BLM unironically thinks that FBI statistics make them look good by ifuckredditsnitches_ in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 15 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 3 fun16 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

LMAO this is priceless

Tribalism is an inferior human condition that only leads to chaos and misery. by Zoomer1212 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So did the concept of atom or bacteria. That doesn't mean they weren't real.

Texas adopts IHRA (International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism). This is the hottest hot button issue I have ever seen Jews go apeshit about. It essentially outlaws any criticism of any Jews or Jewish organizations, no matter what they do. It makes them Gods. by Fitter_Happier in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:

  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

Now this is just precious. The exact same thing jews are denying to us suddenly becomes a horrible evil if it is denied to them.

***REDDIT MELTDOWN WATCH: ROE VS WADE OVERTURNED*** by Tarrock in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Good point. I haven't thought about this. Wonder how this will effect the migration of Californians into Midwest.

How many negroes are there in Ukraine? by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Blacks are extremely narcissistic population. WE WUZZING is just one of many manifestations of that. Their behavior starts making a lot of sense when you look at them this way.

What is the counter-argument against blacks/minorities getting sentenced more harshly than whites for the same crime? by Sapphire in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In Beaver et al. 2013 researchers compared criminal’s sentencing time after controlling for their verbal IQ and their self reported history of violence. They found that holding these variables constant completely eliminated the racial cap in sentencing.

Meta-analysis from 1998 finds that race is unrelated to criminal sentence length after controlling for offense type and prior criminal records (k = 47, n = 48,251).

Memorial Day General Thread by cisheteroscum in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I recently watched this TRS podcast on the "Tulsa race massacre" as it is now called. Highly recommend. I read about this in the past so I knew it was quite overblown with a lot of urban myths but I didn't knew it was this bad.

https://therightstuff.biz/2019/10/28/tds511-anti-citation-remarks/

Any theories on why leftist whites are so self-hating? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sean Last wrote an article on this.

tl;dr

In summary, studies show that liberals have low self esteem and that causing low self esteem causes people to be more liberal. Research also shows that liberals have unrealistically negative views of the morals of conservatives and unrealistically positive views of the morals of liberals. And polling shows that liberals are far more likely to break social ties with people over politics. They are moral crusaders. The fact that liberals want everyone to know that they are liberal, that they seem to purposefully pick offensive views, their debate style, and the fact that being morally superior normally feels pretty good, suggests to me that the moral crusading and the low self esteem are connected. Liberals are liberal so that they can say that society sucks so that they can say that they are better than everyone else so that they can feel a little less shitty about themselves.

https://web.archive.org/web/20150103001651/http://spawktalk.blogspot.com/2014/12/liberalism-and-low-self-esteem.html

There is no such thing as a "misogynist" society. by PeddaKondappa in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I will bite a little

A misogynist is one who hates women. (Definition of misogyny)

This is actually not true. Here is definition of misogynist from Cambridge dictionary:

a man who hates women or believes that men are much better than women

So by this logic, even if some men loved their mothers they can still think they are worse than men. Therefore an example misogynist society is the one where men believe they are better than women.

I like race mixing, change my mind. by IsraelDid911 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 7 fun5 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

I used to be a white nationalist until I came across this post. Hot stuff right there. 😎😎😎

The demise of Russia is devastating to the alt-right worldview. by Zoomer1212 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Jesse what the fuck are you talking about?

What evidence is there that race and ethnicity are biological (e.g. determined by genetics) and not social constructs? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Lynn because he lied about his results for Africa (he admitted to using Spanish children test scores and filling in the blanks for Africa)

This is not what happened.

The people who first pointed this out were Wicherts et al. (2010) and this is how they characterized it:

"However, the use of this sample is an error. The average IQ of the people of Equatorial Guinea is based on a lengthy book chapter (Fernández-Ballesteros et al., 1997). Although this chapter reports research conducted among members of an illiterate tribe in Equatorial Guinea, the WISC-R was not administered to these Africans. The forty-eight children, to whom the WISC (not the WISC-R) was administered, were from Spain, not from Equatorial Guinea. Clearly, Lynn (and Vanhanen) made a mistake in using this sample to estimate average IQ of Africans."

It is clear to them but it is not clear to the internet. How this paragraph managed to be transformed into "Lynn admitted to lying about his results" is just fascinating. I hope I don't have to explain to anyone the difference between lying and making a mistake. Lynn didn't went like "ha-ha-ha now I will pretend this is the IQ of Equatorial Guinea because God, I just hate black people so much. Fuck melanin!!!"

I urge anyone who is not convinced whether Lynn's IQ maps can be trusted to either read this paper or chapters on IQ reliability and IQ validity in this book, p. 30-33.

Anyone who uses this argument should know that James Flynn used to argue back in 90s that asians have lower IQ than whites and that Stephen Jay Gould believed that humans can mate with monkeys. Does this mean Flynn Effect isn't real or that James Flynn has serious credibility issues? Scientists sometimes believe stupid shit that later turn out to be not true. Underestimating IQ of some African shithole country is very minor fuck up in comparison. Especially when take into consideration that Lynn had to go over hundreds of IQ papers while making his book.

and Rushton because he took money from the Pioneer Fund.

The is even worse argument than the first one. Receiving funds from some organization does not make you not credible. Sandra Scarr's research was also financed by Pioneer Fund, and she is well-known egalitarian. Is she not credible either?

