Radical Feminist Readings: Why Does He Do That? Lundy Bancroft (Can be Accessed for Free on OpenLibrary)

radfem · 2020-07-22T21:07:19+00:00

Buddy you have one source and it doesn’t even support you argument.

There’s no legal requirement for spousal consent and no minimum age for vasectomy other than the minimum age of consent. But while it’s not necessary to have spousal consent, it’s a really good idea, and involving the spouse in the decision is encouraged.

Meaning literally no doctor is telling any young unmarried man he can’t get snipped because what will his future wife will think.

radfem · 2020-07-21T20:45:48+00:00

Y’all don’t seem to think women getting their tubes tied is their own business,

https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/its-2016-and-women-in-australia-still-arent-allowed-control-of-their-bodies-20160724-gqcs6l.html

https://www.marieclaire.com/health-fitness/a15937/tubes-tied-young/

https://www.vice.com/en_asia/article/9kxam7/tubal-ligation-requirements-doctor-denials

radfem · 2020-07-21T10:12:23+00:00

You know what I think about every time some kid does something violent and... it's the video games/movies/music...etc... lather rinse repeat...

I think of penny dreadfuls, the like OG violent, trashy entertainment, and how in 1880 a lawyer actually tried to have them banned because they were glamorizing the lives of pirates and scoundrels and encouraging children to run away and live as thieves... yep that 'think of the children' discourse has been running well over a hundred years.

Some things literally never change.

It's like the graffiti they finally managed to translate on the walls of Pompeii (oh everyone got so excited to see what the common man would write about his life and times)...

'I fucked many women here'

Phenomenal.

Same with feminist literature, some of it is still so on point even a hundred years later that it just is honestly horrific.

radfem · 2020-07-21T02:18:21+00:00

For anyone interested in more on this, the wiki is actually pretty comprehensive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Cyborg_Manifesto

If you would like to read the actual manifesto itself:

https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=14B512B232FDEF31FB37A7E0D70B3B7E

(Please note the above isn't a legal link and typically I would not post it however the book can be somewhat difficult to source)

radfem · 2020-07-20T21:16:44+00:00

All prolife people are trolls, they literally have no good arguments to defend their misogyny and hypocrisy. You won't see a single good one here. Every comment is a reply to my own and every reply to my own us either simple name-calling or strawman arguments.

And you, here to pretend that people's inability to engage in a productive intelligent way is my fault. But that's classic too, that's like rule number one of misogyny... everything ultimately a woman's fault... instead of you know the people who can't turn out quality content to save their lives.

radfem · 2020-07-20T04:17:51+00:00

And abortions were used by jewish doctors to save women's lives.

I can give you an entire biography on it if you'd like.

But I'm not the one insisting people are Nazis for sharing basic medical practices here.

radfem · 2020-07-20T01:07:11+00:00

Yeah, it's pretty obvious intelligent thought isn't big around here.

Have you considered a better sub.

radfem · 2020-07-20T00:47:43+00:00

That's alright her biography isn't anymore complex then these messages that you've been reading.

Good luck with it.

radfem · 2020-07-20T00:39:22+00:00

Sure but that involves reading source materials and if you aren't willing too further education might not be for you

radfem · 2020-07-20T00:13:05+00:00

Alright get back to me once you've read her autobiography and we'll discuss it.

radfem · 2020-07-19T22:54:11+00:00

Are you honestly arguing that those of us alive today today cannot talk about events we're haven't directly lived through...

Cos if you are then pretty much every person whittling on about what Jesus would say about abortions needs to shut up because they never met the man.

Meanwhile since you too didn't live through ww2 you also need to shut up about what relatives told you.

Didn't think that argument through too well did you?

Meanwhile this woman actually performed those abortions I was talking about, heres her autobiography, or should the Jewish doctor living in the concentration camp also shut up because her life story doesn't support your bigoted narrative?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gisella_Perl

radfem · 2020-07-19T22:01:43+00:00

I'm sorry, I'm not actually old enough to have lived through the holocaust, although as a gay women I absolutely would have been subjected to rape and medical experimentation whether I was of the Jewish faith or not at the time. I feel like people often forget that part of the war, where gay people were left to rot in camps long after the end of WW2 and Jewish liberation because being gay was still seen as a subhuman crime.

