whatever

whatever

all 35 comments

American_Muskrat 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun 1 month ago

Neither one has abused their mod powers afaik.

GuyWhite 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

Yep. Neither has abused their privilege.

Rah[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

Not my point.

hfxB0oyA 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

I believe that anyone should be able to say their piece. This includes them with their subs and you with your criticism of those subs. I'm not going to block those I disagree with. It really goes against the reason why Saidit was established in the first place.

Rah[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

You value freedom yet do not believe that only by denying sin you can do it. Read Leo XIII's Libertas. You will NEVER have freedom until you ban sin and sinful behaviour.

neolib 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

So your position is Saidit is only for Trump fans? Support current US head of state or leave Saidit? How is that an alternative website then? Looks like Trump is the establishment now, and you are for the establishment, not a dissident of sorts.

DaveMaverick 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

I believe OP is for "good" and "truth", not "establishment" or "anti-establishment".

neolib 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun 1 month ago

I was reacting to putting "TDS-infested subs" in title, as for "good" and "truth" I believe these concepts are not universal but depend on person's worldview/value system.

[deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

[deleted]

American_Muskrat 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

No that's definitely not Gravi.

Rah[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

Check the OP text again for examples on why there is nothing that says "good" and "truth" in what these two say.

Rah[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 1 month ago

I will be forever a dissident until the US is made a Catholic monarchy and the Vatican is restored to its pre-1960s status. My personal political views are irrelevant.

Be_incorrigible 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun 1 month ago

I'm old. I just come here to read the headlines... And occasionally click on something. I can't even figure out how to post here except to respond like this. I'm assuming what you just said... Was sarcasm?

Rah[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

Well gramps, I just gave you a list of subs to block or ignore for your own good. Its up to you to do it or not.

My personal views are not sarcasm; being a Trump fan or not is irrelevant to the point.

YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

Gravi's now banned cunninglingus from the sub again - 20th time in the past few months - and notice the supposed reason (other than my accuracy about his alts and these posts of his):

subreddit message via /s/whatever[M] sent 17 minutes ago

You have been temporarily banned from participating in /s/whatever. This ban will last for 1 days. You can still view and subscribe to /s/whatever, but you won't be able to post or comment.

Note from the moderators:

Stop personally insulting/attacking others and name calling

If you have a question regarding your ban, you can contact the moderator team for /s/whatever by replying to this message.

Reminder from the saidit staff: If you use another account to circumvent this sub ban, that will be considered a violation of the Content Policy and can result in your account being suspendedfrom the site as a whole.

https://saidit.net/s/whatever/about/log

So bloody obvious what this triggered boy is up to, LMAO?

And for the "-Gravi" user/me who was typing the update above:

You've been banned from participating in /s/whatever

subreddit message via /s/whatever[M] sent 2 minutes ago

You have been banned from participating in /s/whatever. You can still view and subscribe to /s/whatever, but you won't be able to post or comment.

If you have a question regarding your ban, you can contact the moderator team for /s/whatever by replying to this message.

Reminder from the saidit staff: If you use another account to circumvent this sub ban, that will be considered a violation of the Content Policy and can result in your account being suspendedfrom the site as a whole.

https://saidit.net/s/whatever/about/log

TrumpMuskGayMarriage 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

Why would you care? This isn't a censor-fest like reddit, and you can easily comment on any extreme political crap however you want.

DaveMaverick 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

He cares because the people in question are moderators of the listed subs. If it was a case of dissention in the comments, that's free speech but there are valid concerns that leftist moderators will engage in censorship similar to that of reddit and I share similar concerns.

neolib 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

Modlogs are open on Saidit: https://saidit.net/s/whatever/modlog

DaveMaverick 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

Neat! TIL & TYVM

TrumpMuskGayMarriage 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

I see the modlog is public, so that's good. I don't see saidit censoring/banning people for disagreeing with insane political views like reddit does.

Rah[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

Transparency is a soft deterrent. Its good that it exists.

Rah[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

Allowing these people in your communities is what made Reddit the way it is now.

TrumpMuskGayMarriage 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

Permabanning people for saying fag, and shadowbanning 90% of the comments because they don't support the narrative they're trying to push is what made reddit what it is today.

DaveMaverick 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

Lmao somebody did a dirty delete in the comments. It was a really juvenile comment too, I'd have deleted it as well.

Rah[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

Not the first time it happened. Caught a couple myself.

cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

Awe - crybully rah didn't like my honesty about his attempt to dox a Saiditor and now he upvotes another post with his alts (also against Saidit rules), trying to attack Saiditors again. Really pathetic.

And to his point, the only items removed from those subs have been obvious spam, which you can see in the modlogs.

Rather than attack Saiditors, rah (et al), post something worth reading.

EDIT: Look at how this post got 16 points in just a few minutes, while only 4 users are here. So similar to one of Gravi's alts, and his upvotes of his alts, but IDK.

DaveMaverick 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

No I am a unique user and you gotta step off. You are not right and it's an embarrassing thing to clutch onto power on a site with maybe 30 unique users like you are going to mold the zeitgeist or something.

Think about why people like me and OP might think the way that we do.

GraviAss We Can 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 1 month ago

Are you fucking retarded? You're the one with alts not me lmao.

-Gravi 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

So you've banned me from the sub so that I cannot respond? https://saidit.net/s/whatever/about/log

LMAO

GraviAss We Can 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun 1 month ago

No, because you broke rules and kept dragging down the discussion by name calling and insulting.

Oh also, no impersonation

YoMamma 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 1 month ago

LOL - that's not against site rules, or your 'rah' account and your many comments as Gravi would have been banned multiple times. Nor is that the reason you stated in your ban, weakling:

https://saidit.net/s/whatever/comments/ft8r/a_list_of_tdsinfested_subs_by_degenerate/179wv