Did the majority of Native Americans die from disease or organized murder/genocide? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Out of 2 million, 50K at most were killed in conflict with whites

In the United States, the best estimate of the decline in American Indian numbers is that they decreased from about 2.2 million at the time of first contact to about 350,000 at their nadir around 1900. How much of this decline was the result of killings by whites? An 1894 estimate by the US Bureau of the Census claimed that “about 30,000” Indians had been killed by whites between 1775 and 1894. Recent historians have raised this figure to about 53,500 (and 19,000 whites killed by Indians).

https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/history-wars/2008/12/historical-revision-versus-holocaust-denial/

What are your thoughts on this reddit thread regarding African American crime? by Nasser in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He might be right about anti-black bias in news coverage BUT he is ignoring the anti-white bias in TV shows. Whites are much more often depicted as murderers on TV than they are in reality.

Content analyses of three seasons of Law & Order were examined to evaluate the show’s portrayal of race and crime compared to actual crime statistics for New York City during the same periods.[...] Results suggest whites are disproportionately portrayed as criminals five to eight times more often on police dramas compared to actual crime statistics for the city of New York, exposure to police dramas increases beliefs of threats to personal safety, and exposure to police dramas leads to elevated perceptions of white criminality among non-whites.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311886.2015.1104977

Now, I would assume TV shows have larger audience than news coverage of crimes so by his own logic whites are erroneously over-represented in these NCVS surveys to even larger extent than blacks.

That being said I think this whole narrative is BS. According to him people don't remember the race of the man who robbed them because of the stress so they just say he was black that's what they saw on the news? Whether the offender was white or black is not some tiny detail you forget because of stress. This excuse doesn't even pass basic smell test. Not mentioning he didn't provide any evidence that this is happening, it's pure speculation on his part.

It's also funny he claims blacks and whites use drugs at similar rates based on a self-report survey (National Household Survey on Drug Abuse) when he criticized surveys for being inaccurate few moments ago. I guess they start being accurate when they show what he likes to see. Unfortunately for him there is good evidence that blacks are lying on these surveys about their drug use. This has been documented here: https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/is-the-criminal-justice-system-racist/

To put it shortly, blacks use drugs at higher rates than whites so it doesn't mean there is systemic racism when they get arrested for drugs at higher rates as well.

Anyway that's my response. If someone here has functioning reddit account you can send him this reply. I would be curious what he has to say.

Russian - Ukraine War updates by JuliusCaesar225 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Don't know if this is the right thread but I don's know where else to share it.

I came across this very amusing thread. Basically it's all black people crying about racism that countries that rejected Syrians in 2015 are now opening their borders to Ukrainians. There is one post where there is news article from 2015 about how Poland closed its borders to refugees and then recent one about how it allows all Ukrainians and even their pets. Of course blacks are seething in the replies about the huge injustice inflected upon them. Hilarious stuff.

https://twitter.com/TihomirSabchev/status/1497264454236610563

How can races/ethnicities be pure when all genes are mixed and environments constantly change? by CuteAsDuck in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What is your deal buddy? You keep making these race-denier posts, each dumber than the previous one, and after each post gets answered you delete it and make new one. What the hell is this? Are you seriously asking why a person who is 95% Chinese and 5% Japanese identifies as Chinese instead of Chinese-Japanese? Are you genuinely confused by it? This is so incredibly basic even layman with no background in anything intuitively understands this. I try but I have huge trouble pretending you are asking this in good faith.

The Dissident Right/WN obsesses too much over race-mixing. It's really not that big of a deal, IMO. by AltAlt in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The mean between black and white IQ is 92.5 which is what mulatto's would be expected to have. The Eyferth study showed male mulatto's have 97 IQ on average. The hereditarian Arthur Jensen stated heterosis may have contributed to that.

We already went through this. The blacks in the Eyferth sample had above-average IQ so their mulatto offspring would not have IQ of 92.5 but around 95-96. Precisely as the study found.

Group Eyferth IQ Hereditarian “Prediction”
White Males 101 100.5
White Females 93 100.5
Mixed Males 97 95.6
Mixed Females 96 95.6

The Eyferth study supports hereditarianism more than it does environmentalism. And as for Jensen, as far as I know, he only suggested heterosis as one possible explanation. And given that he didn't mention it when discussing Eyferth study in his 2005 review of literature he did with Rushton, it's safe to conclude he does no longer believe that. Not even as a possibility.

Netflix has a new show called "Bridgerton" set in Victorian England. I decided to skim through a few episodes to see how blacked it was.... by JuliusCaesar225 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Blacks are around 5% of UK population but their TV makes it seem like they are almost a quarter of the population.

That's not even the worst part. This show is set in Victorian England and blacks constituted around 0.1% of population in 1780. And this was probably lower in higher classes. With 20% of cast being black this isn't mere over-representation but attempt at rewriting of history.

Similar situation is in Sweden where over half of commercials feature a non-white

Do you expect a white ethnostate in your lifetime? by Soylent in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In 2018, poll that found fully 39 percent of Americans — including 42 percent of Democrats — wanted to secede. I don't know if this is higher of lower than what is was before Civil War and you don't either. And bringing up civil war doesn't help your case at all. It was fought precisely because one side wanted to be separate from the other. And the only reason it didn't happen is because the side that wanted to keep them in won. But this time, there will be no side like that. This time, everyone wants to leave.

Academics are writing books about incoming secession, and both right and the left is entertaining the idea more and more. It's only matter of time.

Derek Chauvin guilty in death of George Floyd: Live updates by Fitter_Happier in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

name a few white interest groups and now, you want to deflect to the groups's relevancy

Yeah, we really are ungrateful aren't we? White people are being discriminated against in university admission and job market, losing political power over their own nation, other races can openly call for wealth redistribution from whites but oooooh boy that monthly newsletter about Oktoberfest is truly something else.

Separation is the Solution - American Renaissance by Fitter_Happier in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Majority of those 439,000 blacks are democrats and even more so are black racial nationalists who want to redistribute resources and political power away from whites and use some oppression narrative they believe in as justification for that. There is no reason why we would want these people in our country.

