you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Okay sorry. I thought (incorrectly) that you believed in science and reality.

I see now that you can only engage with studies which validate the conclusions you already held .

You are into the kind of science, where you decide that masks don't work, and then set out to find proof of the conclusion.

I thought you engaged with the shared reality of discovery and logical positivism, but clearly your head is up your ass, and only studies which prove your pre-existing fake notions can exist in your world, so whatever, my mistake

[–]Megatron95 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Your mistake is thinking you have enough credibility to sway the opinions of the established users. Whether you're right or wrong, no one cares. Your smelly, gaslighting rhetoric can be picked up from miles away. It's funny how our so-called health ''experts'' were discouraging mask-wearing at the beginning and then did a complete 180 after a few months. Same for the ever-changing MSM narrative modelled to fit the agenda of the day. Thankfully, people are paying attention and it doesn't take a brain surgeon to assess that people's trust in corporate and state media is at an all time low. BTW, your less than objective stance reveals a propensity for confirmation bias as well.

[–]Site_rly_sux 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

sway the opinions of the established users

That's so funny and cringe. Do you have a neckbeard and a fedora, by any chance?

your less than objective stance reveals a propensity for confirmation bias as well.

Sure, go ahead and point out where you think I'm wrong, and I'll have a normal discussion about it with you, unlike douchebag OP.

how our so-called health ''experts'' were discouraging mask-wearing at the beginning and then did a complete 180 after a few months.

You're literally misremembering. Go and check because you're wrong about this. I understand that it's part of your extended fantasy universe but I'm not going to partake in make believe with you. That straight up didn't happen.

Here's the truth which you're lying about

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/27/science/face-mask-guidelines-timeline.html

[–]Megatron95 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Citing the New York Times? What a loser! Everyone knows you're a lying pro-establishment shill. I'm definitely not misremembering anything. Orwell's Ministry of Truth was a blueprint for the way current mainstream media outlets operate. I'm done here. You're a contemptible media parroting POS and a mindless consensus-creating drone. Now go wank your three inch erection and cry yourself to climax.

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol come back if you find a single thing wrong in their timeline.

It should be really easy. It should be really, really easy for you to find just a single thing wrong with it, given you're so confident