DeepCrimsonPill

The problem here is that you're still trying to put things under "radical centrism" instead of fully accepting the truth of far right philosophy.

If genes really predict from birth to death how successful people can be, how does personal accountability exist?

Personal accountability comes in when people do not use the room they've been given by their genes to reach their full potential or actively sabotage the system that brings order in the first place. I believe that, because of predeterminism, we should have a better understanding of those who are less gifted than us, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't act to control their negative behaviors.

There's a myriad of scenarios to play with but ultimately, accepting IQ science, especially Racial or Gender based ones, seems to support a Dystopia scenario where Human beings are treated like animals, and the only explanations for this can come from a "superior" group who believes they know what is best for people.

Firstly, humans are animals. Secondly, "dystopia" is an accusation levied to any radical system that isn't afraid to use power. I'd support systems found in 1984 or Brave New World, because if you don't take the reigns of power, a more dominant group will. The real question you should be asking is why shouldn't people who have proven themselves as superior impose their will onto others? Because we'd see fewer lower quality people with less influence?

Would you terminate your newborn child if science determined he will be born below 100 IQ or has a 50% chance of being a rapist?

Yes. r/Christianity is that away. <--- We're an explicitly eugenic movement, and it would be a crime to force mothers to bear the burden of incompetent progeny for the rest of their lives. You can see European countries completely exterminating Downs Syndrome kids - and every disability places them somewhere on the scale of desirability.

What if science found you are carrying genes right now that 99% make you a terrorist? Do you voluntarily imprison or kill yourself for the good of public safety, even if you lead a complete life of non-violence?

The State should eliminate such a person. But it isn't up to the individual to cuck himself for the good of others. We consider conflict to be natural and inevitable.

It's easy to see how someone can abuse this science to disenfranchise or enslave entire groups, because it assumes automatic superiority exists at birth, and that none of the "lesser" races are allowed to change their fate. And history has shown how these atrocities were carried out.

All of human history has been a war between the superior and the inferior. You seem to lack a cohesive argument for the protection of these groups other than it would be very, very, very mean. However, these lesser races are allowed to change their fate - but it won't be at the voting booth, but the battlefield. If you want a nation to sacrifice power, you'll need to do it by force.

Despite the fact, Africans, or South Americans or Middle Easterners never voted to be oppressed, yet they are still called dumb or seen as hopeless when they try to fix their own nations.

You have no evidence to suggest these people would have amazing nations if it weren't for the intervention of Western nations. In fact, colonization is correlated with higher wealth. Just look at Ethiopia. Better success than other African nations during ancient times, but because they weren't colonized, they became notorious as a starving nation. And while I'm against much of our interventions, I do not regret superior people having advantage over the inferior. Letting go of their reigns will just hand them over to the Chinamen.

You're biggest problem is not understanding the nature and importance of power. Morality only comes in relation to a person's use to the State and in its ability to maintain it. Enemies are only afforded little since they are against the State. If you do not acknowledge power politics, you will lose it until you cannot maintain anything at all. Power is something to be strived for, right next to stability, with mercy carefully delivered on our own terms.