Something of a Hollywood Insider With Peripheral Knowledge of DEEPLY CLASSIFIED MATERIAL. Please, AMA!!
1 day ago by BeaconOfAnonDim to /s/conspiracy from self.conspiracy
Non-linear propaganda in geopolitics ; so Bolton wanted regime change but he didn't, so, Trump wanted Regime change, but he doesn't? by Jesus in conspiracy
[–]BeaconOfAnonDim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 days ago (0 children)
by 'future reality of war' you mean asymmetric warfare and the propaganda state? are you saying they deliberately confuse the audience to disarm their sensibilities?
(((THEY))) Zionists bashed Trump so the people would believe he is against the system. It worked. The real goal for world dominance is the building of the 3rd temple.This plan is thousands of years old and as far as I can tell the talmudic rabbis run the show and write the script. by Jesus in conspiracy
All the evidence is there to make a compelling story and expose the Mockingbird media using its own material. In the case of 9-11, there isn't a single video that adequately underscores the links between the pop-culture references and the event itself, not in a way that could cross ideological boundaries at least - but a Hannah Arendt of our time could do the trick in bridging that gap. Properly displaying and making of sense of these instances concisely would take a little effort but I think it would be a fascinating project that could be explored from a multitude of angles. Hearing trained psychologists speak to these similarities and follow their implications through might be interesting. Historians of propaganda could weigh in with a global perspective and draw that information out over decades with examples that are not so sensitive to domestic viewers. Former intelligence agents, or even foreign intelligence agents, could offer their unique perspectives and elevated levels of assurity... just think of what Yuri Besmenov could have said and how his expertise is immediately undeniable. And why not theologians, anthropologists, and conspiracy theorists too? Maybe a whole society can be drawn into this conversation. Maybe we can find the cream of the crop in the process if we just start.
We still live in a world of rules and law and relative stability. Maybe if we stand back and approach this like curious budding academics we can turn conspiracy into modern research where it rightfully belongs. Eventually we should be releasing charts and diagrams, and providing historical accounts of psy-ops with an heir of authority on the subject. We should have classifications of propaganda and sub groups within them to break these tactics down to the most principle components. We should start arranging the data and classifying it so that its understandable and easier to detect to the lay man. We should be providing very good drafts of new research to readers and asking for their advice, assistance, and general acceptance. We should be providing the kind of information that is revered eons from now because it was the first to break the veil to the masses; because if you think propaganda is a thing decades in the future, you're mistaken. Eventually the curtain falls and its up to us to guide that transition so we can adequately prepare ourselves for a new kind of society that's required for the time. Making sense of the world as it is right now needs to be the foundation for the road ahead otherwise people will go in blind and at the behest of the state. It will not be pretty either. Letting this moment slip into the hands of the propagandists could spoil humanity in ways never before witnessed and we're seeing it become blatantly obvious in places like country and rap music, pornography, academia, and the news. After that garbage runs its course on a generation or two, the next is weakened in a way that's possibly irreparably to levels we would currently consider normal. Taking on algorithms and the civil establishment is a walk in the park compared to what future generations will endure if this is left unabated.
So if there are more researched fellows out there who are earnest about what they do, we should definitely be joining forces. A person or group needs to be attributed to this game of hard-ball. It needs a few supporting spokespeople and assistants that are passionate and curious and they should be somewhat public. With savoy technical assistance it could be the story for the age. That, or we stay complacent with business as usual.
I'm serious about this. We could be writing the most interesting story of our time, if nothing else, the most imaginative and compelling. It could start a chain reaction of cascading events that get people thinking again. Its certainly bold and with proper tutelage it can be principled too. If you're speaking the truth as you see and believe it, I would certainly like to have you on board and maybe we can do what has never been done - educate the masses.
.... .... .... .... ....