Regardless, many of the people who did live through the nightmare have left pretty detailed written records behind (called books) so we fortunately don't need to rely of half remembered (and sometimes heavily edited revisionist) tales told to people who were never anywhere near the horror (but feel it's some sort of mark of character that they were related to someone who was).

The fantastic thing about books too is is that they give us many varied narratives and not just the limited experiences of one person being treated as the norm and the horrific stories of others being denied just because they are different from what people like to believe the only story was.

Pretty good system we have with written narratives (called books) don't you think.

I can personally recommend this women's autobiography:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gisella_Perl

And this book about what happened to women after the fall of Berlin:

https://www.amazon.com/Woman-Berlin/dp/1844081117

radfem · 2020-07-19T19:54:58+00:00

Actually there’s several great free classes and phenomenal books I could pass along if you like. My wife’s also of Polish decent and one of her great aunts, a gay woman, was used as a test subject in the regimes later years which involved impregnation through rape. Sadly she didn’t survive the inhuman treatment.

So yeah I think we’d actually both have a lot to share.

radfem · 2020-07-19T19:49:34+00:00

Thousands of poor women die in labour every year because of improper medical care... someone here hates poor people and thinks they should just die, but I don’t think it’s me.

radfem · 2020-07-19T11:49:06+00:00

That's the spirit, now get out there and start converting your brothers, we gotta get this male responsibility train moving.

radfem · 2020-07-19T11:45:57+00:00

Yep it absolutely will not hurt any man. Unlike pregnancy which kills thousands of women annually.

radfem · 2020-07-19T11:34:38+00:00

My man you clearly aren't a radical feminist, so I don't think this is the sub for you, as we don't indulge sealioning or other forms of trolling here.

You're absolutely right though, men really should start taking responsibility for their semen. Their body, their responsibility. Or you know, they could just not have sex, I'm still 100% behind that.

radfem · 2020-07-19T11:29:37+00:00

Buddy you don't know your history, forcing women to give birth was part of Nazi eugenics and a number of nurses saved many women by giving them secret abortions so they wouldn't be used as test subjects.

Maybe go do some reading on the topic before you try to insult me any further.

radfem · 2020-07-19T11:04:13+00:00

Firstly how dare you that woman is a goddess... secondly shit Larry Vincent was awesome too. You know he did the inaugural Knots Berry Farm Halloween Haunt? Jesus his death was a loss...

Meanwhile Hispanic Citizen Catches Illegal Anglos? Thanks I snorted Tequila up my nose.

I would watch that though, but full disclosure, I watch a movie called Killer Condoms regularly

radfem · 2020-07-19T09:19:34+00:00

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/11/03/500549503/male-birth-control-study-killed-after-men-complain-about-side-effects

Actually as it turns out men are just babies when it comes to the mildest of side effects.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/may/25/women-happier-without-children-or-a-spouse-happiness-expert

Also women are happier unmarried and childless.

As I said... men really need to start embracing vasectomies and stop burdening women.

radfem · 2020-07-19T09:02:52+00:00

Umm no try again...

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-47691567

Ps. If men don’t want to get a vasectomy why don’t they just avoid sex while they’re fertile and not looking to produce children.

radfem · 2020-07-19T08:40:52+00:00

https://www.healthline.com/health/birth-control-side-effects

You’re totally right, like totally fake news.

Meanwhile according to the article why don’t we have male oral contraceptives?

radfem · 2020-07-19T08:22:39+00:00

While Cassandra has lived in LA for a majority of her life, she wasn't born there, I think the appearance is actually due to Elvira herself. As the character was initially based on that dippy Valley Girl stereotype. Meanwhile, Jesus what a time warp, I haven't thought about Cheech since... Boyfriend from Hell?

radfem · 2020-07-19T08:18:26+00:00

Literally all of your points are addressed within the article, you should give it a read, it's actually really interesting.

radfem · 2020-07-19T07:53:57+00:00

Buddy if we agree that all prolifers are misogynists and that not supporting the full bodily autonomy of women is wrong then we really don't have anything to discuss here. Glad to see your on my side though.

radfem · 2020-07-19T07:19:34+00:00

Did you just admit that all prolifers and anyone who doesn't 100% support abortions and full female bodily autonomy are misogynists?

radfem · 2020-07-19T06:25:14+00:00

For suggesting men be held accountable for the lives they help make. I'm so not surprised that you think so.

