 AM] Based on a tweet by VideoLAN, VLC may not be as vulnerable as it initially appeared. VideoLAN says the “security issue” in VLC was caused by a third-party library called Libebml that was fixed 16 months ago, and that Mitre’s claim was based on a previous (and outdated) version of VLC.

[Update 10:30 AM] The VLC CVE on the National Vulnerability Database has now been updated, downgrading the severity of the issue from a Base Score of 9.8 (critical) to 5.5 (medium), with the change log also specifying that the “Victim must voluntarily interact with attack mechanism.”

My Side Saidit Projects by OmegaUser296 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

By the way I might decide to update the contents of Mod Toolbox as it's currently built on Mod Toolbox 3.5. I might upgrade it to be up to date with the Mod Toolbox for Reddit's latest version if I get around to it as I would have to basically do all the same stuff again but for almost completely different code.

My Side Saidit Projects by OmegaUser296 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'll continue to update this with every new development I have

Equivalent to api.reddit.com for Saidit by OmegaUser296 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, also this post is unrelated to the mod toolbox problem so once you think you fixed the rate limits message me so I can test it.

Equivalent to api.reddit.com for Saidit by OmegaUser296 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you for the quick reply d3rr.

Equivalent to api.reddit.com for Saidit by OmegaUser296 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

u/d3rr sorry to ping you just thought you might be able to give a clear cut answer quickly on this.

Edit: Just to clarify this post isn't related to the API delay I messaged you about, that's a different project entirely.

This Sub Exists by OmegaUser296 in HolocaustSkepticism

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

What DOXXING?

Also yeah working it out with JC will be a pain in my arse.

This Sub Exists by OmegaUser296 in HolocaustSkepticism

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I won't kill it, worst I will do is make it redirect to a more general skepticism sub.

I love you guys by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'll go edit the rules as I see fit, might out right change a few things so reviewing them tomorrow or something may be best.

This Sub Exists by OmegaUser296 in HolocaustSkepticism

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

wait doxxed yourself, hol up why, and where.

This Sub Exists by OmegaUser296 in HolocaustSkepticism

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's fine a little censorship won't hurt if it keeps the discussion good.

Although some users like JasonCarswelll might dislike the censorship that shouldn't become an issue as Censorship is needed to keep the site from becoming like Voat and if people like the censorship or not isn't your guys problem.

This Sub Exists by OmegaUser296 in HolocaustSkepticism

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay understandable. I had only brought it up because many people here seem to be strictly against censorship and assume this site is also against it.

And yeah the problem is opening free speech commonly also opens the gate for Voat levels of toxicity and crazy shit or Reddit levels of censorship to try and stop the free speech from getting out of hand.

I personally don't mind a little censorship as long as we stay away from going to Reddit levels of it.

This Sub Exists by OmegaUser296 in HolocaustSkepticism

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trust me I understand your many concerns and I have seen what you mean with people trying to turn this into Voat and I don't want it either.

Also I think something is wrong with the Spam Filter. It has added your comments to Spam 3 times I keep having to approve them manually. I checked and it isn't automod or anything it seems.

Edit: I think I fixed the spam filter problem but reply to this just so I can check.

This Sub Exists by OmegaUser296 in HolocaustSkepticism

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Comment ended up in spam again, I think I need to check the automod rules.

And I couldn't agree more, although I know Jason most likely won't let it die off but I do agree with all that you've stated.

But since it most likely won't die at least I can try to keep the conversation dual sided instead of just right wing like Voat mainly is.

I will try to let this sub come to it's natural death hopefully that won't be long. Heck I might just make it redirect to a general skepticism sub once it naturally calms down as that would be killing it but not making it a straight up killing of the sub.

This Sub Exists by OmegaUser296 in HolocaustSkepticism

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The problem was the moderator of s/Holocaust was turning it into an insult of a sub.

I personally don't believe the skepticism around the holocaust. I was only helping them by making a community that hopefully will actually not be killed off by it's own creator.

I also had made sure to remove it from r/all and other things to avoid it becoming the face of saidit in any way.

I understand all your concerns and if I see the sub getting out of hand or posting false information or anything trust me I will keep it in check.

