you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (15 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

    https://c19ivm.org/meta.html https://c19hcq.org/

    It has been thoroughly studied now and it has been proven through science that both ivermectin and hcq works against covid19.
    They're used by several countries too as standard practice to treat covid.

    It is not profitable for big pharma because no one has a patent on them and they can both be produced very cheaply.

    [–][deleted]  (13 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

      Yes, it is anti vax site. The studies are science.

      Welcome to science 101. Science informs our opinions. When science shows that ivermectin and hcq works, then we believe that.

      [–][deleted]  (11 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

        Your websites are untrustworthy mainstream news.

        Notice however that your washingtonpost article is from 2020, 3 years ago. I didn't click the second link because it is likely another useless article. Mediabiasfactcheck is a leftist mainstream propaganda page.

        [–][deleted]  (9 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

          https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4072489

          For overall mortality, with 74,193 participants and 61 deaths (mRNA:31; placebo:30)

          More people died of the vaccine than without the vaccine.
          This is statistically significant. Meaning that there is less than 5% probability that this is not the case.

          Danish study, huge number of participants. Not anti vaxers.

          Of course this study was never shown in the media or even our government institutions, despite some of the people in the study working for the government. Because --- it undermines the propaganda.

          [–][deleted]  (7 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

            It's a preprint but it has been peer reviwed by now and published.

            The authors aren't untrustworthy. They are highly qualified and well respected in Denmark. We do quality science and in general our data is very good compared to most other countries.

            "The research didn’t conclude that mRNA vaccines were ineffective at protecting people from dying of COVID-19."
            Look how this is your fact checks rebuttal. The study looked at ALL-CAUSE deaths, not covid deaths. The unvaccinated died LESS from ALL-CAUSE deaths than the vaccinated did.

            Your fact check does not disagree. They rather try to lie to you by not talking about all-cause deaths and instead talk about covid deaths only. You see how that sort of lying works? This is the dishonesty of politifact. They lie through omission and misdirection.