I know you guys probably aren’t keen on the Left anymore, but believe me, as a commie this trans idpol crap is depressing by JoeDzhugashvili in GenderCritical

[–]Nelumbo 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you for the recommendations, I will note them down.

The only leftist space online I find remotely tolerable is a board called leftypol, but you probably wouldn’t like it.

I can handle rude and edgy behaviour, the only thing I can't stand about 4chan style websites is that they tend to be infected by pedos who like little cartoon girls. Leftypol seems to like catgirls but as long as they aren't too creepy about it, it seems ok to me.

I know you guys probably aren’t keen on the Left anymore, but believe me, as a commie this trans idpol crap is depressing by JoeDzhugashvili in GenderCritical

[–]Nelumbo 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I feel the same. Is there no communist online community that doesn't promote trans drivel? I know mostly nothing about politics, and communism seems interesting so I want to learn about it, but all leftist places are so pro-trans. I even saw a r/stupidpol mod saying they wanted to ban "TERFs". I don't get it? Isn't most of the world "Trans Exclusionary"? Pick any random woman in China or Africa and surely there's a 99% chance she thinks only women can menstruate?

you’re not allowed to be against trans bs nonsense unless you wanna be kicked out, if you do it online you get banned and cancelled, I can’t take this shit anymore

Yeah, trans activists make the left completely toxic to people. Ladydick and the jewish question are both moronic subjects, but I'm having a more pleasant time interacting with literal fascists on saidit than lefty trans activists on reddit, cause most of the nazis won't run crying to the mods and attempt to get my account banned for disagreeing.

Why is everything on the front page alt-right political stuff? by Honestanonymous in politics

[–]Nelumbo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you. I've seen leftists saying modern liberal feminists and antisemites are two sides of the same coin.

https://img.booru.org/leftypics//images/9/d50a5107342005c1d00b7b4b7bb0d24257d19efd.png

So I wanted to see how those people would react to being confronted with their mirror image, it works pretty well at shutting them up lol.

Adams' article also states:

The Psychic Psychiatrist Illusion involves imagining you can discern the inner thoughts and motives of strangers. I'm talking about the unspoken thoughts and feelings of strangers, not the things they have actually said. If your debate opponents retreat to magical thinking about their abilities to detect secret motives and mental problems in strangers from a distance, you won.

Chipit ran away when he thought he had uncovered me as a libfem, failing to realize my true motive.

Why is everything on the front page alt-right political stuff? by Honestanonymous in politics

[–]Nelumbo 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You brought up, apropos of nothing, the Final Solution

I brought it up because I want to know what you think the solution to the problem should be? Or is there no solution or problem?

I don't think conspiracy theorists are the same thing as nazis, being paranoid is not the same as wanting an ethnostate.

Oh...I see what I'm arguing with now.

Yeah, take a good look in the mirror buddy. Are you seeing a fool looking back at you?

I'm only using feminist identity politics and talk of male oppressors to highlight how similar it is to your jew paranoia. I don't really think all men have privilege over women and I don't use words like mansplaining.

https://www.reddit.com/r/menkampf/comments/byc1w6/salon_buzzfeed_and_huffpo_with_a_word_replacement/

Why is everything on the front page alt-right political stuff? by Honestanonymous in politics

[–]Nelumbo 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you're calling me a Nazi.

lol no I'm not. I saw your post criticizing ethnonationalism so I assume you don't want an ethnostate. I'm asking what the cause of the problem is and how to solve it? It's not my fault if that train of thought leads you into Nazi territory.

I'm honestly curious; did you know before this thread that Epstein and Weinstein were both of Jewish ethnicity?

I've known since I first heard their names, because certain people literally can't shut up about it. Did you know they were both men and that men commit around 99% of rapes? Did you know Hitler and Ted Bundy were both white males? What's the relevance of this information?

The power elite are the real victims here!

The power elite are the rich, not da jooz. Money is power, and power corrupts. Maybe a portion of rich people are jews, but an even larger portion are male. So what? Is there a deliberate plot by men to oppress womyn? How do we solve the male question?

Read the whole article and watch him attack rape victims as liars.

Yeah... Alan Dershowitz is a man. Coincidence? I think not. (I'm joking.)