It's actually amazing how many of you people get significantly less righteous about abusing people and protesting and stripping bodily autonomy when men are suddenly the ones being talked about.

It's almost like preserving life isn't at the core of your morals...

radfem · 2020-07-19T02:43:00+00:00

There are roughly 900,000 accidental pregnancies per year in the US alone. A significant portion directly due to men pressuring or tricking women into having sex without a condom... At what point do we say that men can't be trusted to practise safe sex?

radfem · 2020-07-19T02:10:40+00:00

Ah so we've moved right from... we do help women... to women should just close their legs...

I'm so surprised.

Meanwhile, are women impregnating themselves? Why is it you people never tell men to have vasectomies before they have sex? Why is it that only women need to suffer the indignity of medical procedures they don't consent to?

Why aren't ya'll protesting outside of men's college dorms with pictures of dead babies screaming at them to go get snipped up before they accidentally force some poor young girl to have an abortion just because they were too lazy to use the only form of birth control that is side effect free, foolproof, cheap and readily available.

I'm genuinely curious why ya'll claim to support women yet literally always pretend like women with accidental pregnancies were masturbating when they got that way.

radfem · 2020-07-18T23:36:04+00:00

Actually the leading reason for elective abortions in the US were financial.

Pregnant women shouldn’t need to beg like leper’s hat in hand at churches in the hopes that they won’t starve to death trying to make it through pregnancies people shame them into keeping yet refuse to fund publicly through taxes.

Meanwhile, the vast majority of single mothers wind up below the poverty line, so no offense to your church but it’s actions aren’t enough for idiots to be sign painting.

Also, you're not even correct about the abortion rates.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/abortion-rates-by-country

radfem · 2020-07-18T21:49:53+00:00

They’re not considered ‘babies’ until they’re birthed.

I say this because ironically immediately after birth the people painting these signs stop caring about the lives of those children.

Probirth people are by majority against free healthcare, against funding for public schools, against free lunch programs, against strong social support systems for single mothers and children, against free education programs for single mothers, against housing help for the homeless...

Babies lives do matter, unfortunately idiots painting signs like this only care about controlling vaginas.

Planned parenthood has saved more lives than any probirther.

radfem · 2020-07-18T21:35:53+00:00

Intentions do matter, do they matter more than the impact you have though?

For instance, you’re driving and take your eyes off the road for a moment and hit someone, killing them... your intention of course wasn’t to kill them and the judge will likely take that into consideration during the trial but still...

You’ve killed someone, same result as if you deliberately ran them down. Their family won’t miss them less just because you didn’t mean to kill them.

We tend to focus a lot on our intentions sometimes without giving much thought to that fact that our actions have had devastating effects regardless.

I’ve also noticed that the intent with which people say, ‘my intentions were good’ differs. Some say it to give context to their actions, to assure the wronged person they didn’t mean to hurt them with no denial of the hurt they caused... others use it to excuse the hurt they’ve caused, ‘my intentions were good... so you can’t blame me if you got hurt’.

radfem · 2020-07-17T21:09:07+00:00

Sita Sings the Blues was always a personal favourite of mine, though I’ve been debated a time or two whether it’s technically her best or not.

Her book misinformation wants to be free is incredible as well.

radfem · 2020-07-17T01:43:22+00:00

I'm sorry? Are you actually asking for my messages? Or are you making another claim about me?

If so do you want them just text copied or would you like links to screenshots?

Ps. I don’t know what’s worse if you honestly think I’m a man just because I didn’t agree with your views on how we should discuss a woman’s physical appearance... or if you’re just clutching to that claim because you feel it gives you free reign to do and say whatever you want... doesn’t matter who you’re actually talking to you just claim they’re a male who just wants you sexually and that (in your mind) completely discredits anything they have to say.

radfem · 2020-07-16T19:25:56+00:00

Hypocritical advice from the woman literally removing posts celebrating under appreciated women and derailing those conversations because of her bruised ego and childish overreactions.

Ps. I also think it’s good for other women to be fully informed before they possibly give you any sort of negative comment that you’re likely to abuse them, slander them and ban them from subs you moderate... even if the conversation doesn’t take place in pinkpill feminism.

radfem · 2020-07-16T11:31:29+00:00

Stop stripping quality content out of feminist subs just because you personally don’t like it.

radfem · 2020-07-16T11:30:44+00:00

I offered to show my posts, you refused... and gee... I wonder why. Women like you are just as bad as the men you profess to loathe.

radfem · 2020-07-16T11:28:15+00:00

I’ve explained exactly what my issues are and I’ve been perfectly respectful about it.