Out right harassment of Jews will not be tolerated on the sub and claims without evidence won't either.

I only made it out of concerns that u/JasonCarswell had excersized for the s/Holocaust sub I personally don't believe their claims but I see a need for their beliefs to have a proper sub for it instead of s/Holocaust which was made in a mocking manner.

This Sub Exists by OmegaUser296 in HolocaustSkepticism

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hence why as stated in the rest of this thread I will try to make sure discussion here doesn't get to (Pardon my language) fucked up in any way.

This Sub Exists by OmegaUser296 in HolocaustSkepticism

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I understand how seriously you take it.

Although no offence wanting less subs of this type could be considered censorship by some people cough Jason carswell cough but I see the point in avoiding seeming to much like Voat.

And yeah it was the spam filter, I had meant to set posts and links but accidentally also set it for comments.

This Sub Exists by OmegaUser296 in HolocaustSkepticism

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

for some reason your comment ended up in spam I don't know why. But anyways

If I didn't make this sub Jasoncarswell would have made it, he even said so. I understand you think it doesn't need it's own sub but JasonCarswell felt it did, I made it so that hopefully I can make sure JasonCarswell doesn't try to make claims about it without proper basis.

While I would rather these subs not exist as you would since this sub would have been made either way I felt that why not make it actually proper discussion of the topic instead of just treating it like truth and fact like JasonCarswell would have. In fact I intend this to allow both sides of discussion so it won't be one sided like Voat.

This is more for debate of the topic.

I made this sub only because I feel since it would have happened either way maybe I could have kept it from going downhill and make sure fair discussion can stay instead of treating "Holocaust never happened" as truth like JasonCarswell most likely would have.

I love you guys by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Posting quality stuff....

Excuse me while I post memes to my subs.

I love you guys by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'll send the Moderation invite since I forgot to do that already.

I personally don't lean one way or the other with the Holocaust's existence I acknowledge it happened but as you state the facts are fickle. I personally believe it happened but not at the magnitude that people state. No need to try and convince me as I won't listen to it as the Holocaust never happening is one theory I refuse to look into.

Go ahead and apply your CSS and make a Banner go ahead.

I have the sub set to be approved since it is a highly controversial topic so all posts/comments on it must be approved I'll try to stay upto date on that.


Subs that you moderate that I'd wanna help moderate:

/s/Voting_IsARiggedJoke/ - We all know shit can be rigged and people need to learn voting for elections isn't beyond rigging.

/s/canada - I am in fact Canadian (Insert Maple Syrup joke here) and it seems pretty conservative which fits my politics pretty well. Plus I need a place to post my Justin Trudeau Memes. Plus it seems the other moderators of it are active but not doing much with the sub so I'd try to fill in and help where needed.


Edit: Formatting

I love you guys by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hey I uhhh sort of made that sub minutes before seeing this. Not cause I am one of those skeptics but just because I saw your (other post)[https://saidit.net/s/Holocaust/comments/tzh/open_letter_to_sholocaust/] and wanted to do it.

Ironically had the same name and all as the one you wanted to make.

Since I'm not actually one of the Holocaust skeptics and was just helping the situation would you like to help moderate it? You'd be in charge of most of the stuff and I'd just be there for general moderation.

Post named "Consider moving to Saidit: presenting the rational reasons why" on raddle by r721 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Honestly I'd say whoever did this really royally f**ked up as not just did it make saidit look pretentious as all hell it also caused a few of the users from there to start harassing on here which isn't helping the abundance of recent trolls coming to here.

Honestly whoever it is just needs to fess up and call it off as they have made a bit of a mess.

Honestly the problem isn't the fact that he showed an opposing view they also acted pretentious and snarky in responses and post.

Sorry that you guys are gonna have to deal with whoever who wrote that Raddle post's actions.

Post named "Consider moving to Saidit: presenting the rational reasons why" on raddle by r721 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I just hope that anyone from Raddle sees that the post wasn't made by our admins and decides against any plans to troll our site like their planning to over there.

WatchRedditDie. by ulfw2019 in WatchRedditDie

[–]OmegaUser296 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That screenshot method isn't fool proof as they could just use inspect element to make it look like their logged into a mods account.