All this "they will contribute to the economy" is a lolbert talking point that is irrelevant to us. And it's not even true in the long run because kids of those 120 IQ blacks will be about <100 IQ and in few generations we will be back where we started.

Russia signs military deals with 40 African states by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

" Not to mention the fact that Putin has probably promised these leaders some free Russian -- or captured Ukrainian -- pussy as well."

Very normal thing to say. Go take some family member and read them out loud what you wrote here

If the Iraq War was a Jewish war why did most Jews oppose it? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Go tell this to this jewish author writing for jewish media outlet. He is the closest to claiming it was "jewish war"

The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.

https://www.haaretz.com/2003-04-03/ty-article/white-mans-burden/0000017f-e398-d804-ad7f-f3fa5d520000

To address the Gallup poll results, the most plausible explanations seems lack of nationalism on part of jews. After 9/11 everyone was riled up for revenge to invade some arab country but obviously you won't feel that way if you don't feel any affinity to America in the first place. This explains why the two groups least in favor of the war were blacks and jews. Blacks because they think America is racist and jews because they think nationalism is stepping stone to nazism - unless it's nationalism towards Israel obviously.

nd this isn't just because it was a "Republican" war and most Jews are Democrats. Jews were less supportive of the war than non-Jews regardless of party affiliation.

This is not exactly what the poll said. They only split party affiliation by democrat and non-democrat. In other words jewish centrists+republicans vs. gentile centrists+republicans. Obviously there will be larger share of republicans in the latter.

Why is Latin America more violent than Africa by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're not, Africa just has terrible record keeping.

Here is very telling statistic about the criminality in Africa:

According to the Cleen Foundation's 2005 and 2006 country-wide crime victimization surveys, each covering 10,000 Nigerians, almost 2% of the persons interviewed reported that a member of their household was killed in the past twelve months.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280638856_Conflicts_and_the_political_issues_of_excess_mortality_a_case-study_from_Nigeria

Jewish woman writes doctoral thesis on why US justice system is racist against blacks, and then is stabbed to death by blacks by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Regarding the essay, the researchers selected relatively brief periods in history in countries that have had serious economic and religious problems.

I haven't read that paper so I can't comment on that but in this book author measured ethnic conflict in nations all over the world in the period from 2003-2011. He found that Ethnic diversity has 0.812 correlation with ethnic conflict. Ranging from smaller issues like racial discrimination to ethnic cleansings or separatist wars. Meaning that more diverse countries tend to have more violent conflicts.

Several millennia of cosmopolitan developments offer evidence of the importance diversity.

Yeah, how? Most development throughout history occurred in Europe which was pretty homogeneous.

If you don't like to study hisotry, you can can easily google some of the evidence about the benefits of diversity:

I am familiar with these arguments. I don't know to what degree you read these links because some of them provide literally zero sources, some of them talk about gender diversity which was found to have no impact on company performance. Some cite studies that only found benefits of intellectual diversity which was confounded by racial diversity. I suspect a lot of these findings are just correlational and not causal. You know, big companies having diverse executive boards so they wouldn't get sued by EEOC as opposed to small business owners who don't give fuck and nobody gives a fuck about. Then someone researches this it and goes "oh look, more diverse companies make bigger profits, clearly diversity boosts your business revenue". If that was really the case we would expect to find the same ting on national level i.e. more diverse nations being more richer. However the opposite is true. National diversity correlates with GDP per capita at -0.55.

There is also research showing the opposite - firm productivity decreasing as diversity rises. So who knows. There are some smaller meta-analysis finding negative relationship. Hulsheger and Anderson (2009) meta-analyzed 104 studies and found background diversity correlated at -.133 with innovation.

Williams and O’Reilly (1998) came to this conclusion in their review of the literature:

“There is substantial evidence from both laboratory and field studies conducted over the past four decades that variations in group composition can have important effects on group functioning. These studies show that increased diversity, especially in terms of age, tenure, and ethnicity, typically have negative effects on social integration, communication, and conflict.”

I wish there was bigger meta-analysis like with gender diversity but all available evidence so far suggests that diversity is bad rather than good.

Imam Tariq Nasheed break new ground with his ''documentary''/homoerotic fiction-buck breaking by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Buck Breaking is the best meme of the year

Creating an all new White state is more realistic than ending immigration or deportations. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's more realistic that a new white country is carved somewhere else on the planet.

This is not realistic at all. Every piece of land on Earth is claimed by some country and none of them would give up their territories just so foreign people could live there. Partition of the US is much more realistic option. And also likely option given how polarization is on the rise with each passing year.

Immigration increases the average American wage. by Vegethu in strangestatistics

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Not according to this meta-analysis of 348 estimates on the impact of immigration on native wages in the United States and EU countries which found that a 1% increase in immigrants as part of the labor force was associated with a 0.119% reduction in native wages.

https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/a-meta-analytic-assessment-of-the-effect-of-immigration-on-wages-3

What is your opinion on this comment?Is there any validity?If not can you refute it with sources? by Salos10000 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They idea that slaves built America is absolutely ridiculous. As well as his comment that "...they did all the labor white people were too lazy to do."