I tried to contact you directly.

I didn’t call you out publicly but tried to open up a private dialogue in a public forum.

I’m not here because of you personally, personally I’d be happy to never speak to your awful self again. I’m here because your actions towards me were deplorable and have consequences.

Especially considering you a don’t pull you punches when posting yourself and b profess to hate people silencing women.

radfem · 2020-07-16T11:20:56+00:00

I think you’re a really great example of the dangers of censorship. This is like a really fascinating look at how all individuals need oversight, otherwise you get... well... Donald Trump actually.

radfem · 2020-07-16T11:17:53+00:00

Wow, Im really glad the pain of being banned from reddit taught you some empathy.

Otherwise this might be really bleak.

radfem · 2020-07-16T11:12:05+00:00

Hey we can actually clear this up pretty easily.

I still have my comments to you...

I’m quite happy to post them and we can discuss exactly which parts you feel were creepy, stalking sexual messages.

Then it’ll be pretty obvious why you felt the need to remove them.

Ps. I’d offer you a picture of the ultrasound they took of my ovaries whilst monitoring a cyst but... you might think I’m flirting. Plus I think my wife tossed it.

radfem · 2020-07-16T11:09:05+00:00

This is a post celebrating the overcoming of censorship and deplatforming.

I think this is very on topic.

radfem · 2020-07-16T11:03:25+00:00

Actually I’m the middle aged married gay woman who’s wondering why you’re so defensive that you literally need to remove intelligent content because you’re too lazy to read or post anything over 8 words.

Yet still feel bold enough to come onto a post like this and pretend you care about women being allowed to express themselves freely.

I feel like there’s a large divide between who you are and who you want everyone to think you are... pretty ‘nice guy’ behaviour there.

radfem · 2020-07-16T10:56:39+00:00

Actually I made you so raving mad that you threw a huge tantrum and abused your moderator privileges to remove comments that you felt made you look bad.

One of which was the latest in a series of posts celebrating obscure women.

The other two are still up and have been up for two weeks and are quite popular... but you apparently felt so threatened by the last being on the same topic as one of your posts that you felt the need to remove in out of pure spite.

What’s it like to be so insecure that instead of creating better content you just... remove anything better and remove competing posters?

Asking for a friend of my wife who’s genuinely baffled by your completely shallow love of Cassandra Peterson.

radfem · 2020-07-16T09:10:40+00:00

One has to wonder if it wasn’t some sort of test run for a larger breach.

radfem · 2020-07-16T09:08:30+00:00

A whole 10? Aren’t you the eternal optimist.

radfem · 2020-07-16T07:56:42+00:00

I’m married.

So the fact that you keep trying to impress sexual overtones on my commentary is pretty delusional and weird.

Ps. It’s actually very much like when men insist feminists are just bitter old hags who can’t get laid.

What is that, projection or deflection...?

radfem · 2020-07-16T07:50:55+00:00

So you don’t want men to be misogynists, but you think it’s okay for you to be one?

That’s rather hypocritical don’t you think?

Ps. Douche is used by men to describe any guy not acting in an acceptably male way, typically when they’re not engaging in typical lads behaviour. Hence the insult... you’re gross because you’re too near to a vagina.

In fairness though you don’t seem overly knowledgeable regarding language.

Perhaps try dickbag, nutcup or festering schlong in future.

radfem · 2020-07-16T07:13:50+00:00

In fairness to you, haven't stalking cases actually been linked to wackos combing through 6000 random posts cobbling together info.

I feel like there was an article on a tech site about it.

radfem · 2020-07-16T02:51:00+00:00

Douche is misogynistic insult and a pretty unoriginal one at that.

It literally implies a person is bad for being in close contact with a virgina.

Pretty shitty insult to fling at a lesbian. Dare I say it's rather homophobic.

radfem · 2020-07-16T02:49:21+00:00

How am I obessed with you?

You're a very aggressive, angry person whos literally attacking someone whos agreeing with you.