Maybe have the requirement for proof be they have to make a post from their reddit account saying their saidit username?

We are going to add more CPU cores to the saidit server to speed it up by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I can feel the influx of POWER!!!!!!

Welcome to Switzerland! Saidit's move is complete by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Saidit.net — July 1, 2019 — Servers will move to Switzerland on July 3 at 2am US Central Time. by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Eh?

YouTube Censors Video About Google Election Meddling; Reddit Suspends Project Veritas by JasonCarswell in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]OmegaUser296 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Just gonna repeat what I said on another thread

1984 Wasn't just a story

1984 Wasn't just a warning

1984 Is a fucking prophecy

Cops illegally confiscate guys phone and accidentally record themselves debating the best way to frame him - Reddit admins delete post as it hits #1 on /r/videos by magnora7 in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]OmegaUser296 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Hmph... well shit I gotta go question my own stupidity for thinking that was real.

Cops illegally confiscate guys phone and accidentally record themselves debating the best way to frame him - Reddit admins delete post as it hits #1 on /r/videos by magnora7 in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]OmegaUser296 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

1984 Wasn't just a story

1984 Wasn't just a warning

1984 Is a fucking prophecy

Cops illegally confiscate guys phone and accidentally record themselves debating the best way to frame him - Reddit admins delete post as it hits #1 on /r/videos by magnora7 in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]OmegaUser296 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Reason for deletion:

Shows police in a bad light

Quoted from r/undelete thread linked. I assume that itself was quoted from reddit takedown notices.

Cops illegally confiscate guys phone and accidentally record themselves debating the best way to frame him - Reddit admins delete post as it hits #1 on /r/videos by magnora7 in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]OmegaUser296 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah it was basically a manual for those f**ked up companies on how to pull this shit off!!!

90 Days ago, Alexa ranked SaidIt the 482,835 most popular website in the world. Today's rank is #71,482 (#13,086 in US). by Robin in Internet

[–]OmegaUser296 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I feel like this is mostly coming from people migrating from Reddit after r/The_Donald got quarantined.

So, any other exiles from Reddit here? by sharkiness in The_Donald

[–]OmegaUser296 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I feel they don't have a reason yet, sure they hate the libtards on Reddit but their only Quarantined so they don't wanna move until they have to.

I feel once r/The_Donald gets banned then we'll see the flood of new users from r/The_Donald become much larger.

Reddit Has Censored The Largest Donald Trump Forum 2 Days After Carlos Maza Called For It by sawboss in censorship

[–]OmegaUser296 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They didn't wait, there was proof of the Reddit admins doing it in the past, manipulating votes on r/The_Donald, Altering Comments, Removing Posts, Un-Deleting comments to make it look like the mods weren't doing anything. You name it the Reddit admins manipulated the Databases to do it without traces.

Edit: As for waiting until now they haven't, they just wanted to wait for a hole, the first threat wasn't the Admins and then the others were, the Admins waited for one that got deleted, they undeleted that one, then replied and rallied the violence themselves, in turn making it look like the Mods were doing nothing and make it look like there were more users advocating violence then there actually was.

Reddit Has Censored The Largest Donald Trump Forum 2 Days After Carlos Maza Called For It by sawboss in censorship

[–]OmegaUser296 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I also heard that those few dozen accounts may have been the Reddit Admins themselves as they've done it in the past it wouldn't be a surprise if they did it again.

Welcome to Saidit.net! by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I swear this gets posted every few weeks now due to the flood of new users we get from Reddit's constant banning and quarantining of subreddit's.

EFF Seeks Right to Jailbreak Alexa, Voice Assistants | The Security Ledger, 2018-02-09 by JasonCarswell in jailbreak

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Also this is interesting, I'd love to jailbreak my Alexa.

Maybe make it easier to dick around with it and make it somehow make it play audio from spotify or something by default instead of having to state it every time. It get's annoying to have to state "Play ____, FROM SPOTIFY" just because they make it always try to play from Amazon Music by default which they made separate from Amazon Prime awhile ago which made me not wanna deal with paying for ANOTHER amazon service.

