WHAT ABOUT INTERNATIONAL MENS DAY

submitted by yabbit from self.women

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]NeedMoreCoffee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

Why???? you think making posts telling women they are dumb and should not have the right vote IN THE WOMAN SUB is not dragging the the quality of discussion down??? WTF dude come one

This is absolute bullshit. So what you just want to keep this place dead and let all the incels post how dumb women are? Is that what you want because no woman will join a sub like that. You can just say i fucking hate women and be done with it then and you know it.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

you think making posts telling women they are dumb and should not have the right vote IN THE WOMAN SUB is not dragging the the quality of discussion down???

Did I ever say it wasn't? I'm simply saying you need to remove things for reasons that are saidit rules, not just your own made up reasons. If the rules apply, then they apply. But you can't just make up your own rules, or else the sub gets taken off of /all

[–]NeedMoreCoffee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

And who decides what the specific rules of a sub are? Because i'm pretty sure politics removes everything not politics and everything nazi/white supremacist. Pretty sure food removes everything not food and food related fetishes.

They only things ive removed so far is pure misogyny and links i thought were dead and anything i thought that drags down the quality of this sub. like the rules say

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/j1/the_saiditnet_terms_and_content_policy/

https://saidit.net/static/PyramidDebate.jpg

Ad hominems can be removed. "misogyny" is too subjectively defined, and is not on the saidit rules.

"dead links" do not degrade the quality of discussion, especially if they're not actually dead. So I don't think you should ever remove a dead link since you can't tell if it's actually dead or not.

If you want to stick to only removing infractions that drag the quality of discussion down the pyramid of debate, and stop removing "dead" links, then I'd consider re-adding the sub to /all

[–]NeedMoreCoffee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

How am i even supposed to do that with a woman sub on a site with lots of womanhaters when i can not remove misogyny for dragging down the level of the sub?

Because i was planning to remove the crimes links aswel because they have absolutely no value to the ONLY woman sub on all except to make women look bad.

Like do you even understand the situation with women content on the internet? Its constantly targetted.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

So you want to remove things that "make women look bad"? Including removing on-topic posts that are about women, because it's about women doing crimes?

That's extremely subjective, and is against the saidit moderator rules to apply such subjective mod rules for a sub on /all. You just stated you're going to remove things with a deliberate bias, removing things that look bad but are on topic, rather than just allowing for the free flow of information.

So your sub will definitely remain off of /all as long as you are going to remove things based on your own subjective rules instead of allowing for the free flow of information as saidit is intended.

Anyway, good luck with your sub. Have a nice day.

[–]NeedMoreCoffee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Ok so you just dont want women on saidit. Got it mate. I'll stop promoting the site and leave women dead as a fish.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

That's not what I said. I don't think you're acting in good faith during this discussion... I've tried to explain things to you many times, but you keep lashing out instead of working with me, and that immaturity also proves you're not ready to have a sub on the front page of saidit.

You can't just delete working links because you think they're dead. You can't just make up your own mod rules unless you want to be off of /all. Sorry. Those have always been the rules.

[–]NeedMoreCoffee 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

https://saidit.net/s/women/comments/8xq9/your_tampons_probably_have_cancercausing/x0ug This is what happened mate. This is a place to mock women now.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Well it seems you already gave up, instead of working within the rules everyone else can manage to follow