Anybody else encountered TRAs and their allies claiming no one sees anyone naked in a locker room? by NDG in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 61 insightful - 24 fun61 insightful - 23 fun62 insightful - 24 fun -  (0 children)

My guess is a large number of TRAs have never been involved in any athletic or recreational activity that would involve using a locker room. The only "sport" many seem to do is video gaming. And Olympics-level porn watching, anime consumption and wanking.

Or is LARPing now considered a sport?

Moving to France doesn't make you French by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 22 insightful - 16 fun22 insightful - 15 fun23 insightful - 16 fun -  (0 children)

Enjoyed this a lot, OP. Thanks for the chuckles.

Others get mad at you and call you an ugly American. These people you label haters.

You further accuse them of having a fauxbia - thereby putting a whole new spin on the linguistic concept of faux amis.

https://frenchtogether.com/french-english-false-friends/

More and more Americans start coming over to France and saying they are French. Their tourist visas expire and the French government tries to send them home but they refuse to go, saying that inside they are French, and must be accepted as citizens.

In loud, rude, aggressive voices typical of "ugly Americans," these Yank interlopers constantly repeat the catchphrase, "But we just want to oui!"

''Women's genitals come in all shapes, sizes and colours'' by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 40 insightful - 15 fun40 insightful - 14 fun41 insightful - 15 fun -  (0 children)

"All shapes, sizes and colours" - really? I think they mean "come in a variety of shapes, sizes and colours" LOL.

Seems to me women's vulvas are usually shaped sorta like a rhombus, not like a cube, sphere, giraffe, coffee-maker or firehose. And none is the size of Texas, the Indian subcontinent, Russia, or a refrigerator, skyscraper, 18-wheel truck or even my left leg. Similarly, I've never heard of any women whose genitals are lime green, bright yellow, lavender or sky blue...

Am I, a man, a lesbian? Wherein everyone says yes. by millionssomething in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 11 insightful - 15 fun11 insightful - 14 fun12 insightful - 15 fun -  (0 children)

From "Preyin's Arrived" a remake of the BeeGees "Stayin' Alive" I wrote some months back:

Well you can tell by the way I use my cock

I'm a woman man no one can clock

Lipstick's on and beard's unshorn

Been misgendered since I was born

Females and their rights are passé

“Lady dick” now rules the day

No one gets to reprimand

A modern-times “lesbian man”

Well, well, well... by fijupanda in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 25 insightful - 15 fun25 insightful - 14 fun26 insightful - 15 fun -  (0 children)

Classroom scene in 2020:

Q: Students, how do you spell homophobia?

A: T-R-A-N-S!

Elliot Page Says 'I Knew I Was a Boy When I Was a Toddler': 'Absolutely, 100%' by Femaleisnthateful in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 38 insightful - 14 fun38 insightful - 13 fun39 insightful - 14 fun -  (0 children)

"I knew I was a boy when I was a toddler. I was writing fake love letters and signing them 'Jason.' Every little aspect of my life, that is who I was, who I am, and who I knew myself to be."

Oxford dictionary defines a toddler as

a young child who is just beginning to walk.

All these trans children were so advanced way beyond their years! Instead of babbling nonsense like most toddlers do, Jazz Jennings as a bairn supposedly spoke in full, grammatically-correct sentences and asked when the good fairy was coming to turn his penis into a vagina. And now El Page tops Jazz by saying that when she was just learning to stand upright and toddle around, she not only could read and write already - she could write love letters!

Transphobes baffled, enraged by Elliot Page’s coming out as trans by questioningtw in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 42 insightful - 14 fun42 insightful - 13 fun43 insightful - 14 fun -  (0 children)

People in the comments are saying that GC feminists object to El Page's announcement coz we can't stand anyone who doesn't conform to rigid sex stereotypes, that our main goal is "gender conformity." Oof.

Do men eat oatmeal? by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 7 insightful - 13 fun7 insightful - 12 fun8 insightful - 13 fun -  (0 children)

Bowl? Really real real men don't use bowls. They eat their oatmeal off the table or counter. Or sometimes off the floor. Super manly really real real men don't even soak or cook the oats first - they just scarf 'em down raw.

“I wish women would fight as hard as trans women for our right to harvest their organs” by Marigold-plate in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 23 insightful - 13 fun23 insightful - 12 fun24 insightful - 13 fun -  (0 children)

Best comment:

It’s never going to work. You can’t just stick a uterus in a male body and expect it not to atrophy and go sceptic.

Yes, and the misspelling of "septic" is the best typo too! Now I have an image of a uterus with a face wearing a very doubtful, scoffing expression and wondering, "WTF? How on earth did I end up here? This is clearly no place for the likes of me."

Elliot Page Says 'I Knew I Was a Boy When I Was a Toddler': 'Absolutely, 100%' by Femaleisnthateful in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 16 insightful - 12 fun16 insightful - 11 fun17 insightful - 12 fun -  (0 children)

When I was around 5, I was also afraid of taking baths and any situation that involved removing my underwear coz my mother had explained that girls/women get pregnant when a seed is placed up inside us where the womb is - but she didn't say how exactly the seed got in there. So I went through a brief period when I was deathly afraid that a seed would get inside me and I'd end up pregnant before starting first grade. For extra protection, I began wearing several pairs of underpants at once - and one day I wore my PJ bottoms to kindergarten scrunched up under my skirt too. Fortunately, the teacher noticed this when I was climbing the jungle gym and called my mom, who took me aside and filled me in on the piece of the puzzle I was missing... LOL.

Excluding transwomen from womanhood perpetrates the idea that there's a wrong way to be a woman! by RedditHatesLesbians in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 23 insightful - 12 fun23 insightful - 11 fun24 insightful - 12 fun -  (0 children)

It's why many of us call it the NYTIMs and/or the NYTrans

“Basic trans etiquette” sounds like a cult by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 34 insightful - 11 fun34 insightful - 10 fun35 insightful - 11 fun -  (0 children)

I think it's time to go back to when Prince changed his name to a bunch of symbols that were unfamiliar and unpronounceable, so everyone just referred to him as "the artist formerly known as Prince."

I'm going to start referring to all these attention-seekers similarly: "the actor formerly known as Ellen Page," "the Olympic athlete and father of many formerly known as Bruce Jenner," "the filmmakers formerly known as the Wachowski brothers," "the misogynist dickhead formerly known as Charles Clymer"... and so on.

Muhammed Ali and Yusuf Islam never had any problem with people referring to them as the boxer formerly known as Cassius Clay and the singer-songwriter formerly known as Cat Stevens. Why do today's narcissists get such special treatment? Why do they alone get to memory-hole their own pasts?

Feminity is... Wearing a fluffy robe that's pink by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 11 insightful - 11 fun11 insightful - 10 fun12 insightful - 11 fun -  (0 children)

If you ever give birth to a daughter, you'll find that little bits of pink fuzz from the fluffy robe your female child came into the world wearing will be coming out of your vagina for weeks afterward. It's a real pain.

The Democratic National Convention on Tuesday featured a panelist who identifies as a “nonbinary/gender transcendent mermaid Queen-King” by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 13 insightful - 11 fun13 insightful - 10 fun14 insightful - 11 fun -  (0 children)

Oh c'mon, the Dems are dead-set on winning, which is why they ended the first night of the convention with this crowd pleaser: https://youtu.be/Bhuh9b_qFfo

Interesting that comments are turned off, huh? Wonder why.

Also, early on this famous song from 1966 says "there's a man with a gun over there" - which in 2020 prompts the question, how the hell does the singer know the gun-toting individual is a man? Was this man-appearing individual asked how he identifies? He might look like a man, but he might be a woman, or neutrois, or genderqueer, or maverique, or a zillion other identities. And that phallic thing he's holding that appears to be a gun could well be a gold lamé purse! Or a girl dick!

Poor Stephen Stills to be part of this cringefest. Billy Porter's rendition is a far cry from the original done by Stills & Buffalo Springfield back in 1967: https://youtu.be/gp5JCrSXkJY

There is like 20 other flags and i have no idea what most are...why? by Somets in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 15 insightful - 10 fun15 insightful - 9 fun16 insightful - 10 fun -  (0 children)

Only 20 flags? This site shows 45:

https://www.vispronet.com/blog/sexuality-flags/

Educate yourself and keep up, OP. LOL.

GC: What are the differences between neovagina and vagina, neopenis and penis? by Tea_Or_Coffee in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 18 insightful - 8 fun18 insightful - 7 fun19 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

LOL, now OP says sperm is produced by penises and eggs come from vaginas. Bet what he's drinking ain't tea or coffee.

