all 5 comments

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why not both?

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]noshore4me 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Perhaps he's trying to offset his CO2 production with CO2 reduction initiatives?

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

With this kind of reasoning, a rich corporation may produce all the CO2 they want, while a poor civilian is barely allowed to exhale.

[–]noshore4me 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

With that kind of reasoning, poor civilians should make more money to burn more fossil fuels. How do you not realize this is not an either-or situation?