Ps. I am female. In fact I'm a lesbian whos been married to a woman for over 20 years. Please explain why you feel I don't belong here because you personally disagree with me? I'd really like to know.

Pps. Also a woman well into her fourties who can tell you that myself and my friends are not flattered by posts faunning over older women who've stayed conventionally attractive. Not saying no woman enjoys it but it leaves many of us feeling like crap for daring not to age gracefully.

Or heaven forbid never being pretty in the first place. The worse tragedy to befall any woman of course.

radfem · 2020-07-15T13:07:26+00:00

It really is isn't it, I hate when women are benched just because the idiot 'in charge' thinks their personal opinions are abject fact. It's oh so toxic and you're left with an almost singular cultural narrative which is just such a crying shame.

radfem · 2020-07-15T12:09:47+00:00

Wow, that’s really awful. I can totally commiserate, I just got banned by this really unhinged moderator for calling out her fetishising beauty in older women...

Crazy world we live in.

Oh and posting better content then her... it was frankly bizarre.

radfem · 2020-07-15T10:45:07+00:00

Oh really, and what else does your post celebrate about her?

Meanwhile I’m not trolling, inspired by this I actually made an entire post about Cassandra Peterson because she’s awesome and deserves better than someone merely implying ‘ well she looks good for a 68 year old’.

You should check it out and learn a little about the woman behind the face.

Wow you really dislike narratives that don’t support your own don’t you.

radfem · 2020-07-15T10:20:49+00:00

I’m sorry that you feel me pointing out that celebrating any woman just for her looks is a disservice to her.

Cassandra Peterson is an extraordinary woman and it’s sad that you don’t see anything beyond her beauty.

Meanwhile you keep mentioning that you just didn’t bother to read my reply before telling me what it is I’m doing and where I’m coming from... do you think your not bothering to listen to people says something about them or you?

radfem · 2020-07-15T06:42:38+00:00

It absolutely is, but celebrating still being considered conventionally sexually attractive at an age when most women aren’t isn’t really subverting much by way of ageist expectations.

The exact same way that a feminist being a slim, attractive woman (instead of a hairy, ugly, fatty) isn’t subverting much just by existing.

Unless you put a hell of a lot of stock in men’s opinions and I don’t.

radfem · 2020-07-15T05:11:49+00:00

Um, where’s the logic here...

He raves about the instructor so much that the wife knows, so obviously absolutely knows that he supposedly thought that was where her mind would immediately go regarding the question, but...

Obliviously he doesn’t actually seriously want her or anything.

Gotta second, hope she leaves him, not because of the answer but because he clearly is thinking about being unfaithful.

radfem · 2020-07-15T02:05:07+00:00

Buddy if you don't want to hear about people's sexual preferences maybe don't tell them to suck your dick.

Like are you mentally deficient in some way? Autistic? Genuinely trying to work out why you don't understand how basic social interactions work.

PS. You're so focused on making your gender the bogeyman here but you've admitted to posting 'suck dick' in a deliberate attempt to get banned so you could bitch. So low-quality content not made in good faith. Although yeah you are are a man too so you also don't belong on a radical feminist sub just because of that.

You've also yet to explain why the ban was unfair, besides... 'mummy they were all doing it... it's not fair that you're yelling just me... sulk...'

Are you sure about the nap and binky, it does wonders for actual fussing babies.

radfem · 2020-07-15T01:17:15+00:00

Not being able to take any kind of varied discourse on your posts is a pretty serious personal flaw.

Not everything you post is going to be 100% the most woke feminist thing that’s ever been posted.

As to your post, it’s titled women of the wall meaning you’re trying to address that subculture of judging women for aging because (in those people’s views) women inherently don’t age well visually... an old woman is pretty much always ugly.

Kudos to you for posting a clip of a woman who still looks visually appealing at an age where most women don’t.

However here’s the rub... most women don’t age well... like by conventional beauty standards they just don’t. And you know what, that’s cool. It shouldn’t matter one little bit whether an old woman retains her beauty because literally the entire concept of beauty is based entirely upon someone’s personal social/cultural upbringing. It doesn’t mean jack shit save that misogynist men insist it does for women...

Feminists calling out whole beauty positive culture (everyone is beautiful all the time no matter what) as being bulshit and not helping anyone’s actual self-worth isn’t even a new thing, it’s been going on about 15 years now.