TiM claiming to be on his period asks for advice on finding a period tracker for "AMAB transwomen" complaining that it's difficult to find a period tracker for TiMs because TiMs don't menstruate or bleed. I think it's time for a pandemic or something to give these boys something real to worry about. by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 8 fun4 insightful - 7 fun5 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

Well, I've seen lots of evidence that TIMs certainly suffer from PMS and PMDD: Pissy Male Syndrome and Predatory Misogynistic Dickhead Delusion.

Ellen Page is claiming to be transgender. What is going on?! by socialistrobot in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 46 insightful - 8 fun46 insightful - 7 fun47 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

You're whole career is based on your pretty look and cute face!

Also, so many people (particularly those of us who don't watch movies like "X-Men" or TV series like all the ones she's been in) know Page principally or exclusively for playing a pregnant teenager in "Juno." Everyone back when "Juno" came out thought the pregnant teen was a girl, and Page was a young woman. Now are we supposed to believe it was a man or someone without a sex who played that role, and the girl was the first pregnant transman? Amazing what a huge leap human evolution has made in just a few short years. /s

This pathetic jockeying for the limelight has gotten to the point that celebrities should start getting annual awards for the most attention-seeking ways of making use of gender identity idiocy. Sams Smiths would win the 2020 "AMAB" at birth prize, and Page would be a contender for the "AFAB" award. Just imagine the get-ups and all the posturing and preening on the red carpet. And the droning, ponderous, self-important speeches - they'd be priceless (in a hilarious way).

People in the comments are peaking over "Pregnant People" by Tovasshi in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 10 insightful - 8 fun10 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

What does he mean by "matching genitals" anyway? It's like he's talking about a necktie and pocket square, or shoes and a handbag.

Laura Jane Grace: "JK Rowling has no grounds to speak on the transgender experience because she knows nothing about it" | NME by alttrawl in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 43 insightful - 8 fun43 insightful - 7 fun44 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

"Laura Jane Grace has no grounds to speak on females' experience or being a woman because he knows nothing about it"

Fixed it for ya, NME!

You're welcome.

If the relationship involves a vulva owner... by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 10 insightful - 8 fun10 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

When I was a teen in the early 1970s, my family in the US had a Volvo but my mother always mispronounced it as "vulva." So that's what the whole family ended up calling it too. Which led to some funny comments, like "Hey anyone else need the vulva tonight?", "The vulva needs an oil change", "The vulva is having ignition trouble", "Anyone see the vulva keys?" and "(Name of brother) crashed the vulva last night."

Any time anyone in the family badmouthed the family vulva, the rest of us would sing the classic Kinks song as though it were "Stop Your Saabing":

Chrissie Hynde & The Pretenders' 1979 cover: https://youtu.be/RTVqZNObw5o

The Kinks' original from 1964: https://youtu.be/GZQUKN5G9xk

JK Rowling Doubles Down in Her Support of Women & Children & Her Wariness of Trans Agenda In New Statement Explaining Why She Has Returned Her Robert F Kennedy Award for Humanitarianism by MarkTwainiac in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac[S] 22 insightful - 8 fun22 insightful - 7 fun23 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

If sex isn't binary, how come it was Kerry Kennedy's mother Ethel who bore all 11 of the children she had with Robert F Kennedy? You'd think RFK being such a gentleman would've pitched in & carried & birthed at least a few of the 11 babies he fathered rather than making Ethel shoulder the entire burden.

If sex isn't binary, how come Kerry is the one who bore all the children during her own marriage to current NY Governor Andrew Cuomo? Why didn't Andrew go halfsies with her?

If sex isn't binary, how come Kerry's famous car crash whilst addled on the sleeping pill Ambien prompted the USA medical establishment to do research that revealed women metabolize Ambien very differently to men, ultimately causing the USA's FDA to issue new prescribing regulations that say females should be given half the dose as males?

Is this an actual word? transmisogyny by our_team_is_winning in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 14 insightful - 8 fun14 insightful - 7 fun15 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

It's an actual word in the sense that transgender, cisgender, nonbinary, girldick, pansexual, neutrois, maverique, tetrigender, menstruator, chestfeeder, uterus-haver, gestator, vapogender and so on are actual words.

Seriously - 'The TERF Industrial Complex' by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 15 insightful - 8 fun15 insightful - 7 fun16 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

Word salad nonsense

This nonsense is more like a "food product" that has zero nutritional value & leaves a bad taste coz it's made up entirely of artificial ingredients that have been cooked up in a lab, have hard-to-pronounce multi-syllabic names no one except mad scientists can make sense of, & are likely to be harmful to health.

We've reached peak crazy. by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 41 insightful - 8 fun41 insightful - 7 fun42 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

The look of one's body does not imbibe it with identity

Imbibe? Imbibe means to drink. Does he mean imbue or endow? What a moron.

Having a vagina that appears and functions more similar to a strap-on sex toy is not a valid and substantiated reasoning for being body shamed.

I'll skip over the author's further misuse of words and just go to my basic reaction: WTF? Yeah, there are strap-on dicks and fake vulvas because dicks and vulvas are both external organs... but what the hell is a strap-on vagina?

How does one strap on an internal organ? Clearly this idiot is clueless about the defining properties and core functions of a vagina.

As to the rest: no one is "shaming" or "discriminating against" men for not having vaginas. Women and men with a grasp of reality are simply saying that males who have fantasies, fetishes and wishes about having female bodies do not actually have or acquire female bodies no matter how much mental gymnastics they do.

How do you do fellow women? by avena_sativa_3 in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 11 insightful - 8 fun11 insightful - 7 fun12 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

Brilliant and weird Bryan Ferry predicted this in his strange 1972/73 Roxy Music classic about alienation amidst the comforts and pleasures of middle-class modernity, "In Every Dream Home A Heart Ache":

In every dream home a heartache/ And every step I take/ Takes me further from heaven/ ... I bought you mail order/ My plain wrapper baby/ Your skin is like vinyl/ The perfect companion/ You float my new pool/ De luxe and delightful/ Inflatable doll/ My role is to serve you/ Disposable darling/ Can't throw you away now/ Immortal and life size/ My breath is inside you/ I'll dress you up daily/ And keep you till death sighs...

GC: Are men entitled to male-only spaces? by womanual in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 8 insightful - 7 fun8 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, I got that. And you must really be something if all the men you encounter get erections the minute they set eyes on you.

QT/Trans: Trans women say feminism and women's rights should include ALL women, and this means anyone who identifies as a woman. But 99% of women are cis. Why then do trans women not care about the history and rights of 99% of women? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 2 insightful - 7 fun2 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

I agree with this. Also, in English, an easy way to get around using sexed pronouns is simply to switch from the second to third persons. So instead of writing, A woman... she, write instead, Women...they

TiM Young Adult author,"i wish i lived in a world where i didn't have to have sensitive zoom meetings during my period because i'm crying at the drop of a hat *and* incredibly irritable.the next time someone tells me trans women don't have periods im gonna dump a whole tub of period diarrhea on them by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 25 insightful - 7 fun25 insightful - 6 fun26 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

This is just part of the larger campaign on the part of these sick fucks to liken the vagina, the female reproductive tract & female biological processes - menstruation, childbirth - to the anus/asshole, lower alimentary tract & defecation.

I am reminded of the Martin Niemoller poem about the Nazis & the Holocaust, First They Came For...

First, they came for the vagina and rechristened it the "front hole."

Then they came for pregnancy and said they could simulate it by sticking a hose in their asses and pumping their bowels full of water so their abdomens became grossly distended.

Then they came for pregnant women's waters breaking when they said evacuating all that fluid from their intestines was essentially what pregnant women go through when the amnio sac ruptures & amnio fluid leaks or gushes out of the vagina

Then they came for childbirth and reframed it as "shitting out a baby" or "crapping out a kid."

Then they came for menstruation and likened it to having diarrhea.

Then they came for menstrual cramps and likened them to bowel spasms.

Then they came for the bloody imagery in the book & movies Carrie, but instead of buckets of blood being dumped, it was "a whole tub of period diarrhea"

And so on.

*Fortunately, one variation of "front hole" I heard a few years ago - "franus" - didn't catch on. The two college-age TIFs who tried to convince me of the merits of this neologism a couple of Thanksgivings ago told me that giving birth vaginally is inherently debasing & disgusting, much more so than defecating. Defecating, in their view, was far superior to giving birth because males defecate - and whatever males do counts as superior & constitutes the ideal. In their view, the female ability to bring new life into the world makes us inherently inferior to males. They had lots of other cockamamie misogynistic ideas. One was that males are biologically superior coz they have the ability to jizz every day - or several times a day - whereas us slow & lazy women take 9+ months to "shit out a spawn." I had already "peaked trans" years before meeting these two loons, but they brought me to new heights where I thought to myself, "the extinction of the human race can't come fast enough. Bring on climate change & ceaseless meteor showers."