Slaves worked on average 300 hours a year less than white workers. And there is no evidence they were any more productive. There is actually quite a bit of evidence that slaves were pretty lazy. From Thaddeus Russell, A Renegade History of The United States (2010):

On every plantation he visited, Olmsted found at least one slave not working “on account of some illness, strain, bruise or wound, of which he or she was complaining.” According to Olmsted, “[t]he slave, if he is indisposed to work, and especially if he is not treated well, or does not like the master who has hired him, will sham sickness—even make himself sick or lame—that he need not work.” We have substantial quantitative evidence of this from three Mississippi plantations in the early nineteenth century. On the Wheeles plantation, one out of seven working days was lost to slaves claiming they were too sick to work. On the Bowles plantation, of the 159 days missed due to illness in one year, only fve were Sundays, when there was the least work to do. Te Leigh plantation, where only thirty slaves worked, reported 398 sick days in one year. At these plantations, the rates of sickness peaked on Saturdays and during the planting and harvest seasons, when there was the most work to be done.

On top of that, South was poorest region of the country up until mid-20th century. When Northerner Frederick Law Olmsted traveled to the South he remarked that Southern whites lived in far worse conditions than whites in the north. Southern per-capita income in 1840 was just three quarters of national average. Likely because it wasn't so industrialized due to slavery. The idea that that slaves built America comes from cotton because it constituted 50% of America's export but exports were just 6% of GNP.

He is also quite stretching when he talks about their cultural contributions. "Do you like art? Chances are it was drawn by an artist who was inspired by the mix of black and white art traditions." There are no black artists so he say art made by white people was "inspired" by them. Same with country music. Another white genre blacks contributed nothing into but he is making them responsible for it anyway.

Blacks haven't made virtually any contributions to building of America, in fact they take 660 billion dollars a year from its budget. Their cultural contribution, the actual ones, like jazz, rap or hip-hop don't mean that they build this country. And America would probably be better off without it.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/V3N-LO-zQkA/

https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/slavery-in-the-united-states/

Let's be real here,most people here dont deny the holocaust, but know it happened and believe it was good. by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I would never imagine I say this but posts like this make me miss reddit userbase

Derek Chauvin guilty in death of George Floyd: Live updates by Fitter_Happier in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's a shame. Would be funny meme if he won. And the chimpout would be glorious. Hopefully BLM organizes some celebration lootings instead.

Russia signs military deals with 40 African states by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What in the hell is wrong with you

Where is the evidence for the claim that the left supports pedophilia? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Incels are disproportionately brown so this checks out

If the Iraq War was a Jewish war why did most Jews oppose it? by IlorinYuri in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If the Iraq War was a Jewish war

Did someone actually say those words or are you arguing against strawmen in your head?

Nigeria bans white models by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How many white models are there even in Nigeria?

This HAS TO be bullshit: Leftist studies that claim that "diversity" is a source of strength by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You have this from that Vaush google doc, don't you? Here is a good response to it:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bT_Q3TXZX0ZjnNS_QMsR-MEPut7S5EIkFeAkIO7vEGI/edit

For instance, for the "enormous meta analysis":

“First, many of these studies measured ethnic diversity in a way that would call a half White half Black neighborhood and a half British American half German American neighborhood equally diverse. More specifically, ethnic diversity was often measured as the probability that two randomly selected two people from the same region would be of different ethnics groups were the list of possible ethnic groups included not 3-6 “races” but, rather, 100+ ethnic groups. Thus, many of these studies looked at ethnic, rather than racial, diversity. This is problematic because ethnic groups are far more genetically (and phenotypically) similar than races are.

The second problem with this meta-analysis is that many of the studies referenced controlled for the mechanisms by which ethnic diversity might damage social cohesion. For instance, many studies controlled for income inequality and crime. The results of such an analysis will be misleading because ethnic diversity might cause a decrease in social cohesion by causing an increase in crime and income inequality. Thus, many of these studies controlled for the effects of diversity and then concluded that diversity had not effect.

The worst of these are studies that actually controlled for racial diversity. For instance, Aizlewood and Pendakur (2005) and Andersen and Millligan (2011) both found that the proportion of a neighborhood which is non white negatively correlated with its level of social cohesion but that ethnic diversity had no, or a positive, impact on social cohesion, after controlling for the effects of variation in the size of the population that isn’t white! Several of these studies were counted as “failed replications” by Meet and Tolsma.”

The study of 200 students found the exact opposite of what Vaush is claiming:

Second, we find that subjects who are paired with a partner of a different race or nationality send back less money to their partner. Eleven out of the twelve times in which the recipient sent back nothing, the sender and the recipient were of different races. These effects are stronger than the social network effects and survive controls for the social connection of the sender and recipient. This finding is also unsurprising, but serves as a reminder of the continuing barriers that racial and national differences may create” (p.814)

and others:

Tatu Vanhanen analyzed 176 countries in the period from 2003-2011. He found that Ethnic diversity has 0.812 correlation with ethnic conflict. Meaning that more diverse countries tend to have more violent conflicts.

Have Liberals/Leftists ever explained these photos of diversity being forced at gunpoint? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why is White students having to sit class with Black students worse than Black students getting a worse education and thus quality of life? And in regard to the Little Rock incident they can point to the state forces planning on opening fire on Black children which is morally and optically horrific.

They didn't get "worse education". This is a myth, stop saying that. Black schools right now get more funding per student, they have teachers with higher salary and more experience yet they still do worse academically then whites. There are no bad schools only bad students. But even if it all was true it doesn't justify the government sending troops to limit freedom of association of its people. What is this game you're playing here? "Blakpipo still have it worse so it doesn't count if your basic freedoms are being restricted"

Btw, what do you think would happen to the people in the photo if they didn't comply? You think power of white privilege would protect them from bayonets?

Communist China seeks to develop a race-based bio-weapon that targets and eliminates some human races while leaving other human races unharmed by peaceful in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

This is so stupid do they not know race is a social construct created by Europeans to justify slavery? Do they not believe in science or what???

