all 8 comments

[–]BISH 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Time for pelvic removal surgery.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Who would risk the ability to walk just for this?

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Who would risk the ability to walk just for this?

Someone who would remove their male bits.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Archaeologist have already found skeletons that are intersex.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/dna-test-shows-medieval-person-buried-sword-and-womens-clothing-may-have-been-intersex-180978407/

Past ones have been shitter than recent ones at sexing skeletons.

In 1972, Kenneth Weiss, now a professor emeritus of anthropology and genetics at Pennsylvania State University, noticed that there were about 12 percent more male skeletons than females reported at archaeological sites. This seemed odd, since the proportion of men to women should have been about half and half. The reason for the bias, Weiss concluded, was an "irresistible temptation in many cases to call doubtful specimens male." For example, a particularly tall, narrow-hipped woman might be mistakenly cataloged as a man. After Weiss published about this male bias, research practices began to change. In 1993, 21 years later, the aptly named Karen Bone, then a master's student at the University of Tennessee–Knoxville, examined a more recent data set and found that the bias had declined: The ratio of male to female skeletons had balanced out. In part that might be because of better, more accurate ways of sexing skeletons. But also, when I went back through the papers Bone cited, I noticed there were more individuals categorized as "indeterminate" after 1972 and basically none prior. -https://psmag.com/social-justice/our-bones-reveal-sex-is-not-binary

[–]In-the-clouds 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You trust Smithsonian?

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Of course.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That’s terfery. Burn the witch! /s

[–]In-the-clouds 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Another view of the differences in bones between men and women:

https://skirun.run/uploads/post/image/2/248/24860/hd_male-female.jpg