The Rothschilds? Conspiracy theoryyyyy!!!!! WHARRRRRRRGARBL

Chipit, take your meds.

Why is everything on the front page alt-right political stuff? by Honestanonymous in politics

[–]Nelumbo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't say anything about your position (and it's not absurd to point out accurate statistics about men), I asked if you think there should be some sort of Solution to this Question?

You seem to think there is a problem with jews (or men lol) in particular, so what is the cause of the problem and what would the solution be?

Why is everything on the front page alt-right political stuff? by Honestanonymous in politics

[–]Nelumbo 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Did you know Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein are both men?

https://saidit.net/s/memes/comments/5j3c/summation_of_recent_jewish_controversy_on_saidit/lcr3

Should there be a Final Solution to the Male Question?

Summation of recent jewish controversy on Saidit. by kokolokoNightcrawler in memes

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The only source listed in the wikipedia that dealt with the number of Jews in leadership roles, entitled "The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda During World War II and the Holocaust" I could not find.

See the [9] on Wikipedia after the sentence about the Communist Central Committee? Click on it and you'll see the source is actually A History of the Jews in the Modern World by Howard Sachar. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Bolshevism#cite_note-9

https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/159515/a-history-of-the-jews-in-the-modern-world-by-howard-m-sachar/

The Jewish Enemy book also exists:

https://www.amazon.com/Jewish-Enemy-Propaganda-during-Holocaust/dp/0674027388

Here's another source. From 1919 until 1991, 89 members of the Politburo were Russians (which makes up 68 percent). In distant second were Ukrainians, who had 11 members in the Politburo, making up 8 percent. In third place are both ethnic Jews and Georgians, who had 4 members respectively. Sourced from The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Politburo by John Löwenhardt, Erik van Ree and James Ozinga.

I did find out something interesting about the author. You'll never guess what his enthnicity was... I'll give you a hint. He wasn't a Presbyterian.

Wow, maybe it's because it's mostly jews and anti-semites who would even care to write about how many jews were in high positions at the Soviet government. Wikipedia says your source on the names, Robert Wilton, is an anti-semite who has been accused of fabrication. They do not use him as a source, but instead other writers.

Passive aggressive reddit-tier strawman take my guy.

Well, the Zionist lizard people comment was a joking jab, but also a way to point out that you'll dismiss any Wikipedia (a site anyone can edit, thus more likely to be neutral, though they can also suffer biases) source I give as being part of the Zionist lizard conspiracy, and say I should trust the cephas-library page (only editable by whoever runs that website) which sources anti-semite Robert Wilton and links to... Stormfront? No bias there? It's suspicious the owners deleted the page too, maybe they realized it was bullshit?

The quote you posted regarding women is nothing but anecdotal Kafka-trap drivel

Wtf is kafkatrap? Google says it's accusing someone of being sexist? You have to explain if it means something else. I don't care if you hate women or are a feminist, I'm just testing how well my arguments hold water. How am I trapping you? If all I wanted to do was call you sexist I would've done that instead of sharing that quote. In the eyes of normies you already look like Hitler just by making that 2% post, anything I say isn't gonna make you look worse.

In fact, I've seen studies suggesting men have overall less free time than women (I'll have to look around to find them again), but that wouldn't fit your narrative.

Are these studies written by men? If so I guess I can just dismiss them as biased on account of being written by the oppressor class, like you do with things written by jews.

Of course, I myself don't really buy into that identity politics nonsense, so you can link them anyway. I'll give it a critical look since I don't want to repeat falsehoods if I am wrong.

You also didn't answer why jews supposedly control so many things and why that's a problem, is it due to a toxic component in their biology? Are they all part of some secret cabal? Certain feminists have said the same things about men, and even proposed a Final Solution to the Male Question...

Summation of recent jewish controversy on Saidit. by kokolokoNightcrawler in memes

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

there is a genetic predisposition for men to be innovative

I'm going to quote what someone else wrote:

The main reason why the majority of "geniuses" are men is not because they have a super talent that women lack. But because historically they have had plenty of available time for training or work. They never have to waste the slightest drop of sweat on either strenuous housework or noisy children. Because during the waking hours of the day, their wives take care of it every day seven days a week. Totally free. They sacrifice their own careers for their husbands to fulfill their vain dreams of fame, glory, wealth and success. However, more than 99 percent of men's dreams never come true. But about these failures, not a word is mentioned about either here or in the media.