Check out AltBase if you haven't already by AltBaseGuy in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Also subscribe to s/strangestatistics

do you think single moms should be allowed to join the white nationalist movment by valkyria1488 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We have no membership. There is nothing to join. If you want to ask if single moms can believe in white nationalism (however that is defined) then yes.

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ahh okay, but that's false. Mixed race people have IQ that is intermediate between IQs of their parents.

https://files.catbox.moe/ip9dax.png

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Did you read any of the links you posted? Because I doubt it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3146070/Mixed-race-relationships-making-taller-smarter-Children-born-genetically-diverse-parents-intelligent-ancestors.html

https://www.quora.com/Are-children-of-mixed-races-more-intelligent-than-those-of-a-homogeneous-gene-pool

These refer to the same study posted by OP. He even posted the same Dailymail article as you did.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjEtN3ag8_xAhXH_rsIHf1xDo4QFnoECAgQAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mdpi.com%2F2624-8611%2F1%2F1%2F10%2Fpdf&usg=AOvVaw2zAAsMctM881I9zjw5U71L

The sample size for the black-Japanese group was 6. Yes, N=6.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyferth_study

The section on hereditarian interpretation is a good summary of why this paper is essentially useless. However I would add this article by AltHype. In short, Eyferth study supports hereditarian explanation more than the environmentalist one.

https://www.brookings.edu/research/multi-racial-adolescents-show-no-test-score-gap-with-whites/

Problem with this is that they don't specify what kind of multiracial we are talking about. Because hapas score higher than mulattoes. And slightly higher than whites so this wouldn't be surprising. And considering that most black-white people identify as black rather than multiracial I would say we are looking at the test scores of hapas.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100414092523.htm

This study consists of a psychology professor having his class of 20 (twenty) white psychology students rate faces of people he pulled form Facebook. To his great satisfaction he found that mixed race people are rated as the most attractive. Unfortunately, data from dating websites with N= 500,000 reveal that whites prefer rate own race to be most attractive indicating strongly non-representative sample of his raters. This guy is quite funny though. He made similar study one year later this time with 40 students again finding to his satisfaction that mixed race people are most attractive! What a great news.

The rest has nothing to do with anything. I tried to find some pattern there but you're all over the place. There is one butthurt reply to Bell Curve from 1995, one study about intelligence of infants, article on James Watson, a paper about Hans Eysenck which argues for hereditarianism btw and one paywalled New Yorker article.

Do you find it odd that no country bans race-mixing [today]? And diversity as a whole is still legal? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Like go to Japan or China and see a non-Asian person walking around as one of their husbands/wives and you'll get mean looks. Yet how come even in these socially racist places, they just don't outlaw such behavior to begin with?

Because non-asian people in those countries are extremely rare and interracial relationships even more so. So this doesn't become an issue. Similarly like some northern US states didn't outlaw miscegenation because they had no black population. There was no need for it.

Would Africa/Blacks be better off just copying Egyptian Culture? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Iceland is 5,000km away from Egypt, whereas Sudan is 1,552 km away.

You are comparing the farthest point of Europe to nears point of SS Africa. Egypt is roughly 2k from Italy, 3k km from Germany and France and 3k km from Congo, 4k from Angola and West Africa where slaves came from.

You also missed the point that I said it's still an African civilization.

They are on the same continent which given how big Africa is doesn't say much. Do you call Russia an Asian civilization? Egypt is closest to middle east culturally and genetically.

The Dissident Right/WN obsesses too much over race-mixing. It's really not that big of a deal, IMO. by AltAlt in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You forget 80% of the Africans in the study were French Africans during WW2.

It's the other way around. 20% French North Africans and 80% American blacks. This is stated by both by Jencks & Phillips (1998) (the one cited by wikipedia) and by Rushton and Jensen (2005). Some wiki editor must have mixed up the percentages.

my main argument that the beneficial genes will be preserved while inferior ones discarded long-term from the bigger gene pool is supported by evolution

I don't know what you mean by this. Beneficial for what? Evolution selects for genes beneficial for further reproduction. Right now, low IQ people have higher birth rates and so genes for lower intelligence are being selected for. But I doubt most people would consider those genes to be beneficial.

It seems Germany still makes period pieces that lights Europeans in a good light. Is continental culture less blacked than anglo ones? by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How far have we fallen. Now simply a historical drama set in medieval Europe with all-white cast is considered a victory for us.

why are mainly rightwingers so into anti-vax conspiracies? by grocerymannn in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I haven't seen anyone being anti-vaccines. No idea what you are talking about.

British government study says "Most child sexual abuse gangs made up of white men", has anyone gone through this study to debunk it yet? by JuliusCaesar225 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's classic lying with statistics when leftists forget what per-capita is.

https://twitter.com/lporiginalg/status/1339302470904758272

"So what exactly are white people superior at?" by Erasmus in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can smell the video through the screen

Do you expect a white ethnostate in your lifetime? by Soylent in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anyone capable of reason and not blinded by bias, and desire for the US to be destroyed can see the Civil War was a far more polarized time.

They way I see it is that you have nothing, as expected, but you still want to believe that polarization was greater then and this is the rationalization you tell yourself.

Even if it was greater back then, so what? Our current situation won't be getting any better. People will be hating each other more and more and the polarization will continue to increase, and at some point, it will be greater than it ever was.

At least try not to contradict yourself if attempting to debate someone.

I'm not saying it will happen this year. Or even within ten years most likely. My estimation is that America won't survive in its current state until ~2050.

An honest question to the pro-vax people on this sub, why do you trust the state on the vaccine issue? by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I am vaccinated though I wouldn't call myself pro-vax nor do I criticize those who are not. I trust the vaccine because I saw no good reason not to. I don't buy the idea that the elites are reducing the population, if anything, they want there to be more of us so they could have more workers. If anyone has any other arguments against the vaccine I would like to hear them.

