you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Do you think there would be a way to make this post without breaking that rule? Maybe if he didn't mention the name?

[–][deleted]  (15 children)

[deleted]

    [–]bucetao6969 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

    Maybe because he doesn't want someone that wants to inject puberty blockers into children near children?

    [–][deleted]  (13 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      Legislation is literally

      not figuratively

      literally

      the codification of morality

      [–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      But to what extent? To prevent violence or to enforce personal beliefs and even preferences?

      [–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      To every extent. If people didn't find something "wrong" they wouldn't legislate it into illegality.

      [–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      But why should they be doing that?

      [–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

      when that person does something wrong, that's when to react

      Wrong. If a person has signs that he might do something wrong, we act. We don't have to punish him but things such as surveillance is fine enough. After all we shouldn't imprison someone who has done nothing wrong.

      [–][deleted]  (6 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

        Did I say harass or bully?

        [–][deleted]  (4 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]bucetao6969 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

          Nazi's did that for neighbors who seemed odd, sending some of them to concentration camps because neighbors claimed they were mentally challenged.

          If a woman accuses someone of rape we can't have surveillance on him because nazis did surveillance! Are you insane? What bullshit logic

          In any event there wouldn't be a reason to spy on the foolish teacher.

          "In any event" so absolutely nothing that the teacher did would justify spying on him? Are you willing to go that far to not have someone transgender being affected? Jesus get a damn grip

          [–][deleted]  (2 children)

          [deleted]