QT: Do women have a right to boundaries? by Penultimate_Penance in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 2 insightful - 7 fun2 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry, but even today there is still a lot of sex segregation in the world that's meant to exclude & restrict girls & women & does just that. It's only in certain narrow circumstances and for specific reasons that sex-segregation facilitates female people's full inclusion/participation in society rather than our oppression.

I understand that technically "males were allowed to have their own spaces and females weren't allowed to have their own spaces"

That's not what I meant. It wasn't that males had their own spaces & females weren't allowed to have their own spaces. It's that pretty much the whole world both at home & outside it was the domain of males, whilst females were confined to very narrow areas - the domestic sphere, harems, brothels, nunneries & a few jobs outside the home (cleaners, servers, cooks, laundresses, nurses).

Females for millennia have had our own spaces, but mostly not by choice, and usually not in a way that fostered either inclusion in society or which led to liberation rather than oppression.

GC: Male pregnancy blurs the line between male and female. But do the males of other species really get pregnant? And how come gametes and sex organs are put into categories of male and female? by ImageNotUploaded in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 13 insightful - 7 fun13 insightful - 6 fun14 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

You left out the the seminal work on this topic that Dr Suess wrote in the 1930s and published in 1940: Horton Hatches The Egg. https://youtu.be/WOYKFLn_2Rc

Apparently not sleeping with a Tim is the same as not being open to dating other races by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 11 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

Does the woman who made this cringey video think she is some kind of man?

They are not even hiding that they are MRA anymore: "Remove women-centric language when speaking about abortions and reproductive rights" by VioletRemi in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 29 insightful - 7 fun29 insightful - 6 fun30 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

So according to Planned Parenthood MA

acknowledging that the use of woman-centric language in reproductive & abortion advocacy is erasure of trans health care.

By this logic, using teeth- and mouth-centric language in advocacy for better dental care and oral health is erasure of health care for people with medical needs involving other parts of the body.

Using oncology-centric language in cancer advocacy is erasure of diabetes health care.

Heart disease charities are erasing health care for people with arthritis.

Gay Men's Health Crisis by its very name and founding aims erased health care for straight and bi men, boys, all girls and women, and everyone without HIV or AIDS.

In the late 1950s and 60s, my parents helped found a charity for children with cystic fibrosis in the US. By so doing, their real aim must've been to erase health care for all the kids back then who had polio, measles, rubella, mumps, chicken pox, whooping cough, cerebral palsy and Downs syndrome.

Book shop bans JK Rowling novels from shelves and will 'phase out' Harry Potter by alttrawl in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 20 insightful - 7 fun20 insightful - 6 fun21 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

This is like trying to build up your muscles by going to a gym where the only weights that anyone is allowed to lift are feathers.

Study on The Psychology of Gender Critical Feminism by GenderCriticalStudy in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 16 insightful - 7 fun16 insightful - 6 fun17 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

online surveys are extremely common in psychology

Which is one of the reasons psychology and the study of it have become such jokes.

Court Rules For Transgender Rights In School Bathroom Case (Represented by ACLU) by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 9 insightful - 7 fun9 insightful - 6 fun10 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

I now call them GITs - gender ideology tyrants.

It's entirely coincidental that in British English, git also means "an unpleasant or contemptible person."

I’m confused by these stories of post-op TIMs going to gynecologists??? by catawampus in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 25 insightful - 7 fun25 insightful - 6 fun26 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

I think this is more akin to taking a busted crock pot to the Mercedes dealer & demanding they figure out why it won't work & do the repairs. A Toyota still has all the same basic properties & can perform all the same automotive functions as a Mercedes. Whereas a TIM's fauxgina has none of the same properties as a vagina, and it can't perform any of a vagina's functions except one - being penetrated - either. What's more, even when used for penetrative sex, a fauxgina functions nothing like a real vagina.

6 TW talk menstruaion. Ooh - let's all play: 6 White people talk being black; or 6 tone- deaf people talk being concert pianists... by Echoofmiles in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 12 insightful - 7 fun12 insightful - 6 fun13 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, when you looked like the man you are, other men did not shout out sexual harassment at you on the street

Even when these men think/claim they are getting the same sort of sexual harassment that girls and women get, it's usually not the case, LOL: https://youtu.be/GMbrj10zuWE

As the parent of two vagina owners by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 12 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Why own a vagina when you can lease? Vagina vacation rentals and time shares - they're the ticket!

Will births in the US rebound? Probably not. by anxietyaccount8 in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 13 insightful - 6 fun13 insightful - 5 fun14 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

If "transwomen are women" why not have them step up & have some babies?

QT/Trans: Trans women say feminism and women's rights should include ALL women, and this means anyone who identifies as a woman. But 99% of women are cis. Why then do trans women not care about the history and rights of 99% of women? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 7 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

My former psychology professor told us when we meet someone the 1st thing we as is their gender, to apply stereotypes. For instance,

Was your psych professor speaking of when people meet IRL, on anonymously online? Whatever the answer, your professor mistakenly assumes everyone in the world is a genderist. But the fact is, lots of people don't try to scope out other people's gender when meeting for the first time - or later on - coz we don't agree with genderism and we don't go around imposing sexist sex stereotypes on everyone.

Do you and your psych professor assume everyone hurriedly tries to suss out the race, ethnicity, religious backgrounds, politics etc of others we encounter in life so that we can immediately start applying racist, ethnic, religious, political and other stereotypes to them as well?

Also, in the examples you gave, it seems like people were asking for the parent's sex in the first case, and for the child's sex in the second case. People might want to know this NOT coz "they clearly wanted to apply stereotypes" as you assume and assert, but because they might want to be able to inquire about & factor in which kind of sex stereotypes might be at play in the minds of the children in each case. Fact is, lots of parents who don't ascribe to or live according to sex stereotypes themselves, and who did not and do not fill their kids' heads with sex stereotypes at home, often still find that their children have learned many sex stereotypes from other kids, entertainment media and social media - and their kids use those sex stereotypes as the basis for forming expectations and judgments of their own parents and their parents' partners. Moreover, lots of kids with sexist ideas apply double standards to their own parents & parents' partners depending on the sex of the adults involved & of the kids too.

The sex of the parent in the first case and of the child in the second case are actually very relevant to the discussion.

Sounds like that psych prof of yours didn't teach much about psychosexual family dynamics.

[YIKES!!!] "Chile's government distributed faulty birth control pills. Now more than 150 people are pregnant." by censorshipment in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 7 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

150 "people" are pregnant? So presumably half the pregnancies are in males?

QT: Do women have a right to boundaries? by Penultimate_Penance in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Sex-segregation was done as inclusive measure - to include women into social life and sports. While race segregation was the opposite - to exclude black people from social life

Actually, sex-segregation was originally done as an exclusive measure - namely, to make & keep institutions and most of the public sphere for males only, and to keep girls & women confined mainly at home, in domestic work, in harems & brothels, or to their own section in synagogues, mosques and other houses of worship.

Sex-segregation was also instituted as a way of shaming, ostracizing or separating women from the rest of the world & normal life when undergoing specific processes of female biology - hence, menstrual huts, women being forbidden from cooking or preparing food when menstruating, and forcing women into long periods of "confinement" before & after giving birth.

In much of the world, sex segregation has been accomplished via laws and customs that kept women mostly at home, forbade them from attending school, restricted their access to transport, required them to be accompanied by male chaperones outside the home and to cover their heads and bodies whenever in public. Items of clothing like burquas and the head-to-toe chadors that girls & women in Iran were forced to wear after the 1979 Islamic revolution are basically portable cloth prisons meant to identify, stigmatize, segregate, isolate, physically discomfort and encumber girls & women as much as possible when outside the home.

As these examples illustrate, sex segregation be can be used as much to oppress as to help liberate women and insure our safety, dignity & privacy. Sex-segregation itself is not inherently a benefit or a drawback. Its impact varies depending on the specific reasoning behind it, circumstances surrounding it, & how it's implemented.

In the West, when schools, workplaces, major institutions & the public sphere gradually started opening up to girls & women, additional facilities for females like loos, waiting rooms and train cars were added to the already-existing ones long in use exclusively by males. But the reasoning when this happened wasn't always or necessarily to provide girls & women with safety, privacy, dignity and fairness - it was to keep girls & women out of the many male-only spaces that males wanted to remain male-only, such as the smoking & bar cars on trains, institutions of higher learning, certain professions, social clubs and entertainment venues.

Fact is, even after the world outside the home began to open up to girls & women, boys & men didn't want female people in their toilets, locker rooms, clubs, smoking lounges, sports venues, fraternities, grills, saloons, pool halls etc except as servers, cleaners, cooks and when working in some capacity to entertain and sexually service men.