If alt right can blame black crime ultimately on the Js, then why can’t the media blame black on Asian crimes ultimately on white supremacy. by curious2 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If alt right can blame black crime ultimately on the Js

Oh man, I learn so much new things about myself.

Could you explain to us what lead you to make this statement?

Derek Chauvin guilty in death of George Floyd: Live updates by Fitter_Happier in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

These organizations don't seem to be advocating for the interests of their ethnic groups. Apart from the Polish one but even there, its list of activates is quite sparse. They complete bullshit. Just look at this

The German-American Journal is the official newsletter of DANK, and is published bimonthly. At the start of DANK in 1959 the newspaper consisted of six pages, was issued every three weeks, and was written almost entirely in German. As of 2011, the paper is 16 pages and written primarily in English (articles written in German are often accompanied by an English translation or summary). Recurring topics in the Journal include current events, food and entertainment, reviews, organization news and other articles of interest to German-Americans

How tf can someone think this is comparable to ADL or SPLC?

Also, what about white Americans who don't identify by any European ethnic group? What organizations do they have? Even bullshit ones like these?

Communist women have totally surprising fantasies by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Do you expect a white ethnostate in your lifetime? by Soylent in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I expect some sort of partition of the US. Whether that being partition into politically-based areas or racially-based areas, it will be separation of some sort. America is simply too polarized to survive much longer.

BLM unironically thinks that FBI statistics make them look good by ifuckredditsnitches_ in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Why Liberals and Atheists are More Intelligent by cybitch in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No, I think liberals have higher IQ because universities are propagating liberal narratives. And universities are of course places where smart people go so this is what you get. I don't think there is something inherent about liberal views that smart people follow. This is supported by the fact that smart people tend to support free speech while liberals support free speech less than republicans. Also his explanation that "violate the self-preservation nature of survival" doesn't make sense in case of libertarians who do better on general science tests, are wealthier and more college-educated than the general public. [1]

What happened to hitler after WW2? by jacques1102 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Damn bro you got us

Is there any data on school bullies broken down by race? by 8thmonitor in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://seanlast.substack.com/p/racial-diversity-strength-or-weakness

Turning to bullying, Farris (2006) finds that black students are more likely to be bullies than are white students while white students are more likely than black students to be the victims of bullying. Latino students are both more likely than black students to be engage in, and be a victim of, bullying. [...] With respect to interracial bullying, Farris finds that black on white bullying is 64% more common than is White on Black bullying.

"Any religion that has a less ambitious goal than dominating the world is not a true religion. It’s a cope." - Mark Brahmin by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mark Brahmin is a complete retard who cannot stand having his ideas questioned. He blocked me while we were having a debate on Twitter and from what I've heard he blocked others in alt-right sphere for petty reasons.

Opinions on this post blowing up on reddit about a Black couple potentially being racially discriminated by an appraiser by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Someone on twitter pointed out that prices of real estates went up between the time period when they made the house "whitewashed". It's just a dumb click bait article to push more racism narrative.

If this effect existed in the real world you could just buy black owned house and then resell it for 300K higher price. People would make millions out of this if it was possible.

Viktor Orbán adviser resigns after Hungarian premier’s ‘mixed race’ speech by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Here is what the 2nd source says

According to OIF’s data, the overwhelming majority of this year’s applicants, nearly 30,000 people (60%), are Ukrainian citizens, followed by a little more than 4,000 Serbian citizens, then Vietnamese, Chinese, and Indians.

The number of non-whites is pretty low. Majority of them are Europeans.

This HAS TO be bullshit: Leftist studies that claim that "diversity" is a source of strength by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The second study found the exact opposite. Someone just lied about it.

Second, we find that subjects who are paired with a partner of a different race or nationality send back less money to their partner. Eleven out of the twelve times in which the recipient sent back nothing, the sender and the recipient were of different races. These effects are stronger than the social network effects and survive controls for the social connection of the sender and recipient. This finding is also unsurprising, but serves as a reminder of the continuing barriers that racial and national differences may create” (p.814)

This HAS TO be bullshit: Leftist studies that claim that "diversity" is a source of strength by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That paper found the exact opposite of what he's claiming

“Second, we find that subjects who are paired with a partner of a different race or nationality send back less money to their partner. Eleven out of the twelve times in which the recipient sent back nothing, the sender and the recipient were of different races. These effects are stronger than the social network effects and survive controls for the social connection of the sender and recipient. This finding is also unsurprising, but serves as a reminder of the continuing barriers that racial and national differences may create”

and in the abstract:

When individuals are closer socially, both trust and trustworthiness rise. Trustworthiness declines when partners are of different races or nationalities.

You can't make this shit up

Even when Blacks are a demographic majority, they still call themselves oppressed. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh you mean Howard Gardner's "multiple intelligences" theory. This is a good write up on it:

https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/multiple-intelligences-emotional-intelligence-creativity-and-g/

Here are some highlights from the article:

Gardner admitted that “MI theory has few enthusiasts among psychometricians or others of a traditional psychological background” because they require “psychometric or experimental evidence that allows one to prove the existence of the several intelligences.”

here, Gardner himself admitted that MI theory is unfalsifiable because it can't be measured.

This lead the authors of this textbook to correctly conclude:

The Textbook “Introducing Neuroeducational Research: Neuroscience, Education and the Brain from Contexts to Practice” classifies multiple intelligences as a pseudoscience because it is unfalsifiable (there’s no way to show it’s wrong) and doesn’t make any predictions.