Hey, back in late December and early January there was a guy steadily releasing nuclear scenarios for a few cities in California. It could have been a moderately well-crafted hoax for all I know, but the timing of it was interesting and the material was relatively robust compared to the kinds of prognostications that are typically offered. If I'm not mistaken, it was primarily focused on San Jose in the 2030s. What made it interesting was the cited choice for that location - it had something to do with it having limited liability in manufacturing capabilities compared to other cities, or something along those lines. Very interesting material. Its logic behind it was the most interesting part to be learned from.
[–]BeaconOfAnonDim 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 6 days ago (0 children)
If you see through his game, and understand it is not entirely his own, then what's from stopping us from relegating his importance to something secondary and take on the primary interests which are the true controllers and ourselves. If life stopped being a psy-op maybe we could get to something real again. Maybe we could start introducing the kind of material that makes people look inside themselves.
I think the way to do that is to simply break the propaganda machine. Smash that apparatus into a million pieces, scatter it to the wind. Make it never work again. As for Trump and the NWO, if they are following the most known script of all time (a very interpretive one too) then it should be easy to figure out where they go with it and why. Subversion should be easy, as far as these things go.
You know how engaging this stuff is. It'll get support. You know how real it is, so let's make a project out of it. Can the script be flipped, or are we just commenting on the inevitable?
By the way, the thing with Trump and the media has little to do with shifting allegiances back to center politics as it does with creating a non-linear narrative where its impossible to draw conclusions about basic realities, right or left. He aims to stupefy and enrage, then he makes a swift exit. This is meant to take the air out of the room, not to encourage factional reporting. At least that's how I perceive it. I certainly know that carefully guided dialog is kryptonite to this tactic and both sides are susceptible. Working people that are generally unaware of this become elated when its made evident. Successful comedians make short work of this song and dance regularly.
Welcoming myself to SaidIt with an AMA that I did a few weeks back on Reddit. 93 comments and lots of candid info. This is where Hollywood gets dismantled and the Deep State comes under review. Original and new content that YOU can help make sense of! by BeaconOfAnonDim in conspiracy
[–]BeaconOfAnonDim[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 6 days ago (0 children)
It seems obvious who did it and who knew about it from the inside. And it should intimidate me more than it bothers, but it hardly does even that at this point. I want to take this subject on in a principled way and I want to start the work now with people that are passionate and talented. We could be developing more intriguing and engaging conspiracy theory that draws out broader plans. We could be making a more compelling case for taking this information seriously, then position that knowledge in the public as a catalyst for thinking and change rather than offering the bits and pieces that point to conspiracy but teach us nothing about its backstage developments, how to confront these radical displays of brutishness, or how to move forward with all this in a practical way. Ultimately, this information is a unique piece of our history and the closest most will ever hear or see of the true motivations of the elite and how they portray them to the world. Making sense of predictive programming potentially unlocks future calamities before they develop. In the case of 9-11, these could have been warning signs rather than taunts. For the rest of the narratives that are still in limbo, what we do now could have historical consequence depending on if we choose to take them seriously or not. I tend to think that The Feshman makes clear what they're next sets of plans are and how they'll develop. If social order is the name of the game and 9-11 was only the opening act, it would seem to me that its either time to run or intellectually hunker down.
The neocons may not care about exposure but their lackeys in office sure do. I bet that is doubly true of the red carpet crowds that don't have the immediate saving graces of executive privilege, though they probably feel quite secure in the grand scheme of things all the same. In two of the examples you provide there is a clear uncomfort when public figures (comic con writers and bush at the end of the 9-11 compilation video) are pressed on having inside knowledge. This may be as close to justice as things have gone so far, but lets not lose sight of the fact that this open challenging has a staggering effect, so that should let us know just how sensitive these matters can be and how quickly matters could devolve - and how incompetent these figureheads can be when put under pressure. There is good reason to continue these inquiries, as I see it, and we're bringing more to the table with a few decades of research under our wings
More to the subject of the video, while some of the examples of predictive programming could be seen as being a little flimsy, there are others that are clear as day and foretold decades in advance and enough of them to show a concerted and sustained effort. This may not be so surprising seeing that much of the material comes from a small list of executives overseeing the works. Is it reasonable to assume they're privy to other operations of similar scale that could be loosely related, if not essential to broader plans of equal scope? I'll give you a for-instance - in the 1990 film The Freshman there are three clear 9-11 references...
