CreditKnifeMan

Everyone deserves the same rights. Individual rights.

Individual rights should necessarily have negative obligations; no action is required by others for another person's rights.
The individual can do as they please; provided their action does no harm to others.

Western values are predicated on individual rights with negative obligations.

Negative obligations are also consistent with natural law.

Conversely, totalitarian societies often impose "rights" with positive obligations.

An obvious and relevant example of a positive obligations is forcing another person to use specific pronouns, etc.

It is amoral to force a subjective obligation upon one person for the benefit of another.

It's easy to see how the concept of positive obligations can get out of control.

For example safety: How safe is safe enough?

It's understandable that certain requirements should exist for manufacturers, where some measure of safety should be designed into a product/process.

Deadly amusement park rides should not be allowed, etc.

However, the banning of firearms is a positive obligation law. Amoral.
Someone is denied the natural law right to self defence, because someone else is frightened by the things they see on TV, etc.

The owner of the firearm has a responsibility to safely own self defense property, and will be held liable in negligent circumstances.

Cars are inherently unsafe. Should cars have a 1 ft thick bumper cushion on the front to reduce injury?

Should the cushion be thicker??? 2 ft?
5 ft?

Where does a positive obligation to the safety of others end??? It's impossible to achieve.

The answer is personal liability consequences in a society of negative-obligation individual rights.

This ensures individual rights, and individual responsibility.
Easily defined equal rights.

Edit:.

If an informed adult wants to chop off their parts, then that's their right.

No one has an obligation to treat them in any particular way.

Imposing radical cultural views on children should be abolished. Children who are forced into the "education" system are not consenting adults.
They are prisoners of political/economic circumstances.

Children can look into these issues when they are adults, and decide for themselves.