Over time, women realized and articulated all the various ways that certain kinds of sex-segregated spaces in specific circumstances can and do benefit girls & women. As a result, over time women lobbied for & built a lot of female-only spaces - ranging from women's only schools & universities, women's loos & lounges, women's social clubs, women's hospital wards & entire hospitals, women's organizations, and in the 1960s & 70s, rape refuges and shelters for women escaping male domestic violence.

But when sex-segregation originated, & through much of its history even in the contemporary era, it was put into place & maintained because it's what men & boys wanted.

TiM Who Thought Facial Feminization Surgery Would Change His Life Gets Wish, Just Not in the Way He Expected. by barnarnas in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 10 insightful - 6 fun10 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

I noticed that, too, and my next thought was, bet he can still jerk off, though. However, I didn't post it earlier coz I thought it was too rude and mean. But now you've inspired me.

GC: Can you give me a definition of male or female that does not exclude those that can not produce or release gametes, have undergone an operation to surgically remove sex organs, etc? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 17 insightful - 6 fun17 insightful - 5 fun18 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Oh stop with this nonsense.

Your dinner is getting cold.

I am seriously regretting conceiving you, carrying you in my uterus for 9-10 months, risking my life and health to give birth to you, and the myriad pelvic floor issues and pain I am still suffering decades later from giving birth to you.

The only reason I put up with your batshit posts is that I feel guilty for all the times I dropped you on your head when you were an infant. Clearly, the chickens have come home to roost.

Love, Mom

Nearly All Transgender Survey Respondents Say They Want Uterus, Vagina Transplants From Women | Women Are Human by BiologyIsReal in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 11 insightful - 6 fun11 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Please take me with you. I'll bring snacks.

We're Doomed by Finnegan7921 in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 7 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

LOL, ever since I read your comment several hours ago, I keep imagining all the "founding fathers" at the various meetings they held looking aghast and flipping their own wigs at the idea that in the future the government they were forming would be fronting for authoritarians and sexual fetishists wearing very different kinds of wigs.

Perhaps the US Declaration of Independence should be rewritten as follows:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that some of them were born in the wrong body and therefore must be called women and regarded as superior to those other kind of women, you know the female ones, and that all these men who were created equal and like to LARP as the opposite sex are endowed by their Creator with innate gender identities as well as certain unalienable Rights, that among these rights are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, as well as the right to have their gender identities constantly affirmed and validated, the right to indulge their male sexual fetishes openly and freely without compunction, and the right to slur, abuse and ostracize everyone who refuses to recite and sign the Pledge of Allegiance to Gender Identity Ideology: "Trans women are women! Trans men are men! Non-binary is valid! Misgendering is violence!"

Bet a few of the 56 signers of the original declaration would pause before putting their John Hancocks on that, LOL.

PLANNED PARENTHOOD'S double standard by fuckupaddams in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 6 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not intentionally being provocative, goady or argumentative here. I just don't get why this IMGUR image of text from PP (shown without any context) is supposed to be more offensive to females than to males.

The male anatomy is described in a way that is completely incorrect. Coz the internal parts of male sex anatomy are NOT typically made up of testicles as the text says. The internal parts of male sex anatomy are made up of the prostate, vas deferens and other organs. The testicles in nearly 100% of males are external.

The internal parts of female sexual anatomy include the vagina and other organs such as the uterus, Fallopian tubes and ovaries.

However, due to disease, medical conditions or other reasons (such as adopting an opposite-sex "gender identity"), many grown women have the parts of their internal female sex anatomy other than their vaginas - the ovaries, Fallopian tubes and uterus - surgically removed. Moreover, some women coz of DSDs/VSCs never developed some/all of the internal female sex organs in the first place.

Therefore I can see the point of PP using the phrasing "what's typically referred to as female" in this one particular instance. Though I can't know for sure coz, again, the full context has been omitted.

The comments call this dog a terf for knowing a tim is actually male by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 21 insightful - 6 fun21 insightful - 5 fun22 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

It would be more accurate to use a different acronym here. Such as MORC, MORP, MORD or MORM - or MERC, MERP, MERD, or MERM. Coz this animal is a male-observing/espying realistic canine/pooch/dog/ mutt. The hound isn't noticing and responding to the fact that this TIM considers himself "trans," the animal is picking up on the TIM's sex and responding accordingly.

The dog also isn't "excluding" the TIM by barking at him - the dog is acknowledging the TIM's sex and treating him as he'd treat any other human of the same sex. Sounds pretty "inclusive" to me.

They honestly just want to pee by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 22 insightful - 6 fun22 insightful - 5 fun23 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Nothing says "I am a genuine woman" like taking selfies in women's public toilets and gleefully posting them on social media as proof of invading and claiming ownership of a foreign domain./s

Ellen Page is claiming to be transgender. What is going on?! by socialistrobot in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 36 insightful - 6 fun36 insightful - 5 fun37 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Also, the gender identity crowd think seem to think they are the first people who ever used different names to the ones given at birth. When people have been doing this for eons for various reasons. Archibald Leach became Cary Grant. Ralph Lifschitz became Ralph Lauren. The Bronte sisters published as Currer (Charlotte), Ellis (Emily) and Acton (Anne) Bell. And so on.

This is not new! What is new is thinking that by uttering the magic words "I am trans," a person's whole past is erased in a puff of woke and it's now a faux pas, indeed in some jurisdictions a criminal act, for anyone else to mention it and your previous name.

Wow!!! People with uterus! Erasure of women at its finest! by Laundromat_Avenue in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 14 insightful - 6 fun14 insightful - 5 fun15 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Gestators, menstruators, vulva people, front-hole havers, milk producers

Sam Smith reveals they're open to dating a man, woman, or non-binary person by worried19 in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 13 insightful - 6 fun13 insightful - 5 fun14 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

I think when he says he's open to dating a "woman" he means one with a dick and balls.

PROPAGANDA - Online Class for Ages 7-10 "Let's Talk About Gender: Trans and Non-Binary Identities" The ad "“Not everyone is a boy or a girl. Some are both! Some are in-between! Some are way beyond either of those definitions! Gender can be anything you want!” by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

From now on, whenever I see "gender" I am going to replace it with "flavor."

I've taken the official writeup of this nonsense from the website and edited it accordingly:

Course Description

Not every food is sweet or savory. Some are both! Some are in-between! Some are way beyond either of those definitions! Flavor is expansive, and can be anything you want!

Your learner will explore flavor beyond the binary of sweet and spicy. This class will look at some examples of already defined flavor identities, how they fit into the larger culinary community, and what words we can use to describe them! There will be plenty of time for your learner's questions and space for them to share their experiences and feelings.

This class will be nearly equal parts presentation of BS propaganda and discussion. Students will have time to reflect on new BS propaganda and ask as many questions as they want (but not the questions that aren't allowed to be asked).

Week 1: We'll talk about what your learner understands about flavor, to gauge where our discussions should go. We'll go over a couple of key (authoritarian) ground rules about questions (things you're not allowed to ask) and classroom expectations (things you're not allowed to say or think), as well as some basic vocabulary (gibberish) to get everyone on the same page before we dive into the good stuff (propaganda)!

Week 2: We'll start to explore some new flavors and combos, their histories, and ways to talk about them. Students will have ample time for questions (except not the ones they're not allowed to ask).

Week 3: We'll continue to explore expansive, exotic flavors and combos, and your learner will have more time for questions (but not the ones that question the propaganda the course is shoving down their throats).

Week 4: We'll recap what we learned the previous week and make space for all the new questions that may have popped up over the weekend (when they might have eaten some delicious real-life food and wondered about the BS this course is feeding them). With the remaining time, we will continue to learn about new flavors!

Week 5: We'll explore new ways to talk about our own fave flavors! It's much more fun to describe our fave flavors with color and feelings than with labels! Sometimes my fave flavor feels Navy Blue!

Week 6: We'll recap what we've learned in class. Then, students will have a chance to share what the liked best about the course (but obviously no one can say what they disliked), ask those lingering questions (but not the ones no one is allowed to ask) and, if they want, share the wacky ways they describe their own flavor!

A note to skeptic parents (I think this "educator" meant skeptical): This class is EDUCATIONAL! (Yeah, that's why this "educator" is having to assert that it is - and in all caps with an exclamation point too, LOL.)

This class is not to promote any flavors as superior than others. Your learner does not need to like, prefer or identify as salty or sugary or sweet and sour to enjoy this class and learn. The goals of this class are to educate your learner on non-cisflavors and non-binary flavors, and to give your student the tools to think about their own fave flavors in different terms. Like I said: It's much more fun to describe our fave flavors with color and feelings than with labels!

Students will learn the words to talk about flavors outside of the binaries. They will be able to describe their own feelings about flavors without using terms like sweet and salty or chocolate and vanilla.