Lots of women with exceptionally high IQ have throughout history sacrificed their own careers by becoming housewives for their husbands who want to reach the top. Women who have reached the top are often childless singles. Men who have reached the top are mostly married family fathers with free service by their wives taking care of housework and kids. Almost no man wants to sacrifice his own career to let his talented wife devote both time and energy to solving math problems, building future large companies, inventions or whatever she may be obsessed with.

There you have the explanation. The IQ difference between the sexes is far too trivial to explain why the absolute majority, 80 to 95 percent, of Nobel laureates, star chefs, stock market CEOs, top researchers, computer geniuses, elite chess players, etc. are men.

Men: talent plus full-time housework service performed free of charge by sacrificial wives. Women: talent. Women have more or less been forced to make sacrifices ever since man's transition from the hunter-gatherer era to the agricultural society in order for their husbands to be successful and wealthy.

End quote.

Jews are far more represented than they should be.

If you think it's so unfair that some jews have a lot of money, maybe you should work towards creating a communist state instead of an ethnostate. By the way, sources listed on Wikipedia say that in 1917 only five of the twenty-one members of the Communist Central Committee were Jews. It doesn't look like the jews controlled everything, but let me guess, Wikipedia is run by Zionist lizard people from Mars so you can't trust any source they approve of.

There are about 7 million Jews in the US, meaning that even if their average IQ was as high as 124, there would be ~3.5 million Jews available in the possible pool of "leadership roles."

It could be some other aspect of their biology besides IQ that makes them more predisposed for leadership roles, maybe it's a "leadership" gene? Of course that's nonsense, but what do you believe, that there's a "sneaky jew" gene? Do you think all jews are part of some secret cabal who spends their time planning and cackling about how to best subjugate the goyim? lol that's what teen girls on tumblr think men do, that all males are rapists and part of some patriarchal plot to deliberately oppress womynkind.

Money equals power, the real rulers and oppressors are the rich elite, regardless of their race or gender.

Saidit is currently undergoing the largest DDOS attack we've ever had by magnora7 in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

lol

GenderCritical does not belong on Saidit. The moderators are determined to not follow site rules. by bobbobbybob in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

is anybody forcing you to reply? go do something less boring then.

Summation of recent jewish controversy on Saidit. by kokolokoNightcrawler in memes

[–]Nelumbo 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, men also are responsible for practically all modern innovation and they built basically every building you see in every major city and always have.

Because for most of civilization women were second class citizens who, if they tried being innovative, would be beaten or burned at the stake by the brutes who commit 99% of rapes. Probably gonna take some time for female led innovation to catch up after that shit.

men are more likely to have the testosterone

Testosterone also leads to murder and war, imagine how many potential scientists and innovators have died as a result of war.

You don't see how a specific 2% with no real nation of their own being responsible for the issues their host nation has is different?

Ummm, sweety, have you considered that maybe jews are in control of everything because of biological reasons? Perhaps whites are just lazy and jews are more likely to have a genetic makeup that drives them into positions of leadership in the first place? /sarcasm

Summation of recent jewish controversy on Saidit. by kokolokoNightcrawler in memes

[–]Nelumbo 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Despite being only 50% of the American population...

96% of the Supreme Court justices have been men

Men on most of the media

Men are in control of most of the advertising companies along with the media and uses this to promote the subjugation of women

Even in the Soviet Union, it was the men that were disproportionately in leadership roles

Men control the porn industry, look at all the male names of porn company founders

All American presidents have been men

Men made up 88% of the world's billionaires in 2015

Men are charged for about 99% of rapes and 88% of murders

What do you want to do with this information? Create an ethnostate without da jooz? Extreme feminists can use the same arguments as a reason for why men and women should have separate countries, only interacting when there is need for copulation to further the species. But you probably think that sounds laughable, so why should anyone take this ethnostate shit (or whatever the alt-right wants to do about the jews) seriously?

