Wall Street Wants Dems to Nominate Anyone But Sanders, Warren, or Gabbard by Orangutan in politics

[–]34679 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've always voted 3rd party for president (many elections). I would vote for Gabbard, but not the other two.

Is it too late to fend off the invasion of SaidIt by revolutionary Communists and their Fascist allies? If not, what can be done? by sawboss in AskSaidIt

[–]34679 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I love my neighbors. Even the ones with different ideas and beliefs. You can too, love is easier than hate.

Is it too late to fend off the invasion of SaidIt by revolutionary Communists and their Fascist allies? If not, what can be done? by sawboss in AskSaidIt

[–]34679 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Extremists from both sides can fuck right off.

NEW POLL: Bernie Sanders now has the single largest lead against Trump of any 2020 Democrat by Orangutan in politics

[–]34679 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

See:

Ron Paul & RNC 2008, 2012

Bernie Sanders & DNC 2016

[Discussion] Premarital sex is bad and celibacy should be celebrated by [deleted] in CriticalThoughts

[–]34679 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How does two responsible adults smoking methamphetamine privately in their free time have to do with you?

It doesn't.

What effect could that possibly have on your life?

None. If they then to decide to steal, that's an entirely different act that is rightfully illegal, because stealing requires a victim.

Marriage is a construct our society was built around, and because of that has proven to be a valuable.

Since you like strawmen, so was slavery. How valuable do you consider it to be?

Downfall of western civilization

The hallmark of western civilization is personal freedom. Freedom to say what you want, worship how you want, and for adults to fuck how we want. Treating parts of personal freedom ala carte because you don't like what someone else does has proven to be destructive.

[Discussion] Premarital sex is bad and celibacy should be celebrated by [deleted] in CriticalThoughts

[–]34679 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

There can be nothing more natural than sexual reproduction. Marriage, on the other hand, is a modern, man made prison built for control. Two people are perfectly capable of raising children without ever even being aware of the concept of marriage.

And sexual deviancy? In what way does the private sexual relations of others impact your life negatively? I'd say it's likely that a lack of tolerance would have a greater negative impact on a person's life.

Has hating sluts improved your life in any way?

Fossil of 'real-life Loch Ness Monster' found in Antarctica by magnora7 in science

[–]34679 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Daily Mail is a tabloid, not a reliable news source.

Is Tulsi Gabbard Courting Wall Street? ~ Status Coup by JasonCarswell in ElectionsUSA2020

[–]34679 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No.

Charles Lindbergh warns of US entry into World War II by 34679 in conspiracy

[–]34679[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What's antisemitic about it?

The OnA refugees could pose an issue to the principles of Saidit by SpeakEasy in SaidIt

[–]34679 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Just think of it as a grown up table and a kids table. You can sit with the grown ups when you start acting like one.

This is what happens when you let children create as many accounts as they want from the same IP. Saidit needs moderation now or it is dead. by 34679 in SaidIt

[–]34679[S] 9 insightful - 7 fun9 insightful - 6 fun10 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

Saiditor for 18 hours

First post in OpieandAnthony.

Hi, FatsMcWhatley

This is what happens when you let children create as many accounts as they want from the same IP. Saidit needs moderation now or it is dead. by 34679 in SaidIt

[–]34679[S] 12 insightful - 15 fun12 insightful - 14 fun13 insightful - 15 fun -  (0 children)

I'm talking about you. Don't you have anything better to do than create accounts on saidit to spam your bullshit? Or are you really spez, on a mission to turn people away from your competition?

Retail Apocalypse Is Heating Up in 2019. Here Are the Major Stores Currently on Deathwatch by dcjogger in news

[–]34679 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hey, look at all the jobs Amazon is creating with their tax-free fulfillment centers!

Joe Rogan Experience #1170 - Tulsi Gabbard by 34679 in videos

[–]34679[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks

PSA: We all fell for an obvious lie. by wizzwizz4 in SaidIt

[–]34679 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

  1. Or, more likely, OP used the snipping tool to grab the part he was most outraged by because the full text wouldn't fit with the title. Go ahead and pull it up. Unless you're running 4K, it's not fitting on your screen.

  2. See 1. OP took a snip of that part of the law, and combined it with the header showing the name of the law, resolution number, sponsor, committee, etc. In other words, context that enables anyone to find the whole law and read it themselves.

Anti-Semetic Posts by Work2Death in SaidIt

[–]34679 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The only person who has control over being offended is the person offended. Beyond being polite as often as possible, I don't give a shit what anyone else decides to be offended by.

PSA: We all fell for an obvious lie. by wizzwizz4 in SaidIt

[–]34679 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

OP posted the part of the law he was outraged by, and shared it as evidence of Jewish influence over US legislation. How was it misrepresented? What lie did the OP tell?

PSA: We all fell for an obvious lie. by wizzwizz4 in SaidIt

[–]34679 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

people like you and OP insinuating that they're evil warmongers who rule the world behind the scenes

I see. You just make shit up and attribute it to others as you go along, just like you did with the OP's post.

Anti-Semetic Posts by Work2Death in SaidIt

[–]34679 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The fuck is going on?

People don't like their governments being overly influenced by foreign lobbies, and Jews often mistake that for anti-semetism.

PSA: We all fell for an obvious lie. by wizzwizz4 in SaidIt

[–]34679 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fallen for what? It's an example of Jewish influence over US legislation, which supports the OP's claim.