It’s very tempting to play men’s games, but ultimately pretty pointless. Women are born, become or grow out of being what’s considered ugly and you know what it shouldn’t matter one single effing bit. Like it’s not particularly worth talking about.

But thanks you’ve given me some great ideas.

radfem · 2020-07-14T22:47:50+00:00

I remember that, but I can’t find it. Was it twitter though?

radfem · 2020-07-14T22:03:21+00:00

If you literally can only celebrate women (of any age) for their looks you maybe need to examine why.

Also don’t be that person. You know internet ‘mother’ who simply has to monitor everyone else’s behaviour to ensure it adheres to their personal ideals of social propriety.

radfem · 2020-07-14T11:07:27+00:00

I think they meant that commenting on a woman’s looks in any way just reinforces the idea that beauty is the most important quality in any woman.

Who gives a shit what she looks like the woman is a comedic genius.

radfem · 2020-07-14T10:51:23+00:00

Oh I get it...

Look at me mummy... look at me... you can’t ignore me mummy now I’m saying naughty things about you.

Wow I’m seriously flattered.

I usually have to work to piss men off this much.

radfem · 2020-07-14T10:47:52+00:00

Buddy I agree with certain forms censorship and have had many posts removed before, on many different forums.

I’m a grown up who literally doesn’t tear my hair out over Internet discourses.

Surprising to you I know, but it’s literally an adult thing, that adults do.

Ps. Why you riding my dick buddy, you really that ignored everywhere else that you need to continually message someone you profess to think is an idiot?

radfem · 2020-07-14T03:53:18+00:00

You really don't like having you blatant hypocrisy called out do you?

In which case I have a suggestion for you, don't post about how a user should be banned because they banned you and that's censorship and all censorship is bad.

Like 5 year olds grasp these concepts.

Ps. You're really focused on my lesbianism when literally I brought it up once in jest to your jab about sucking dick...

Like bro, lesbians aren't out to get you, calm your tits bro.

Pps. Was that a no to the nap and binky.

Pps. You know what I love most of all, as you’re trying to defend yourself you’ve got to contend with your brother in arms making you look even worse and it is fucking hysterical. Trollers be trolling no matter what I guess.

radfem · 2020-07-13T20:10:30+00:00

You know there’s nothing sadder than the man who literally thinks every woman is his therapist and will...

With virtually no provocation.

Just dump his crap all over any woman as though she asks or cares where he’s coming from or why he is the way he is. Sorry bro save it for a larger more attentive audience.

Ps. As a lesbian am living proof no women needs a man. As are the studies that show that straight marriages decrease female lives both in length and quality.

radfem · 2020-07-13T19:56:32+00:00

Brigading you mean that thing where a user not interested in a sub purposely invade it to troll, downvote and make pointless inflammatory posts...

Hmmm... again seems like you like censorship when it’s in your favour.

Meanwhile...

But you cant say suck dick on pillpink now can you? LOL seems like someone’s being a cry bully mantrum thrower here... but I don’t think it’s me.

It’s okay baby... maybe go get your binky and go take a little nap and then you won’t feel so irrational. I can make you a nice warm bottle too if that would help.

Since you clearly already feel every woman is your mother and needs to just deal if you shit.

radfem · 2020-07-13T19:51:29+00:00

I think you are quite lost...

Is giving out advice.

Sorry can’t take any sort of advice from a red pill dude who refers to homosexuality as ‘gay shit’ and thinks women are entirely responsible for their interactions with toxic men... sorry ‘bad boys!’.

Ps. And who perpetuates the gold digging bimbo myth.

radfem · 2020-07-13T19:07:29+00:00

Sorry I can’t take any advice from people who have red pill affiliations or declare lesbianism as ‘gay shit!’...

For the same reason I don’t take advice from Nazis, antivaxers or other misogynists, y’all have clearly departed reality.

radfem · 2020-07-13T19:04:51+00:00

The problem with reddit wasn’t people being banned from subs, it was subs being banned by admins.

Which is exactly the sort of large scale censorship you want now by imposing your rules on a sub you aren’t welcome in and have absolutely nothing of worth to contribute too.

Ps. Still really hypocritical to complain about banning and then ask a user to be banned. You’re pro censorship or not bro.

radfem · 2020-07-13T11:48:07+00:00

How is that a blanket label? How is that even inherently negative... outside of maybe suggesting men aren’t great at debating.