Creepy support of pedo organization by twitter by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]Nelumbo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is also an interesting article linking queer theory to pedophilia.

lol this video will always be relevant https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2u3hmZCsXoE

GenderCritical does not belong on Saidit. The moderators are determined to not follow site rules. by bobbobbybob in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

they were still following the rules. they only showed up on /all/new because of the way saidit was coded.

GenderCritical does not belong on Saidit. The moderators are determined to not follow site rules. by bobbobbybob in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

you re very boring.

is anybody forcing you to reply? go do something less boring then.

GenderCritical does not belong on Saidit. The moderators are determined to not follow site rules. by bobbobbybob in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

put down can also mean kill. clicking on your profile and seeing your second post from the top is saying that, is not stalking. if you truly think so then go whine to the admins that they should disable user pages.

GenderCritical does not belong on Saidit. The moderators are determined to not follow site rules. by bobbobbybob in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the link is to an 18 day old post by magnora7 telling people GC is following the rules by being off /all, and you replying that you're fine with it

GenderCritical does not belong on Saidit. The moderators are determined to not follow site rules. by bobbobbybob in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"now"? they did it a week before you posted this thread whining about them, as you already know going by your reply to the admin

https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/53n9/theres_some_censorship_going_on_in_the_newly/j6p7

GenderCritical does not belong on Saidit. The moderators are determined to not follow site rules. by bobbobbybob in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

you said

I've met some very 'normal' trans people. So I now consider there to be two types: Harmless types who kinda fit into to their chosen gender roles, and attention freak whores who hate women.

One lot doesn't make me feel uncomfortable or cause any hint of sexual threat. The other lot need to be put down.

Saidit — conspiracy kooks, bots and a irrational censoring admin (magnora7). What a fucked up site. by 0O_O0 in whatever

[–]Nelumbo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

no

Yes, There Is Such a Thing as Cancel Culture. Incredibly, the Harper's letter spawned a bunch of people saying that there is no such thing as cancel culture. As Steven Pinker has argued, cancel culture has parallels with the Chinese cultural revolution and the European witch hunts. by Chipit in politics

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

for some reason corporations seem to be very interested in pushing a left leaning narrative, even to their financial disadvantage.

Is it really to their financial disadvantage? I'm not sure what you're referring to where they have lost money doing this.

Which would indicate the reasons for this supercede actually making money, and have a possibly more covert motivation.

What's that motivation?

If mega corporations approve of your message, you should step back and reflect on your message with suspicion.

Well, Reddit banned leftist subs too, like r/chapotraphouse and those for radical feminists.

You know what made reddit shitty? It wasn't the dev team (they were shitty too), it wasn't the website flaws, and it wasn't the banwave of censorship. It was the people. It was you guys. by zeusdx1118 in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Don't know why you'd dismiss that as a conspiracy and flatly state CCP doesn't censor Reddit.

What's your proof of CCP censoring Reddit? Why haven't they turned r/China into a pro-CCP sub? Why is r/HongKong anti-CCP with a top post promoting a revolution? If they're in control they're doing an awful job of censoring... and what's with the fixation on some Chinese people owning 5%? Why does nobody care who the owners of the other 95% are and what their intentions may be?

hence why I callout your aims as you continue to make these false equivalencies in order to avoid admitting that the CCP has a history of censorship and money is an influence.

The CCP has a history of censorship and money is an influence. I said it, are you happy?

Same is true for the U.S. government lol

You know what made reddit shitty? It wasn't the dev team (they were shitty too), it wasn't the website flaws, and it wasn't the banwave of censorship. It was the people. It was you guys. by zeusdx1118 in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's quite telling that you'd reason with 'whataboutism.'

In regards to Abu Ghraib, you're the one who started it by bringing up Tiananmen out of nowhere. Who said I support all the actions of the CCP?

Being able to openly discuss these issues is the point I've been making, a luxury being curtailed on media platforms and obviously banned in China.

I don't support China's censorship of speech, neither do I support Americans censorship of speech. Pointing out that Americans are doing this is not whataboutism, since Reddit, the subject of the thread, is owned by them.

But hey, you are out here wrecking tin foil hats serving what cause and which master?