If you still aren't convinced consider these surveys of psychologists which found that they overwhelmingly favor a g-factor model of intelligence over specific abilities. [1] [2]

Jared Taylor Vs EMJ Official Thread by send_nasty_stuff in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That was quite of a shitshow. Didn't know EMJ is so spergy and immature. Best part for me was when he said that jews weaponize race by pretending it doesn't exist.

What???

DebateAltRight banned me, and this was my response by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Moreover, these authorities can be important, if they're earned the right to be authorities on a given subject. "Appealing to authority" is not necessarily a problem. Don't fear authorities. You're not 12.

Dude do you even know what appeal to authority means? And why that is fallacious?

Is it true that Cameroonian kids have better self control than German kids? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You have explanation right in that article

A few years ago, she and her colleagues found evidence that the marshmallow test doesn't involve just self-control. It also measures how much a child trusts his environment — how much the child trusts that the researcher is really going to return with the second marshmallow.

"What also matters is kids' expectations about whether waiting will be worth it or not," Kidd says.

Because if you think about it, if the child doesn't believe that second marshmallow is actually going to arrive, then it makes sense to eat the first one.

"We have evidence that kids take under consideration the statistical nature of what has happened in the past," Kidd says. "So for example, if a child is living in an environment where there's a lot of uncertainty and instability, then they may think that waiting isn't likely to pay off even though they have the ability to delay gratification."

Nso parents are quite strict and consistent with their discipline. So, Kidd says, perhaps this consistent parenting boosts the kids' trust in adults — that when the person in charge says they're going to bring a second treat, they likely will.

What I think is more likely is that this is a fluke result. Studies on self-control, whether Marshmallow test or real-life applications, consistently find racial difference in opposite direction.

Wany, Rieger, and Hens (2011) utilized a sample of 5,291 university students from 45 countries and gave participants a chance to choose an immediate monetary reward or a larger long term reward. This chart shows the proportion of people from different regions that chose the larger and less immediate reward. https://thealternativehypothesis.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Wait-by-Country.jpg

Africa is at the bottom, Germany at the top.

Studies that show that race mixing is a bad thing? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh goodie. We have poisoning the well, appeal to authority, appeal to popularity all in single comment. All this due to a screenshot of studies from Lynn's book. Studies that weren't even made by Lynn. Amazin'

Did White People Invent the Idea of Race? Jared Taylor demolishes a stupid and dangerous fable. by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Great video. I knew Romans and Greeks had concept of race but I didn't know they were such a racial supremacists

“There is a long-standing tradition in Greek and Latin literature of idealizing the concepts of unmixed origin, pure lineage, and autochthony.” Autochthony means being the original people in a place. “This entails explicit statements that intermarriage between peoples produces descendants of inferior quality – physical, mental, and moral – while consistent marriage between men and women belonging to the same people will result in superior beings.” “The quality of an entire people is determined by lineage and origin only, and will be stable if protected against outside contamination.” “Autochthony – being a native – assumes a physical relationship between man and land which, by definition, turns an immigrant or descendant of immigrants into an inferior being.”

Now compare this to what shitlibs say how Rome was multiracial paradise where no one cared what race you were as long as you were Roman. lol what a delusional people.

Would Africa/Blacks be better off just copying Egyptian Culture? by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Technically, Egypt IS in Africa, and the entire continent already shares much of the same geography and environment that made the original Civilization successful.

Egypt is both geographically and genetically closer to Europe than to sub-Saharan Africa. This is nowhere near analogous to Rome in Europe.

What are your thoughts on this reddit comment? by ShiversRussia2017 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is nothing Europeans have to pay for. Colonization was economically beneficial for Africans.

https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/colonialism-did-not-make-africa-poor/

A big flaw about white demographic change that can't be ignored. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Europe use to be an extremely violent continent. The Romans would invade someone, the Vikings would invade someone, Napoleon would invade someone, the British would invade someone, Hitler would invade someone. Today? Germans and French can meet at the border and hold hands peacefully. How do you explain that if tribalness is hard coded in our genes?

Tribalism is encoded in our genes but warfare isn't. Tribalism doesn't always end in slaughter. You originally said "...humans could actually work together or get over tribal differences". If you instead said that "...humans could stop waging warfare on each other" then I would agree.

Similarly, in the USA, we see more peace among the races. President Biden is White, the Vice President is a Woman, Black & Indian. It's almost been a full month since they have been in power and yet there is no Civil War demanding the races must perish violently.

This is such a strawman I won't bother to respond to it I'll just say that more diverse countries have more ethnic conflicts. Ethnic diversity correlates with ethnic conflicts at 0.81.

https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/ethnic-conflicts-their-biological-roots-in-ethnic-nepotism-tatu-vanhanen.pdf

If they can match Europe from 100 years ago, why can't they match them in the future?

Sub-saharan Africa was never as rich as Europe in the last few thousand years so I doubt it will change in foreseeable future.

Keep in mind, countries like China, South Korea or Japan were once only known as feudal states who still slaughtered each other with swords. What evidence says Africans or Vietnamese or Brazilians will never become competitive with Italy or Greece

One difference between these nations is their average IQ. China, South Korea or Japan are all above 100 whereas Africa and Brazil are 71 and 85 respectively. It's been found that the correlation between national IQ and GDP per capita is around 0.7 which means that national IQs explain 50 percent of the variance in national per capita income. There is just no way Africa will ever match European standards of living. One exception is Vietnam whose economy has been crippled by socialism. They might get richer if they adopted more free market policies.

TDS: The Plan is Unfolding on Schedule: Texas GOP Calls for Secession! by VarangianRasputin in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nate Silver also starts to seriously consider secession. Looking at the replies, shitlibs are about as supportive of it as we are. Maybe America will get partitioned sooner than we expected.

https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1337184849656942594

How do you reconcile your ethnostate dreams with the fact that half of young whites are pro-globalist or leftist by Zoomer1212 in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hispanics are becoming a red constituency and blacks are slowly shifting red as well. Southern Texas as well as Florida are actually on the verge of becoming republican.

