you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]passionflounderPaper tiger 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

It's difficult to process through the filter of competence a campaign whose objective seems very much to be the collapse and destruction that's used as evidence that government "doesn't know what it's doing".

Government knows EXACTLY what it's doing and the crises and destruction are intentional.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Corrupt law maker and politicians are not "government". The word "government" is used to describe a system, not the people who abuse it.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/government

[–]EddieC 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Systems & usurpation-risk:

  • Indirect systems are at-risk of usurpation
  • Direct systems are risk-free of usurpation

 
Hence, IF people want no/less risk of usurpation:
"Why are we still talking about Indirect X,
when we should be discussing AND doing Direct X?"