That master would be "the truth". China is not censoring Reddit.

You know what made reddit shitty? It wasn't the dev team (they were shitty too), it wasn't the website flaws, and it wasn't the banwave of censorship. It was the people. It was you guys. by zeusdx1118 in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Doesn't change the argument that CCP money equals influence and that the result is propaganda, censorship and repression.

you believe the U.S. engages in none of those things? tencent only owns about 5% of reddit, censorship on the website is the fault of americans.

Maybe you'd like to take your victory lap around tiananmen square?

k if you take one around abu ghraib

You know what made reddit shitty? It wasn't the dev team (they were shitty too), it wasn't the website flaws, and it wasn't the banwave of censorship. It was the people. It was you guys. by zeusdx1118 in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That article is outdated, at the bottom Wikipedia offers a link to check if a site is banned. Testing reddit there https://viewdns.info/chinesefirewall/ shows that, yes, reddit is banned in china. More confirmation here. Like, did you even read your own link? The visiontimes.com page says reddit is banned in the opening paragraph.

Tinfoil hatters get wrecked.

Can we please talk about the Muslim concentration camps in China and REDDIT? by PencilPusher55 in politics

[–]Nelumbo 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reddit mods do not remove all these posts. The r/China sub is literally just a circlejerk of people who hate the CCP. If reddit was pro-CCP that sub would only be allowed to have positive comments.

the social justice "PUNCH A NAZI!" group of people turn a blind eye and censor any mention of it

This is a complete lie, the social justice warriors on AgainstHateSubreddits campaigned to have MoreTankieChapo banned for being pro-CCP, and they succeeded (also that sub wasn't making fun of people dying). Now they are trying to get r/sino banned too. They don't seem to want any pro-CCP subs on reddit. The SJW's are on your side.

The purpose of what China is doing is not organ harvesting. China is attempting to curb jihadism by re-educating muslims, as they have committed plenty of terror attacks and murders in the country:

https://saidit.net/s/WorldNews/comments/5fbg/drone_footage_of_uighurs_being_taken_away/kvqk

When muslims engaged in terrorism against America, 9/11, America's attempt to curb jihadism resulted in 208,000+ civilian deaths as a result of the Iraq war. Anyone who supports the U.S. government has no grounds to complain about how China is handling islamic terrorism.

You know what made reddit shitty? It wasn't the dev team (they were shitty too), it wasn't the website flaws, and it wasn't the banwave of censorship. It was the people. It was you guys. by zeusdx1118 in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

r/China is literally just a redditor circlejerk about how Xi Jinping is worse than Hitler, amazing propaganda there. Your conspiracy theory is dumb.

What made reddit shitty was the powermods banning everyone they didn't like.

Yes, There Is Such a Thing as Cancel Culture. Incredibly, the Harper's letter spawned a bunch of people saying that there is no such thing as cancel culture. As Steven Pinker has argued, cancel culture has parallels with the Chinese cultural revolution and the European witch hunts. by Chipit in politics

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

how about you guys stop moving the goalposts? the jesus comic is enough to show that right wingers have the power to cancel things, I'm not gonna go looking for more evidence when the response is just gonna be "but that wasn't REAL censorship" everytime (and I didn't even have to do any research to find out about that comic, I just saw it in the news some time ago).

also "the Dixie Chicks were blacklisted by thousands of country radio stations, and the band members received death threats", they got so succesfully canceled they had to give a fake apology. when you claim I gave one example, well that's a way to show that you don't even care to look into the examples I provide.

Drone footage of Uighurs being taken away by magnora7 in WorldNews

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

lol according to redditors saidit is run by neonazis

Drone footage of Uighurs being taken away by magnora7 in WorldNews

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Possibly. I don't know what the best way of dealing with jihadism would be, I just know America certainly hasn't handled things in a better way.

Drone footage of Uighurs being taken away by magnora7 in WorldNews

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just disproving the American propaganda Belisarius has been fed about Uyghurs supposedly never committing terrorism.

When muslims engaged in terrorism against America, 9/11, America's attempt to curb jihadism resulted in 208,000+ civilian deaths as a result of the Iraq war. America is more of a terrorist country than China.

