Generally speaking, I am fairly skeptical of democracy is all that good at producing outcomes given its kind of schizophrenic nature of flipping your vote for the other side when you're mad at the guy you voted for. It kind of makes people never commit to an actual direction with where they want to take their country. But I am not entirely convinced that we should get rid of it and basically throw the baby with the bath water. It is great to have a certain control over where your country can go but at the same time democracy often gives power to people who are too clueless and gullible that they would throw the country in a bad direction and then ask themselves why they are facing all kinds of shitty policies that they themselves have voted for. I would say a significant increase in the standards in qualification for who can and can't participate in it is warranted. I would say being employed, having a basic knowledge of economics and civics, being married, minimum 5 years of working to get some experience from the real world. I'd say that if we got these kinds of standards (regardless of whether or not it's realistic), we would have better outcomes for a white population. Taking away women's right to vote might not be all that necessary tbh. Would be hell to actually make this happen. I rather increase the qualifications other than "hurr durr, yoU'rE 18 oR OlDer, yOu CaN vOtE". That would give us better outcomes without the shitstorm produced from taking women's voting rights away. Just my more pragmatic approach to what we should do.