EFF Seeks Right to Jailbreak Alexa, Voice Assistants | The Security Ledger, 2018-02-09 by JasonCarswell in jailbreak

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know I am having those ones redirect here until their communities grow enough to warrant having individual subs for each smaller topic.

Edit: More thorough description of my Motives for those who care

I made a lot of more specific jailbreaking subs. Until their presence grows on s/Jailbreak enough to warrant a separate sub all of those communities are to post here. I made the others redirect here so that I can gauge the reaction here. Once the community for say iOS Jailbreaking grows to a high enough amount they will be moved into their own sub (s/iOSJailbreaking)

EFF Seeks Right to Jailbreak Alexa, Voice Assistants | The Security Ledger, 2018-02-09 by JasonCarswell in jailbreak

[–]OmegaUser296 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'd Point out that the Sidebar says iOS Jailbreak but then I remembered that I forgot to change that.

Until this sub becomes large enough this sub will encompass any and all Jailbreaking. I will update the Sidebar to reflect as much.

TL;DR this post is allowed as this is a general Jailbreaking sub, not just iOS.

What conspiracy theory do you believe to be true? by EndlessSunflowers in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]OmegaUser296 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Probably because it's true X-Files theme plays in distance

Here We Go Again by EndlessSunflowers in WayOfTheBern

[–]OmegaUser296 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I thought it was the "Aww... shit, here we go again" meme you were thinking of.

What really is the dumbest way to die? by miclejhon in AskSaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

they are BACK again, but where is the chatbox? by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What MMA thing?

they are BACK again, but where is the chatbox? by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So I assume they tried a DDOS again?

Also yeah take your time, this is only a minor set-back, these idiotic script kiddies will stop sooner or later.

YouTube updates hate speech guidelines to prohibit videos: The video streaming company says it has already made it more difficult to find such videos, but it's now removing them outright. YouTube will also prohibit videos that deny certain proven events have taken place... Effective Immediately. by Orangutan in politics

[–]OmegaUser296 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well shit, who's running archival on this shit, we gotta archive as many conspiracy and general political videos as they might disappear.

We're back again. by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Better Title would have been "We're back... back again"

  • This was a joke don't kill me Lord Magnora

This is the new saidit pyramid. PAY CLOSE ATTENTION AND OBEY you fucks by brothamanarmy in OpieAndAnthony

[–]OmegaUser296 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Hey u/JasonCarswell I just came across this, have you seen this, they put you on their "Pyramid of Faggotry" think this is something Magnora should hear about?

This is the new saidit pyramid. PAY CLOSE ATTENTION AND OBEY you fucks by brothamanarmy in OpieAndAnthony

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What, I wasn't being a tattle tail I just wanted to mention it to the person you guys were insulting.

Saidit is worse than reddit with censorship. by Troll in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I wouldn't want to be an Admin but I do like to help this site in whatever way I can.

Saidit is worse than reddit with censorship. by Troll in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 11 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not Magnora7 but I can assume that you were harassing him like you have others in the comment.

Also the Pyramid is a method of keeping discussion from falling to such childish circle jerk as Reddit, hence it probably wasn't political and more just your Sub was acting like a bunch of circle jerky Redditors.

Edit: Your sub also broke the Pyramid of Debate AND Site wide rules with your avocation of violence.

Saidit is worse than reddit with censorship. by Troll in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The change was made awhile ago and they continued to do it after the change, the change was made as a urgent need was made for it due to multiple people of that kind, it was already against the TOS and Policy before hand anyways so even without the pyramid update they were still breaking the rules.

100% done with Reddit by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hi, I'm a redditor as well as a Saidit user (Saidtor I guess)

Just a few links to get you started over here.

https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/37r/welcome_to_saiditnet/

https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/j1/the_saiditnet_terms_and_content_policy/

And I just want to say, yeah Reddit can be shit. I personally hate Reddit communities but I have worked to make my own Subreddits over on Reddit not like the rest of Reddit (In other words make them not assholes) I also run a few subs here which also go for the same rules and morals as my subreddits which is basically "Don't act like a normal redditor"

100% done with Reddit by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'd like it if it was a bot account and if you add it as a mod or something it allowed you to repost from your subs reddit counterpart that way if you do own both the Subreddit and the Sub you can share the content to here and or if the Reddit counter part of your sub isn't to toxic/stupid you can forward it, that bot would be a good idea in some cases.