Yes, There Is Such a Thing as Cancel Culture. Incredibly, the Harper's letter spawned a bunch of people saying that there is no such thing as cancel culture. As Steven Pinker has argued, cancel culture has parallels with the Chinese cultural revolution and the European witch hunts. by Chipit in politics

[–]Nelumbo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

then why are you bringing up terror acts by al-qaida? chipit is obsessed with the nonsensical idea that only leftists are capable of censorship, and he asked for an example of modern right wing censorship, which I provided. I don't see how your comment about charlie hebdo is supposed to be a refutation of that. unless it was meant to be a joke.

Yes, There Is Such a Thing as Cancel Culture. Incredibly, the Harper's letter spawned a bunch of people saying that there is no such thing as cancel culture. As Steven Pinker has argued, cancel culture has parallels with the Chinese cultural revolution and the European witch hunts. by Chipit in politics

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

do you seriously think charlie hebdo was massacred by the same people who are boycotting jk rowling because she said only women can menstruate

Can we make our post/comment history private like on Ruqqus? by GetOffMyLawn in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your comments can be perused without looking at your profile. Just go on google and type site:https://saidit.net/ "GetOffMyLawn" along with something you want to look up about a person, like their opinion on "Ruqqus", and this thread title shows up.

Privating comments will only benefit trolls https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/5fja/can_we_make_our_postcomment_history_private_like/kvma as dedicated people can still dox you.

Drone footage of Uighurs being taken away by magnora7 in WorldNews

[–]Nelumbo 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When was the last time Uyghurs commited terrorism?

🙄

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Aksu_bombing

7+ dead, 14+ wounded.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Kashgar_attacks

23+ dead, 42+ wounded.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_2014_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_attack

43 dead, 90+ wounded.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_China#Xinjiang

There have been no terrorist attacks in Xinjiang since 2017, mainly because of the Chinese governments harsh responses against it such as mass surveillance, increased arrests, and a system of "re-education camps".

Hmmm... I wonder if the right wingers on this site would support anti-jihadist re-education if it prevented terrorist attacks like the Manchester Arena bombing.

Miriam Margolyes claims JK Rowling has a 'conservative view' of transgender people 🙄 by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, the Soviets were also the first people in space, does that mean astronautics is marxist?

It makes sense that they would do research trips regardless of their views on transsexuality, as the institute was about sexuality in general. As said in your link, transsexuality was only one topic of many that the institute researched, they also advocated "sex education, contraception, the treatment of sexually transmitted diseases, and women's emancipation" along with pro LGB rights. You are using the destruction of the institute as some sort of evidence that fascism is ideal, when it can also be used as evidence that fascism is anti women's emancipation and anti LGB (which wouldn't make your ideology look appealing to all the feminists and lesbians on this sub).

Looking at LGBT history in the Soviet Union, which was established in 1922, it does not seem like transsexual activism was videly encouraged. From 1933 to until two years after the end of the Soviet Union, 1993, homosexuality (and presumably transsexuality together with it) was criminalized. You're also the one who brought up China during Mao, and I find no evidence Mao encouraged transsexuality. Homosexuality was criminalized under his era. If communism is the same as trans activism why wasn't Maoist China full of sex reassignment surgeries?

To be clear, I have nothing against homosexuality or men dressing like women, I just think they shouldn't deny biological reality or be encouraged to mutilate their bodies. That's really the view of the gendercritical community as a whole, this image is from the sidebar of the old sub:

https://archive.vn/tw1M4/1d9e09667808d6c863ca001eb1d47d6b28399221.png

To call TRAs fascist is kind of ironic considering that historic fascists burned their TRA books

Yes, that is stupid, almost as stupid as calling them communists.

The LGBT oppression ideology is marxist in nature.