...but that is the lower limit of what they are predicting in the film. In fact, as I see it, every line has a dual meaning that speaks more to a manufactured end times or some kind of monumental transitioning of society than just a few smatterings of insider knowledge on 9-11, not to discount its importance in the transition. Maybe in a few years time, with the benefit of hindsight, as painful as it may be, we'll begin to see a whole other narrative come to light that speaks to prophecies written long before the advent of modern cinema. Maybe we'll see warnings and prognostications that should by all accounts be avoided by an aware citizenry on the defensive. You clearly see a lot. Do you have an idea of what is going on in a broader sense, or maybe a even a specific one? Do you have any interest in seeing this knowledge advance and take on greater meaning than showing mere instances of insider knowledge without the context that underscores its true importance? Would you be interested in weaving this information into the narrative of our time, from a people's perspective?
I've got the goods and with a team we can go further together than any of us could do by ourselves.
Think about it and reach out.
treesandseeds at protonmail dot com
I'm Mid-Atlantic with a nice working space, at the moment.
[–]BeaconOfAnonDim[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 7 days ago (0 children)
At what point do either appear culpable? Breaking Bad is in a league of its own for how vile it is, if people only knew.
[–]BeaconOfAnonDim[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 7 days ago (0 children)
Thank you very much for this response.
In three little sentences you say so much.
I took the time to look up the trailer for Medusa Torch, and there it was in two and a half minutes, clear as day. Seeing Richard Burtton of 1984 infamy as a lead role was no surprise.
I then looked up Arnon and even his own wikipedia page labels him an intelligence operative. This took thirty seconds. Scanning his list of 140 associated movies took thirty seconds more. And there were so many other scandalous titles.
I'm anticipating another blockbuster find with the comic con convention.
So why is this good information not circulated more readily or showcased clearly and comprehensively on one site that can be referenced? How can such rich and compelling content be so likely to be passed over? I'm thankful for the contribution but had I not made the small effort to corroborate what you wrote I would have missed so much and I think this is a more than likely scenario for many readers. How do we spread the gospel more effectively?
And is it ok to prognosticate on events that have been featured but yet to unfold, or will we just go to the loony-bin?
(Hey, I want to work in this field and have got the goods. Wanna join forces and make a career? PM me.)
[–]BeaconOfAnonDim[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 9 days ago (0 children)
He's American and clearly in on it.
[–]BeaconOfAnonDim[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 10 days ago (0 children)
I'm looking froward to El Camino, the new hit spin-off of AMC's Breaking Bad but will have to hold judgement until its out. Vince Gilligan has been a state propagandist for his career, most notably for his Lone Gunman pilot episode that happened to precisely foretell 9-11 and even give the motivations as to why. Breaking Bad is little different except it glorifies a real agent - which is a major point that I was trying to get across with the AMA I linked to. You should give it a read and see if it peaks your curiosity.
Its not an interest of mine past knowing that its widely perceived as the driving force behind foreign policy and even some domestic affairs. But the term is loaded and I don't see it as a valuable way of looking into influence, which is what you're talking about, I hope.
Separate from organized interest is the idea that some wacko religious fundamentalists are working deep within the state and I think that is horribly messed up. Mormons are thought to be particularly useful for some deep state positions for their culture's psychological and hierarchical makeup and that seems to show that some unique personality types are specifically sought within the power structure. Until these heathens in the deep state show some virtue I don't trust them or their purposes and find it especially troubling when they invoke divine right.
Power to the people.
You want to talk about propaganda?
Welcoming myself to SaidIt with an AMA that I did a few weeks back on Reddit. 93 comments and lots of candid info. This is where Hollywood gets dismantled and the Deep State comes under review. Original and new content that YOU can help make sense of!
10 days ago by BeaconOfAnonDim to /s/conspiracy from self.conspiracy