Weird Issue in CSS on s/unc0ver by OmegaUser296 in SaiditCSSthemes

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Done

Weird Issue in CSS on s/unc0ver by OmegaUser296 in SaiditCSSthemes

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good Idea, also will add the short explanation on how it works, if you use the working code give credit please, I will add it once done with the current thing I am doing.

One small step for Moderator, One Large step for the Jailbreak Community! by OmegaUser296 in Unc0ver

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, I personally am making a few subs related to iOS jailbreaking in efforts to make a safe haven for those who were ridiculed by r/jailbreak over on reddit, iOS jailbreaking shouldn't be a topic that is so terribly moderated as PJ09 and his gang on Reddit does it.

One small step for Moderator, One Large step for the Jailbreak Community! by OmegaUser296 in Unc0ver

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And of course N8thegr8 on Reddit can't forget that SOB

What should the limits be on sub moderators? by magnora7 in AskSaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I understand and u/JasonCarswell (I pinged because I want you to know) if your willing to once the right users come along and this site grows give those subs to other users, then your doing nothing wrong.

I'd only used you as an example due to your high Sub count I understand your not Hoarding for personal gain.

Edit: Improved content and Format

What should the limits be on sub moderators? by magnora7 in AskSaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay I'm not trying to personally attack you, your just an example because you own a high amount of subs without any intent to stop.

DM = Direct Message

And all I'm saying is that there should be a hard limit of subs per user of ~50 or something so no one person can mod to much of the subs and in turn not have to much control over the narratives.

What should the limits be on sub moderators? by magnora7 in AskSaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because if someone has say over 50 subs there is no way in heck their actually continuing to moderate each sub and sure as heck won't be able to give much individual attention to each sub.

[Question] How do I move the body section down? by OmegaUser296 in SaiditCSSthemes

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That worked, I did one more change I found a conflicting piece of code, the sidebar was fixed and then when the conflicting code was removed the body code also worked. Thank You!

What should the limits be on sub moderators? by magnora7 in AskSaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I understand all of that but if your there to help with the CSS and not the moderation then leaving the subs after awhile would be a good course of action that way it dosen't seem like your sub hoarding.

I am not trying to limit opinions or anything I only stated that due to a DM where you stated you would prefer more subs over credit which made it seem like your intent was partly to hoard subs, I am sorrry if that wasn't your intent in any way I had misunderstood.

What should the limits be on sub moderators? by magnora7 in AskSaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay please read my comment in which I pinged/mentioned you before you continue to be hostile please.

[Question] How do I move the body section down? by OmegaUser296 in SaiditCSSthemes

[–]OmegaUser296[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I credited you for the code snippet It's marked as Additions and Fixes 4 in the code

(I intend to go back and comment what each of them do from here on out so it might change.)

What should the limits be on sub moderators? by magnora7 in AskSaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hi, this is off topic but just wanted to ask about a possible rule, limiting how many subs one person can moderate that way we never get someone like N8thegr8 from reddit, I'd say 100 would make for a good limit that way it's high enough that any one person would only hit it if their hoarding subs cough u/JasonCarswell is getting close to hoarding subs as of late cough

What should the limits be on sub moderators? by magnora7 in AskSaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay please read my comment in which I pinged/mentioned you before you continue to be hostile please.

What should the limits be on sub moderators? by magnora7 in AskSaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah above 50 would be overboard.

What should the limits be on sub moderators? by magnora7 in AskSaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay using yo as an example (sorry) Most of them would be empty without you falsely filling them, without your posts most of your subs would be empty or near it.

What should the limits be on sub moderators? by magnora7 in AskSaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I hope a limit get's added, I say 50 that way people can still moderate a lot of subs but not hoard them.

How'd you hear about SaidIt? by Jay in AskSaidIt

[–]OmegaUser296 3 insightful - 8 fun3 insightful - 7 fun4 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

I was drunk one night...