Do you mean intersectionality and identity politics? Many leftists would say those things are not marxist, but on the opposite actually only benefit the ruling class by making the workers fight amongst themselves over nonsense.

https://img.booru.org/leftypics//images/2/0fc08d823eb4a183374511c205c12ac12e13356c.jpg

In fact, after having typed the above, by coincidence I even found a communist telling you the same thing before:

https://saidit.net/s/GenderCritical/comments/5bow/who_is_behind_the_transantiwomen_movement/kdci

Miriam Margolyes claims JK Rowling has a 'conservative view' of transgender people 🙄 by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]Nelumbo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How the hell is trans activism the same thing as communism? Don't pretend Mao's China is the only place in which public humiliation has occurred. See Nazi Germany:

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/public-humiliation

What does the communist party of China actually think about transgenderism?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_in_China#Laws_regarding_gender_reassignment

In 2009 the Chinese government made it illegal for minors to change their officially-listed gender, stating that sexual reassignment surgery, available to only those over the age of twenty, was required in order to apply for a revision of their identification card and residence registration.

Disregarding Shanxi, it looks like the commies in the east are more sensible on this matter than the capitalists in the west. In about half the U. S. you don't need SRS to alter the sex on your birth certificate. I bet I could go on popular Chinese social media and write "transwomen are men" in their language without being banned, the same isn't true for popular American social media like reddit and twitter.

"If you do not willingly submit to our ideology, we will teach you submission"

Is it better to put the people who won't submit into gas chambers?

GenderCritical does not belong on Saidit. The moderators are determined to not follow site rules. by bobbobbybob in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

OP made this thread right after getting a post of theirs removed from GenderCritical where they said misogynistic transwomen needed to be put down. So they're angry GC is following the rules against advocating violence.

GenderCritical does not belong on Saidit. The moderators are determined to not follow site rules. by bobbobbybob in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/5cb2/gendercritical_does_not_belong_on_saidit_the/keke

magnora7

Those are the official saidit rules verbatim... They've taken themselves off of /all as required.

Please read the rules: https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/j1/the_saiditnet_terms_and_content_policy/

And carefully read the mod rules: https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/w6s/saidit_rules_for_moderators/

And you will see they're doing it correctly. Thanks

GenderCritical does not belong on Saidit. The moderators are determined to not follow site rules. by bobbobbybob in SaidIt

[–]Nelumbo 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Saidit's owner says they are following the rules, how embarassing that a 1 year old user doesn't understand this.

https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/5cb2/gendercritical_does_not_belong_on_saidit_the/keke

In 2017 I didn't see JK Rowling, Noam Chomsky, and the rest of The Letter's signatories defending this man for being persecuted for speech the far left found offensive. We told you defending his speech was defending your own. Now a scant three years later and the mob has arrived for you. by Chipit in censorship

[–]Nelumbo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There was no letter condemning Dankula.

I didn't say so, I said the people who signed this letter in 2020 did not condemn him when he was being persecuted, so they are not hypocrites.

Thompson is a universally reviled figure.

yeah cuz he's a shitty right winger who doesn't believe in free speech

are you really having that much difficulty understanding when other people speak?

I'm not the one who was called an inbred shill by someone else in this thread lol

I did not condone the censorship.

You said it wasn't censorship.

In 2017 I didn't see JK Rowling, Noam Chomsky, and the rest of The Letter's signatories defending this man for being persecuted for speech the far left found offensive. We told you defending his speech was defending your own. Now a scant three years later and the mob has arrived for you. by Chipit in censorship

[–]Nelumbo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There was no letter and I never claimed there was.

Wtf? I'm talking about this letter https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53330105 you know, the one you're butthurt about in the title? Link to a statement by one of the people who signed it, such as Chomsky, condemning Dankula, since you're saying everyone was doing so.

none of those were successful censorship campaigns.

This is moving the goalposts. Also superhero Jesus was a successful censorship campaign.

How does Doom inspiring the Columbine shooting have anything to do with censorship and cancel culture?

I doubt Doom inspired Columbine, that's just what Jack Thompson thinks. To answer your question, Thompson has rejected arguments that video games like Doom are protected by freedom of expression, saying, "Murder simulators are not constitutionally protected speech. They're not even speech. They're dangerous physical appliances that teach a kid how to kill efficiently and to love it".

The right to be offensive is fundamental to free speech.

In an earlier post here you condoned the censorship of superhero Jesus because you found it disrespectful.

