you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I'd agree but we're not coding a site. We'd be setting up established platform instances. With them up and running we'd assemble a trusted team to start hammering out the charter, goals, roadmap, rules, guides, documentation, and FOTPACHIES management (fair, open, transparent, peaceful, accountable, consistent, honest, inclusive, ethical, social management) with inclusive ways the community at large can weigh in on their management. Call that social flow if you like. Unifying.

[–]SuckDonkeyPINGPONG 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I always find it interesting that beginners in the development business always think that they can bypass the planning stage they think they can bypass forming a team and sitting down and planning things they think they're just going to start hammering away at it and you know what it doesn't usually work out very well that way.

I've been coding for 40 years, maybe I know.

Either way best wishes

[–]JasonCarswellMental Orgy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not in software development. Stop suggesting that I am. And I am planning, organizing, etc.

If you want to code some solutions, do so.

Just some of my subs (not counting the ones I've given up) that touch on organizing communications:
/s/Cassy
/s/DecentralizeAllThings
/s/IdeasForSaidIt
/s/Organizing
/s/PhoenixForum
/s/Projex
/s/ResistanceAnalysis /s/StandUpWindsor
/s/WEFringe
/s/Wikispooks