I am a non-spicy educator. In addition to my own lived experience as a treacly person, I received my BA in Women's and Flavor Studies from DePaul Univeristy. (Where no one taught me to value spelling and proofreading). I was the president of a student organization that conducted Flavor 101 workshops for student and educators. My coursework contained numerous books and articles written by and about tart and flavor non-conforming people. (I think this "educator" means that the flavor studies courses they took had syllabi/reading materials by different authors - how novel.) My senior thesis project was focused primarily on how cinnamon and piquant people fit into the world. I have read and theorized about flavor for most of my adult life. I have experience exploring flavor with youth in my time as a camp counselor with the Illinois Safe Schools Alliance.

Wasabi!

“Because most forms require Male or Female I, a non-binary person, am unable to make purchases or apply for jobs.” by alttrawl in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 17 insightful - 6 fun17 insightful - 5 fun18 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

This is like when TIF Chase Strangio of the ACLU tweeted about having poor credit coz the fact that some of her mail and bills were still in her "deadname" made it too traumatic and triggering for her to collect or look at her mail - and therefore many of her bills went unpaid.

Strangio seemed to think that going online to change her billing details was too much to ask, especially for a poor put-upon trans - the universe should have somehow automatically done this for her when she said "abracadabra I am a man now." She seemed to take the fact that this didn't happen on its own as a sign of the speshul oppression, torments and difficulties that trans people face that make them the worst-off, most marginalized and deeply suffering group in all of human history. (Transpaining.)

Also, as many pointed out at the time, it was strange that Strangio seemed unaware that in this day and age, paperless billing and paying everything online is not only a thing in the USA - it's the norm, especially amongst Strangio's age group.

Piers Clashes With Trans Supporter Over JK Rowling's Controversial New Book | Good Morning Britain by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

If anyone has good video editing skills, it would be a riot to splice footage of Butterballs in this car crash of a segment together with footage of Adrian Harrop when he had his arse handed to him on TV by Posie Parker/Kelli-Jay Keen Minshull here:

https://youtu.be/y8nViKYmEhU

Seriously - 'The TERF Industrial Complex' by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 19 insightful - 6 fun19 insightful - 5 fun20 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Just did a google image search for "women working in industry" & saw tons of great photos from today as well as the past, but couldn't figure out which factories were full of terven making TERFy industrial products. But bet these women sure would've scoffed at the notion of "lady dick":

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Women%27s_War_Work-_Life_in_a_Shell_Factory,_England,_UK,_1942_D8578.jpg

This woman might have been a bit TERFy: https://chineseposters.net/posters/e16-17.php

These women too: https://www.nabmw.org/the-rosies

I think I'm having a stroke. by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 22 insightful - 6 fun22 insightful - 5 fun23 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

I think I am having a stroke.

OP, I know your title was meant facetiously, but please be aware that there are likely to be some people here with family members who've had strokes, who've had a stroke (or more than one) themselves, or have health conditions that put us at high risk for stroke. I'm not trying to be over-sensitive here, but having a stroke is really no laughing matter.

What's more, strokes are a feminist issue.

Fact is, strokes are often deadly or severely disabling, particularly in women. One in five women in the US will have a stroke in her lifetime. Stroke is currently the third leading cause of death amongst women in the US. Stroke kills twice as many women as breast cancer does.

Women's risk of stroke is particularly high at certain points in life: during pregnancy and over age 55. Women in both categories are likely to be members or lurkers here.

The risks of stroke are higher for black women in the US; of all ethnic groups, African Americans have the highest rate of death due to stroke.

https://www.cdc.gov/stroke/women.htm

https://www.stroke.org/en/about-stroke/stroke-risk-factors/women-have-a-higher-risk-of-stroke

Strokes are a feminist issue also because a little known fact is that women often present with different symptoms to men. As a result, women who are in the midst of having a stroke often don't get the urgent medical care they need. Which is probably one of the reasons we are more likely to end up disabled or dead from stroke.

https://www.heart.org/en/news/2019/05/31/is-it-fatigue-or-a-stroke-women-shouldnt-ignore-these-warning-signs

Another reason strokes are a feminist issue is that people who survive strokes often end up with disabilities so severe that they can no longer earn a living or function independently. This is terrible for stroke victims, the majority of whom are female and thus already were likely to have deal with such matters as sex discrimination, lessened job prospects because of sex, falling behind because of maternity/pregnancy, sexual harassment and lower lifetime earnings than their male counterparts.

Moreover, the disabilities that stroke often causes put a HUGE set of extra burdens on female members of society. Because women and girls are the ones normally expected to step up and be caretakers for ill or incapacitated family members. And women tend to be the low-paid health-care workers who provide the bulk of hands-on care for stroke victims in hospitals, nursing/care homes, rehab centers. Women are more likely than men to be physical therapists, speech therapists and other kinds of workers tasked with helping stroke victims regain function and skills.

Sorry if I have come across as "language policing" or hectoring here. That's not my intent. But as someone whose life has been hugely affected by stroke - and not in a good way - I just wanted to raise awareness that stroke is no joke.

Tra/qt how is ‘examine your genital preference’ not homosexual conversion therapy? by Houseplant in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

If someone tells you they don’t like trains and you ask why it isn’t a demand to change, but a search for analysis.

If your answer is “It takes to long with all the stops so isn’t convenient for my lifestyle” that’s not something anyone is saying change. If the answer is “because poor people ride them and they are diseased” that’s a problematic belief worth addressing and even after changing that problematic belief you may still not like trains for non problematic reasons

Wow, it sounds like you know a lot of trainsphobes. That's too bad. Most people I know really like trains. Lots of people are huge fans of trains, life size actual trains, scale-model trains, toy trains like Brio and and fictional trains like in The Little Engine That Could and Thomas, Percy and the gang. Many adults including big-name celebrities like Rod Stewart and Jools Holland have extensive model train collections. Some of the biggest entertainment draws are model train exhibitions. Back in the 90s, I used to see David Byrne at the holiday season model train displays at the NY Botanical Gardens, Citi Corp building in midtown Manhattan, and in the lower levels of the World Trade Center - which my son back then referred to as "the World Train Center." Millions, even billions, of people love trains. You could even say they/we are all on board...

https://youtu.be/jd34Ioye5v4

https://youtu.be/hHkKJfcBXcw

At the cutting edge of gender degeneracy by Chunkeeguy in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

"Gender degeneracy": Maybe we should make a a new word to convey this concept. How 'bout degenderacy?

QT: How is the concept of a "gender identity" not sexist? by Penultimate_Penance in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 17 insightful - 5 fun17 insightful - 4 fun18 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

I see myself as female, and would see myself as female regardless of my birth sex.

How can you be so certain? It's like saying that I see myself as American-born because the US is where my mother gave birth to me, and I would still see myself as American-born even if I'd actually been born in Bolivia, Russia or Japan. Or that I see myself as "white" and of northern European heritage coz of my coloring, certain physical characteristics & family history, and I'd still see myself in exactly the same way even if I was black and of East African heritage or Asian of Korean heritage.

Your conviction that you have a fixed, immutable female "gender identity" that would remain in place even if your sex were male suggests that you see "gender identity" as a spiritual essence that exists entirely apart from your physical body and will outlive your body after death. In other words, a soul.

QT/Trans: Trans women say feminism and women's rights should include ALL women, and this means anyone who identifies as a woman. But 99% of women are cis. Why then do trans women not care about the history and rights of 99% of women? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

👍Yes, double duh. Thanks. It really is amazing how I can think I'm writing one word when my fingers are typing out the opposite one. I did the same thing a bunch of times on various posts yesterday: wrote older when I meant younger, woman when I meant man.

GC: Why is there more focus on trans women than trans men? by Genderbender in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Oh c'mon. No, not all "transmen" are just as terrible as the rest of TRAs. But some are. I was disagreeing with your claim that

What they are doing is stupid and annoying and but it’s less harmful than transwomen. Yeah, they suck for undermining other women but they aren’t the rapists or the violent men taking away women's protections.

Fact is, it's not just rapists & violent men who are taking away women's protections; they're not even the principal parties doing it. Women's protections are being removed by attorneys, political strategists, lobbyists, legislators, law enforcement, jurists, sports governing bodies, school administrators, government officials and establishment orgs like the ACLU, HCR, NOW, NCLR and the USA's Democratic Party. Some of the people playing key roles in the removal of women's protections are females who identify as the opposite sex.

QT/Trans: Trans women say feminism and women's rights should include ALL women, and this means anyone who identifies as a woman. But 99% of women are cis. Why then do trans women not care about the history and rights of 99% of women? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

If I was born male, I would feel great distress and want to transition via hormones and surgery.