How did you get this conclusion? Because Trump got 8% black female vote instead of 4% like in 2016? This is the red shift you have in mind? Democrat support of non-whites have not changed since 2016. There is no "red shift", Florida , Texas or let alone southern Texas won't go red. Stop with this baloney and get back to reality

From my experience YOUNG WHITES are the ones who are most "woke" and most leftists I encounter are young whites or sometimes Jews. I have NEVER met a single pro-BLM hispanic or Asian in real life, but too many my white zoomer friends are total virtue signalling idiots

Well, your experience is unsurprisingly wrong. Whites are least likely to support BLM out of all racial groups. You don't encounter leftists hispanics because you don't encounter hispanics at all most likely.

And Trump's support among 18-29 whites increased since 2016 so you are wrong on that too.

Also, you seem to think that Trump lost 5% white male vote because they turned into shitlibs? No, they didn't vote for Trump because they think he is useless. They are all either wignats or Spencer-like retards.

Does anyone even go on reddit anymore? by AltBaseGuy in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I go on r/politicalcompassmemes. There are people from all of political spectrum so it sometimes makes for a good discussion about various topics like black crime, race & IQ and history. You can regularly find N-chains and DESPITE memes in comment sections. People don't make a big deal about auth-right racism so naturally the most insane and sensitive shitlibs filtered themselves out. I just think it degraded in the last months due to constantly appearing on r/all and getting flooded by average redditors. They so-so manage to assimilate but the quality of discourse there is incredibly low IQ sometimes. If you go to any comment section you will find just people replying "based" to everything. It is weird mix of 4chan lingo and general reddit faggotry.

There is also r/loveforlandlords which is just anti-chapo shitposting sub where we larp as landlords.

Should America balkanize by race? by [deleted] in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He at least wanted to keep America white

Critique of the alt-right and why you must accept “blackpills” by marc_gee in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The biggest blackpill we must accept is that whites are abject cucks, and their cuckedness is the primary cause of our erasure.

Correction, it is only secondary cause. The primary cause are jews pushing anti-white narratives in our societies whether that being Boas and Gould lying about existence of race, Frankfurt School pushing the notion that white ethnocentrism is psychopathology. All these being amplified by the media. The high white individualism, or cuckedness as you called it, only explains why whites are more susceptible to these narratives. But not why they exist in the first place.

Many people excuse whites and give them extraordinary leeway. You blame jews, yet jews didn't prevent you from waking up.

This is just idiotic. Waking up from what? Perhaps from all those jewish narratives? They first indoctrinate your country but since they don' prevent you to resist the indoctrination they dindu nuffin? Seems like they deserve the blame to me. And they are in fact preventing whites from "waking up" by banning and censoring all pro white voices on the internet.

Someone might think that in the 1960's the white masses didn't accept diversity and yet they still failed, therefore waking the masses won't work. But many northerners did accept diversity (in 1956 49% of Americans — 61% of Northerners and 15% of Southerners — believed that Whites and Blacks should attend the same schools.

Not in 1960s but earlier it was indeed true. In 1942, only 30% of whites approved of school integration and in 1950 it was 41% [1]. But this doesn't really matter. They say they approve of integration but in real world, they still seek out white schools for their kids.

In a study to be published in Ethnic and Racial Studies, Emerson and Sikkink cite earlier work on school choice in Philadelphia, where race was found to be a factor in Whites’ decisions about the quality of a school. Unlike Blacks, who judged schools on factors like graduation rates and students’ test scores, Whites initially eliminated any schools with a majority of Black students before considering factors such as graduation rates.

https://diverseeducation.com/article/6098/

Same pattern is found in Sweden.

Research shows that the tipping point for that flight to occur is very low: after 4% of non-European immigrants the native Swedes start to move out. This is arguably an even worse segregation problem than in the US. At the same time, there is a fascinating study that shows that if you ask the average Swede if it is important to live in a multicultural neighborhood most of them say yes. Actually, the ones who moved away from those neighborhoods are even more likely to respond positively.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sweden-brink-interview-dr-tino-sanandaji-erico-matias-tavares

Whites only like the idea of diversity and integration as concepts but they certainly don't act like it.

Many people here think historical examples of revolutions apply to current times but they don't. Small percentages of people successfully taking control of governments are the rare exceptions, not the rule. Those historical examples didn't have 24-hour anti-white television and social media to contend with. They didn't have a morality like anti-racism that turned leaders and countrymen against their own race. They also didn't have the rampant racial diversity of modern white countries.

I agree. Hoping to retake the government is naive. The only option we have at this point is partition of US into ethnostates.

Heterosis: A Benefit of Miscegenation by Soylent in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

From the Lewis (2010) study:

Twenty white psychology students rated each face on its attractiveness on a 9-point scale (5 being of average attractiveness).

The sample size of people judging attentiveness was too small and too unrepresentative. So much for his "wider test". Moreover, according to Figure 1 black men are rated as more attractive than white men and white women are rated the same as black women. When you look at the data from any dating website with sample size of hundreds of thousands, blacks are rated as much less attractive than white people. Again indicating either the unrepresentativeness of the sample or that the college kids were trying to come off as "non-racist" so they lied about about their opinions. Or the professor told them, directly or indirectly, what results he seeks to find and they cooperated. Wouldn't be first time this happened.

What about a win community? by Ethnocrat in debatealtright

[–]FoxySDT 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We should be focusing to congregate on one place only . So far, that place seems to be saidit so let's stick with it. Being dispersed all over would do more harm than good.