In 2017 I didn't see JK Rowling, Noam Chomsky, and the rest of The Letter's signatories defending this man for being persecuted for speech the far left found offensive. We told you defending his speech was defending your own. Now a scant three years later and the mob has arrived for you. by Chipit in censorship

[–]Nelumbo 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He was widely condemned and when he was convicted a large cheer went up.

Then link to signatories of the letter condemning him. The left is not a hivemind.

This isn't censorship. It's just disrespect.

lmao ok and plenty of people would say teaching your dog to sieg heil is disrespecting holocaust victims.

They are not in favor of free speech. They are only in favor of their own speech.

like you getting butthurt over superhero jesus

Ask yourself if they would do the same thing about Mohammed. Remember when Comedy Central had that episode that featured Mohammed?

They censored it cause they were afraid of being bombed by islamic extremists, not left wingers. South Park isn't afraid to piss off leftists, see "strong woman". I support both superhero Jesus and superhero Mohammed.

Cite examples of the right censoring the left.

Superhero Jesus https://www.citizengo.org/en/md/167848-dc-comics-slated-release-blasphemous-series-about-jesus

Harry Potter book burnings https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_debates_over_the_Harry_Potter_series#Christianity

Dixie Chicks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dixie_Chicks_controversy

Videogames https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson_(activist) Thompson is right wing and tried blaming Doom and other games for school shootings https://www.inverse.com/article/12633-attorney-jack-thompson-and-his-personal-vendetta-against-video-games

Thompson: "At the wrongful death trial, we brought a world renowned child psychologist who testified that, if not for the influence of this movie and the game Doom, Michael Carneal [the shooter] would never have been capable of any of this." "I told him my greatest fear is that other teenagers would have access to these kinds of pop-culture materials and that it might inspire further violence. Eight days later, Columbine happens. Those shooters both reference Doom and The Basketball Diaries in their suicide video. It’s a terrible thing to be the guy who predicted Columbine. "

John Romero, one of Doom's designers (I think the main one?), is obnoxiously left wing (he's into trans activism and tells Trump voters to unfriend him on twitter).

Then there's all this other shit on citizengo about wanting to ban a Gay Jesus film, Sesame Street, and so on...

https://www.citizengo.org/en-af/rf/175897-ask-netflix-cancel-film-depicting-jesus-homosexual

https://www.citizengo.org/en/fm/180572-boycott-sesame-street

In 2017 I didn't see JK Rowling, Noam Chomsky, and the rest of The Letter's signatories defending this man for being persecuted for speech the far left found offensive. We told you defending his speech was defending your own. Now a scant three years later and the mob has arrived for you. by Chipit in censorship

[–]Nelumbo 24 insightful - 3 fun24 insightful - 2 fun25 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Probably because none of the signatories had any idea who the fuck this guy is or what he got in trouble for. Do you have links to any of these people condemning him? If not it isn't hypocrisy.

Also I didn't see Dankula condemning right wingers for wanting to ban Superhero Jesus

https://www.citizengo.org/en/md/167848-dc-comics-slated-release-blasphemous-series-about-jesus

https://comicbook.com/dc/news/dc-comics-over-100k-people-petition-pull-second-coming-comic/

Clearly this means Dankula is a hypocrite and the right wing deserves to have the mob of censors turn on themselves /sarcasm.

Stop pretending that wanting to censor free speech is just a lefty thing.

Another ban wave just happened. by [deleted] in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]Nelumbo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yet morons will still try to claim the ban wave is the fault of commies and China, despite MTC being explicitly pro China. http://archive.vn/ORXqP

Pornhub bought ads on /r/nofap, in violation of Reddit policy. Cruelly taunting addicts who were trying to quit. After a brief blackout, her account is active again. Of course Gawker Media punches down and ridicules the addicts, an act of bullying. by Chipit in whatever

[–]Nelumbo 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The links between you and sextrafficking are "indisputable" in the same way.

Absolute brainlet comparison. Suzieq is an individual posting on a site that does not allow porn. Pornhub is a corporation that hosted child porn on their site for months.

And that's great, much easier to catch criminals if they are dumb enough to document their crime and upload to the public porn hosting.

Except pornhub didn't do anything to catch them, they ignored reports about the videos for months.

Would you let pornhub host videos of your kid being raped? If not you shouldn't be calling it great.