Sorry, that kind of mental exercise is just silly. It's like saying, "If I were born in ancient China, or if I were born a gazelle, or if I were born in the year 3,500, if I were born with 100 legs..." Such imaginary scenarios might be fun (for some) to speculate about when stoned, perhaps, but they don't constitute grounds for trying to radically rearrange all of human society and impose all the authoritarian rules you want to put in place. Moreover, they provide zero insight in human psychology, self-concept formation, and the fact & implications of being one sex or the other. Fact is, you're not gonna wake up one day and find you were born male, coz it's a total impossibility, and you have no idea how you'd feel.

Funny thing is, even when humans do go through events that likely will happen to the majority of us in the course of our lifetimes - parent or both parents dying; having a serious health scare or disease; getting our heart broken; getting married; having a baby/becoming a parent; achieving some long-pursued goal that we've dreamt of for years - it's often the case that how we actually feel at the time is rather different to what we imagined beforehand.

The thought of me having a penis freaks me out. I'm sure trans women feel the same way, and trans men feel the same way.

Uh, most trans people are fine with their genitals. Fewer than 5% of males who identify as the opposite sex get genital surgery. Many love their dicks and balls, which is why they don't want to part with them. Many just rebrand their penises as as lady dicks and girl cocks.

QT/Trans: Trans women say feminism and women's rights should include ALL women, and this means anyone who identifies as a woman. But 99% of women are cis. Why then do trans women not care about the history and rights of 99% of women? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Oops, duh, LOL. I meant switch from the third person singular to the third person singular: women, men, boys girls vs woman, man, etc.

GC: Why is there more focus on trans women than trans men? by Genderbender in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Women in the 20th century in the Western world were not "barred from the public sphere in general" LOL. At all. Women were allowed in a vast number of spheres and spaces. Women could even be US Congress members and US Senators, state legislators, governors, mayors, civic leaders. In the 20th century, India, Israel, the UK and Pakistan all had female prime ministers.

But for the first three-quarters of the 20th century, the vast majority of women in the Western world were barred from many specific jobs and professions because of our sex. There were plenty of women working in all sorts of factories, offices and business enterprises throughout the 20th century - but only in certain jobs (except for during WW2). Women weren't kept at home chained to the stove, barefoot and pregnant throughout - women were allowed to participate in the larger world outside the home, but with a few exceptions like Indira Gandhi and Golda Meir, only if we kept to our place. Women could work in business, but mainly as secretaries and file clerks. Women could work in restaurants, but almost always only as waitresses, not as cooks or chefs. Women could work in banks, but as tellers, not as loan officers and executives...

In the 19th century, women responded to being barred from male institutions by setting up some female-only analogous ones such as women's colleges and universities, some as sister schools to the male ones (Radcliffe, Pembroke, Barnard), as well as medical schools, and of course women's hospitals and health clinics. But for the most part, this was not the case in the 20th century. When women were allowed into areas that previously we'd been barred from in the 20th century, particularly in the 1960s and onwards, we did not seek or get our own sex-specific institutions in general - except that is, for facilities like rape refuges, DV shelters, consciousness raising groups, support groups, rehab programs. Women who started attending Yale in the late 60s didn't seek or set up a Yale 4 Women. Women who entered various professions like law, medicine & business in unprecedented numbers in the 1970s did not set up women's law, medical and business schools - or aim for separatism in the world of work after graduation. Women who fought for the right to run in marathons did not seek to have a separate NY Marathon and Boston Marathon for women - in fact, when the NY marathon tried to segregate women, all the female runners protested and refused.

Where existing institutions already existed and sex mattered, such as in scholastic sports & dormitory provisions, women in the 20th century set up female-specific sports programs, places (locker rooms, loos, dorm rooms or sections of dorms) and social spaces (sororities, women's centers) within the extant institutions - but by and large, we did not advocate for creating a whole bunch of entirely separate institutions. We wanted our own locker rooms and sports competitions, but no girls & women in JHS, HSs, colleges & universities were advocating for our own female-only gymnasiums, field houses, ball fields, track & field facilities, courts, rinks, pools, boathouses and such. And where sex did not matter - such as in classrooms, libraries and labs, we wanted to learn and live in a mixed sex environment. In many previously all-male universities, women didn't even want separate housing - we preferred to to live in mixed-sex dorms where sex segregation only occurred by floor, section, pods or room, and where both sexes could come & go freely at all hours.

QT/Trans: Trans women say feminism and women's rights should include ALL women, and this means anyone who identifies as a woman. But 99% of women are cis. Why then do trans women not care about the history and rights of 99% of women? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

For instance, women get paid less than men. But WOC will get paid less than white woman.

For the same exact job working for the same employer withe same qualifications & experience? In what country?

Sounds like you're confusing earnings inequality with wage inequality.

According to Elizabeth Spelman's 1988 book: Inessential Woman 'gender realism' is "the view that women have some social feature in common that makes them women" – so there is an official term for TRAs: gender realists by SnowAssMan in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Duh, I know all this. Which is why I said these ideas are sexist and racist tosh. I dunno why OP posted this here. The name of the sub is "Gender Critical," not "Ignorant About Gender Ideology."

Here's a "golden rule" for you: look up "rhetorical question." Rhetorical questions are not posed out of ignorance, and they should not be taken as a sign that those who use said device are rubes who need to be educated about the matter at hand.

Also, in your attempt to educate me, you missed the main point: the definition OP has brought forward is that "gender realism" = "the view that women have some social feature in common that makes them women." Not a feature or features, which could be biological. But specifically a feature that is both social and singular. Which is why I asked rhetorically

What is the defining social feature we're supposed to have in common? If it's definitive of women, then all women but no men can have it. So what is it supposed to be? Why so coy?

All: Do men and women need each other beyond purposes of reproduction? by [deleted] in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkTwainiac 13 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Fleurista, I don't say this to be mean, but it's really become apparent to me that even though you "identify as" a woman and claim you "live as" a woman, you really have no idea about the reality of the vast majority of girls' & women's lives, particularly outside the contemporary West and but also for many within the West even today. Initially, I thought it was just that you were uninformed about female biology and the vast array of physical differences between male & female human bodies that go beyond the reproductive systems and the implications & consequences of all these differences. But it seems you also have little sense of what girls & women experience through our lives in the context of male-dominated, male-centric, male-supremacist human societies, families, clans/tribes, religious traditions, legal systems, economies, power structures, political movements, forms of government and so on.

Richard Dawkins Says He Didn't Mean to "Disparage Trans People" By Asking How Identifying As Opposite Sex Is Different To Identifying As Another Race. Then He Disparages Gender Critical People As "Republican Bigots" In The Next Sentence by MarkTwainiac in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac[S] 28 insightful - 5 fun28 insightful - 4 fun29 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Took him two days to do a turnaround. Appears that the Church of Genderology is the one religion he's too scared to take on.

How will the young TQ+ cope with bodily aging? by JulienMayfair in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

I remember being 28/29 in the 1980s & people in their late teens & early 20s (both male & female) acting shocked when they found out my age. Typical comments were, "But you look so good!" and "You must live in a refrigerator."

Once I turned 30, I dated a lot of hot guys who were 20-23, so obviously the view that others of their age had about "older" women was not universal. When I finally married at age 36, it was to another hot guy nearly 8 years younger. But none of his friends - or our kids - ever noticed the age difference. When for one reason or another one of his friends found out, they were flabbergasted.

In situations when I had to use my passport or driver's license, my kids when they were young would remark in alarm that my DOB year was wrong & always blamed the government for making a mistake. This wasn't coz I ever overtly lied to them, but coz they simply (& sexistly) assumed I must have been born the same or an earlier year as their father. I never disabused them of this notion coz I thought the whole thing was hilarious, & I am evil & duplicitous.

When I became eligible for Medicare due to old age, they were like, "How can this be, you're only 57 or 58!" So I finally 'fessed up that I am in fact rather older than they thought. They were pissed & still are. LOL

On FaceBook, I chose the earliest birth year option available - which when I signed up was 1910. So in FB years, I am 111.

Lex Croucher, yet another woman who has come out as the most popular self-identification among that demographic: not-a-woman by SnowAssMan in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

We'll have to agree to disagree. This post of yours sounds very mixed up. Are you drunk? That's the only explanation I can come up with for why you would compare the situation of Scott Newgent in the 21st century to a woman who lived in the 18th century - and why you'd make some of the other claims you've made that I find odd and incredible.

Women believing in "misandry" are worse than women believing in "transphobia" by censorshipment in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 16 insightful - 5 fun16 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

A woman can often get whatever she wants on a golden platter, and if that doesn't work she can just cry about it and you're a monster if you don't give in. While a man can go die in a war or suffer the worst torture imaginable--with lower pain tolerance, mind you, both mentally and physically--and no one will give a shit; in fact, he will be punished if he doesn't suffer, without complaint. Women can get away with almost anything with no consequences

I suggest you look at the mass rapes and abuse of women and girls that men routinely commit in war. Look what the Japanese Imperial soldiers did to the women of Nanjing, China in WW2, and to the Korean women they forced into prostitution for the Japanese troops. Look at the mass rapes of German girls and women that Soviet troops committed at the end of WW2. For present day examples, look at the what ISIS and the Taliban have done to women in war.

