you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (27 children)

That seems normal to me. Being attracted to someone below your level seems desperate.

[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (26 children)

false dichotomy fallacy. the dichotomy isnt "getting with people less atractive than you" vs "getting with people more attractive than you". the dichotomy is "getting with people less atractive than you" vs "getting with people more attractive than you" vs "getting with people as attractive as you and up". women choose "getting with people more attractive than you" rather than "getting with people as attractive as you and up". note that I never said anything about dating down in terms of looks, but you have repeatedly said I have.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

It's practically the same. What you're saying is like saying >= is nothing like >. In the vast majority of cases they have the same outcome.

[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

Absolutely they are not the same. because if its true that women have the abnormally high standards in the way that I said then we should stop that through social shame.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

No, we need to relieve men of their desperation.

[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

ok woman. say we relieve men of their desperation, that wont stop the incel problem because women will still have insanely high standards

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

The whole reason the incel problem exists is because women can get almost any guy they want, which is because men will fuck almost any woman.

[–]AnimeRespecter[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (20 children)

listen here roastie, if men arent desperate women will not start magically dating average men, they will still only want chad so they will all sleep with chad, and he will cycle through them, sleeping with all of them but settling for none because he has so many options. none of what I just outlined requires men to have low standards.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Chad must have pretty low standards to sleep with every woman.

You don't seem to understand that if men weren't so desperate and had such low standards, women would have to deal with mens' high standards too. Then the power imbalance would be corrected.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]AnimeRespecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    every foid wants chad, so if every men wants stacy the only people who will end up in relationships will be chad and stacies ad average people wont get into them at all. that's the thing women strictly adhere to their standards in the sense that women will choose to get with noone over their male equivalent.

    [–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    Btw I'm no roastie. I like bondage not sex.

    [–]AnimeRespecter[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    female equals roastie therefore you are a roastie