Redditors vs Predditors, by former Reddit mod @womenopausal. We complained to the Reddit Admins, but they never did anything helpful. In fact, they ignored r/GenderCritical almost entirely - right up to the point when they banned us without warning or justification.

Comatoast

With buck teeth like that, he could eat corn on the cob through a picket fence.

I died.

Comatoast

I saw the conversation between the two of them and was under the impression that Bob left on her own after getting pissed, and Mag7 just kinda remarking with a general "Don't let the door hit ya" sort of comment.

I know she reposted some of the content, and that can be seen as being antagonistic, but she was genuinely pissed about some of the topics of conversation that the Roman numerals crew posted being banned because of wanting to discuss it. I don't think she's a shill, she's just hot headed and pissy about things. I don't see the account creation or anything that you mention, wouldn't know about it outside of your mention, so I'm not sure what's going on there.

Comatoast

I wouldn't refer to the GC crowd as sexual degenerates by any stretch. They criticize gender roles (in the name), and are staunch protectors of biological sex for a number of reasons. My understanding is that it's imperative to allow children to grow into adulthood unmarred by predatory caregivers and the medical community that would attempt to convince the child that they're trans, to allow boys to have the same emotional processes as girls (to cry or be emotional without being seen as "weak or feminine", allow women and girls to be tomboys or "butch" without being convinced that they're actually men, to keep men's crimes as men's crimes in documentation (instead of it being recorded under female crime statistics and fucking up/skewing numbers heavily), etc. and so on. There are some very well spoken men and women in the GC communities here on Saidit. Sexual degenerates though? From what I've seen they're generally anti-porn, and many that I've interacted with would even be seen as more prudish by other feminists. There are a lot of lesbians, but I don't really consider lesbianism degenerate, especially compared to other sexual orientations (even straight folks honestly. Sometimes heterosexuals are just.. gross and hypersexual-- think coomerism).

Comatoast

Male puberty is just as natural as female puberty, and shame on you for suggesting otherwise.

Comatoast

I mean, I'm not addicted to alcohol (far from it), and somewhat against pornography and enjoy talking to Bob. I enjoy following your material and exchanges as well. She's aggressive, but the two of you just have it out for one another-- despite whoever started what. Y'all just don't need to mention or interact with one another at all. Come on though, you can have conversations with people and consider them to be friends without having to respect ways that they behave under conditions outside of your control and be damned to behave similarly.

The last month has been an descent into some crazy shit over s/all, just in general with a ton of folks. Maybe it's always been going on and I didn't see it before, but I don't think so.

Comatoast

Suggested reading material in English?

And why not refer to it as r/radicalillumination? Or r/radicalPrometheism?

Comatoast

You'll understand that I don't feel safe clicking on links, as much as I would like to have further context. If you can spell out links, that would be appreciated, if you're not willing--that is fine too.

Why would you consider your group to be associated with radical satanism if it's more associated with mythological underpinnings of leftism?

Comatoast

And what are the primary sects of satanism that r/radicalsatanism deals in?

Comatoast

Was it banned on Reddit, or does it continue to be active (r/radicalsatanism)? Why did you leave VOAT?

Comatoast

Big, BIG question here: Did you do this on Reddit (if you were on Reddit)? Did you do this on other platforms? Why is this platform such an ideal target for you? Why do you feel more wronged here than on other platforms that have hypothetically removed your subs?

Comatoast

That's a lie. Americans are absolutely brainwashed on this though, because it's been touted as being beneficial and "cleaner" to have male children circumcised by the medical establishment here, or at least used to be. This is a subject that gets confused looks from even the men here that aren't educated on exactly what foreskin is and why it shouldn't be removed. I've even had a guy bring up his friend's constant yeast infections passed back and forth between their girlfriend. Something that could be easily resolved by wearing a fucking condom and keeping antifungal medication all over the tissue, and the gf actually keeping hers treated with diflucan/topical meds. I also explained how if having foreskin wasn't clean, then it would be common practice in Europe to remove it-- but it's not. It's beneficial in sex, for women too, helping to actually keep lubrication in there.