Also, look into history and world events more generally.

When I was growing up in the US in the 1960s, American women had no right to legal abortion - and it was legal to fire female employees from their jobs and kick girls and women out of school for getting pregnant. Girls and women who got pregnant when they weren't married were scorned as sluts, privately and publicly shunned and sent away.

In Ireland (both the republic and NI), girls and women who got pregnant outside of marriage - or merely had the temerity to flirt with boys - were locked up and enslaved in places the workhouses known as Magadelene laundries and institutions called mother & baby homes. Those who gave birth usually had their babies taken away against their will and given to married couples for adoption. Many of the children who were not adopted out died due to malnutrition, lack of medical treatment, abuse by officials and other suspicious circumstances.

For decades, the stories of these places and the atrocities carried out in them, were largely unspoken — despite calls from the mothers who became virtual prisoners within their walls and children who spent their earliest years there, later sharing stories of neglect and abuse.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/12/world/europe/ireland-mother-baby-home-report.html

The Magdalene laundries remained in operation until 1984. The mother and baby homes until 1998. More than 56,000 girls and women in Ireland ranging in age from 12 to 44 were sent to these institutions for getting pregnant outside of marriage, or sometimes just for having flirted, kissed or been sexually abused by boys or men (including priests and other clergymen and their own brothers and fathers). But not a single one of the boys and men who had sex with these girls and women and fathered their children suffered any negative consequences whatsoever.

In most of the West, women only got the right to vote in national elections 100 years ago - and this right certainly was not handed to women "on a golden platter." In my own lifetime, girls and women lacked basic rights like the right to attend certain schools and study certain subjects, the right to apply for certain jobs and enter various professions, the right to get a credit card or bank loan without a male co-signer, the right to have scholastic sports, and the right to prosecute if we were beaten or raped by the men we were married to.

As for war: what many men through history have suffered physically and emotionally in warfare is horrible. But nearly all wars over the course of human history have been started and waged by men. Used to be, warfare was called delayed male infanticide - a way that older men past their prime could legally kill off young males once they reached the age when they were at their sexual and physical peak and could compete with, challenge or overthrow the older men.

With the exception of outliers like Golda Meir and Margaret Thatcher, few women have started and waged wars coz very few women have been heads of state or commanders of militaries.

Women have always done their bit in various wars in all sorts of ways both on the home front and on the front lines, including serving in combat:

https://www.history.com/news/women-wwii-military-combat-front-lines

https://www.airforcemag.com/PDF/MagazineArchive/Magazine%20Documents/2014/October%202014/1014Witches.pdf

While a man can go die in a war or suffer the worst torture imaginable--with lower pain tolerance, mind you, both mentally and physically--and no one will give a shit

I suggest you spend some time looking into what human labor and childbirth entails for women mentally and physically both as it happens and in the months and years down the line. In the poorer parts of the world today, the leading cause of death for teenage girls is pregnancy/childbirth.

New Scientific American piece quotes TiM gender doctor Marci Bowers, "The penis is just a large clitoris." Yes, which is why women shoot sperm out of their clitoris... by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 18 insightful - 5 fun18 insightful - 4 fun19 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

I guess it's why we pee from our clits too! And why our clits are connected to our prostates and other glands that are involved in making seminal fluid.

What are your thoughts on and arguments against these articles that say there is no such a thing as a male or female body? by Not_a_celebrity in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

If the liquid that comes from "milking" a bull were to end up in this guy's coffee or on his cereal, I bet he'd notice the difference immediately!

"People keep calling Serena Williams the greatest female athlete of all time, as if Caitlyn Jenner didn't even exist." by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 24 insightful - 5 fun24 insightful - 4 fun25 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

When that guy tweeted

Not only did Caitlyn win the decathlon, she even beat all the men!

He, being a guy, missed an important point: Jenner not only beat all the men, but "she" beat all the men in an Olympic category for which there was no female equivalent at the time, and there still is no female equivalent today.

The Olympic decathlon - which consists of 10 events - is for males only, and always has been. The closest female athletes can get in the Olympics is the heptathlon - which consists of 7 events. The women's heptathlon was only added to the Olympics in 1984.

Elliot Page and Emma Portner Announce Plans to Divorce After 3 Years of Marriage: We 'Remain Close Friends' by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

No, there's nothing offensive about saying someone - male or female - is "masculine." What in my opinion is offensive is saying "stereotypically speaking" that a woman you think looks "pretty manly" is more likely to be a lesbian than not.

I know many women who are lesbians whom others consider very "feminine" in appearance. And I know many women of all sexual orientations - straight, bi, lesbian - who are considered by some/many others to be "masculine." By today's regressive sexist standards, most of the "1950s housewives" who birthed and raised women of my generation would be considered much more "masculine" than "feminine."

Some women will be seen by others as either "masculine" or "feminine" by their culture's and generation's standards and definition of these terms throughout their lives. But how these women are or will be perceived by others is not necessarily indicative of the women's sexual orientations.

At the same time, amongst women who are fortunate enough to live a full lifespan (mid-80s to 90s), many will be regarded by others as both "feminine" and "masculine" at different points in life. Fact is, even women who appeared "feminine" from girlhood into their 50s commonly find that during and after menopause they'll often be seen by others as "masculine." And the more elderly women get, the more commonplace it is for us to be perceived by others as "manly."

Many older women whose looks have become naturally "masculinized" due to the aging process are presumed by others to be lesbians as a result - and these presumptions are made by other people of all sexualities. This sort of sexist stereotyping is not helpful to anyone.

I think it's time for all of us to stop assuming that because a person looks a certain way, that it's indicative of - or a tell of - the person's sexual orientation.

Elliot Page and Emma Portner Announce Plans to Divorce After 3 Years of Marriage: We 'Remain Close Friends' by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

She had not previous female relationship, but she look more like a lesbian than Ellen, stereotypically speaking, she's pretty mainly lol

Elvira95, that's a pretty offensive statement.

Elliot Page and Emma Portner Announce Plans to Divorce After 3 Years of Marriage: We 'Remain Close Friends' by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Emma gives off serious “Gone Girl” vibes.

Emma must be the villain coz she has "bad vibes"? Really?

Both a quick and deep peruse show that every photo of them together involves Page looking lovingly and submissively toward Emma and searching for her approval while Emma shows coldness, disinterest, and smugness.

I just did Google image searches under both their names individually and together. Saw nothing like this. On the contrary, saw tons of pics of the two smooching, smiling (or mugging for the camera) cheek to cheek, with arms draped around one another.

I admit, Emma isn't nearly as photogenic as El. Emma's strong facial structure is such that her "resting face" looks stern and forbidding, whereas El's delicate beauty is conventionally "feminine" and makes her naturally look more appealing and approachable. Also, Emma is much taller and far bigger boned than El and seems less graceful; I know Emma's a dancer, but in still photos she often looks stiff and ungainly and like she's not at all at ease. This is particularly true when posing with El for photos on the red carpet - in those sorts of shots, Emma often looks uncomfortable and tense, whereas El is not just relaxed, she's "all lit up" with her high-wattage star power turned on high.

This makes sense given that El has spent her entire life in front of cameras. El grew up having her image and look carefully shaped and highly curated and by an army of stylists, hairdressers, makeup artists and "image consultants;" she's been taught all the tricks of how to be photographed not just so she looks good, but also so comes off as nice; and she's comfortable being the center of attention and fawned over at publicity events and shoots coz all that stuff is part and parcel of her job.

I don’t believe there is evidence that Emma had a prior history with women. If this is the case it provides an explanation for Page seeking to identify out of womanhood.

So people's sexual orientation is only "valid" and can be presumed real when they provide strangers with documented "evidence" of it? Even today in the (new) era of social media when it's become all too common for people to post the details of their personal lives and everything they do online, many people still prefer to keep their private lives, well, private - and they do so.

Also, Emma was 23 when she and El married, probably younger when they first started dating. A lot of lesbians take a while to come out to themselves and to others - I know many who didn't come out until their mid 20s or even much later. El Page herself didn't come out as a lesbian until she was 27. What's more, prior to announcing that she's a lesbian, Page sure gave the world plenty of "evidence" that she was straight or bisexual by being very public about all the high-profile men she dated... So why the double standard?