PSA: We all fell for an obvious lie. by wizzwizz4 in SaidIt

[–]34679 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

if you take a section of something and say it's the entire thing

Yeah, but that didn't happen. Where did the post say that was the entire law? OP picked the part that was most disturbing to them, highlighted it and shared it. The additional context doesn't take away from the post, IMO. Our legislature has far more pressing issues than worring about Jewish persecution in Europe. The fact that they're spending their time writing, debating, and passing stuff like this supports the OP's position that Jews have much influence over the US government, and nobody has posted anything to counter that specific argument.

PSA: We all fell for an obvious lie. by wizzwizz4 in SaidIt

[–]34679 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The screenshot showed a portion of the text, not cherry-picked pieces put together.

PSA: We all fell for an obvious lie. by wizzwizz4 in SaidIt

[–]34679 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In other words, what was represented as a new law by the US Congress was, in fact, merely a definition given by the EUMC (quoted in an act requiring an increase in reporting stuff going on in Europe).

When congress passes legislation and the president signs it, it is the law. To suggest it isn't.. that would be lying.

Full text of the Law:

AT THE SECOND SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

To require continued and enhanced annual reporting to Congress in the Annual Report on International Religious Freedom on anti-Semitic incidents in Europe, the safety and security of European Jewish communities, and the efforts of the United States to partner with European governments, the European Union, and civil society groups, to combat anti-Semitism, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. Short title.

This Act may be cited as the “Combating European Anti-Semitism Act of 2017”.

SEC. 2. Findings.

Congress finds the following:

(1) During the past decade, there has been a steady increase in anti-Semitic incidents in Europe, resulting in European Jews being the targets of physical and verbal harassment and even lethal terrorist attacks, all of which has eroded personal and communal security and the quality of daily Jewish life.

(2) According to reporting by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), between 2005 and 2014, anti-Semitic incidents increased in France from 508 to 851; in Germany from 60 to 173; in Belgium from 58 to 130; in Italy from 49 to 86; and in the United Kingdom from 459 to 1,168.

(3) Anti-Zionism has at times devolved into anti-Semitic attacks, prompting condemnation from many European leaders, including French Prime Minister Manuel Valls, British Prime Minister David Cameron, and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

(4) Since 2010, the Department of State has adhered to the working definition of Anti-Semitism by the European Monitoring Center on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC). Some contemporary examples of anti-Semitism include the following:

(A) Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews (often in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion).

(B) Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such, or the power of Jews as a collective, especially, but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government, or other societal institutions.

(C) Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, the State of Israel, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.

(D) Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

(E) Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interest of their own countries.

(5) On October 16, 2004, the President signed into law the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004. This law provides the legal foundation for a reporting requirement provided by the Department of State annually on anti-Semitism around the world.

(6) In November 2015, the House of Representatives passed H. Res. 354 by a vote of 418–0, urging the Secretary of State to continue robust United States reporting on anti-Semitism by the Department of State and the Special Envoy to Combat and Monitor Anti-Semitism.

(7) In 2016, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), comprised of 31 member countries, adopted a working definition of anti-Semitism which stated: “Anti-Semitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”.

(8) The IHRA further clarified that manifestations of anti-Semitism might also target the State of Israel, conceived of as a Jewish collectivity. Anti-Semitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong”. It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms, and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.

SEC. 3. Sense of Congress.

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) it is in the national interest of the United States to combat anti-Semitism at home and abroad;

(2) anti-Semitism is a challenge to the basic principles of tolerance, pluralism, and democracy, and the shared values that bind Americans and Europeans together;

(3) there is an urgent need to ensure the safety and security of European Jewish communities, including synagogues, schools, cemeteries, and other institutions;

(4) the United States should continue to emphasize the importance of combating anti-Semitism in multilateral bodies, including the United Nations, European Union institutions, and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe;

(5) the Department of State should continue to thoroughly document acts of anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incitement that occur around the world, and should continue to encourage other countries to do the same, and share their findings; and

(6) the Department of State should continue to work to encourage adoption by national government institutions and multilateral institutions of a working definition of anti-Semitism similar to the one adopted in the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance context.

SEC. 4. Annual reporting on the state of anti-Semitism in Europe.

Paragraph (1) of section 102(b) of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6412) is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

“(G) ANTI-SEMITISM IN EUROPE.—In addition to the information required under clause (vii) of subparagraph (A), with respect to each European country in which verbal or physical threats or attacks are particularly significant against Jewish persons, places of worship, schools, cemeteries, and other religious institutions, a description of—

“(i) the security challenges and needs of European Jewish communities and European law enforcement agencies in such countries to better protect such communities;

“(ii) to the extent practicable, the efforts of the United States Government over the reporting period to partner with European law enforcement agencies and civil society groups regarding the sharing of information and best practices to combat anti-Semitic incidents in Europe;

“(iii) European educational programming and public awareness initiatives that aim to collaborate on educational curricula and campaigns that impart shared values of pluralism and tolerance, and showcase the positive contributions of Jews in culture, scholarship, science, and art, with special attention to those segments of the population that exhibit a high degree of anti-Semitic animus; and

“(iv) efforts by European governments to adopt and apply a working definition of anti-Semitism.”.

Hillary Clinton: Julian Assange must 'answer for what he has done' by useless_aether in news

[–]34679 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't trust anyone who cites the dissemination of truth as a reason for her election loss.

A woman did something! So brave! So strong! by sawboss in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]34679 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Every digital picture you've ever seen was created by code that interpreted data from an electronic sensor.

This squirrel by happysmash27 in Aww

[–]34679 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Chipmunk.