Completely null and void of course when taken in context and clearly I was referencing male misogynists... idiot ones at that.

radfem · 2020-07-13T11:23:13+00:00

Only it’s not a common phenomenon.

It’s a deliberately perpetuated stereotype, kept alive so women can be blamed for the misbehaviour of their male partners.

Not to mention that typically when women do tolerate bad behaviour in males isn’t nothing to do with sexual attraction and everything to do with them being socially conditioned to expect and accept the worst because if they expect better they’ll become the old crazy cat lady...

As though women being single isn’t better for them.

radfem · 2020-07-13T11:17:09+00:00

Marriage shit...

Women do 90% of the emotional labour in relationships long before being married.

radfem · 2020-07-13T10:53:13+00:00

Ah buddy, I’m a lesbian who’s been married to a woman for decades. But way to perpetuate the stereotype that no woman can have a legitimate problem with males and instead have all just been burnt by their personal choice to associate with ‘bad boys’.

Best form of ‘not all men!’ That is.

Ps. Exactly what do you think saying you have loyal female friends means?

Pps. Gold digging bimbo is mostly a myth, women and children are typically extremely financially disadvantaged by divorce.

radfem · 2020-07-13T08:55:59+00:00

You are not very clever at explaining your own point. Please get help with that before it starts to negatively effect you.

Ps. Some of best friends are male!

radfem · 2020-07-13T08:44:54+00:00

Show me where I’ve blanket labelled anyone? Disliking misogynists does not translate to disliking all men... unless you literally think all men are idiot misogynists. In which case I think it’s actually you who has problems with men.

radfem · 2020-07-13T08:32:21+00:00

Wasting the time of idiot misogynists makes me a misandrist?

How so?

Never mind, looking at your post history explains it.

radfem · 2020-07-13T08:01:06+00:00

That would necessitate me looking at naked men though, pretty against that.

radfem · 2020-07-13T07:28:32+00:00

No, I'm just tired of talking to you and am going to eat dinner with my wife and then work on my horror novel in which men are murdered in bloody and completely unjustified ways.

It's what radical feminists do every night.

I'd give you the address of the website on which we post the stories... but...

Well... you know...

Chin up buddy.

PS. best of luck on getting my posts banned... I mean, they were very mean too you... and that is very upsetting...

radfem · 2020-07-13T07:26:33+00:00

No, I'm just tired of talking to you and am going to eat dinner with my wife and then work on my horror novel in which men are murdered in bloody and completely unjustified ways.

It's what radical feminists do every night.

I'd give you the address of the website on which we post the stories... but...

Well... you know...

Chin up buddy.

PS. best of luck on getting my posts banned... I mean, they were very mean too you... and that is very upsetting...

radfem · 2020-07-13T07:23:28+00:00

You know what you are totally right, it's very clear that women need men and not the other way round.

You keep your chin up there little buddy.

You'll make it to your promised land one day.

radfem · 2020-07-13T07:16:38+00:00

Actually it clearly says:

A city court asked a woman to look for a job, saying she was qualified and capable and should not put financial burden on her estranged husband, a decision that could spur a debate on India’s alimony system.

She was not granted the alimony that she wanted, because women aren't just handed money by judges like you claim they are.

So like you're cherry-picking again.

But like I said, I get it, really hard to prove men are treated unfairly when literally the only documented thing standing in the way of them and alimony is them being too sexist to ask for it.

radfem · 2020-07-13T07:00:52+00:00

https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/get-a-job-don-t-rely-on-maintenance-court-tells-woman-seeking-alimony/story-IiQmAwxSEDuxPp6wvPr5lK.html

Listen here buddy, don’t get short with me.

Ps. Yeah buddy I know you'll continue being sexist beyond all logic it's one of the many reasons feminists refuse to debate with you, you like to pretend you don't have a vested interest in keeping sexism alive and well.

radfem · 2020-07-13T06:55:16+00:00

Since men refuse to ask for alimony how can you possibly prove women are treated preferentially?

Ps. You provided one source from two biased authors, don’t start masturbating over your victory just yet buddy.

radfem · 2020-07-13T06:47:02+00:00

You know it’s illegal to practice medicine without proper licensing right. This includes mental health help. Please stop before you get sued.

radfem

MODERATOR OF