You are blaming the mental health crisis and internalized misogyny of a full-grown woman soon to turn 34 entirely on the younger woman she has been involved with/married to for a tenth of her life or less. I have no idea what's occasioned El Page's evident mental health crisis, or what went on in her relationship with Emma Porter. But I do know enough about the etiology of mental illness, low self-esteem and internalized misogyny as well as what happens between married couples to be confident that the situation is not quite as simple as you're portraying it. It's not fair - nor is it feminist - to assume that when a relationship between two women breaks down, one is an evil villain whose "bad vibes" mean that whatever happened must be all her fault and only her fault, and the other woman is a pure, entirely innocent victim who couldn't have contributed to the couple's problems coz she's incapable of ever doing any wrong - and she presumably entered the relationship without any baggage or pre-existing issues of her own.

Finally, isn't the overarching message of "Gone Girl" that people aren't necessarily who they appear to be in the public eye, and no one outside a married couple's relationship can truly know - or even have an idea - what goes on between the two partners behind closed doors?

Elliot Page and Emma Portner Announce Plans to Divorce After 3 Years of Marriage: We 'Remain Close Friends' by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 12 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

If El's wife is the big TRA here, why wasn't she the one to go trans? Or why didn't the two of them go trans together - so they could pretend to be two married gay men?

These are genuine questions. I don't have the background on this couple that others here seem privy to. But it seems to be commonly assumed that El went trans due to coercion, pressure or perhaps worse from El's wife. Which portrays El as an entirely innocent victim and El's wife as the guilty, nefarious villain who took advantage of El.

But is it really that black and white? I'd think that El's status as a Hollywood star who, compared to her wife, was always the one with far greater wealth, earning potential, name-recognition, institutional support (from agents, managers, studio execs, PR teams, attorneys and so on), that El would have at least equal standing in their relationship. Also, El is older by 7 or so years. At the time of their marriage, El was already 30 or more, whereas El's wife was only 23 or thereabouts.

My post illustrates that these two were not on equal footing. Here I am as a member of the general public referring to El's wife as El's wife - coz without her name being stated in the thread title, I'd have no idea what it is. All I've heard previously is that she's a choreographer-dancer who once did something in or for a Justin Bieber video. That's her main claim to fame outside her marriage - not enough to make her a household name. Whereas Page is a household name.

We Need to Change the Terms of the Debate on Trans Kids | The New Yorker by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 11 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

The author of this piece is Masha Gessen, age 54. Gessen has a recently-minted "identity" as "nonbinary and trans" and "uses they/them pronouns" that still have that fresh-off-the-store-shelf smell. Coz as Gessen reveals in the article, Gessen didn't start "transitioning" until she - oops, they/them - was over 50.

Here's a video of Gessen did with Frontline in 2017.https://youtu.be/Kk9igTqTx9s

Interestingly, the writeup on the Frontline website still refers to Gessen by pronouns that correctly denote her sex. Guess they're transphobes. Or maybe they missed the "gender reveal" party and memo.

Also, just a brief glance at this video shows that Gessen sounds and looks like a zillion other women of menopausal age or older. Many of my friends and I - boring older women with no gender speshul status - look as or even more "nonbinary" and "trans" than she does. Due to our edgy hairstyles in our youth, our practical hairstyles during most the rest of our lives, especially when we had young children and/or demanding jobs, and the fact that several of us have been bald at times due to chemotherapy for cancer, and now in our dotage we are balding naturally, our hair is just as - or actually far more - "masc" as hers. My pate currently looks more like the Rock's, Bruce Willis's and Yul Byrnner's than Gessen's. And she definitely has better teeth!

Growing numbers of women turning to sex work as Covid crisis pushes them into ‘desperate poverty’ by Rationalmind in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

The body of this article contradicts the headline.

The headline makes it seem like droves of women who've never done "sex work" before are now turning to it coz COVID-19 has closed off all their other employment, earning and income options and pushed them into "desperate poverty."

But the article itself is mainly about women who've been doing sex work for many years - two decades in the case of one of the two women quoted and featured - and who say that conditions created by the COVID-19 crisis have made it much more difficult for them and other longstanding sex workers to make decent money from sex work.

One of these women, who serves as an organizer and official for/of a prostitutes union, claims that during the COVID-19 crisis lots of women with no history of doing sex work have been calling to inquire about the possibility of going into it in order to make ends meet. But beyond that claim, no evidence is given that this is actually true - or that the majority of the women supposedly calling to inquire about going into sex work end up actually taking it up.

Also, the article makes it sound as though in the UK there has been no government financial support for people affected by COVID-19, and that the UK also has no welfare programs that women and especially women with children could avail themselves of that predated COVID and which have remained in place throughout the crisis. I understand that austerity, the new Universal Credit system and new rules around child benefits and tax credits have left many women with and without children worse off than they were when the UK's benefits system was more generous. But it's not true that there is no longer any government assistance in the UK the way this article pretends. Compared to the US, the financial supports available in the UK are generous. In the UK, housing is a right, and there's free universal health care too.

Just goes to show that the Independent is a rag just out for the clicks.

Gendering animals (a paper arguing that animals might have gender...) by BiologyIsReal in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 16 insightful - 5 fun16 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

You can put lipstick on a pig, kitten ears on a pooch or a parakeet, and dress up animals in all sorts of silly outfits ranging from frilly frocks to macho costumes like those of the Village People - and still animals wouldn't have "gender."

This inane, desperate effort puts a new spin on the old proverb "you can't make a silk gold lamé purse out of a sow's ear."

Pelosi Bans ‘Gender’ Terms Mother, Daughter, Father, Son in House Rules by VioletRemi in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 13 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

What difference does the white house using gender neutral language really make??

These rules are for the US House of Representatives (which along with the Senate is known as the US Congress), not the White House, HQ and residence of the US president. Congress is the legislative branch, presidency/the WH is the executive branch.

These rules definitely will make a difference coz it's Congress that writes/rewrites & passes US federal laws. Moreover, what happens at the federal level often trickles down & sets the tone for what happens in state and local legislatures.

Without being able to use the words mother or father, it will be much more difficult to discuss and properly draft laws pertaining to sex-specific issues like workplace provisions for pregnancy, maternity & discrimination based on pregnancy & maternity as well as the distinctions between maternity leave & parental leave; abortion; surrogacy; child custody & family law; insurance coverage for medical conditions related to pregnancy & childbirth as well as male and female infertility, and of course for birth control prescriptions (which usually pertain to women only for the purpose of preventing becoming mothers); and what information should be on birth certificates & other government-issued documents and collected/kept track of in/by government registries, data bases, health departments, planning agencies and the US Census.

I wonder if under the new House rules AOC would be considered out of order and subject to censure for making the following remarks on the House floor in July 2020 about the verbal sex-based harassment she received from Rep. Ted Yoho (emphasis added):

I do not need Representative Yoho to apologize to me. Clearly he does not want to. Clearly when given the opportunity he will not and I will not stay up late at night waiting for an apology from a man who has no remorse over calling women and using abusive language towards women, but what I do have issue with is using women, our wives and daughters, as shields and excuses for poor behavior. Mr. Yoho mentioned that he has a wife and two daughters. I am two years younger than Mr. Yoho’s youngest daughter. I am someone’s daughter too. My father, thankfully, is not alive to see how Mr. Yoho treated his daughter. My mother got to see Mr. Yoho’s disrespect on the floor of this House towards me on television and I am here because I have to show my parents that I am their daughter and that they did not raise me to accept abuse from men.

Now what I am here to say is that this harm that Mr. Yoho levied, it tried to levy against me, was not just an incident directed at me, but when you do that to any woman, what Mr. Yoho did was give permission to other men to do that to his daughters. In using that language in front of the press, he gave permission to use that language against his wife, his daughters, women in his community, and I am here to stand up to say that is not acceptable...

And so what I believe is that having a daughter does not make a man decent. Having a wife does not make a decent man...

Seems to me that if AOC had been made to change daughter, father, mother and wife to the sex obscurant terms child, parent and spouse instead, her remarks would have lost a lot of their power, pointedness and sting.

Meanwhile on reddit, it's okay to abuse a man if you're trans. by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 26 insightful - 5 fun26 insightful - 4 fun27 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

this person's lived most of his life as a male.

Actually, he's lived all his life as a male.

Ellen Page is claiming to be transgender. What is going on?! by socialistrobot in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

LOL. You've inspired me. Today I announce that I am a stunning and brave super-masc transman named Currer Acton Ellis Twainiac.

Then again, since my original user name was cribbed from the pen name used by Samuel Clemens, perhaps I was trans already??? Geez, who knows?

I was watching The Queen's Gambit and immediately noticed the man posing as a female in the first episode. (Very minor spoilers.) by Nonime in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, you're absolutely right. Gays are now in the "cis" camp. I stand corrected. Thank you for educating me. Where can I send you the money to compensate you for your emotional labor? Again, my abject apologies for getting it wrong and not being fully up to speed with the latest dogma. I promise I will "do better" in the future. (LOL)