Sadly, a lot of adults here in the states just think that it's normal. You have to find openings that aren't awkward and come to them with factual information, informing that it's an unnecessary and outdated religious practice. There's also the underlying problem that medical doctors end up treating foreskin tightening with steroid creams. Steroid-based creams actually thin tissue and leave it susceptible to tearing, and provide temporary relief at best-- but it's still pushed. Then you have someone damn near begging for circumcision just to relieve them of the issue.

Comatoast

I'm of firm belief that satire can be subjective. I'm also a believer in our abilities to control our own misery, at least to some small degree, and that includes things that we choose to become upset by and how much power we give others to cause us psychological torment.

I'll choose laughter, thanks.

Comatoast

Muppets need sex too.

Comatoast

This is advice from a medicated, daydreaming, innattentive serial procrastinator:

Collegeruled spiralbound notebooks, the three thick ones--get one for each class. Since you're hitting the end of the semester, you could probably deal with the regular ones.

Whether it's Zoom lectures or just pre-recorded bullshit, pretend you're on camera while you're watching it. You're obviously lying to yourself, but dismiss that. Now you're being held accountable, and have to at least look like you're paying attention (even if you're hyperfocused on the shape of a suddenly very interesting speck of dust on your computer screen).

Write notes. Just write them. It fucking sucks, but it's imperative. I have damn near novels worth of notes that I've taken. Mix it up with different pens of different colors, and attempt to make it exciting.. because it's not exciting. I have a thing with office supplies though that might not translate over for other people. Draw things you need to understand and label them with them, do whatever. If you have instruction materials that are pausible, take advantage of that. If all of your shit is mostly reading chapters, I'm sorry from the bottom of my heart. I've thrown myself around in a tantrum of despair over this because of how soul destroyingly boring it is (note: do not let others see you do this. Throw your grown ass adult boredom hissy alone and never admit to it. It's yours alone to treasure).

Comatoast

Thank you for taking the time to respond.

Comatoast

Saidit: the place where memes and obvious satire and/or humor is deconstructed to the point of autistic analysis with all humor removed in the comments.

High five y'all, it's just another Tuesday.

Comatoast

I'm having trouble understanding what you mean, because you used a completely unrelated example. So what is the promotion of disinformation within the article here that is meant to be a joke using qualities observed above many women (shamefully, self included-- except decorative pillows are stupid on the bed unless you actually make yours/or want it to look nice, and lack utility even then). Is it disinfo to poke fun at someone or to laugh with someone trying to poke fun at you?

Comatoast

Are you having a hard time figuring out a study structure with it? Or just not feeling motivated because of how it's laid out?

Comatoast

I was referring to you as goofy, but I'll hear you out. How is the satire being used, and why would I appreciate that it's not goofy?

Comatoast

I'll go through there and check it out. There seems to be a debate on whether it's as good as bovine bones there.

Thank you!

Comatoast

Not yet. Give me about ten years for this gene variant to wipe everything out in there, and I'm sure I'll be back.

Comatoast

Did I read something wrong?

Comatoast

It's satire news, you goof.

Comatoast

Surely this is sati-

Huffington Post

Of course. Nothing interesting involving the goetia, no lovecraftian horrors, no interesting history-- just selfishness and ye magic(k)al buttsex.

"The Satanic Temple hopes to appear before the Supreme Court in a case challenging a Missouri abortion law that requires those seeking to terminate their pregnancy to first receive materials asserting that their abortion would end the life of a separate, unique person. The temple argues that these materials violate the deeply held religious beliefs of one of its members regarding bodily autonomy and scientifically reasonable personal choice. "

Was this the group insisting on abortion needing to be legal on a religious basis so that they could use them for sacrifice, or am I remembering a cliche movie?

Comatoast

A heartfelt "thank you" and a psychic handshake or a high five, your choosing.

Comatoast