This may or may not be @ActuallyNot and his boyfriend. He spends his days fagging up Saidit.

submitted by Rah from commondescentpodcast.com

all 33 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Rah[S] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

If this is his podcast, his favourite themes are: posting conspiracies that men can influence the world's temperatures, hating the 45th, 46th (not the fake) and 47th president of the USA, celebrating politicians laundering money in the Ukraine war, regime change in Syria that will lead to yet another Christian genocide and archeology

[–]Questionable-̱͞|͞מ͟͞͞פ͟ו͟͞͞ק͞פ͟͞͞ק͞|̊̆ 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You know theories say Trump is actually the 17ᵗʰ & 18ᵗʰ president, as all the presidents after the 16ᵗʰ were not Presidents of the republic, but of a corporation.

[–]Rah[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What a nice subject for a podcast! Maybe two gentlemen with normal testosterone levels and a naturally inclined sexuality could check it out.

[–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Seems you've enjoyed watching more of their podcasts than any of us on Saidit. I'll see what they have to say.

I see already that there are only a few of those podcasts linked on Saidit, all of which are about natural science, not politics.

You're obviously an asshole.

[–]Rah[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Im glad to announce I have never listened to one single second of these two faggots.

[–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Seems you enjoy being an asshole.

[–]Rah[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Relevant username.

[–]HiddenFox 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

Honestly why is this even relevant? Doxing him in the hopes he leaves the website? Why would you even want that?

u/ActuallyNot brings perspective, discussion and a counter point, often with "proof" to almost everything that is posted here. Without him and his alts it's just a echo chamber.

I like being challenged on my ideas and comments. Here is a good run I had with him last month about the missiles being launched into Russia.

https://saidit.net/s/news/comments/fjvt/great_news_americans_dont_have_to_move_to_canada/

There is a little bit of snark (Some might call it passion for the topic) at the start but overall it was a great discussion. I disagreed with him on almost everything but I did do a lot of reading on what Russia is doing towards the civilians after he brought it up as genocide. We never came to an agreement on what to call it but it defiantly educated me on the situation that is being overlooked by MSM. (Well at least here in Canada. I see nothing about it.)

I find the best way to engage with him is to force a strong discipline of respect (Avoid the temptation to mock, bait or gloat) and keep to the facts while providing proof.

[–]Rah[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ad hominems are not a fallacy, but a rather weak argument because it rarely bears any fruit to reality.

Keyword here: rarely

[–]Rah[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

You calling it a dox showcases reading comprehension issues; if one says it "may or may not be", its not a certainty, but the rebuttals getting this strong only confirm the theory. I imagined it could also be a paypig or deranged fan of these two faggots (it would be much worse then).

My best way of engaging with him is calling him a faggot at every opportunity possible so people can start to associate his points of view with faggots and immediately disregard his posts the moment their almonds are activated.

[–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

HiddenFox is correct, however. You do try too hard to compensate for having the limpest microdick on Saidit.

[–]Rah[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Its my duty to reiterate ActuallyNot's faggot army has never got eyesight of my massive balls and dick

[–]cunninglingus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

When you make a post about a podcast you know nothing about. Nah - this confirms you'd need magnifying glass to see your junk.

[–]HiddenFox 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You calling it a dox showcases reading comprehension issues; if one says it "may or may not be"

No, I understood the "may or may not be". My comment stands. You need the first two questions for the third one to make sense and make my point.

[–]Rah[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Its not a dox. Its an attempt to justify the hardline approach to those with minimal knowledge of physiogonomy

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's obviously an attempt at doxxing, you knuckle-dragging, rabid, closeted, leatherboy, microdick, retarded imbecile. You are the weakest, saddest, dumbest user on Saidit, no? It's of course against Saidit rules to do what you've attempted to do, but never mind, you've got worse problems, nor do you appear to have the slightest clue of what's happening.

[–]Rah[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

angry soyjack noises

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah - that summarizes your crying about a user "fagging up Saidit." Weak. What 'fags up' Saidit is your crybullying.

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Great points.

(He doesn't have an alt. He's also incredibly polite to all of the snarky man-children here, me included.)

[–]Rah[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Relevant username for such a womanly comment.

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Says the faggot who is so obsessed with faggots, it's the most common word and topic in his comments and posts. But it's OK to be a faggot, faggot. It's not OK to offer Saidit nothing but hatred, asshole.

[–]Rah[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

If you dont like it go back to Reddit, redditor

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What kind of moron assumes a Saiditor would never be connected to Reddit?

[–]Rah[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Then go back where you and your kind belong, faggot.

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Should I move through the internet like Tron, or some video game character, or are you merely the kind of moron who can't comprehend the notion of movement or presence or 'to be' online? Certainly the latter, according to your approach to the present post?

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks.

To make clear, I don't have any alts.

[–]ActuallyNot 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Very good podcast.

Will and Dave are natural science communicators. I was a patreon of theirs for a bit. I should start back up again. That can be one of my new-years resolutions.

[–]cunninglingus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks for the info. I'll have a look. (Hilarious that what's meant to be an insult actually compares you with what appear to be really cool, interesting and informative podcasters.)

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tbh I normally have Rah on blocked, but he/she/it has come up a bit in some moderation threads.

But giving The Common Descent podcast a mention is good work.

[–]LarrySwinger2 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What a faggot.

[–]Rah[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Ikr

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

(He's referring to you.)

[–]GUnion 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

True.